2026+职业脉搏:复杂项目成功之道-从任务管控走向系统驾驭+Pulse+of+the+Profession+2026_第1页
2026+职业脉搏:复杂项目成功之道-从任务管控走向系统驾驭+Pulse+of+the+Profession+2026_第2页
2026+职业脉搏:复杂项目成功之道-从任务管控走向系统驾驭+Pulse+of+the+Profession+2026_第3页
2026+职业脉搏:复杂项目成功之道-从任务管控走向系统驾驭+Pulse+of+the+Profession+2026_第4页
2026+职业脉搏:复杂项目成功之道-从任务管控走向系统驾驭+Pulse+of+the+Profession+2026_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩52页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

PulseoftheProfession⑧2026

DrivingSuccessinComplexProjects

FromNavigatingTaskstoNavigatingSystems

Project

ManagementInstitute.

Foreword

Eachyear,PMI'sPulseoftheProfession⑧research

captureswhatprojectprofessionalsaroundthe

worldareexperiencing.Thisyear,ourkeyfindingwasconsistentacrossindustries,geographiesandorganizationsizes:complexityisincreasingand

changingthenatureofprojectwork.

In2025,ourMaximizingProjectSuccessresearch

reframedwhatitmeansforaprojecttosucceed.Frommeetingthetime,budgetandscopeconstraintstowardvalueandimpactcreation.Shortlyafter,weintroduced

M.O.R.E.—acallforactionforprojectprofessionalsto

raisetheiraccountability,expandtheirinfluenceanddeliverresultsthatmattertotheirorganizations.Botheffortspointedtothesameunderlyingchallenge:inconditionsdefinedbyrapidchange,interdependence

anduncertainty,projectsdemandintentionalityand

rigortodelivervalue.

Thisreportisaboutjustthat.Itexploreswhere

complexitycomesfromandhowitimpactsprojects

whenitgoesunaddressed.Thereportprovidesinsights

intowhatthemosteffectiveprojectprofessionals

dodifferently,andthatonecoredistinctionmatters:

complexityisnotsimplydifficultystemmingfrom

complications.Adifficult,complicatedprojectcanbesolvedwitheffort,expertiseandtherightresources.Acomplexprojectrequirestheabilitytosense,adaptandrespondasconditionsshiftinwaysthatweren'tanticipatedattheoutset.

Whatseparateshighperformersisn'tthattheyfacelesscomplexity.It'sthattheyrespondtoitdifferentlybysensingandadaptingratherthanplanningand

controlling.ThatorientationiswhatM.O.R.E.isdesignedtosupport,anditiswhatthisreportisdesignedto

helpyoubuild.

PierreLeManh,PMP

President&CEO

ProjectManagementInstitute

Contents

Foreword 2

KeyTakeawaysandResearchInsights 4

Introduction 5

WhereComplexityComesFrom:ThreeDimensions 8

WhatComplexityDoestoYourProjects 16

ComplexitySolutions:WhatYouCanDo 18

Conclusion 25

Acknowledgments 26

Appendix 27

KeyTakeawaysandResearchInsights

Project

Complexity

Effectsof

Complexity

Proven

Practices

Projectcomplexitydoesnot

comefromasinglesource;it

emergesfromtheinteractionoforganizational,environmentalandhumandynamics.

Nearlyhalfofprojectprofessionals

(48%)citefastertechnologyand

toolcyclesasadriverofcomplexity,highlightingonewaytheseforcesarereshapingmodernprojectwork.

Theeffectsofcomplexitymanifestinprojectsinwaysthatreducevalueanddrain

resources.

Incomplexprojects,61%ofprojectprofessionalsreportexperiencingsomeformofvaluelossasaresultofcomplexity.

Provenpracticescandrivegreatersuccessincomplexprojects.

Fromsponsoralignment,to

stakeholderengagement,tobuildingteammomentum—aselectsetofcoreprojectskillshavetheabilityto

mostcomplexprojects.

movetheneedleoneventhe

Introduction

Organizationsfaceconstantpressuretoreinvent.ThelatestCEOresearch¹fromPMIfoundthat93%ofCEOssaytheirorganizationsmustrethinktheiroperatingmodelsatleasteveryfiveyears,and65%saytheymustdosoeverytwoyearsormore.ThetopdriversforthatchangeareAlandautomation(citedby72%ofCEOs),marketandeconomicpressures(48%)andgrowingcompetition(41%).

Projectsarethevehiclesthroughwhichthistransformationandreinventionhappen—andcomplexityisthefrictionthataccumulateswhenthepaceofchangeand

interdependencestrainstheorganization'sabilitytoadapt.Thesameforcesthatpromptreinvention—rapidtechnologychange,marketvolatilityandgeopoliticalinstability—alsomakeindividualprojectshardertoplan,executeandsustain,independentofanyorganization-widechangeinitiative.

MaximizingProjectSuccess²researchfromPMIdefinessuccessfulprojectsas

thosethatdelivervalueworththeeffortandexpense.Ifnothandledwell,complexitypressuresonbothsidesofthatequationincreasethepotentialforvalueerosionandpoorstrategicalignment,aswellascostandeffort.

Thetraditionalmanagementsystemisno

longerfitforpurposetohelporganizations

reallynavigatethespeedandcomplexityoftheenvironmentwithinwhichwerenowoperating.

MichaelLurie

chiefcatalystofficer,Bayer,U.S.A.

ComplexProjectsToday:2026PulseoftheProfession®

Aboutathird(31%)ofcomplexprojectsfailtoachievethe

fullscopeoftheiroriginallyintendedbenefits,accordingtothelatestPMIPulseoftheProfession®research—morethantwicethe12%³ratereportedinour2024MaximizingProjectSuccessresearch.

OurPulseoftheProfession⑧researchrevealstheubiquityofcomplexity:97%ofprojectprofessionalssaytheymanagedatleastonecomplexprojectinthepastyear,withover

halfclassifyingthoseprojectsassignificantlycomplex.

Additionally,projectprofessionalsreportthatcomplexityisincreasing:81%sayprojectshavebecomemorecomplexinrecentyears,with37%describingasignificantincrease.Theforcesdrivingthisincreaseincludetherapidevolutionoftechnology,navigationofmultiplestakeholdergroupsacrossfunctionsandgeographies,andinstabilityinthe

politicalandregulatoryenvironments—forcessimilartothosedrivingCEOstoreconsidertheiroperatingmodels.

Whyisthisimportant?Becausefourinfivecomplex

projectsexperiencesomefalloutdrivenbycomplexityinwaysthataren'talwaysimmediatelyapparent:strategicdrift,diminishedvalueandteamsslowlyburningout.

Whilecomplexitypervadesmodernprojectwork,itsimpactcanbemitigated.Ouranalysisshowsthathighperformers(thosewhoseetheircomplexprojectperformhigher

thanaverage)don'tfacefewercomplexitychallenges;

theyrespondtothemmoreeffectivelybyapplyingfamiliarprojectmanagementpracticeswithintentionandforesight.Highperformersalignstakeholdersearly,engagethem

strategicallyovertime,keepteamsmovingthrough

uncertaintyandusestructuredapproachestoanticipate

andinterpretemergingchallenges.Indoingso,theylook

beyondexecutiontoprotectthevaluetheprojectismeanttocreateandthispaysoff.Projectsthatmanagecomplexityeffectivelyarefivetimesmorelikelytosucceed.Eighty-eightpercentofprojectswereratedextremelyorverysuccessfulwhenteamswerehighlyeffectiveatmanagingcomplexity,comparedwithjust14%whenteamswereonlyslightly

effectiveorineffective.

Thisreportexploresthelandscapeofprojectcomplexitytoday:whereitcomesfrom,whatitdoestoprojectsandhowproactiveprojectprofessionalscannavigateit.

+31%

Percentageofcomplexprojectsthatfailto

achieveoriginallyintendedgoals

◎DEEPDIVE

WhatDoWeMeanbyProjectComplexity?

Notallchallengesareasignofcomplexity,whichdiffersfrom“complicated”ordifficult.

Acomplicatedproblemhasmanyelementsbuttheirrelationshipsareknowable.Complicatedsystemscanbeunderstoodand

resolvedwithexpertise.

Complexproblemsaredifferent—theyalsohavemanyelements,buttherelationshipsamongthoseelementsareunpredictable.

Complexsystemsevolvethroughinteractions,andnavigatingthemrequiressensing,experimentationandadjustment—notafixed

plan.

Ourdefinitionofcomplexityreflectsthesedistinctions:

Bycomplex,wemeantheinherentqualitythatariseswhenmanyinterdependentelements—suchastasks,stakeholders,

technologiesandexternalinfluences—interactindynamicand

oftenunpredictableways.Thechallengecomeslessfromeffortorexpertiseandmorefromadaptation,emergenceand

interdependence—itrequiressensingandresponding.

WhereComplexityComes

From:ThreeDimensions

>THREEDIMENSIONSOFCOMPLEXITY

1OrganizationalDimension

EnvironmentalDimension

HumanDimension

3

BasedonPMIresearchintohowprojectprofessionalsareexperiencingcomplexitytoday,thisreportoffersasimplifiedlenstoidentifythedimensionsofcomplexityintheirprojects:organizational,humanandenvironmental.Thisframinghelpsproject

professionalsquicklyidentifywherethefrictioniscomingfrom:insidetheprojectororganization,outsidetheorganizationoramongpeople.

Inshapingthismodel,wealsodrewonabroadrangeofacademicresearch,practiceguidanceandrelatedprofessionalperspectivesoncomplexity.Toprovidemore

granularityanddepthoncomplexity,includingprojectcharacteristicsthatcause

complexityandtypesofprojectcomplexity,PMIisdevelopingtheupcoming

NavigatingComplexity:APracticeGuide—SecondEdition.Forprojectprofessionalswhowanttoexplorefurther,thereisasubstantial,decades-longbodyofacademicliteratureoncomplexitythatoffersvaluableinsightintothedynamicsofcomplex

systemsandchangesacrossmultipledisciplines.

TheOrganizationalDimension

Organizationalcomplexity,whichalignswithmanydefinitionsofstructuralcomplexityintheliterature,istheinternalfriction:uncleardecision-makingauthority,siloedteams,competingprioritiesandmisalignedobjectives.Organizationalcomplexitycreates

coordinationchallengesacrossteams,vendorsandgovernancestructures.These

challengesscalewithsize-amongprojectprofessionalsinthelargestorganizations(100,000ormoreemployees),91%reportincreasingcomplexity,comparedwith78%inorganizationswithfewerthan500employees(seeFigure1).

Whatdoesthislooklike?Escalationstakelonger,approvalsstallinhiddenlayersand“whoownsthis?”becomesarecurringquestion.Whenyoumaptheissue,thebottlenecksoccurinstructure,governanceandalignment.

Figure1:CoordinationChallengesAcrossTeams

OrganizationswithOrganizationswith

fewerthan500100,000ormore

employeesemployees

13-pointgap:

Challengesscale

withsize

TheEnvironmentalDimension

Environmentalcomplexityistheexternalforces—Al,digitaltransformation,regulatoryflux,geopoliticalshifts,supplychainandthird-partycollaborators—thatimpacttheprojectfromoutsideandoftenreshapethecontextfasterthanteamscanplanfor.

Environmentalcomplexitybringsexternaldisruptions—fromregulatorychangestomarketvolatility—thatripplethroughprojectplans.

Seniorleadersciteenvironmentalfactorsmoreoftenthanprojectprofessionals

(seeFigure2),indicatingthatseniorleadersareoftenfocusedonexternalforces,whereasprojectteamsaremorefocusedonthedailyprojectrealities.Thisgap,andthedifferingperspectivesthatleadtoit,cancreatefrictionwhentryingtoexecuteonstrategicpriorities.

Whatdoesthislooklike?Thebroadercontexttheprojectsitsinisunstableandprojectprofessionalsmustcontinuouslyadjustasaresult.Requirementsorscopechangenotbecausestakeholderscan'tdecide,butbecausetheworldaroundtheprojectischangingfasterthantheoriginalplan.Emergingtechnologies,suchasAlsolutions,resetexpectationsonspeed,costorscope.Marketshiftsorgeopoliticaleventsforcearethinkofwhat“value”lookslike.

10

11

TheHumanDimension

Humancomplexityisthesocialandcognitivedimension:howthedynamicsamong

thepeopleinvolvedimpactdecision-makingandteamconfidence.Humancomplexityintroducescompetingincentives,politicsandrelationshipdynamics.

Whatdoesthislooklike?Decision-makersavoidcommitment.Teamssecond-

guessdirection.Psychologicalsafetybecomesastretchratherthananexpectation.Scopechangesarrivenotbecauserequirementsareunclear,butbecausepolitical

dynamicsamongstakeholderskeepshiftingthem.Navigatingthisdimensionrequiresemotionalintelligence,influenceandtheabilitytobuildcoalitions—capabilitiesthat

nomethodologyinstallsautomatically.

Inreality,organizational,environmentalandhumancomplexityofteninteract:

Aregulatoryshift(environmental)triggersnewinternalapprovals

(organizational),whichincreaseanxietyandmicromanagement(human).

Economicuncertainty(environmental)createspressuretoreducecostswhilestilldeliveringtheoriginalobjectives(organizational),resultinginstrainon

teammorale(human).

12

WhatIsDrivingIncreasingComplexity?

Complexityisrisingacrosstheboardbutitsdriversarenot

uniform-andwhereyousitshapeswhatyousee(seeFigure2).

Seniorleadersandprojectprofessionalsarenavigatingthe

sameenvironmentbutdiagnosingitdifferently.Leaderspoint

outward—totechnologycycles,Aldisruptionandregulatory

volatility.Projectprofessionalsseetheseforceswhentheyimpacttheproject,manifestingasshiftingscope,conflictingpriorities

andcoordinationbreakdowns.Thisisn'tadisagreementaboutwhatcomplexityis—it'sadifferenceinperspective.Butwhenthediagnosisdoesn'talign,theresponseoftendoesn'teither,resultinginthestrategy-executiongapthatCEOsnameastheirtopchallenge.9Bridgingthatdividerequiresasharedvocabularyandrecognitionthatbothperspectivesarepartialviewsofa

largersystem.

Figure2:WhyComplexityisIncreasing:WhatProjectProfessionalsandSeniorLeadersSay

ProjectProfessionalsDSeniorLeaders

Fastertechnologyandtool

cyclescreatingconstantchange

Morestakeholdersinvolved

acrossfunctionsorgeographies

Takingonaleadershiprolewithmoredecision-makingauthorityandmorecomplexprojects

DigitaltransformationandAladoptionareintroducingnewuncertainties

Political,economicor

regulatoryinstability

Higherstakeholderturnoverandleadershipchurn

Distributedorhybridworkismakingalignmentharder

Globalsupplychainfragilityandinterdependence

45%

44%40%

44%40%

40%

47%

30%

38%

27%

27%

22%

29%

17%19%

57%

(7-point

+8(8-point

0

(0-point

+12

(12-pointgap)

-4

(4-pointgap)

-4

(4-pointgap)

+7

gap)

gap)

gap)

+7

(7-pointgap)

+2

(2-pointgap)

13

Acrossindustries,overhalfofprojectsareviewedascomplex,buttheforcesthatdriveincreasingcomplexitydiffer(seeFigure3,4).

ForIT,telecommunications,automotive,aerospaceandhealthcare,theprimarydriveristechnological:relentlesschangecyclesthatoutpacegovernance.

▶Forfinancialservices,consultingandtransportation,theprimarydriveristheuncertaintyintroducedbydigitaltransformationandAladoption.

▶Governmentstandsapart:Political,economicorregulatoryinstabilityisitsdefiningpressure,reflectinghowthoroughlypoliticalvolatilityshapesprojectconditionsfromtheoutsidein.

▶Formanufacturing,constructionandenergy,thedominantforceisinternal:Projectprofessionalsinthesesectorspointtoevolvingleadershipdemandsandexpandingdecision-makingresponsibilityastheprimarydrivers,signalinganorganizationalandworkforceevolutionrunningalongsidethetechnicalone.

Understandingwherecomplexityoriginates-andwhatisfuelingitsrapidgrowth一empowersprojectprofessionalstodiagnosedisruptionsandrespondstrategically.

Figure3:ProjectComplexityFrequencybyIndustry

Training/Education

45.7%Transportation

48.3%

Automotive

53.2%

Construction

53.3%

Information

Technology

54.2%

Aerospace

Manufacturing

55.0%

60.8%

Energy

60.5%

Government

58.0%

FinancialServices

60.1%

Consulting

54.4%

Telecom

59.9%

57.8%

Healthcare

14

Figure4:DriversofComplexitybyIndustry

ComplexityIncreasesDrivenbyEnvironmentalFactors

Industriesshapedbyrapidchangeorregulation

facerisingcomplexityfromexternal

andtechnologicalforces

Fastertechnologyand

toolcyclescreatingconstantchange

InformationTechnology

·Telecom·Automotive

·Aerospace·Healthcare

Digitaltransformationand

Aladoptionintroducing

newuncertainties

FinancialServices

·Consulting

·Transportation/

Logistics/Distribution

Political,economicorregulatory

instability

Government

ComplexityIncreasesDrivenbyOrganizationalFactors

Peopleandcoordination-heavy

sectorsgrowmorecomplex

asstakeholdernetworksexpand

Morestakeholdersinvolvedacrossfunctionsorgeographies

Training/Education

ComplexityIncreasesDrivenbyHumanFactors

Decision-intensiveindustries

facegreatercomplexityasleadershipandprojectdemandsincrease

Takenonaleadershiprolewithmore

decision-makingauthorityand

morecomplexprojects

Manufacturing·Construction

·Energy

DEEPDIVE

SystemsThinking:SeeingtheBiggerPicture

Systemsthinkingisalens.Projectprofessionalswhouseittreattheirprojectasawebofinterdependenciesratherthanalistoftasks.Thispreciselytargetsthe

natureofcomplexity—thedynamicandoften-

unpredictableinteractionofmultipleorganizational,

environmentalandhumanelements.

Academicresearchreinforceswhythismatters.In

aPMIThesisResearchwhitepaperoninternational

developmentprojects,5researchersNhlabatsiandlkafoundthatcomplexityfactorsareinterdependentandconnected,andthateffectivenavigationrequiresanintegratedviewoftheproject.ResearchbyMaylorandcolleagues⁶alsofoundthatthemostconsequential

complexityinprojectsliesnotintechnicalstructurebutintheinteractionsamongstakeholders,prioritiesandshiftingexpectations.

Despitethevalueofthiscapability,however,only23%ofprojectprofessionalsinoursurveyidentifysystemsthinkingascriticalfornavigatingcomplexity.

Applyingsystemsthinkingdoesn'trequiremasteringtheory.Itstartswiththinkingmorebroadlyabout

yourproject.Insteadoffocusingonlyontasks,

deadlinesanddeliverables,lookattherelationships,assumptions,dependenciesandfeedbackloopsthatinfluencehowsuccessfullytheprojectisprogressing.

Askthesequestions:Whatisreallygoingonhere?Whoandwhatareinfluencingtheproject?Howisthesituationchanging?Askinggoodquestionscanhelpyoubegintheprocess.Infact,youmayalreadybeapplyingsystemsthinkingwithoutrealizingit—whenyouspotahiddendependencyorconsiderdownstreamimplications.

ThePMIvisionfortheprofession,M.O.R.E.⁷一

managingperceptions,owningsuccess,relentlesslyreassessingandexpandingperspective—aligns

closelywiththeprinciplesofsystemsthinking.

Keepingthesefourelementsinmindcanhelpyouapplysystemsthinking.

16

WhatComplexity

DoestoYourProjects

Thethreedimensionsofcomplexitydescribetheunderlyingforcesshapingmodernprojects,butcomplexityrarelypresentsitselftoprojectprofessionalsinthoseterms.Instead,complexityappearsthroughtheeverydaychallengesofprojectexecution:

requirementsthatshiftmidstream,stakeholderswhodisagreeonpriorities,vendorsthatstruggletointegratesystemsorsponsorswhoseattentionmoveselsewhere.

Theseissuescanlooklikeisolatedmanagementproblems.Butsteppingbacktoseehowtheyfitwithinthebiggerpicturecanhelpprojectprofessionalsnavigatethese

challengesmoreeffectivelytomitigatetheimpacttheycanhaveonprojectoutcomes:

strategicdrift,deliverydisruptionsandstrainedteammorale.

TheImpactonProjectOutcomes

Fouroutoffiveprojectsexperiencesomefalloutasaresultofpoorlymanaged

complexity.Onaverage,complexprojectsexperiencedatleasttwodifferenttypesofnegativeoutcomesoutof12evaluatedinthesurvey,highlightingthewidespreaddifficultiesofhandlingcomplexity.Theseeffectsclusterintothreedimensions.

Importantly,theseimpactdimensionsarenota1:1maptothethreesourcesof

complexitydescribedintheprevioussection,andtherelationshipshouldnotbereadasdirectcausation.Anymixoforganizational,environmentalandhumancomplexitycancontributetoanyoftheimpactsbelow,oftenincombination(seeFigure5).

Figure5:NegativeOutcomesofPoorlyManagedComplexityonProjects

Asaresultofcomplexity..

Value/AlignmentGapsarethemost

pervasiveconsequences.Theseprojectsdeliveroutputswhilelosingsightof

outcomes.Whenalignmentbreaksdown,aprojectcancrossthefinishlineandstillfallshortofitspurpose.

DeliveryDisruptionsarewherecomplexity

becomesvisiblethroughimpacts

onexecution.Misseddeadlinesand

operationalinefficienciesmayappear

asisolatedproblems,butinacomplexprojecttheyaresignsthatthesystemisperformingbelowitsintendedlevel.

61%

experience

Value/AlignmentGaps

55%

experience

Delivery

Disruptions

31%

experience

HumanImpact

HumanImpactisfrequentlyinvisibleand

perhapsthemostconsequentialforlong-termcapability.Thesearen't“soft"issuesseparate

fromdelivery—theycompoundfromone

projecttoanother.Ateamfatiguedbyone

complexprojectcarriesthatstrainintothenext,creatingdragthatoutlastsanysingleinitiative.

Theaverageprojectexperiences2.1complexity-relatedissues

Delaysinstakeholderdecision-making

Exceedingbudget

Profitloss

Failed/compromisedorganization

strategyexecutionSafetyissues

MissingdeliverydeadlinesOperationalinefficiencies

NotmeetingscopeorqualitytargetsProjectfailure

Decreasedteammorale DecreasedcustomersatisfactionDecreasedemployeeengagement

Gap

+5

(5-pointgap)

33%38%

34%28%

27%

33%

+6

(6-pointgap)

11%

14%

+3

(3-pointgap)

9%

8%

-1

(1-pointgap)

12%

9%

-4

(4-pointgap)

7%

8%4%

+1

(1-pointgap)

35%36%

-1

(1-pointgap)

23%22%

0

(0-pointgap)

16%16%16%

5%7%+2

(2-pointgap)

6%

-1

(1-pointgap)

19%12%

19%18%

11%

15%

+4

(4-pointgap)

11%1%-10

11%

(10-pointgap)

ProjectSenior

TotalProfessionalsLeaders

35%

23%

ComplexitySolutions:WhatYouCanDo

Ourresearchonprojectsuccessshowsthatprojectprofessionalswhomovebeyondexecutiontofocusonvalue—bymanagingperceptions,owningsuccess,relentlesslyreassessingandexpandingperspective-arethreetimesmorelikelytodeliver

successfulprojects.8Embracingthesebehaviors,whichwecallM.O.R.E.,todrivevalueisthePMIvisionfortheprofession.Thepracticesarethekeytonavigatingcomplexity.

Whenmanagingacomplexproject,whatdoesthislooklikeinpractice?Ourresearchsurfacedfivespecificpractices—alignedtoM.O.R.E.—thatdrivebetteroutcomesincomplexprojects.Wealsoidentifiedseveralexamplesofexemplarycomplexity

navigationamongtheprojectleadersweinterviewed.

PRACTICESTHATDRIVEBETTEROUTCOMES

1

3

4

SponsorAlignmentatInitiation

PhasedStakeholder

Engagement

BuildingandMaintainingTeamMomentum

ScenarioPlanning

Frameworks

PracticesThatMovetheNeedle

Thedataisclearonwhichpracticesandtoolsactuallydriveoutcomes.Whatmakesthemcredibleisn'tjustthenumbers—it'sthattheprojectprofessionalswhonavigatecomplexitymosteffectivelyarealreadyusingthemdeliberatelyandbydesign.

Sponsoralignmentatinitiationestablishessharedunderstandingofwhattheprojectis,whatsuccesslookslikeandwhoisaccountablebeforeexecutionbegins.Withoutit,everyambiguousdecisiondownstreambecomesasiteofmisalignment.Fortypercentofhighperformersusethisleverversus30%oflowperformers.

Projectprofessionalsdescribethisasdeliberaterelationalwork.“It'ssponsorship

—that'scritical,"saidVugarRustamli,projectmanagementconsultantatPMWill,

Czechia."Ireachedouttothesponsorfirsttoconvincethem,whichtookweeks,beforeengagingstakeholdergroups.Fortunately,theylistenedtome."ThefullbreakdownofdataoneffectivepracticesisavailableinFigure10intheAppendix.

Othersembedthisthroughgovernancestructure:AriefPrasetyo,HQintegrationPMOmanager,SLB,UK,describedhowhisorganizationbringsseniorleadershipdirectlyintostage-gatepreparation—"TheVPwouldbethere,andtheprojectmanagerwould

havethatcommunicationdirectlytotheVP”—soalignmentisbuiltintotherhythmoftheproject,notretrofittedwhenproblemsarise.

Severalpracticesthatsupportmanagingperceptionsinprojects,asoutlinedintheM.O.R.E.Playbook,canenablethisalignment:

Clearlymaphoweachstakeholder'sneedsandwantswillbeaddressedinasuccessfulprojectoutcome.

Alignstakeholdersonwhichmetricswillbeusedto

evaluateprogresstowardvaluecreation.

Alignstakeholderexpectationsonatimelinefor

successfulvaluecreation.

Buildtrustwithstakeholdersthroughearlyandongoingengagement,whichcanenablethisalignment.

20

Phasedstakeholderengagement-engagingtherightpeopleattherighttime—

alsomapstoM.O.R.E:continuouslyevaluatingwhichstakeholdersneedtobeinvolvedthroughoutthelifeoftheproject,notjustthosewhowereactivatedatkickoff.High

performersdothis50%ofthetime,versus42%oflowperformers.

"Inthediscoveryphase,definewhothestakeholderswillbe,"saidVugarRustamli,projectmanagementandagiletransformationconsultant,PMWILL,Czechia."Butatinitiation,whenwe'reputtingthebaselinefortheproject,invitingseniorstakeholdersisbeneficial.”

HasseneSiddat,regionalITmanageratWHOWesternPacificRegion,Philippines

describedhowsustainedengagementchangedteamdynamics:"Byhavingkeyplayerstogetherearlyintheprojectboard,weputinplaceregularupdateswheredifferent

aspectsarediscussedbetweentheteams.”Therightpeople,broughtinattherightmoment,turnstakeholderengagementfromariskactivityintoanalignmentengine.

Thesepractices,outlinedintheM.O.R.E.Playbook,canhelpprojectprofessionalsengageeffectively:

Identifyandprioritizewhichstakeholders'opinionsaremostlikelytoinfluenceperceptionofsuccess.

Tailorcommunicationandengagementstrategiestomatchthespecificneeds

andexpectationsofeachstakeholder.

Regularlycollectfeedbacktoidentifyemergentopportunities,risksandpotentialstakeholders.

21

Buildingandmaintainingteammomentumisusedby42%ofhighperformersversus33%oflowperformers.Incomplexenvironments,progressisrarelylinearandmakingittangiblekeepsteamsanchoredtopurpose.Deliberatemomentum-buildingmakesprogressvisible

andbuildscriticalpsychologicalresilien

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论