论刑事诉讼法的再修改-----毕业设计

A1A1A1A2A0A3A4A5A6A7A8A9本科毕业论文（设计）论文（设计）题目论刑事诉讼法的再修改学院法学院专业法学班级学号学生姓名指导教师2008年5月31日A10A10A10A11A12A13A14A15A16A17A18A18A19目录摘要A20A20ABSTRACTA20A20引言1一、刑事诉讼法再修改的必要性1（一）是理念变化的需要21司法公正22人权保障观念2（二）是总结司法实践经验、完善司法体制改革的需要3（三）是与联合国刑事司法准则接轨的需要4二、刑事诉讼法再修改时需要注意的几个关系5（一）尊重宪法体制与推进刑事司法改革5（二）控制犯罪与保障人权6（三）司法公正与诉讼效率7（四）借鉴国外先进经验与立足本国国情8三、再次修改刑事诉讼法的若干建议10（一）完善刑事强制措施101完善拘传制度102取消监视居住103完善取保候审制度11（二）加强对辩护权利的保护121废除“如实回答”的义务122加强法G5471G6600G2173G712强化辩护人G3332G131312结G1678213G2454G13783G7003G1049814G14280G1688614A21A21A21A22A23A24A25A26A27A17A18A18A18A19摘要G6117国刑事诉讼制度G5062经G7389G1114G5468G3835进G8505G712G1306G7092G16782G3324G3534本G7512G7562G17836是G1867体G12255G5219G7053G19766G712G18129G7389改革G2656完善的必要G452G6164G1209G712G1038G17878G5224制度G6984合的需要G712G2528时G1075G1038G1114推G2172司法改革G712G17878G5224国G19481G12050G1262经G8994G10627G3671的G2469G4649G712G5224G16825对G10628G15904刑事诉讼法进G15904修改G727G17837G993G1177G1177是司法理念的变化G712G1075是总结司法实践经验、完善司法体制改革的需要G452G3324修改G17819G12255G1025G712G5224G5415正G11842G3800理G3921尊重宪法体制与推进刑事司法改革、控制犯罪与保障人权、司法公正与诉讼效率、借鉴国外先进经验与立足本国国情G1055G19400的关系G727修改的G3534本G1881G4493G2265G6336完善刑事强制措施与加强对辩护权利的保护G1016个G7053G19766G712G1186G7693本G990保障G3324诉讼G1025人的合法权利G712实G10628司法公正G2462G6564G20652诉讼效率G17837一司法制度G6164G17873G8726的G1016G3835G11458G7643G452G5088G7407G17902G17819G8504次修改G712G1363刑事诉讼法G11507正G14033G3827G6116G1038一G18108G12538合G10628G1207G8677G1039法G8847国G4490要G8726G712与国G19481刑事司法准则G11468G15912接、G12538合G1025国国情、G5430G5347完G3803的法G1868G452关键词刑事诉讼法再修改人权保障司法公正刑事强制措施A21A21A21A22A23A24A25A26A27A17A18A28A19ABSTRACTONTHESECONDREVISIONOFTHECODEOFCRIMINALPROCEDURECHINASCRIMINALSYSTEMHASBEENMADEGREATPROGRESSG712HOWEVER,BOTHTHEBASICFRAMEWORKANDSPECIFICPROCEDURESHAVETHENECESSARYTOREFORMINORDERTOMEETTHENEEDSOFSYSTEMINTEGRATIONANDTHEINTERNATIONALDEVELOPMENTOFSOCIOECONOMICENVIRONMENTANDPROMOTEJUDICIALREFORMATION,THECURRENTCRIMINALPROCEDURELAWSHOULDBEAMENDEDG727WESHOULDNOTONLYCHANGETHECONCEPTOFJUSTICE,BUTALSOSUMUPTHEPRACTICALEXPERIENCEINTHEPROCESSOFAMENDMENT,WESHOULDCORRECTLYHANDLETHERELATIONBETWEENCONSTITUTIONALSYSTEMANDCRIMINALJUSTICEREFORM,CRIMECONTROLANDPROTECTIONOFHUMANRIGHTS,JUSTICEANDEFFICIENCYOFTHEPROCEEDINGS,ADVANCEDFOREIGNEXPERIENCEANDOURNATIONALCONDITIONSTHETWOMAJOROBJECTOFAMENDMENTARETOPROTECTTHEHUMANRIGHTSINTHELEGALPROCEDUREANDREALIZETHEJUSTICEANDTHEEFFICIENCYOFTHECRIMIANALJUDICIALSYSTEMTHEBASICCONCEPTOFAMENDMENTINCLUDINGIMPROVINGCRIMINALCOERCIVEMEASURESANDSTRENGTHENINGTHEPROTECTIONOFTHERIGHTSOFTHEDEFENCETHROUGHTHEAMENDMENT,THECODEOFCRIMINALPROCEDUREISTOSATISFYTHENEEDOFMODERNDEMOCRATICONECOUNTRYRULEDBYLAW,ANDITISTOLINKUPTHESTANDARDSOFINTERNATIONALCRIMINALJUSTICE,ANDITHASACOMPREHENSIVEFORMWHICHINLINEWITHCHINASNATIONALCONDITIONSKEYWORDSG726TOAMENDMENTOFCRIMINALPROCEDURELAWG727THEPROTECTIONOFHUMANRIGHTSG727JUSTICEG727CRIMINALCOMPULSORYMEASURESA29A29A29A30A31A32A33A34A35A36A37A38引言G6117国G10628G15904的刑事诉讼法G20053G5079G11221G287G28G5192G712G33241G28G286G5192进G15904G1114一次G17751G3835的修改G712G5194G11221G28G287G51921G73881G7097正G5347实施G452刑诉法的G17837次修改G712是G6117国刑事诉讼制度的重G3835改革G2656G2469G4649G712进一G8505完善G1114G6117国刑事诉讼制度G712G3324G5415时的G2394G2502G7477G1226G991G712G8504次修改是G2325G2010G6116G2163的G452G9994G13792时G17819G3671G17813G712G2325一G5192G2530的G1182天G712随着G6117国的政G8847、经G8994、G12050G1262G5430势G2469生G1114深刻的变化G712人们法G5471意识的G993断G6564G20652、法G5471G7003化的进G8505,尤其是“国G4490尊重与保障人权”的入宪,显示出G1025国人权G2469G4649进入G1114一个重要里G12255碑G712G12050G1262G2469G4649对刑事诉讼G12255G5219的G8677G1039G1209G2462人权保障G6564出G1114更G20652要G8726G452G2528时,1G28G286G5192修改G2530的刑事诉讼法G3324实施G5415G1025G1075暴露出来G1114许多问题,如刑事诉讼法的实G19481运作、执G15904与立法G1055初的G11458G7643要G8726,与推G2172科学技术G2469G4649、促进G12050G1262G2656谐的要G8726,G17836存G3324一定差距G452G5468多问题迫切需要G17902G17819修改立法加G1209改革G2656完善G452G9994G13792G712刑事诉讼法毕竟是G1177次G1122宪法的“G3534本法G5471”G712况且G33241G28G286G5192G5062经G7389G17819G3835的修改G712施G15904短短G2325余G5192G712再进G15904修改是否合G17878如果要再次修改刑事诉讼法G712需要注意哪些问题G1039要修改哪些G1881G4493本G7003拟就G990述问题G712作一简析G452一、刑事诉讼法再修改的必要性关G1122刑事诉讼法的再修改G7389G7092必要学术界的意见是G7389G2010歧的G712G1039要的矛盾就G3324G1122G726法G5471的稳定性G2656“与时俱进”G452保持法G5471的G11468对稳定性是法G5471制定的G3534本原则G1055一G712G17837一结G16782是G6117国G10628G15904许多法理学著作的共识G4521尽管表述G993一G712G1306G18129一G14280强调G3324立法G1025保持法G5471的稳定性G712认G1038G17837是保持法G5471权威性的必要G7477G1226G712是G2394G2502经验的总结G452因G8504美国宪法G1016百G5192G3534本G993变G6116G1038法制佳话G452G1306G3324另一G7053G19766G712法G5471又要对世界格局的变化、G12050G1262的G2469G4649做出必要的回G5224G712否则G712调控手段与G2469生G1114变化的G12050G1262机制、G12050G1262价值等G11468脱节G712就G1262出G10628“G993合时宜”的问题G452G6117国的刑事诉讼法经G178191G28G286G5192的重G3835修改G712G1177G1177经G17819短短G2325余载G712又要进G15904G3835修G712是否显得G17819G1122轻率G712是G10628G3324便着手进G15904研究如何修改G712G17836是等G6117国法制的G3835G10627G3671G7389G17751G3835改观G1055G2530再做定夺G452笔者认G1038G712对刑诉法的再修改G5224持积极态度G712把G10628G3324G5062经G1867G3803修改G7477G1226的G3332G7053G712如G3324实G19481G5224用G5415G1025G17902G17819检验的、科学性G2656可操作性G17751强的司法解释编入法G1868G1025G712G6116G1038正G5347的法G7477生效G712增强其合法性G712对刑诉再修改建议稿G1025的问题G2656建议全G19766研讨G712争取修改G2530的立法尽快获得G17902G17819G452理由简述如G991G7261A39A40A41A42A43A44A45A46A47A48A49A50A51A52A53A46A54A55A56A57A531982A58A56A53A59254A60A61A62A62A62A63A47A64A65A51A66A67A68A69A70（一）是理念变化的需要1司法公正长G7411G1209来G712G3324G6117国的刑事司法实践G5415G1025G712一G11464存G3324着重实体轻G12255G5219的G19181G16835观念G712G1209G14280G1122G5585G11065G1114G12255G5219本G17535的G1881G3324价值G712G17837显G9994是G993可取的G452G13792与G1055G11468对G5224的则是时G991G8981G15904的G12255G5219本G1313G16782G712G7389人G1075G6564出“G12255G5219的合法性可G1209更G4581G9053G2462实G17148性正义G6122G3324G993G14033实G10628实G17148性正义的情况G991G10432立存G3324G452”G6117认G1038G17837G12193G16840法可G1209G15999G11487作是一G12193G11107G5585G712因G1038G5234G5515G3324G5468G1049G1209G2081就G7378G6363出G726G254法G5471G12255G5219G712是手段G13792G19762G11458的G712G4439必G20047G19480G4658G1122实体法G712作G1038G3324诉讼G1025实G10628实体法的手段G255A71A72A73可见G12255G5219的价值G20330先是G1038G1114实G10628实体价值G712G5194G993G14033G17241G17246实体G13792存G3324G452G10628G3324G7389G993G4581学者G1039G5364G12255G5219公正与实体公正G5194重G712笔者是G17202G2528G17837G12193观G9869的G712G2528时G1075认G1038G17837是G11468对G7380合理G1306G2376G3324实践G1025G5468G19602实G10628的G452G16840G7380合理是因G1038二者G2520G7389G10432G14270的G1881G9097G2656要G8726G712G17819G12255公正与结果公正G3355是G2528等重要G712G16021G2040的公正性与G1147生G17837一G16021G2040的G12255G5219的公正性G1867G7389一G12193G1881G3324的关联性G452A71A74A73G3845G2447公正G17819G12255的结果人们G19602G1209G6227认其公正性G712G13792G2494一G2631注重G12255G5219的公正G2376G1009G8639G993G3324意结果G712G18039G1052G17837G7691的G17819G12255又G7389G1172G1052实G19481G990的意义G712因G8504G4439们是G1126G11468联系又G1126G11468G10432立的G1016个G14551G11080G712二者G5194重G1075正是一G12193“G2172态的G5194重”G727G16840G19602G1209实G10628则是G3324G1122公正的G12255G5219G993一定G1262G1147生公正的结果G712一G7098G12255G5219公正与实体公正G2469生矛盾G2656G1926G12373G712便G5468G19602取G14305G712G17837G1075是对G8504观G9869G20059G7389G5506G16801的学者G17148G11109的G7693G9316G6164G3324G452G14279G1122G16825G5602G7691G2040断G712G3324G17837里G6117G5831引用G14533国著G2529学者G6152G13512G103G12871G2214的一G2489话G726“G3324G7389些情G5430G1025G712G12255G5219正义G2656结果正义是G1926G12373的G712G14279G1122G18039时G1262G1147生G1172G1052结果G712就是一个G2040断问题G452G5194G8821G7389G1172G1052理由G19762得G3324G1016G12193公G5191G1055G19400制G17908出G4408注一G6539的G17885G6333G452”2人权保障观念随着人G12879G12050G1262G7003G7138的G2469G4649G712G5415G1182世界G712人权G5062G6116G1038G2520国G2656国G19481G12050G1262G3800理政G8847、经G8994、法G5471等事务时G5132G5132G1260先G1116G1209G13783G15397的问题G452可长G7411G1209来G712G6117国刑事司法机关G17819G2010关注如何G20652效率的G6183G1999G2656控制犯罪G712G1186G13792G17908G6116G1114G5415事人的人权问题G7092法得G2052保障G452就人权保障制度G13792言G712法国的人权G4471言、美国的权利法G7708、G1209G2462联合国世界人权G4471言、公G8677权利G2656政G8847权利国G19481公G13434等G18129G17227G2052G1114G1868G14551作用G712G11468对G1122G6117国刑事诉讼法的G1881G4493与G17837些国G4490法G5471G6122国G19481G7003G1226G3324人权保障G7053G19766的共性进G15904对G10043G712差距G17836G86161A75A76A77A78A77A79A80A81A82A83A84A85A86A87A88A89A90A91A92A93A94A95A96A97A98A99A100A101A102A103A78A104A105A106A77A84A89A107A108A109A110A111A112A113A113A114A78A115A782A116A117A118A119A78A120A121A122A123A98A124A85A86A87A88A89A125A126A90A91A92A101A127A103A128A129A81A130A131A132A132A133A134A112A113A113A115A134A112A135A136A137A137A138A139A139A139A131A132A140A141A99A142A143A144A145A145A146G17751G7138显G452A71A72A73如G7092罪推定、G993得G15999迫G14270G16789其罪、一事G993再理等G3324G6117国刑事诉讼法G1025G18129G8821G7389G11842立G452G5062经G16280定G3324宪法G2656刑事诉讼法G1025的“权利”又G3324G1867体实施G17819G12255G1025G15999G6183G1114“G6252G6199”G712如G1231意G7609G4565、G6199G6288公G8677G12181G7389G17142G1147G712G1209G17873G17175G2529义G1231意G3800G13634、G8821G6922合法G17142G1147G712辩护G5471G5084G3534本权利得G993G2052保障G712公G8677权利G2475G2052G1417犯时G19602G1209G17902G17819G12255G5219G1881的手段得G2052G2462时、G7389效的G6949G8994G712尤其是刑G16771G17936G1391G3324一定G14551G3272G1881存G3324G712与G10628G1207G7003G7138更是显得格格G993入G712G7389G17841G6117G1838“G1209人G1038本”的执政理念G712G4493G7143G2172摇人G8677群众对法G5471权威G2462司法公正的信心G452因G8504G712进一G8505修改刑事诉讼法G712对健全人权保障制度G712实G10628刑事诉讼制度G8677G1039化、G12255G5219法G5471化G712G18129G1867G7389G2325G2010重要的G10628实意义G452陈光G1025先生G1039编的刑事诉讼法再修改专G4490建议稿G1025将刑事诉讼法的立法宗旨由“惩罚犯罪G712保护人G8677”修改G1038“惩罚犯罪G712保障人权”G712G17837G16840G7138G1114刑事诉讼法G993G1177G1177保护“人G8677”,（人G8677是一个政G8847G14551G11080G712是与敌人G11468对立的一个概念G712G3324外延G990G993G2265G6336严重的刑事犯罪G2010子G452G13792犯罪嫌G11109人、G15999告人G7389一G18108G2010G1075可G14033G993G4658G1122人G8677的G14551G3272G452）A71A74A73G2494要是“人”,G2265G6336犯罪嫌G11109人、G15999告人G2656罪犯,G18129G5224G5415享G7389人权G712因G1038人权是G3534G1122人格G13792G14270G9994存G3324的,G5194G19762是G3534G1122G17535份赋G1116的G452G17837G1075是秉G6227“国G4490尊重G2656保障人权”的意旨,G2528时按G10043国G19481组织G11842立的共G2528的“G7380低G7643准的刑事司法准则”对G6117国刑事诉讼G1025人权保障制度进G15904的修改G452（二）是总结司法实践经验、完善司法体制改革的需要虽G99941G28G286G5192修改刑事诉讼法取得G1114G17751G3835的G6116果G712G1306G7092G16782是司法实践G2656G1209G2469G4649的眼光G11487其G1025仍存G3324许多问题G452G20330先G712G12255G5219G990存G3324许多G11107漏G712G12373出表G10628G3324刑G16771G17936G1391G2656变G11468刑G16771G17936G1391普遍存G3324、一审G1025G28G28G1209G990的G16789人G993出庭作G16789、G14270诉G7708G1226G2475理困G19602、G17241G7411羁G6288问题严重、申请再审G19602G712启G2172再审更是G19602G990加G19602G712等等G452其次G712诉讼模G5347G990G993统一G712“控辩G5347”庭审G7053G5347与“纠问G5347”侦G7609G12255G5219G1055G19400存G3324G1926G12373G712即一G7053G19766要G8726G3324法庭审理阶段由控辩双G7053举G16789、辩G16782G712G5088G7407G17902G17819控辩对抗的G7053G5347揭示G7708G1226的事实G11507G11468G712G13792另一G7053G5194G8821G7389G1038辩G7053G6564G1391充G2010G15904G1363辩护权G6164必要的G12255G5219保障G712因G13792G712G993G14033保G16789控辩双G7053的G5191等对抗G452A71A147A73再次G712对法G1868G1025G16280定G993G3827G7138G11842的G3332G7053G712与刑事司法G7389关的国G4490机关G18129制定G1114本系统执G15904刑诉法的“解释”G6122“G16280定”G712G17837些法G5471解释G6122G16280定又G15999异化G1038一G12193权力G712进G13792G17908G6116G1114法G5471G17878用的混乱G712严重干扰G1114司法G10432立、背离G12255G5219法定原则G452刑事诉讼活G2172关系G2052犯罪控制G2656G12050G1262稳定G712G1075关系G2052公G8677的G3534本权利保障G712G1038人A148A149A150A151A152A153A154A155A156A157A158A159A160A161A162A163A164A165A166A167A168A169A170A171A172A173A174A175A176A177A177A178A175A179A180A181A176A182A148A183A150A184A185A186A187A188A189A190A191A192A173A193A194A195A196A197A198A199A200A168A169A170A201A202A175A176A177A177A178A175A180A148A203A150A204A205A206A187A207A188A208A189A190A191A192A173A209A196A193A194A195A168A169A170A210A172A173A174A175A176A177A177A211A175A176A212A213A214A215A216A216A216A217A174A218A219A188A220A221A222A223A223A223A224G8677群众密切关注G452换言G1055G712刑事诉讼法就是刑事司法实践G2656人G8677群众生活需要的反映G452正如G5515国著G2529法学G4490拉G5515G5079鲁赫G6164言G726“如果将法G5471理解G1038G12050G1262生活的G5430G5347G712G18039G1052作G1038G254G5430G5347的法G5471G255的G12255G5219法G712则是G17837G12193G5430G5347的G5430G5347G712G4439如G2528桅杆的顶尖G712对船G17535G7380轻G5506的运G2172G1075G1262作出强烈的摆G2172G452”1因G8504G712G2494G7389G3324总结司法实践经验G2656解决人G8677群众的实G19481需要的G3534础G990再次修改刑事诉讼法G712实事G8726是的解决司法G17878用G1025存G3324的问题G712G1363G993G2528的刑事诉讼制度G2656G12255G5219G1055G19400保持协调一G14280G712G1363得G3534本法G5471、G15904政G2462司法解释、G18108门G16280章等G1039次G2010G7138G712G5430G6116科学合理的体系G712G1363刑事诉讼法G3324G1182G2530得G1209顺利、统一的实施G712G7380终完善司法体制G452（三）是与联合国刑事司法准则接轨的需要联合国刑事司法准则是一个G1025国化的术语G712G4439是G6363由联合国G17902G17819的G7003书G6164G11842认的G3324刑事司法G1025G5224G5415遵循G6122尽可G14033遵循的准则G452A225A226A227其G1881G4493G6164G9053G2462G2052的G7389关联合国刑事司法准则的国G19481公G13434G1039要G7389G1016G3835G12879G726一G12879是保障司法公正G712G13512护人权G712如公G8677权利G2656政G8847权利国G19481公G13434、禁止酷刑G2656其他残忍、G993人道G6122G7389辱人格的待遇G6122G3800罚公G13434G712等等G727另一G12879则是如何G14033G15904G1055G7389效的控制犯罪G712如联合国反腐败公G13434G712等G452G17837些国G19481公G13434经G17819联合国G2520G6116员国的共G2528努力G712G4658G1122国G19481G12050G1262公认的“G3534本G7643准”G712对G1122世界G2520国G7389放G1055四海G13792皆准的号召力G2656实用性G452“G7477G13434必G20047信守”是一项古老的国G19481法原则G712加G1055G6117国既是联合国的创始国G1055一G712G2528时G1075是G10628G1231的安理G1262G5132G1231理事国G712对G1122G5062经批准G2656加入的国G19481公G13434的遵守G2656G13512护更是责G7092旁贷G452G14270G6117国加入WTOG1209G2530G712国G19481交往与国G19481合作的领域空G2081扩G4649G712G17837就要G8726司法体制必G20047G2528世界接轨G452就保障司法公正、G13512护人权的国G19481公G13434G13792言G712亟待解决的是G6117国政G5232G11221G28G288G519210G73885G7097G12626G13638的公G8677权利G2656政G8847权利国G19481公G13434何时G14033生效的问题G452全世界G5062经G7389140多个国G4490加入G1114G16825公G13434,其G1025许多国G4490的G12050G1262G2469G4649G12255度G8616G6117国G14865G2530,G17837意G2631着公G8677权利G2656政G8847权利国G19481公G13434G16280定的公G8677权利是一个世界G17902G15904的、G17751低G8712G5191的G7643准G712G1075是G11458G2081国G19481人权法G1025G7380全G19766G1867体且G7380G1867普遍性的法G5471G7003G1226G452其G1025G16280定G1114公正审G2040的国G19481G7643准G712如诉讼G1025的人权保障、G7092罪推定原则、审G2040G10432立、G16822问G993利G16789人G5194G1363G7389利G16789人出庭、一事G993再理原则、反对强迫G14270G16789其罪原则等等G452G11458G2081G712G6117国G10628G15904刑事诉讼法的G16280定与G8504公G13434G3324一些问题G990G17836存G3324着G11468G5415的差距G452如关G1122G7092罪推定的A228A229A230A231A232A233A234A235A236A234A237A238A239A240A241A242A243A244A245A246A233A247A235A248A249A250A251A252A253A254A255A33A0A1A81A2A2A3A27A0A248A28A81A4A5A29A30A228A6A230A124A7A8A126A127A9A15A129A10A250A11A12A13A242A14A16A17A249A250A11A12A18A19A242A20A21A22A23A233A53A235A35A24A25A26A248A4A5A5A3A248A81A81A31A31A31A251A243A32A34A245A36A37A38A39A40问题G712G6117国G10628G15904刑诉法G1868G1025虽G2559G7389G7092罪推定的G12946G12082G712G1306G3324G1867体执G15904G990G2376G3534本G7422G14033体G10628G452又如一事G993再理原则G712G10628G15904刑事诉讼法对G8504G8821G7389G16280定G712G17837项原则作G1038一项G3534本人权的普遍意义G8821G7389G14033G3827G5468G3921的体G10628G452因G8504G712刑事诉讼法立法修改时G5224G5415G2454G10043国G19481G17902G15904刑事司法准则G1025的G11468关G1881G4493G712对G6117国的刑事诉讼制度G2656G12255G5219作进一G8505完善G712促进G6117国刑事诉讼G12255G5219与国G19481G17902G15904准则接轨G452G5415G9994G712G1186G4665G15904国G19481法义务的G16294度来G11487G712再次修改刑事诉讼法G1075是一G12193必G9994的G17885G6333G452二、刑事诉讼法再修改时需要注意的几个关系（一）尊重宪法体制与推进刑事司法改革宪法是国G4490的G7693本G3835法G712G1867G7389G7380G20652的法G5471效力G712作G1038一国G8847国安G18042的总章G12255G712G1075是其他普G17902法G5471制定的G3534础G2656G1393G6466G712G4439的G2469G4649G2394G12255对其他普G17902法G5471的G2469G4649G2462完善G18129G17227着举足轻重的G6363G4560意义G712尤其是刑事诉讼法G452A41A42A43G13792刑事诉讼法作G1038宪法的子法、G17878用法,二者G1055G19400是G990G1313法与G991G1313法的关系G712G6164G1209刑事诉讼法的实施G1075必G9994是建立G3324G10628G15904宪法体制的G3534础G1055G990G452因G8504尊重宪法体制G7092G11109是刑事诉讼法修改G6164必G20047遵守的G2081G6564G452G9994G13792G1186G2394G2502G990G11487G712刑事诉讼法的重G3835修改往往又G18129是G1209宪法制度的重G3835变革G1038G2081G6564的G712如2001G5192G1432G13611G7043刑事诉讼法的修改就是G5468G3921的G16789G7138G452G10628G3324学术界G7389G17837G7691一G12193G11487法G712认G1038G6117国G10628G15904的宪法体制存G3324着制度G990的重G3835G13582G19531G712如果一G2631G3374持遵G10043宪法的G16280定G712G18039G1052势必G1262G19471G11873刑事司法改革的进G12255G712要推G2172G5415G2081刑事司法改革就必G20047G6183G11784宪法的G7475G13550G452因G8504G712如何G3800理G3921尊重宪法体制与推进刑事司法改革G1055G19400的关系便G6116G1038再修改刑事诉讼法必G20047G20330先正视的问题G452A41A44A43G5224G5415G11487G2052G712G6117国G10628G15904宪法G3324国G4490权力的G2010G18209G1209G2462G3534本人权的保障G7053G19766G18129存G3324G7138显的G993足G712G4439既G7422G14033G3961善G3332解决司法G10432立的问题G712G1075G8821G7389充G2010G13955定人G8677G11468对G1122政G5232的正G5415权利G452G17837些G993足对刑事G12255G5219的体制性G13582G19531G17227G1114决定性的作用G452G1306G17837是否可G1209作G1038否定宪法权威的G1393G6466G2614G5415G9994G993G15904G701如果G1038G1114修改刑事诉讼法G13792公G9994G17841背G10628G15904的宪法体制,否定其作G1038G7693本法的G13489对权威性G712G18039G1052国G4490的法G5471体制G1075便再G7092稳定性可言G712G17837G7092G11109是本G7423G1510G13634G452由G8504G11487来G712对宪法的尊重G5224G5415是本着G9801活的原则,G993G14033将尊重宪法体制机G7812化G3332理解G1038G1177对宪法G7477G7003的遵守,拘G8889G1122宪法的G7003G4395表述G13792G13634宪法G12946G12082G1122G993G20050G712G3324G993与宪法总的G12946G12082G11468G17841背的G2081G6564G991G712对G7588些问题可G1209G3324G10628G15904宪法G16280定的A228A229A230A136A45A46A47A28A48A49A22A50A17A11A12A18A19A242A21A22A23A233A53A235A142A51A51A52A243A54A243A55A248A4A5A5A61A248A4A81A80A61A82A56A110A57A145A110A58A228A6A230A83A59A60A47A11A12A18A19A242A21A22A62A63A64A249A65A66A67A68A20A69A70A71A72A233A53A235A73A74A75A76A77A78A78A79A76A84A85A85A85A86A74A87A88A89A90A91A92A93G3534础G990作一些G6311G4649性的改革G712G17837G3324G7588G12193意义G990G16774G1075是G2469G4649G1114宪法G452加G1055保障人权的G7477G8466G5062经入宪,G17837就G1038G3324刑事诉讼法G1025增加人权保障的G1881G4493G6564G1391G1114充G2010的宪政G3534础G452G8616如G712宪法G1177G16280定G1114“G15999告人G7389权获得辩护”G712G13792G8821G7389对犯罪嫌G11109人作出G11468G5224的G16280定G712G1306是G712G1186保障人权的G12946G12082来G11487G712G1038G1114保G16789审G2081G12255G5219犯罪嫌G11109人的辩护权G712G3324刑事诉讼法再修改时G11842立犯罪嫌G11109人、G15999告人G3355G7389权获得辩护G712G5194G3324G1867体制度G990G1116G1209保障G712是G2325G2010可G15904G1075是G11468G5415必要的G452A94A95A96G12879G1296如G8504的G6311G4649G712既G8821G7389G17841反宪法的G16280定G712又G1363G3534本的人权得G1209G7389效的保障G712何G1060G13792G993G1038G452（二）控制犯罪与保障人权G1186G7693本G990G16774G712法G5224G5415G1209人G1038本G712即G1209人权G1038本G1313G452G1867体G2052刑事诉讼法G5415G1025G712G5224G5415把控制犯罪G2656保障人权作G1038其要实G10628的G3534本G11458G7643G712G1016者G3324诉讼体制G1025G13582一G993可A97如果一G2631G17873G8726犯罪控制的G11458G7643G712G2494G1262G1363人权保障G8826G1038空G16860G727G13792G17819G2010强调对人权的保障G7092G11109又G1262G2078G5381刑罚权的威G5925力G712G17908G6116G9520G3324的G19556G5751存G3324G1122G12050G1262G1055G1025G712反G13792G1262G7389G17841立法初G15947G452G13449观G5415G2081世界G712G2520国刑事司法G16786G16757者G7092G993G18129G3324刑事诉讼法G1025G4559G8726控制犯罪与保障人权G1055G19400的G5191G15925G452如G1432G13611G7043就G3324其G7044刑事诉讼法G1868G1025G7138G11842G16280定G1114G17873究犯罪与保护人权G5194重的G11458的G712G1432G13611G7043联G18042刑事诉讼法G1868G12544G1857G7477G16280定G726“1、刑事诉讼G