综合护理干预在老年髋部骨折患者术后的应用效果

-精选财经经济类资料- -最新财经经济资料-感谢阅读- 1 综合护理干预在老年髋部骨折患者 术后的应用效果 摘要目的 探讨综合护理干预在 老年髋部骨折患者术后的应用效果。方 法 选取 2015 年 6 月2017 年 6 月我科 室收治的 90 例老年髋部骨折患者作为 研究对象，随机分为对照组和观察组， 每组各 45 例。对照组患者给予常规护 理，观察组患者施行综合护理干预。比 较两组患者护理干预前后自我效能 （GSES） 、焦 状态（SAS）的评分结 果以及并发症的发生情况。结果 两组 患者护理干预前的 SAS、 GSES 评分比 较，差异无统计学意义（P0.05） ；护 理干预后，观察组患者的 SAS 评分显 著低于对照组，GSES 评分明显高于对 -精选财经经济类资料- -最新财经经济资料-感谢阅读- 2 照组，差异有统计学意义（P 中国论文 网 /6/view-13017681.htm 关键词 老年髋部骨折患者；术 后焦虑状态；综合护理干预 中图分类号 R47 文献标识码 A 文章编号 1674-4721（2017） 12（b）-0186-03 AbstractObjective To explore the application effect of comprehensive nursing intervention in elderly patients with hip fracture.Methods 90 elderly patients with hip fracture treated in our department from June 2015 to June 2017 were selected as the research objects，and randomly divided into the control group and the observation group，45 cases in each group.The control group was treated with traditional nursing intervention，and the observation group was treated with comprehensive nursing intervention.The scores of self-efficacy （GSES ） ，anxiety state （SAS） and complications were -精选财经经济类资料- -最新财经经济资料-感谢阅读- 3 compared between the two groups before and after nursing intervention.Results There was no significant difference in SAS and GSES scores before nursing intervention between the two groups （P0.05）.After nursing intervention，the SAS score of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group，and the GSES score was significantly higher than that of the control group，the differences were statistically significant （P60 岁； 经过 CT 或 X 线检查确认为髋部骨折， 且需要手术治疗的患者。排除标准：认 知功能障碍；患有精神、神经类疾病的 患者。两组患者一般资料