如何阅读案例.ppt

1、1,Case Reading,2,Case Reading Skills,“PreviewDoReview” is your basic learning strategy. After creating a positive learning environment, you are ready to read cases. Preview each case. Instead of plunging into a case, preview it. Get a feel for the case without bogging down in specifics. Try these th

2、ree strategies for getting a preview and use the one that works best for you. (1)First and last paragraphs: Read the beginning and end of the case, just enough to get a taste for the parties, the dispute, and the holding. (2)First sentence of each paragraph: Read the first paragraph, first sentence

3、of each succeeding paragraph, and the last paragraph. In addition to getting the basic plot, you will be introduced to the courts reasoning. (3)Story line reading: Skim the case quickly for the basic story line. Connect the story to the subject you are studying.,3,Ask questions. Based on your previe

4、w, ask yourself questions. What is this case about? Why did the winning party prevail? What were the key facts? How does the case relate to the casebook topic? Read each case. After your preview, read through the case carefully and actively, try to answer the questions that you posed to yourself. Ta

5、ke notes in the margins if this helps you.,4,Review. You will have two stages of review. 1) Briefing the case. What are the facts the court found most important in reaching their decision? What rule of law should you understand from the case? What types of legal reasoning did the court rely on in co

6、ming to a decision? 2) Reviewing after briefing. After you brief all your cases, spend two minutes thinking about how each case you read relates to the subject matter of the class. Does one case illustrate a majority and the other a minority rule? Traditional rule and modern rule? Rule and exception

7、? This review will help you remember the cases and also acts as a preview for the class.,5,案例的组成部分,1、Case Name (案例名称)eg: Smith v. John, v. is short for versus.(诉) 2、Court rendering the opinion (判决法院)eg: New Jersey Supreme Court(新泽西最高法院) 3、Citation(卷宗号、案号)eg:93 N. J.324, 461 A. 2d 138(1983)，这说明该案出自新西

8、汇编第93卷，第324页，以及大西洋汇编第二辑第138页，该案件判决于1983年。像这种指明两个或两个以上出处的卷宗号叫做parallel citation(an additional reference to a case that has been reported in more than more reporter平行卷宗号),6,Citation,Citation is a reference to a legal authority 布莱克法律词典中的定义：A reference to a legal precedent or authority, such as a case,

9、statute, or treaties, that either substantiates or contradicts a given position.,7,案例之中的卷宗号通常包括以下几个部分：,A) the names of the parties involved in the lawsuit B) the volume number of the reporter containing the full text of the case C) the abbreviated name of that case reporter D) the page number on whi

10、ch the case begins E) the year the case was decided F) the name of the court deciding the case,8,案例之中的卷宗号通常包括以下几个部分：,A) the names of the parties involved in the lawsuit（案件双方当事人姓名） B) the volume number of the reporter containing the full text of the case（案件全文的汇编卷号） C) the abbreviated name of that cas

11、e reporter（案例汇编的缩写名称） D) the page number on which the case begins（案例开始的页码数） E) the year the case was decided （案例判决年份） F) the name of the court deciding the case（案例判决法院）,9,卷宗号之中的缩略码,A.Atlantic Reporter 大西洋汇编 A.2d. Atlantic Reporter, 2nd Series大西洋汇编第二辑 Cal.Rep.California Reporter加利福尼亚州汇编 F.Federal Rep

12、orter联邦汇编 F.2d. Federal Reporter , 2nd Series联邦汇编第二辑 F.3d. Federal Reporter , 3rd Series联邦汇编第三辑 F. Supp. Federal Supplement联邦补充案例 L.Ed.U.S. U.S. Supreme Court Decisions, Lawyers Edition 美国最高法院案例汇编，律师版 L.Ed. 2d.U.S. U.S. Supreme Court Decisions, Lawyers Edition, 2nd Series美国最高法院案例汇编，律师版第二辑 N.E. North

13、eastern Reporter东北汇编 N.E.2d. Northeastern Repoter,2nd Series东北汇编第二辑,10,卷宗号之中的缩略码,N.W.Northwestern Reporter西北汇编 N.W.2dNorthwestern Reporter ,2nd Series西北汇编第二辑 N.Y.S.New York Supplement纽约补充案例 N.Y.S. 2dNew York Supplement , 2nd Series纽约补充案例第二辑 S.Ct. Supreme Court Reporter最高法院案例汇编 S.E. Southeastern Repo

14、rter东南汇编 S.E. 2d Southeastern Reporter ,2nd Series东南汇编第二辑 So. Southern Reporter南方汇编 So. 2d. Southern Reporter ,2nd Series南方汇编第二辑 S.W. Southwestern Reporter西南汇编 S.W. 2d. Southwestern Reporter ,2nd Series西南汇编第二辑 U.S.United States Reports美国案例汇编,11,案例的组成部分,4、Justice wrote the opinion(主审法官姓名) 5、Opinion(s

15、tating the issue raised, describing the parties and facts, discussing the relevant law, and rendering judgment判决书) 判决书是整个案例的主体部分，其中包括法律争议（Issue）、双方当事人情况、事实经过、判决采用的相关法律以及判决结果。 注意：在阅读判决书的过程中，要注意的几点有(1)时态方面：主审法官的意见用现在时态，前审法院的意见用过去时态。(2)主审法官的意见是法院意见。(3)除了法院外还有两种意见，它们被称为dissenting opinion or dissent(反对意见

16、是指opinion offered by a judge disagreeing with the majority panel of judges conclusion )和concurring opinion(配合意见是指opinion written by a judge agreeing with the majoritys conclusion but not its reasoning)。,12,The Structure of a Judicial Opinion,(1)Headnote (2)Caption (3)Citation (4)Author of Opinion (5

17、)Facts (6)Issues (7)Procedural History (8)Legal Reasoning (9)Holding/Decision (10)Concurrence/Dissent,13,Headnote,Headnote is a summary of the key legal points determined by a court, which appears just above each decision in the published reports of cases.,14,Caption,Caption is the title of the case

18、, which tells you who was involved in the case and reflects the last names of the two sides to the dispute. These two sides are often refered to as the parties or as the litigants. Eg: Smith v. Jones (Mr. Smith sues Mr. Jones),15,Citation,略,16,Author of opinion,The author of opinion is the name of t

19、he judge who wrote the opinion. The name tells you which judge wrote that particular opinion. In most cases, the opinion often simply states a last name followed by the initial “J”. “J” stands for “Judge” or “Justice”, depending on the court (eg: Holmes, J. is Judge Holmes or Justice Holmes). Some c

20、ourts call their judge “Chancellors”, so the initial will be a “C” instead of a “J”, some variations include “C.J.” for Chief Judge, “V.C.” for Vice Chancellor.,17,Facts,The facts of the case are probably the most important aspects of a legal case, because law is often fact sensitive. Facts can tell

21、 you the judges understanding of the case and what the judge though was an important aspect of the case that help the judge reach the decision,18,Issues,Issue is the matter of dispute in a legal controversy or lawsuit. The issue of a case is usually fairly easy to spot. Sometimes the judge writing t

22、he opinion will refer to the “issue presented”, “question presented” or “the factual issues” by the case. There is always at least one issue in a case. The issue of a case should always be phrased in the form of a question. An example of an issue would be: May a police officer enter a home to search

23、 when he hears someone yelling for help?,19,Procedural history,Most state systems and federal system have three different courts. The lowest court is the trial court. The intermediate courts are called the Court of Appeal. The procedural history usually consists of various hearings, trials, and proc

24、eedings that went on in the case before the court. State Trial Court Court of AppealState Supreme Court U.S. Supreme Court,20,Legal Reasoning,To understand the reasoning of an opinion, you should first identify the source of the law the judge applied. Some opinions interpret the Constitution, the fo

25、unding charter of the government. Other cases interpret “statutes,” which is a fancy name for written laws passed by legislative bodies such as Congress. After you have identified the source of law, you should next identify the method of reasoning that the court used to justify its decision. When a

26、case is governed by a statute, the court usually will simply follow what the statute says. The courts role is narrow in such settings because the legislature has settled the law. Similarly, when past courts have already answered similar questions before, a court may conclude that it is required to r

27、each a particular result because it is bound by the past precedents. This is an application of the judicial practice of stare decisis.,21,Holding/Decision,The holding is the core legal principle that the case represents. It is the conclusion that the case stands for, the courts resolution of the key

28、 legal dispute that it faced. It usually appears at the end of the main opinion, and tells you what action the court is taking with the case.,22,Concurrence/Dissent,When a group of judges get together to decide a case, they vote on which side should win and also try to agree on a legal rationale to explain w