摩根大通-中国电池行业:利润池再平衡第二部分:又一轮盈利下调-China Battery Profit-pool rebalancing,part 2:Another round of earnings cuts-20261105_第1页
摩根大通-中国电池行业:利润池再平衡第二部分:又一轮盈利下调-China Battery Profit-pool rebalancing,part 2:Another round of earnings cuts-20261105_第2页
摩根大通-中国电池行业:利润池再平衡第二部分:又一轮盈利下调-China Battery Profit-pool rebalancing,part 2:Another round of earnings cuts-20261105_第3页
摩根大通-中国电池行业:利润池再平衡第二部分:又一轮盈利下调-China Battery Profit-pool rebalancing,part 2:Another round of earnings cuts-20261105_第4页
摩根大通-中国电池行业:利润池再平衡第二部分:又一轮盈利下调-China Battery Profit-pool rebalancing,part 2:Another round of earnings cuts-20261105_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩108页未读, 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

AsiaPacificEquityResearch

05November2026

J.P.Morgan

ThismaterialisneitherintendedtobedistributedtoMainlandChinainvestorsnortoprovidesecuritiesinvestmentconsultancyserviceswithinthe

territoryofMainlandChina.Thismaterialoranyportionhereofmaynotbereprinted,soldorredistributedwithoutthewrittenconsentofJ.P.Morgan.

ChinaBattery

Profit-poolrebalancing,part2:Anotherroundofearningscuts

CATL-Hfellafurther15%followingits3Q26earningsmiss,bringingitsYTDdeclineto27%(vsHSI-1%/-9%).CATL-Aexhibitedabetternear-termtrend:-5%post3Q26and-31%YTD(CSI300:-2%/-11%),thankstoChina“nationalteam”effortstostabilisemarkets.FollowingourOct-20sectordowngradereport,"China

Battery:Profit-poolrebalancing:CATLmaytakethefirsthit,butgainthemost”

publishedaheadofCATL's3Q26results,wenowseefurtherdownsidetoearningsestimates.OurlatestdiscussionswithOEMsandESSintegratorssuggestthattaxpass-throughisprovingmoredifficultthanwepreviouslyassumed.Wealsoseegrowingdifferentiationwithinthesector:CATL'shigherunitprofitability,net-cashbalancesheetandstrongercashgenerationprovideamateriallylargerbuffer,whileTier-2playersfacethinnermargins,weakerFCFandhigherleveragethanduringthe2023-24downcycle.CATL-AremainsouronlyOW;weareNeutral

onl-tCn,dconso.A/Hvaluation-gap

narrowing.National-teamflowsappeartohavebeenameaningfultechnicaldriverofCATL-A,withourestimatessuggestingthatimpliedCATLbuyingviaChinaETFsrepresentedc.5%ofthestock'scumulativetradingvolume

fromOctober9toNovember3.TheCATLH/Avaluationdiscounthasalreadynarrowedfromapeakof59%inmid-2026to27%currently,andweseescopeforfurthernarrowingshouldnational-teamETFbuyingcontinue.

·Wecutourearningsestimatesacrossourbatterycoverageagain,primarilyreflectinglowerassumedunitprofitabilityratherthanweakervolumes.FollowingCATL's3Q26missandrecentvalue-chainfeedback,weseeincreasingevidencethatcustomersareunwillingtosimplyabsorbincrementalbatterytaxesthroughhigherprices.OEMsandESSintegratorsareinsteadseekingburdensharing,suppliercostreductionsandsupply-chainoptimization,whilenoOEMhassofarguidedtoavehiclepriceincreasespecificallytooffsetthebatteryconsumptiontax.Potentialyear-endvehiclepricecutsandlowerlithiumpricescouldfurthercomplicatebattery-pricenegotiations.ForCATL,wefirstloweredour2027Enetprofit/unitassumptiontoRmb0.09/WhinourSep-10report,cutthistoRmb0.08/WhinourOct-20CATL-Hdowngrade,andhavenowreduceditfurthertoRmb0.07/

Wh.

·Growthwithoutprofit?Theearningsdivergencebecomesmuchclearerin2027E.WenowforecastCATL’s2026/27EnetprofitatRmb85bn/Rmb89bn,implyingjust5%YoYgrowthin2027E.YetCATListheonlybatterymakerunderourcoverageforwhichweforecastpositiveprofitgrowthnextyear,versusprofitdeclinesatEVEandCALBandanetlossatGotion.ThisisdespitesubstantiallystrongervolumegrowthatTier-2players:weforecast2027Eshipmentgrowthof25%forCATL,versus30-90%+fortier-2players(partiallyreferringtothecompany'sguidance).

·Tier-2balancesheetsareweakerthistime;financialresiliencemaybecomethenextcompetitivemoat.TheearningspressuremattersmoretodaybecauseseveralTier-2playershavecontinuedtoinvestaggressivelydespitestructurallylowerprofitability.At3Q26,netdebt/equitystoodat150%for

AsiaAutos&EVBatteryRebeccaWenAC

(852)2800-8505

rebecca.y.wen@

JP.MorganSecurities(AsiaPacific)Limited/JP.MorganBroking(Hongkong)Limited

ShirleyFeng

86-21)6106-6149

shirley.x.feng@

SACRegistrationNumber:S1730524040001

J.P.MorganSecurities(China)CompanyLimited

CathyLiu

(852)2800-8629

cathy.xiao.liu@

J.P.MorganSecurities(AsiaPacific)Limited/JP.

MorganBroking(HongKong)Limited

Seepage57foranalystcertificationandimportantdisclosures,includingnon-USanalystdisclosures.

2

RebeccaWenAC

(852)2800-8505

rebecca.y.wen@

AsiaPacificEquityResearch

05November2026

Gotion,100%forCALBand60%forEVE,versusa21%net-cash/equitypositionforCATL.Goingforward,weexpectCALB,EVEandGotiontocontinuegeneratingnegativeFCFastheyfundcapacityexpansionandR&D,whileshortersupplier-paymentcyclesunderChina’santi-involutionmeasurescouldcreateanadditionalworking-capitaldrag.Lowerunitearningsthereforecreateamoredifficulttrade-offforTier-2playersbetweenmaintaininginvestment,raisingleverageandprotectingthebalancesheet.CATL’ssuperiorprofitability,cashgenerationandnet-cashpositionshouldgiveitmateriallygreaterflexibilitytoinvestthroughthecycle.

•WhydosomeTier-2playersappearabletopassthroughmoretaxthanCATL?Wewouldbecarefulwiththeheadlinenumbers.Recentcompanycommentsappear

:Sunwodasaidnegotiationshadbeencompletedwithc.80-90%ofcustomers,withmorethan90%pass-throughamongagreedcustomers,whileEVEindicatedthatmostcustomershadagreedtobearorshareincrementalcosts;CATL,bycomparison,saidnegotiationsremainongoinganditiscurrentlyabsorbingtheconsumptiontax.WedonotthinkthisnecessarilyimpliesstrongerTier-2bargainingpower.Differencesincustomer/projectmixmatter:newESSprojectscanincorporatetaxesintonewquotationsmoreeasilythanexistingpassenger-EVnominations.Moreover,headlinepricepass-throughdoesnotnecessarilyequaleconomicpass-through,ascustomerscouldreceiveoffsetsthroughotherprojectpricing,annualrebatesorcommercialconcessions.Recognitiontimingonaccountingcouldalsocontributetonear-termreporteddifferences.WethereforebelieveinvestorsshouldfocusmoreonrealizedASP,grossandandNP/Whoverthenextfewquarters,ratherthanstatedpass-throughpercentagesalone.

•CATLmaytakethefirsthit,butcouldultimatelygainthemost.CATLmayabsorbmorenear-termtaxpressuregivenitslargerprofitpool,butTier-2playersfaceatoughertrade-off:maintainpricingandrisklosingcompetitiveness,orfollowCATLandputfurtherpressureonalready-thinprofitsandweakerbalancesheets.WebelieveeitherscenariostrengthensCATL’srelativecompetitiveposition.

AsiaPacificEquityResearch

05November2026

RebeccaWenAC

(852)2800-8505

rebecca.y.wen@

3

TableOfContents

Valuationsummary 5

NationalTeambuyingcontributedtoCATL-Asharerally 6

Whyarewecuttingestimatesagain? 7

2027E:Growthwithoutprofit 7

WhywepreferCATL:thefinancialgapiswidening,not

narrowing 9

CATL’sunderlyingearningsbuffermaybewiderthanheadlineprofits

suggest 9

Financialresiliencethenextcompetitivemoat 9

Cashflowandbalancesheetanalysis 11

Taxpass-through:Whyheadlinecommentscanbe

misleading 13

Whatbatterymakersaresayings 13

WhydosomeTier-2playersappeartopassthroughmore? 15

CATLmaytakethefirsthit,butultimatelygainthemost 16

Appendix:Couldaccountingrecognitiontimingexplainthedivergent3Q26

taximpact? 18

Howlargeisthetaxburdenandwhoultimatelypays? 21

Taxburdensharing:WhatareOEMsandESSintegratorssaying? 23

Appendix:Whatdofinancialstatementstellusaboutthetaximpact? 26

BatteryMakers’FinancialComparison 28

Salesvolumeandtargets 28

ASP 29

GPMandGP/unit 30

COGSbreakdown 31

Netprofitperunit 34

ROEcomparison 35

CATL-A 36

CATL-H 40

CALB 44

GotionHigh-Tech 48

EVEEnergy 52

AsiaPacificEquityResearch

05November2026

RebeccaWenAC

(852)2800-8505

rebecca.y.wen@

4

EquityRatingsandPriceTargets

Company

Ticker

MktCap

($mn)

PriceCCY

Price

Rating

PriceTarget

Cur

Prev

CurEndDate

Prev

EndDate

CATL-A

300750CH

167,149

CNY

252.88

OW

n/c

300.00

Jun-27

310.00

n/c

CATL-H

3750HK

10,488

HKD

377.00

N

n/c

420.00

Jun-27

440.00

n/c

CALB

3931HK

1,694

HKD

13.72

N

n/c

15.00

Jun-27

17.00

n/c

GotionHigh-Tech

002074CH

6,570

CNY

24.15

UW

n/c

18.00

Jun-27

n/c

n/c

EVEEnergy

300014CH

16,259

CNY

49.91

UW

n/c

33.00

Jun-27

n/c

n/c

Source:Companydata,BloombergFinanceL.P.,J.P.Morganestimates.n/c=nochange.Allpricesasof04Nov26.

5

Valuationsummary

Table1:Globalbatteryvaluationcomps

AsofNov4,2026

GlobalValuationComps

Company

Ticker

Rating

Stockprice

MktCap

EV/EBITDA(x)

P/E(x)

EPSgrowth(%)

RoE(%)

Dividendsyield(%)

FCFyield(%)

Return(%)

(LC)

(US$bn)

26E

27E

26E

27E

26E

27E

26E

27E

26E

27E

26E

27E

YTD

Cell

CATL-A

300750CH

OW

253

177.5

8.4

7.1

13.8

12.9

14%

7%

23%

22%

3.1%

3.6%

1%

4%

-30%

CATL-H

3750HK

N

377

177.5

8.8

7.5

17.5

16.3

14%

7%

23%

22%

2.5%

2.9%

1%

3%

-25%

BYD-H

1211HK

N

72

103.3

6.5

5.6

15.6

12.0

19%

30%

13%

15%

1.5%

1.9%

5%

6%

-24%

BYD-A

002594CH

UW

85

103.3

6.5

5.6

21.1

16.0

21%

32%

14%

16%

1.1%

1.5%

5%

6%

-13%

GotionHigh-Tech

002074CH

UW

24

6.6

13.6

11.4

50.3

nm

-64%

-174%

3%

-2%

0.5%

0.6%

-10%

-12%

-38%

EVEEnergy

300014CH

UW

50

16.3

12.2

9.5

15.2

17.4

68%

-13%

15%

12%

1.4%

1.9%

5%

-3%

-24%

CALB

3931HK

N

14

3.5

11.0

8.5

13.2

19.9

19%

-34%

5%

3%

0.4%

1.4%

-52%

-41%

-45%

REPT

666HK

NC

7

2.1

4.7

3.8

10.8

8.1

126%

33%

11%

13%

0.0%

0.5%

-10%

8%

-46%

SunwodaElectric

300207CH

NC

18

5.1

12.2

9.5

14.9

11.8

129%

26%

8%

10%

1.3%

1.7%

-1%

9%

-30%

ZEEnergy

3677HK

NC

4

1.2

5.4

3.5

8.2

4.9

20%

65%

11%

16%

1.0%

1.7%

-12%

17%

-58%

LGEnergySolution

373220KS

N

355,000

62.0

19.5

13.8

nm

61.0

19%

265%

-4%

6%

0.0%

0.0%

-3%

2%

-4%

SamsungSDI

006400KS

OW

545,000

32.8

19.4

14.0

58.7

30.6

211%

92%

4%

6%

0.2%

0.2%

-1%

3%

101%

SKInnovation

096770KS

OW

123,700

15.6

4.4

6.4

5.4

5.6

214%

-5%

16%

11%

1.8%

2.4%

18%

23%

22%

Panasonic

6752JP

N

3,501

54.3

8.6

7.5

15.7

13.0

163%

0%

10%

11%

1.8%

2.1%

4%

5%

73%

TDK

6762JP

OW

2,451

30.1

7.5

6.6

17.3

14.9

31%

16%

12%

13%

1.7%

2.0%

1%

4%

11%

Average

9.9

8.0

19.8

17.5

67%

6%

11%

11%

1.2%

1.6%

-3%

2%

-9%

Source:BloombergFinanceL.P.,J.P.Morgan.CATL,CALB,GotionandEVEbasedonJPMe,othersbasedonBloombergconsensus.NC=Notcovered.Pricedasof4Nov2026.

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

-10%

Figure1:CATLHvs.Apremium

Source:BloombergFinanceL.P.

Figure2:CATL-AP/Eband

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

+2SD=52x

+1SD=40x

Avg=27x

-1SD=15x

-2SD=3x

Jul-19Jan-20Jul-20Jan-21Jul-21Jan-22Jul-22Jan-23Jul-23Jan-24Jul-24Jan-25Jul-25Jan-26Jul-26P/EAverage+1SD-1SD+2SD-2SD

Source:J.P.Morganestimates,BloombergFinanceL.P.

6

National-teambuyingcontributedtoCATL-A

rally

National-teambuyingappearstohavesupportedCATL-A’ssharepricerallythisweek.Thenationalteamsold~US$231bnofChinaETFsin1H26(link),before

purchasingnearlyUS$60bnsinceOctober9,perBloomberg.BasedondailydataonestimatednationalteamETFpurchases/salesprovidedbyBloombergIntelligence,weestimatethatimpliedCATL-AsellingthroughtheseETFsbythenationalteam

accountedforover10%ofthestock’scumulativetradingvolumeduringthesellingcycle,whilesubsequentimpliedbuyingbythenationalteamrepresented~5%ofthecumulativetradingvolumefromOct9toNov3,2026.

Notably,theimpliedflowsweremoresignificantoncertaintradingdays,withnationalteamETFpurchasesrepresenting14-15%ofCATL-A’sdailytradingvalueduringthisbuyingcycle,versus25–30%forETF-drivensellingonsomedaysduringthesellingcyclein1H26.

Table2:EstimatednationalteambuyingofCATL-AviaETFsasapercentageoftradingvalue(Oct9–Nov3)

TotalestimatedETFamountboughtbyNationalTeam_t(USDmn)

9-Oct

12-Oct

13-Oct

14-Oct

15-Oct

16-Oct

19-Oct

20-Oct

21-Oct

22-Oct

23-Oct

26-Oct

27-Oct

28-Oct

29-Oct

30-Oct

2-Nov

3-Nov

Grand

Total

CSI1000

340

0

0

0

0

0

456

0

0

491

716

0

152

166

0

83

1,335

1,013

4,752

CSI500

190

0

0

0

0

0

621

0

0

349

943

0

0

0

0

100

996

851

4,051

CSI300

215

0

238

0

3,310

2,038

408

826

692

3,500

3,366

3,248

845

230

1,301

1,257

2,115

5,031

28,622

SSE50

82

0

0

0

123

565

304

664

0

677

0

0

0

0

0

0

236

1,556

4,208

STAR50

655

0

0

0

953

97

303

414

185

1,003

630

575

0

0

576

407

1,044

1,659

8,500

ChiNext

327

0

326

0

926

240

331

251

756

892

1,039

378

209

0

643

649

435

1,362

8,763

GrandTotal

1,809

-

564

-

5,312

2,940

2,423

2,155

1,633

6,913

6,693

4,201

1,206

397

2,520

2,496

6,160

11,472

58,897

CATLweighting%_t-1

CSI1000

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

CSI500

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

CSI300

3.1%

3.2%

3.2%

3.1%

3.1%

3.1%

3.1%

3.0%

2.9%

2.6%

2.5%

2.7%

2.7%

2.7%

2.6%

2.6%

2.7%

2.8%

SSE50

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

STAR50

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

ChiNext

14.4%

14.9%

15.3%

14.9%

14.8%

15.2%

15.2%

14.7%

14.3%

12.8%

12.9%

13.3%

13.6%

13.8%

13.1%

13.7%

14.5%

14.7%

EstimatedamountboughtonCATL-Abynationalteam(USDmn)

54

-

58

-

240

100

63

61

128

204

219

138

51

6

118

122

120

339

2,023

CATLdailyturnovervolume(USDmn)

2,395

1,879

1,778

1,422

1,731

1,229

1,257

2,284

4,860

3,055

3,055

3,055

3,055

1,537

1,289

1,549

1,887

2,326

39,643

Nationalteambought%CATLturnovervolume

2.2%

0.0%

3.2%

0.0%

13.8%

8.1%

5.0%

2.7%

2.6%

6.7%

7.2%

4.5%

1.7%

0.4%

9.2%

7.9%

6.4%

14.6%

5.1%

CATL-Astockpricedailychange

3.8%

0.2%

-3.1%

-3.1%

-0.6%

-0.5%

-3.6%

-3.0%

-12.0%

-3.3%

7.8%

0.2%

-2.1%

-1.7%

0.0%

1.7%

3.1%

3.8%

Source:BloombergIntelligence,J.P.Morgan

AsiaPacificEquityResearch

05November2026

RebeccaWenAC

(852)2800-8505

rebecca.y.wen@

7

Whyarewecuttingestimatesagain?

Cuttingearningsagain:Pass-throughisprovingharderthaninitiallyexpected

Wecutour2026-27EearningsestimatesacrossChinabatterymakersagain,asrecentresultsandmanagementcommentsincreaseourconcernsovertheindustry’sabilitytopassthroughincrementaltaxcosts.

•CATL’s3Q26miss(note)pointstogreaternear-termpressure.Theresultsuggeststhetaxandcostimpactisalreadymoremeaningfulthanwhatthemarketpreviouslyexpected,whilecustomernegotiationsremainongoing.

•Downstreamcustomersarepushingbackoncostpass-through.Recent

commentsfromOEMsandESSintegratorspointtoincreasinglydifficultburden-sharingnegotiations.Ratherthansimplyacceptinghigherbatteryprices,

downstreamcustomersarediscussingcostsharingwithsuppliers,internalcost

reductionsandsupply-chainoptimization.Notably,noOEMhassofarindicatedplanstoraisevehiclepricesspecificallytooffsetthebatteryconsumptiontax,

raisingtheriskthatbatterymakerswillultimatelyabsorbameaningfulportionoftheincrementalburden.

•EvenverticallyintegratedOEMsarenotsignalinggreaterwillingnesstoabsorbthetax.BYDsawamaterialbatteryconsumption-taximpactin3Q,whileGreat

WallMotor,despitesourcingc.85%ofitsbatterydemandfromanaffiliatedbatteryproducer,hasdiscussedcostsharingwithbatterysuppliersratherthanpassingthe

costonthroughhighervehicleprices.Webelievethisprovidesanotherindicationofthedifficultybatterymakerscouldfaceinpassingincrementaltaxcosts

downstream.

•Couldtherebeanotherroundofvehiclepricecutsatyear-end?Third-party

channelfeedbacksuggestssomeOEMsmaylaunchanotherroundofpricecutsto

meetannualsalestargets,potentiallycitinglowerlithiumprices.Ifvehicleprices

continuetofallevenasbattery-relatedtaxesincrease,weseelimitedscopefor

OEMstoabsorbhigherbatteryprices,reinforcingourconcernthatagreatershareofthetaxburdencouldultimatelyfallbackonbatterysuppliers.

2027E:Growthwithoutprofit

2027:CATLtheonlyplayerexpectedtodeliverprofitgrowth

Earningspressurebecomesmoreevidentinour2027Eforecasts.WeexpectGotiontoturnloss-making,whileCALBandEVEcouldseeYoYprofitdeclinesdespite40-90%volumegrowth,highlightingthatstrongshipmentgrowthmaynolongertranslateintoearningsgrowthastaxandpricingpressureintensify.CATListheonlyChinabattery

makerunderourcoverageforwhichweforecastYoYprofitgrowthin2027E,despiteassumingthelowestvolumegrowthgivenitsmuchlargerscale.Nevertheless,wehavecutCATL’s2027Eearningsfurtherandnowstand16%belowconsensus,reflectingourincreasinglycautiousassumptionsontaxpass-throughandindustryprofitability.

Ourcutsstilldonotassumethefull4%burdenfortier-2in2028

Importantly,ourrevisedestimatesfortier-2onlyincorporateourassumedtaximpactin2026-27;wehavenotextrapolatedthefull4%consumption-taxburdeninto2028.

Doingsowithoutassumingmeaningfulpass-throughorotheroffsetswouldpushall

Tier-2batterymakersinourcoverageintolossesin2028,whichisnotourbasecaseatthisstage.

AsiaPacificEquityResearch

05November2026

RebeccaWenAC

(852)2800-8505

rebecca.y.wen@

8

Table3:Revised2026-2027Eforbatterymakers

JPMNPestimates

Bloombergconsensus

JPMevs.consensus

2026E2027E

YoY

2026E

2027E

YoY

2026E

2027E

CATL

84,83289,143

5%

90,068

106,751

19%

-6%

-16%

CALB

1,7541,161

-34%

2,528

3,680

46%

-31%

-68%

EVE

6,7425,856

-13%

7,113

9,582

35%

-5%

-39%

Gotion

848-629

-174%

1,786

2,359

32%

-53%

-127%

Source:BloombergFinanceL.P.,J.P.Morganestimates.

Table4:2025-2027ESalesvolumeandunitprofitassumptionsforbatterymakers

Company

2025A

2026E

2027E

Salesvolume(GWh)

CATL

661

980

1,228

CALB

116

180

350

EVE

121

200

280

Gotion

100

150

200

YoY

CATL

48%

25%

CALB

55%

94%

EVE

65%

40%

Gotion

50%

33%

UnitNP(RMB/Wh)

CATL

0.109

0.087

0.073

CALB

0.013

0.010

0.003

EVE

0.017

0.024

0.012

Gotion

0.024

0.006

-0.003

Netprofit(RMBmn)

CATL

72,201

84,832

89,143

CALB

1,476

1,754

1,161

EVE

4,134

6,742

5,856

Gotion

2,383

848

-629

YoY

CATL

17%

5%

CALB

19%

-34%

EVE

63%

-13%

Gotion

-64%

-174%

Source:Companydata,J.P.Morganestimates.

RebeccaWenAC

(852)2800-8505

rebecca.y.wen@

AsiaPacificEquityResearch

05November2026

J.PMorgan

WhywepreferCATL:thefinancialgapiswidening,notnarrowing

CATL'sunderlyingearningsbuffermaybewiderthanheadline

profitssuggest

Importantly,webelieveCATL'sreportedprofitabilitymayunderstateitsunderlying

earningspowerrelativetopeers.CATLappliessomeofthemostconservative

accountingtreatmentsamongmajorChinesebatterymanufacturers,includinghigher

warrantyprovisions,shorterequipmentdepreciationschedulesandfullexpensingof

R&D.Ouranalysissuggeststhatapplyingaccountingtreatmentssimilartothoseof

manyTier-2peerscouldliftCATL'sreportedprofitsbymorethan30%.Wetherefore

believetheunderlyingprofitabilitygapbetweenCATLandTier-2peersiswiderthan

headlineearningssuggest,providingCATLwithgreaterfinancialcapacitytoabsorb

near-termindustrypressurewhilesustaininginvestmentincapacity,R&Dandcustomersupport.

Figure3:Netprofitlunit-CATLadjustedprofitvs.tier-2(FY25)Figure4:Netprofitlunit-CATLadjustedprofitvs.tier-2(FY27E)

Rmb/whRmbwh

0.160.10

..0.08

0.100.06

0.08

0.060.04

0.02

0.040.02

0.00

(0.02)-0.02

(0.04)CATL-CATL-EVECALBGotion

adjustedrepotedadjustedreported

Source:Companydata,J.P.Morganestimates.Adjustedprofitusingtier-2accountingtreatment.Source:Companydata,J.P.Morganestimates.Adjustedprofitusingtier-2accountingtreatment.

Financialresiliencethenextcompetitivemoat

Financialresiliencemayemergeasthenextcompetitivedifferentiator

Thecurrentmarketdebatehasfocusedlargelyontechnologyconvergenceandmarketshareshifts.However,webelieveinvestorsmayincreasinglyneedtofocusonan

equallyimportantquestion:WhichbatterymakerscancontinuefundingcapacityexpansionandR&Dinalower-profitenvironment?

Cashflowgeneration,ratherthanshipmentgrowth,maybecomethekeydifferentiatorasindustryprofitabilitycomesunderpressure.CATLremainstheonlyglobalbattery

manufacturergeneratingconsistentpositivefreecashflowwhilemaintaininganet-cashbalancesheet.Bycontrast,manytier-2playerscontinuetooperatewithsignificantly

lowerprofitability,weakeroperatingcashflowgenerationandhigherrelianceonexternalfinancing.

Anti-involutionmeasurescouldcreateadditionalworkingcapitalpressures

AsiaPacificEquityResearch

05November2026

RebeccaWenAC

(852)2800-8505

rebecca.y.wen@

10

China’songoinganti-involutioncampaignisalsoincreasingfocusonsupplier-paymentpracticesacrossmanufacturingindustries.RecentdisclosuresbyCATLandBYD

suggesteffortstoshortenpaymentcyclesandimprovesettlementtermswithsuppliers.Whilesuchmeasuresmaybenefitupstreamsuppliersandimprovesupplychain

sustainability,theyarealsolikelytoreducetheworkingcapitalfinancingbenefithistoricallyenjoyedbybatterymanufacturers.

Forbatterymakers,shorterpayabledaysdirectlytranslateintoloweroperatingcash

flowandhigherworkingcapitalrequirements.Theimpactmaybemanageablefor

companieswithstrongbalancesheetsandlargecashreserves.However,theresultingworkingcapitaloutflowcouldbecomeincreasinglymaterialforplayersalready

generatingthinmarginsandlimitedoperatingcashflow.1H26reportsshowed

significantdispersioninoperatingcashflowgenerationacrossbatterymakers,with

severaltier-2playersgeneratingminimalorevennegativeoperatingcashflowperunitinrecentperiods.

HigherleveragemayberequiredtosustainexpansionandR&D

Atthesametime,theindustryremainshighlycapital-intensive.Batterymanufacturerscontinuetoinvestheavilyinnewcapacity,next-generationtechnologies,sodium-ion

batteries,semi-solid-statebatteriesandoverseaslocalizationprojects.Fortier-2players,slowingprofitabilityandweakeroperatingcashflowmayincreasinglyforceatrade-offbetweenbalancesheetstrengthandgrowthambitions.

Wethereforeexpectanumberoftier-2playerstogenerateincreasinglynegativefree

cashflowoverthenextonetotwoyears,particularlyifindustrypricingremainsunderpressureandworkingcapitalconditionstighten.MaintainingexpansionplansandR&Dinvestmentsmayconsequentlyrequirehigherleverage,additionalequityfinancingor

slowerinvestmentspending.

Inourview,thishighlightsanincreasinglycompetitiveadvantagefor

CATL.Thecompany’ssuperiorprofitability,operatingcashflowgenerationandnet-cashpositionprovidegreaterflexibilitytocontinueinvestingthroughthecycle,whileweakerplayersmayfacegrowingbalancesheetconstraints.Overtime,financial

resiliencecouldbecomejustasimportantastechnologyandmarketshareindeterminingindustrywinners.

AsiaPacificEquityResearch

05November2026

RebeccaWenAC

(852)2800-8505

rebecca.y.wen@

11

Figure5:Netdebt(cash)toequity

CATListheonlyplayerinanet-cashposition;tier-2playersmayneedtoraiseleverage

CATLCALBEVEGotion

(50%)

-

50%

100%

150%

200%

250%

300%

2026E2027E2028E

Source:Companydata,J.P.Morganestimates.

Figure6:Freecashflow

Rmbmn

80,000

60,000

40,000

20,000

0

-20,000

-40,000

CATL

CALB

EVE

Gotion

2026E

2027E

2028E

Source:Company

data,J.P.Morganestimates.

Unlike2023-24,Tier-2makersenterthisdowncyclewithstretchedbalancesheets

Akeydifferenceversusthe2023-24downcycleisthatTier-2batterymakersare

enteringthecurrentdownturnwithmuchlessbalance-sheetheadroom.Netdebt/equityhasincreasedmateriallyacrosspeers,withGotion/CALBreachingc.150%/100%by

3Q26versusc.110%/40%in2023,whileleverageatEVEandSunwodahasalsomovedhigher.Thismattersbecauseanotherroundofmarginpressureisnowhittinganindustrythathasalreadyspentheavilyoncapacityexpansionandaccumulatedsubstantially

moredebt.Inourview,weakerstartingbalancesheetsreduceTier-2players’abilitytoabsorbearningspressurewhilesustainingcapex,potentiallyforcingsharpercapex

disciplineandputtingfurtherpressureonFCFasthedowncycleprogresses.

Figure7:Tier-2batterymakers&LGESnetdebt/equityinthelastdowncycle(2023-24)vs.now

160%

140%

120%

100%

80%

60%

40%

20%

0%

CALBEVEGotionSunwodaLGES

202320241Q262Q263Q26

Source:Companydata,CALBbasedonA-shr.

AsiaPacificEquityResearch

05November2026

RebeccaWenAC

(852)2800-8505

rebecca.y.wen@

12

CashflowandbalancesheetanalysisTable5:Batterymakers’OPCFperunit(Rmb/wh)

2023

2024

2025

1H24

2H24

1H25

2H25

1H26

1Q25

2Q25

3Q25

4Q25

1Q26

2Q26

3Q26

CATL

0.24

0.20

0.20

0.22

0.19

0.21

0.19

0.14

0.26

0.17

0.13

0.24

0.17

0.11

0.01

Gotion

0.05

0.04

0.04

0.01

0.05

0.01

0.05

0.03

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.09

0.01

0.03

0.00

EVE

0.16

0.05

0.06

0.01

0.08

0.05

0.07

0.00

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.07

-0.01

0.00

0.39

CALB

0.07

0.04

0.09

0.05

0.04

0.06

0.11

0.04

0.03

0.08

0.09

0.13

0.11

-0.01

0.06

Sunwoda

0.23

0.11

0.09

0.21

0.09

0.06

0.10

-0.07

0.13

0.08

0.01

-0.12

-0.02

REPT

0.05

0.09

0.01

0.12

0.09

0.03

0.00

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论