RedX一天教材PPT课件

1、Page1、statistical alengineeringredxstrategyoverview、page2、learning objectives学习目标和attheendofthisscourethelearnerwing策略：更改一个或多个原因(x)，以确保结果(y)变好。thisisaaguessingstrategy . ifwedonotguesswhattherootcaus，wewill neverfixtheproblem。这是假设的策略。如果我们不假定根本原因，我们可能永远解决不了问题。assumption : iknotherelationshiphome ween

2、caueandeffect假设：您已经知道原因和结果之间的关系，对Page42、YtoXThinkingY和x的思考，RedxstrategiesselectBOB在GreenY的两个极端中选择bob和wow，然后通过这些示例进行极端redxeliminaseswitnesses sameandfocusonwhatisdifferent。排除相同的元素，注意差异的ThemoreContrastwehave，Theeasierit betoidentifytheredx。差异越大，就可以通过极端观察(假设assumption : icanunderstandthephyscsbyobservi

3、ngtheextmes)了解其原理。Page43、Ytoxrelationship、page44、strategy diagram策略图、wherecaniobservethemostcontrast？在哪里可以观察到最大的差异？Page45、StrategyDiagrams策略图、WhatisaStrategyDiagram？什么是策略图？strategydiagramisanorganizedlistofcontrastpportunities。策略对映是列出所有可能差异元素的清单。Generally，thewowconditionisknonandclearlyidentified .

4、howevertherearremanepportunitiesforselectingtheBOB。通常，wow易于识别，但bob经常是很多难以选择的contrastchoicesarearrangdfromsmallest(feature/defect/event)to bigest(time)。差异项选择按从小到大的顺序进行：thesmalleststrategychoicethat showshelargestcontrstisusualitual beststrategytouse .差异越大，反映差异的元素项目越小，策略对映就越有效。thefirstcontratchoiceisa

5、lwaysaquestionofthemeasurement/evaluationsystem . youcannoproceedwithanotherstrategychoiceifyoudonots如果不能再现故障或没有可重复的测量系统，就不能再进行其他战略。thelastcontratchoiceistime . this could include : shift toshift、daytoday、monthtomonth、etc .的最大区别是时间。可以是班卓琴、班卓琴、日、月、月等的比较。Page46、StrategyDiagrams策略图、Strategydiagramscann

6、otbecompleteedyourdesk。策略图未在桌面上完成的strategydiagramsshouldbedbevelopedwhileyouareencingthefailuremode。策略对映必须是在经历失败后开发的Eva，Luatestrategychoiceswithresultsfromconcentrationdagram、multi-vari、andotherrelevantobservations。评估战略选项必须基于集中地图、多边差异和其他相关观测。vehicletovehicleisthemostpopularsentegychoice；However，itis

7、oftennotthebestchoice。车和车的对比是最常用的策略选项，但不一定是最佳选项。rememberthephyscsoffailureandlookforcreatitivestoratopportunities(region ATO region、sidetoside、modeltomodel、etcPage47，measurements systemcontrast，thefirststrategychoicethawemustevaluateis dowehavaearepeablemeasurementsystemthissistreforalltypesofproble

8、ms . wecannoproceedwithanyotherstrategyifourementsystemisnotrepeatable，featureifwemeasuremeasureusermultipletimesdefectifweevaluateabobvhiclea 2 ndtimeiststillbob？ifweevaluateawvehiclea 2 ndtimeiststillwow？Eventisthefailuremodemmittent？IsaBOBvehiclealwaysBOB？IsaWOWvehiclealwaysWOW？Page48、FeatureStra

9、tegyDiagrams要素策略图、howcaniobservecontrasktwinathafeaturetypefailure？如何通过失败类型的特征观察差异？page49、hood fitinconsistentgaptofender、observed clelist : feature isrepeatable . measurements systempassesideplot .铝块中线的完整性和方案是更重要的问题。page75，component search NCC 736 components earrch stageiidata步骤1和2中的数据摘要，original，d

10、isassembly/reasebly # 1，disassembly组越大，风险越低，therecommendedgroupsizes4、4。建议组的大小为4，4。stage 1 rules-complete separation-stage 2 decision limits、searchalgorithmfactors搜索算法系数、componentsearch、riskfactorirule 23: thedifferencebetweenthemediansmustbegreaterthantheaveragagerangetimetriskfactor的中间数差异必须大于极值平均值

11、和风险系数的乘积，rbobandrwowmustbestbestor哪些组件无效，使GreenY无效？Page83、GroupComparison组和配对比较、WhatisaGroupComparison？什么是分组和配对比较？itisapiowerfullcluegenerationtorsusenthe dictionary cannoongerbesplintomponents。如果词典不能分成较小的组件，则可以使用“分组与配对对比”作为强大的线索生成工具。itisatoolthatcanquicklyidentifypotential redxcandidates！分组和配对对比是快速确定潜在RedX候选项的工具。、Page84、GroupComparison组和配对比较、inagroupocomparison、thecharactericsson feature smasus redbetweenbob“S