摩根士丹利-代码、资本与碳 数字资产和可持续投资 Code,Capital,and Carbon Digital Assets and Sustainable Investing_第1页
摩根士丹利-代码、资本与碳 数字资产和可持续投资 Code,Capital,and Carbon Digital Assets and Sustainable Investing_第2页
摩根士丹利-代码、资本与碳 数字资产和可持续投资 Code,Capital,and Carbon Digital Assets and Sustainable Investing_第3页
摩根士丹利-代码、资本与碳 数字资产和可持续投资 Code,Capital,and Carbon Digital Assets and Sustainable Investing_第4页
摩根士丹利-代码、资本与碳 数字资产和可持续投资 Code,Capital,and Carbon Digital Assets and Sustainable Investing_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩17页未读, 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

Morganstanley

INVESTMENTMANAGEMENT

calvert

Code,Capital,and

Carbon:DigitalAssets

andSustainableInvesting

DIGITALASSETS|October2026

DANDORMAN

ExecutiveDirector,CalvertResearchandManagement

1Messari.(2026).Totalcryptomarketcapitalization[Dataset].Blockworks.RetrievedasofSeptember30,2026.

OCTOBER2O26|MORGANSTANLEYINVESTMENTMANAGEMENT2

Thearchitectureofmoneyandfinancialsystems–longdominatedbysovereigncurrencies

andcentralizedintermediaries–isundergoing

aprofoundtechnologicalchange.Firstthrough

bitcointhenthroughotherblockchainand

distributedledgerapplications,wehavewitnessedthegrowthofpermissionlesssystemscapableofnearinstantaneousvaluetransferwithoutrelianceongovernmentsandthird-partyintermediaries.Attimes,sustainableinvesting,whichhasalso

experiencedconsiderablegrowthoverasimilarperiod,hasappearedatoddswiththedevelopmentofthevariousformsofdistributedledger

technology.Calvertbelievesthismissesthemark.

Withatotalmarketvalueof$2.9+trillionasofSeptemberof20261,digitalassetsarecomparabletosomeofthe

world’smostvaluablecompaniesandmonetarymetals.

Perspectivesfrominvestors,usersandregulatorsrun

thegamut–fromexcitementtocautiousoptimismto

outrightopposition.Whereskepticismandoppositionhaveexisted,particularlyamonginvestorspursuingsustainableinvestmentmandates,muchofthedebatehascentered

onthemorecontroversialaspectsofdigitalassets,such

astheenergyintensityofbitcoinminingorillicitactivity

thatleveragesthetechnology’spermissionlessnature.Buttheseareonlytwoofmanyfactorsindecidingwhethera

digitalassetallocationcanbecompatiblewithasustainableinvestingmandate.Perhapsabetterquestiontoconsideriswhyblockchaintechnologiesandsustainableinvestinghavebothexperiencedsubstantialgrowthoverasimilarperiodinfinancialmarkethistory.Webelievebothareresponding,atleastinpart,torealandperceivedshortcomingsin

institutionaltrustacrosssociety,includingwithinexistingmonetaryandfinancialsystems.

TheintellectualfoundationsofBitcoinandblockchain

technologywerelaidwellbeforetheGlobalFinancial

Crisis,yettheshadowofthecrisisprovedtobeacatalysttothisnewtechnologygiventhecorrespondingerosionoftrustintheglobalfinancialsystem.Institutionslong

regardedaspillarsofstabilitybecamesourcesofsystemicvulnerability,promptingreviewofcurrencysystemsand

traditionalfinancialintermediation.Thedecentralized

natureofblockchaintechnologywasaresultofefforts

toovercomepresumeddeficienciesoftrust,privacy,

censorshipandcentralizedpointsoffailure.Inthiscontext,thegrowthofsustainableinvestingreflectsaneffortto

strengthentrustinfinancialmarketsbycreatinglong-

termvaluewhilereducingnegativeexternalities,suchaseconomicinequalityorenvironmentaldegradation,thatcanultimatelyunderminemarketefficiency.

Digitalassetscanenablenewopportunitiestoimprove

andexpandexistingfinancialsystemsto(i)increase

financialinclusionthroughpermissionlessaccess,(ii)

reducefrictioninpaymentsandsettlementcosts,(iii)

hedgecurrencydebasement,andincreasingly,(iv)innovateattheintersectionofdigitalinfrastructureandthe

energytransition.Withgreaterregulatoryclaritynow

emerging,mostnotablyintheU.S.,digitalassets’positivefoundationalattributesarelikelytobecomemorecentraltotheglobalfinancialecosystem.

TheEthosofBitcoin

ThebirthoftheBitcoinProtocolwastheculmination

ofdecadesofdevelopmentinvariouscomputerscience

disciplines.Priorinnovationsinpublic-keycryptography

andhash-basedproofslaidthegroundwork,butthe

persistentchallengehadbeenthedoublespendproblem–

thetechnicaldilemmaofpreventingdigitaltokensfrombeingcopiedorreusedwithoutatrustedarbiter.ItwasSatoshi

Nakamoto’sinsighttostitchtheseinnovationstogetherwithadecentralizedconsensusmechanismimplementedthroughproof-of-workandasharedpublicrecordoftransactionsthatestablishedaprotocolwheresharedeconomicincentives

couldreplacecentralizedauthority.

Hisinnovationreflectedadocumentedconcernwiththestructuralfragilitiesofconventionalfinance,particularlytherelianceontrustedintermediariesandthecapacityofcentralbankstoexpandthemoneysupplyattheir

discretion.ThismotivationismostdirectlyexpressedinBitcoin’sdesign:afixedissuancescheduleandhard-

cappedsupplythatremovesmonetarypolicyfromhumandiscretion,andapublic,auditableledgerthatallowsanyparticipanttoverifythesystemwithoutrelyingona

centralauthority.Moresuccinctly:monetaryrulesshouldbepredictable,verifiableandnotsubjecttodiscretionarypoliticalinterference.

Earlycollaboratorswerenotdrawnbyspeculation,

butbythepromiseofadecentralizedmonetarynetworkthatoperatedoutsidetheexistingfinancialsystemandanassertionthatmonetarytrustcouldbeembeddedinalgorithmiccertaintyratherthaninstitutionalreliability.

Bitcoindidmorethanmerelyintroduceanewassetclass

–itintroducedanewmethodoffinancialparticipation.It

recognizesmoneyasmorethanamediumofexchange,andatitscore,asasocialcontractandabasisforparticipationinacivilsociety.Bitcoin’spermissionlessdesigneliminatestheneedforinstitutionalonboarding,credithistoryor

government-issuedidentification,whichisparticularlyusefulinregionswherebankinginfrastructureisscarce,unstableorexclusionary.Itsfunctionalneutralitydoesnotdiscriminatebetweenusersanddoesnotimposeconditionsonitsuse.

Thisinherentlyalignswithimprovingaccesstofinancialservices,asharedaimofsustainabledevelopment.

Butnonetheless,permissionlessblockchainsdocreaterealchallengesandnegativeexternalities.Onesuchchallengeisillicituse.Illicitactivityusingsomeformof

cryptocurrencycontinuestogrowandamountedto

approximately$154billionin2025

2

,whichrepresents

closeto1%ofattributabletransactionvolume.Thisillicitactivityisalsoincreasinglyprofessionalizedandusedby

nationstateactorstocircumventWesternsanctions.

2

Criticsalsopointtotheconcentrationofbitcoinownershipamongarelativelysmallsetofholdersandarguethattheembeddedgainsofearlyadoptersriskreinforcingwealthinequality.Thisisadistributionaloutcometheprotocol’srule-basedneutralitywasneverdesignedtoaddressandadynamicthatislikelytopersist,atleastinthenear

term.However,participationappearstohavebroadened

considerably,withthenumberofwalletaddressesholdingbitcoinincreasingsubstantiallyinrecentyears.Bitcoin’s

effectivenessasastoreofvaluealsoremainssubjecttodebate,giventhatrealizedoutcomeshavehistorically

dependedheavilyonentrytiming.Someofthisvolatilitymayreflectanassetstillprogressingalongitsadoption

curve,althoughexcessiveleverageandmarketcyclicalityhavealsocontributedtoitshistoricallypronouncedpriceswings.Indeed,bitcoin’simpliedvolatilityhascompressedtomulti-yearlowsin2026,whilesuccessivemarketcycleshaveproducedprogressivelyshallowerdrawdowns.

FinancialInclusionandtheProliferationofStablecoins

Perhapsthemostprevalentdigitalassetusecasebeyond

bitcoinisthestablecoin,adigitaltokenpeggedtoafiat

currency,99%ofwhicharepeggedtotheU.S.dollar(USD).Thegrowthofstablecoinsfromzerotoa$300billion

3

marketinlessthanadecadeisperhapsoneofthegreatestfinancialinclusionnarrativesofourtime,especiallyin

emergingandfrontiermarketswherelocalcurrenciesremainvolatile.Tether(USDT),thelargeststablecoinbyvalueandapproximately70%ofthemarket,nowboastsmorethan

500millionusersglobally.

4

Bycombiningrelativeprice

stabilitywithnearimmediatetransmissionandsettlement,stablecoinsaddressfrictioninpaymentsandremittances.

Usecasesforstablecoinsandfinancialinclusionarenumerous:

BANKINGTHEUNBANKEDWITHOUTABANK

Approximately1.3billionadultsremainunbanked

5

,yet

inmanyofthesemarkets,mobilephonepenetration

exceedsaccesstobanking.Becausestablecoinscanbe

heldinself-custodieddigitalwalletsonmobilephones,onboardingcanbeprocessedvirtually,enablinggreatercompetitionandcustomerchoicewhilereducingfrictionandtransactionfees.Assmartphoneadoptionrises

acrossemergingmarkets,wherebankaccountownershiplagsglobalaverages,thesedevicesprovideascalable

distributionchannelforstablecoins.

2Chainalysis.(2026,March5).The2026cryptocrimereport.

3DeFiLlama.TotalStablecoinSupply[dataset].DatathroughAugust30,2026.

4TheBlock.(2025,October21).Tetherhits500millionusersasstablecoinsupplynears$182billion.

3

5Klapper,L.,Singer,D.,Starita,L.,&Norris,A.(2025).TheGlobalFindexDatabase2025:Connectivityandfinancialinclusioninthedigitaleconomy.WorldBank.OCTOBER2O26|MORGANSTANLEYINVESTMENTMANAGEMENT

OCTOBER2O26|MORGANSTANLEYINVESTMENTMANAGEMENT4

GrowthinTotalStablecoinSupply(USD)

350B300B250B200B150B100B 50B0

201720182019202020212022202320242025

USDTUSDCOther

Source:DeFiLlama,DatathroughAugust31st,2026.USDT(TetherUSD)isaU.S.dollar–peggedstablecoinissuedbyTetherLtd.;USDC(USDCoin)isaU.S.

dollarpeggedstablecoinissuedbyCircleInternetFinancial;Otherrepresentstheaggregatevalueofthenext23largestU.S.dollar–peggedstablecoinssothatthetotalstablecoinsupplyrepresentstheaggregatevalueofthetop25USDstablecoins.

FACILITATINGFLOWS

Globalremittanceflowsexceeded$850billionannuallywithanaverageremittancecostof~6%pertransaction,materiallyabovetheUNSustainableDevelopmentGoalof3%.6Stablecoinsnotonlyenablenear-instantcross-bordertransfers,butalsosettlementfeesoftenmeasuredin

centstoafewdollars.FormigrantcorridorssuchasU.S.–LatinAmericaorthePersianGulf–SouthAsia,stablecoinstranslatetofaster,incrementalincomeforsomeofthe

world’spoorestcommunities.

PURCHASINGPOWERSTABILITY

Inhigh-inflationeconomies,especiallycountriesfacing

significantcurrencydebasement,stablecoinsfunction

asadigitalproxyforhardcurrency.Intheseenvironments,accesstoUSDbankaccountsmayberestrictedorcapitalcontrolsmayapply,butUSD-peggedstablecoinsprovideuserswithaportablehedgeagainstlocalcurrency

volatility.Forexample,in2019whenLebanon’slocalcurrencylostover90%ofitsvaluerelativetoUSD,stablecoinusageincreased.

LIQUIDITYFORAGROWINGPOOLOFFINANCIALAPPLICATIONS

Stablecoinshavebecomeacorepillarofdigitalassetinfrastructurewithmonthlyon-chaintransfervolumes

reachingintothetrillionsofdollars.Ethereum,the

secondlargestblockchainbymarketcapitalization,isa

decentralized,programmablenetworkthatunderpinsalargeshareofcryptoactivityandaccountsforaroundhalfofallstablecoinsupply.Ethereum’ssmartcontractfunctionalityenablesstablecoinstomoveseamlesslyacrosswallets,

exchangesanddecentralizedapplications,makingitthe

primarysettlementlayerfordollar-denominateddigital

valueon-chain.OnEthereumalone,stablecoinvolumesnowexceed$2trillionpermonth,comparabletotheroughly$27trillionincombinedannualtransactionvolumesprocessedbyVisaandMastercardin2025.7

Thisgrowingecosystemcanalsosupportdecentralized

finance(DeFi)applicationsofferinglendingandcollateralizedborrowingproducts.Whileriskmanagementandregulatoryoversightremaincriticalandstillunderdevelopedinmany

markets,stablecoinscancreatepathwaysforunderbankeduserstoaccesspaymentandcreditinstrumentswithout

relyingonstandingbankingrelationshipsorcredithistories.

Itisimportanttonote–thefinancialinclusioncaseforstablecoinsisnotpredicatedondisplacingbanks,butonaugmentingaccess.Thecombinationofrelativestability,lowsettlementfrictionandprogrammablefunctionalitypositionsstablecoinsasascalablesolutionforinclusive

6WorldBank.(n.d.).RemittancePricesWorldwide[Dataset].RetrievedAugust9,2026.

7TheBlock.(2026).Ethereumon-chainvolumeofstablecoins[Dataset].RetrievedMay11,2026.

OCTOBER2O26|MORGANSTANLEYINVESTMENTMANAGEMENT5

EthereumOn-ChainStablecoinTransactionVolumes($)

Jul-23

Aug-23

Sep-23

Oct-23

Nov-23

Dec-23

Jan-24

Feb-24

Mar-24

Apr-24

May-24

Jun-24

Jul-24

Aug-24

Sep-24

Oct-24

Nov-24

Dec-24

Jan-25

Feb-25

Mar-25

Apr-25

May-25

Jun-25

Jul-25

Aug-25

Sep-25

Oct-25

Nov-25

Dec-25

Jan-26

Feb-26

Mar-26

Apr-26

May-26

Jun-26

Jul-26

Aug-26

3.5

3.0

2.5

2.0

1.5

1.0

0.5

0

VolumeinTrillions

Source:TheBlock,DatathroughAugust31st,2026.Theon-chainvolumeofstablecoinsshowstheaggregatevalueinUSDoftransfersonEthereum.

finance.Durableimpactwilldependhoweveronregulatoryclarity,consumerprotectionandintegrationwithcomplianton-andoff-rampsacrossjurisdictions.Butasdigitalassetsmatureandoperateunderincreasinglysupportiveregulatoryregimes,financialinclusionwillonlyproliferateandsupportsustainabledevelopmentaims.Forinvestorswithastrongemphasisonsustainability,akeyquestionarises:Arethe

potentialbenefitsofdigitalassetsforfinancialinclusionmateriallyundervalued?

SmartContractsand

ProgrammableInfrastructure

Whilestablecoinsareoneoftheclearest,financially

inclusiveapplicationsofdistributedledgertechnology,thesmartcontractplatformssupportingtheseecosystems

mayultimatelyproveequallyimportantfrombothan

energyefficiencyandfinancialaccessperspective.NetworkssuchasEthereumandSolanacanenableabroadrangeof

applicationsrelatedtopayments,lending,insurance,identity,capitalformationanddigitalcommercebecauseofthe

programmabilityofsmartcontracts.

Ratherthanrelyingoncontinuous,computational

competitiontosecuretheledger,liketheproof-of-work(PoW)protocolofBitcoin,proof-of-stake(PoS)utilizes

cryptographicvalidationandeconomicincentivesthrough

bondedcollateral.InSeptember2022,EthereumtransitionedfromPoWtoPoSinoneofthemostsignificantenergy

efficiencyupgradesundertakenbyamajorblockchain.

Estimatesofthenetwork’selectricityconsumptionbeforeandafterthetransitionindicateareductionofover99%,whileEthereumhasmaintaineddecentralizednetwork

functionalityandbroadglobalparticipation.8

Solana,alternatively,wasarchitectedaroundhigh-throughputprocessingandlowoperationalcostswithcomparatively

minimalenergyexpenditureonapertransactionbasis.Thisefficiencyhasimplicationsnotonlyforresourceconsumption,butalsoforaffordabilityandscalabilityofconsumer-facingapplications.TransactionfeesonSolanaareoftenmeasuredinfractionsofacent,facilitatingmicrotransactionsandhigh-frequencyfinancialactivitydifficulttosupportthroughmanytraditionalpaymentrails.

Importantly,smartcontractplatformsshouldnotnecessarilybeviewedasareplacementfortraditionalfinance,but

ratherasapotentialupgradetocertainusecasesand

processeswherematerialfrictionscontinuetoexist.Banks,paymentnetworksandcapitalmarketscontinuetoplay

criticalrolesincreditcreationandfinancialintermediation.Atthesametime,programmableblockchainnetworks

8Neumüller,A.,Sims,H.,Coelho,H.,Wu,W.,Bear,K.,Arner,D.W.,Proskalovich,R.,&Zhang,B.Z.(2026).EthereumaftertheMerge—Achangeinpower:Evaluatingthepost-Mergeenvironmentalfootprint.CambridgeCentreforAlternativeFinance,CambridgeJudgeBusinessSchool.

OCTOBER2O26|MORGANSTANLEYINVESTMENTMANAGEMENT6

mayimprovecertainareasoffinancialfunctionality,

particularlywhensettlementspeed,interoperability,

accessibilityorautomationareimportantconsiderations.

Beyondfinance,programmableblockchainssupport

emergingapplicationsrelatedtodigitalidentity,

transparentcharitabledistributionandtokenized

ownershipstructures.Whileearly,theydemonstrate

howsmartcontractplatformscansupportbroader

formsofdigitalcoordinationandeconomicparticipation.

Forinvestorsevaluatingdigitalassets,theanalysisincreasinglyextendsbeyondcryptocurrenciesandtowardthefunctionalityoftheunderlyingnetworksthemselves.Ethereumand

Solanaillustratethatblockchainsystemscancombineloweroperationalintensitywithscalablefinancialinfrastructure

capableofsupportingawiderangeofapplications.

Bitcoin,Proof-of-WorkandtheGlobalEnergySystem

Formanyinvestorswithsustainabilitygoals,theenergy

consumptionoftheBitcoinNetworkisofcentralinterest.

Bitcoin’sPoWconsensusmechanismiscomputationallyheavyandenergyintensive,butitisthisenergythatprovidesthe

securityunderpinningBitcoin’spermissionlessandcensorship-resistantfinancialtransactions.Whensovereigncurrencies

canfacedebasementtosatisfynear-termneedsand

politicalaims,groundingascarcemonetaryassettoenergyproductionisatthecoreofBitcoin’svalueproposition.

FocusingsolelyonBitcoin’senergyconsumptionprovides

anincompletepictureofitsvalue.Inourview,bitcoinmininghasthepotentialtofunctionasacatalystwithincertain

aspectsoftheenergytransition.Threeunderappreciateddimensionsofbitcoin’srelationshipwithenergydeserve

mention:(i)itsabilitytoenhancegridstability,(ii)its

potentialtoimproveuniteconomicsforrenewableenergy,and(iii)thepossiblereductionofgreenhousegas(GHG)emissionsthroughmethanecapturetofuelbitcoinmining.

Bitcoin’stotalenergyusecannotbedirectlymeasured,soapproximationreliesontheoreticalmodelingandsurveydata.Bitcoinmining’selectricityconsumptioniscurrently

ANoteonProof-of-WorkandProof-of-Stake

Proof-of-Work(PoW)andProof-of-Stake(PoS)blockchains

differfundamentallyinhowtheysecurethenetwork,resultingindramaticallydifferentenergyprofiles.PoWsecuresthe

networkthroughexternalresourceexpenditure,namely

energyandspecializedhardware,whilePoSsecuresitthroughinternaleconomicbonding:validatorslockupcapitalthat

canbepenalized,or“slashed,”formisbehavior.Bothrelyoncryptography,butPoSachievessecuritywithoutPoW’scontinuousenergycost.

Theirsecurityguaranteesarenotequivalentbutreston

differentassumptions.Whichmethodisstrongerdependsonthetypeofattackconsideredandremainsactivelydebated.

PoWoffersalongerrecordofadversarialexposureandties

securitytophysicalcoststhataredifficulttofake,butitis

energy-andcapital-intensive,andinpracticeminingcanbe

concentrated.PoSisfarmoreenergy-efficientandallows

participationwithoutspecializedhardware,butitisnewer,hasashortertrackrecord,anddependsonadditionalassumptions,suchasstakingthatcanconcentrateamonglargeproviders.

Bitcoin(PoW)reliesonminersrepeatedlyhashingblockdatawithspecializedhardwareinaracetomeetanetwork-set

difficultytarget.Thisprocessisdeliberatelyenergy-intensive:

securityisderivedfromtheeconomicandphysicalcostof

expendingelectricity.Bitcoin’stotalenergyconsumptionis

drivenbyfactorssuchasminingdifficulty,hardwareefficiency,electricityprices,andthevalueoftheblockreward.Energyusescaleswiththeeconomicsofsecuringthenetworkratherthanwithtransactionvolume.

Bycontrast,Ethereum(PoS)replacedminingwithstakingin

its2022“Merge.”Validatorsarepseudo-randomlyselected,

weightedbytheETHtheylockupascollateral,toproposeandattesttoblocks.Thiseliminatestheneedforenergy-intensivemininghardware,andEthereum’senergyconsumptiondroppedbyroughly99.95%afterthetransition.(SeeFootnote9).

estimatedtobe~138TWhperyearorabout0.5%ofglobalelectricityconsumption,andsurveyssuggestamajority

ofthisconsumptionisderivedfromsustainablesources.9

Bitcoinminingisalsounusuallyportable.AnApplication

SpecificIntegratedCircuit,orASIC,istheprimarycomputerhardwarethatisusedinbitcoinmining.ASICsaremodularandlargelylocation-agnosticsoasubstantialshareof

computationalneedscanmigratetowardthelowest-costenergysources.Thisflexibilitywasdemonstratedin2021when60-75%ofthenetwork’scomputationalpower,thenlocatedinChina,wasforcedofflineandredeployedacrossnewgeographieswithinmonths.Eveninsteady-state

9Neumueller,A.,Pieters,G.C.,Mohaddes,K.,Rousseau,V.,&Zhang,B.Z.(2025,April28).Cambridgedigitalminingindustryreport:Globaloperations,sentiment,andenergyuse.CambridgeCentreforAlternativeFinance,CambridgeJudgeBusinessSchool.

OCTOBER2O26|MORGANSTANLEYINVESTMENTMANAGEMENT7

ElectricityConsumptionofBitcoinMiningbySource

ElectricityConsumptionofType

RenewableFossilFuels

Sustainable

ElectricityConsumptionbySource

HydroNuclear

WindGas

SolarCoal

OtherrenewablesOil

Source:CambridgeCentreforAlternativeFinance.CambridgeDigit

lMiningIndustryReport.April2025.

42.6%

15.4%

3.2%

0.5%

39.8

CO2Equivalent

(MtCO2e)

52.4%

9.8%

47.6%38.2%

0.5%

23.4%

inMillionTonnes

8.9%

a

conditions,mininghasshownseasonalmobility,chasingcheaperhydroelectricpowerduringrainyseasons.10

GRIDSTABILITYANDFLEXIBLEDEMAND

Electricitygridsareundergoingstructuraltransformationdueinparttotheenergytransitionandthegrowingdemandforpower.Asintermittentrenewablessuchaswindandsolar

gainshare,variabilityandsupply-demandmismatcheshave

increased,creatingoperationalchallenges.Withinthiscontext,bitcoinminingrepresentsadistinctformofelectricitydemandasminingloadscanbecurtailed,rampeddownorshut-off

withinminuteswithoutdamagingequipmentorincurring

significantrestartcosts,differentiatingitfrommostindustrieswithrigidbaseloadneeds.

Intraditionalgrids,short-termdemandisrelativelyinelastic,requiringoperatorstorelyonpeakingplantsorreserve

capacitytomanagespikesinelectricitydemand.Flexible

demandresourceslikebitcoinminingcanreducesystemcostsandenhancegridreliability.Duringperiodsofgridstress,

minerscancurtailconsumption.Duringperiodsofexcess

generationandlowprices,minerscanabsorbsurpluselectricity.

InTexas,whererapidwindandsolarexpansionhasledattimestonegativeornear-zerowholesaleelectricityprices,minersareabletofunctionasa“buyeroflastresort,”

monetizingsurplusenergysorenewablegeneratorsare

notforcedtocutoutputandreducerevenues.Conversely,duringextremeweatherevents,minersparticipatingin

demandresponseprogramshavecurtailedoperations,

allowingenergytobeusedformorepressingconsumerneeds.Importantly,thisflexibilityiseconomically

incentivized,aligningprivateincentiveswithgridreliabilitywithoutregulatoryoradministrativemandates.

UnlikecloudorAIdatacenters,whichrequirelatency-

sensitiveormission-criticalbaseloadpower,bitcoinmininghasnosetobligations.Blockscanbeminedanywhere

andtemporaryshutdownsbyindividualminersdonot

impairnetworkintegrity.Whencriticsarguethatadding

demandinherentlyincreasesgridstress,manyassume

homogeneous,inflexiblepowerdemand.Bitcoinmining

representsasourceoflarge-scaleandeconomically

motivatedflexibledemand,whichareincreasinglyvaluableattributesincomplexpowersystems.

Importantly,thesebenefitsarecontextdependentrather

thanuniversal.Bitcoinminingismostlikelytosupportgrid

efficiencywhereelectricitysystemsexperienceperiodic

surplusgeneration,minersparticipateinenforceable

curtailmentprograms,marketrulesappropriatelycompensateflexibledemand,andminingdoesnotmateriallyincreasecostsorothernegativeexternalitiesforconsumersandcommunities.

10CambridgeCentreforAlternativeFinance.(n.d.).CambridgeBitcoinminingmap[Dataset].RetrievedAugust9,2026.

Suchaswithotherflexibleloads,outcomesultimatelydependonlocalelectricitymarketdesignandoperatingconditions.

Lookingahead,agrowingnumberofminingcompaniesare

diversifyingintoAIandhigh-performancecomputing(HPC),attractedbystrongereconomicsforcertainworkloads.Unlikebitcoinmining,however,AIandHPCworkloadsgenerally

requirehigheruptime,lowerlatency,andmorereliablepower,makingthemlesssuitableasflexibledemandresources.

RENEWABLEENERGYUNITECONOMICS

Beyondgridoperations,bitcoinminingmayalsoimproverenewableprojecteconomics.Renewablegeneration

costshavedeclinedsubstantially,butmonetizationcanremainchallenging.Asrenewablepenetrationincreases,wholesalepricesduringpeakgenerationoftenfalland

curtailmentsfurthererodereturns,particularlyinregionswithtransmissionconstraintsorunevendemand.

Bitcoinminingintroducesanincrementalrevenuestream

withoutrelianceonsubsidiesorlong-termpowerpurchaseagreements.Byco-locatingminingrigswithrenewable

assets,minerscanmonetizeexcessorstrandedoutput.

Forexample,inpartsofEastAfrica,bitcoinminerspartnerwithrenewablemini-gridsanduseminingtoabsorbsurplusgenerationwhenlocaldemandislow.Thiseffectivelyaddsanewrevenuestreamthatcanhelpsmallrenewableplantsandmini-gridsbecomemorefinanciallyviablesotheycandeliverelectricitytochallenginglocations,supportinga

hostofdevelopmentneeds.Evenmodestimprovementsincapacityutilizationcanmeaningfullyenhanceinternalratesofreturnofrenewableprojects.

Renewableenergygenerationcertainlydoesnotdependonbitcoinminingforlong-termviability,butminers’price-sensitivityandflexibilityalignnaturallywithrenewable

generationprofiles.Still,miningrevenuesarevolatileandregulatoryuncertaintiespersist–bitcoinminingshouldbetreatedasasupplementarysourceofrevenueratherthanfoundationaltorenewablepowerprojectmodels.Butthefactremains,theBit

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论