版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
1、SECTION A MINI-LECTUREModels for ArgumentsThree models for argumentsl the first model for arguing is called (1) _; arguments are treated as war there is much winning and losing it is a (2) _ model for arguingl the second model for arguing is arguments as proofs: (3) warranted _ valid inferences and
2、conclusions no (4) _ in the adversarial sensel the third model for arguing is (5) _: the audience is (6) _ in the arguments arguments must (7) _ the audienceTraits of the argument as warl very dominant: it can shape (8) _l strong arguments are neededl negative effects include: (9) _ are emphasized w
3、inning is the only purpose this type of arguments prevent (10) _ the worst thing is (11) _l implication from arguments as war: (12) _ e.g., one providing reasons and the other raising (13) _ the other one is finally persuadedSuggestions on new ways to (14) _ of argumentsl think of new kinds of argum
4、entsl change roles in argumentsl (15) _SECTION B INTERVIEWNow, listen to the Part One of the interview. Questions 1 to 5 are based on Part One of the interview.1. What is the topic of the interview?A. Maggies university life.B. Her moms life at Harvard.C. Maggies view on studying with Mom.D. Maggies
5、 opinion on her moms major.2. Which of the following indicates that they have the same study schedule?A. They take exams in the same weeks.B. They have similar lecture notes.C. They apply for the same internship.D. They follow the same fashion.3. What do the mother and the daughter have in common as
6、 students?A. Having roommates.B. Practicing court trails.C. Studying together.D. Taking notes by hand.4. What is the biggest advantage of studying with Mom?A. Protection.B. Imagination.C. Excitement.D. Encouragement.5. What is the biggest disadvantage of studying with Mom?A. Thinking of ways to comf
7、ort Mom.B. Occasional interference from Mom.C. Ultimately calls when Maggie is busy.D. Frequent check on Maggies grades.Now, listen to the Part Two of the interview. Questions 6 to 10 are based on Part Two of the interview.6. Why is parent and kid studying together a common case?A. Because parents n
8、eed to be ready for new jobs.B. Because parents love to return to college.C. Because kids require their parents to do so.D. Because kids find it hard to adapt to college life.7. What would Maggies mom like to be after college?A. Real estate agent.B. Financier.C. Lawyer.D. Teacher.8. How does Maggies
9、 mom feel about sitting in class after 30 years?A. Delighted.B. Excited.C. Bored.D. Frustrated.9. What is most challenging for Maggies mom?A. How to make a cake.B. How to make omelets.C. To accept what is taught.D. To plan a future career.10. How does Maggie describe the process of thinking out ones
10、 career path?A. Unsuccessful.B. Gradual.C. Frustrating.D. Passionate.Keys:第 10 页1. the dialectical model2. common and fixed3. premises4. opposition / arguing5. arguments as performances / the rhetorical model6. participatory / participating / the participant / taking part7. be tailored to / cater fo
11、r8. how we argue / our actual conduct9. tactics / strategies10. negotiation and collaboration11. theres no solution / progress12. learning with losing13. questions / counter-considerations / counter-arguments / objections / arguments in opposition14. achieve positive effects15. support oneself / you
12、rselfC A D D BA C D C BScript: Good morning, everyone. My name is David and I am good at arguing. So welcome to our introductory lecture on argumentation. Why do we want to argue? Why do we try to convince other people to believe things that they dont want to believe? And is that even a nice thing t
13、o do? Is that a nice way to treat other human being, try and make them think something they dont want to think? Well, my answer is going to make reference to three models for arguments. (1) The first model lets call this the dialectical model is that we think of arguments as war. And you know what t
14、hats like. There is a lot of screaming and shouting and winning and losing. (2) And thats not really a very helpful model arguing, but its a pretty common and fixed one. I guess you must have seen that type of arguing many times in the street, on the bus or in the subway.Lets move on to the second m
15、odel. The second model for arguing regards arguments as proofs. Think of a mathematicians argument. Heres my argument. Does it work? Is it any good? (3) Are the premises(前提) warranted? Are the inferences(推论)) valid? Does the conclusion follow the premises? (4) No opposition, no adversariality(对抗) no
16、t necessarily any arguing in the adversarial sense.(5) And theres a third model to keep in mind that I think is going to be very helpful, and that is arguments as performances, arguments as being in front of an audience. We can think of a politician trying to present a position, trying to convince t
17、he audience of something.But theres another twist(转折) on this model that I really think is important; namely, that when we argue before an audience, (6) sometimes the audience has a more participatory role in the argument; that is, you present you arguments in front of an audience who are like jurie
18、s(陪审团) that make a judgment and decide the case. (5) Lets call this model the rhetorical model, (7) where you have to tailor(迎合) your argument to the audience at hand.Of those three, the argument as war is the dominant one. It dominates how we talk about arguments, it dominates how we think about ar
19、guments, and because of that, (8) it shapes how we argue, our actual right on target. We want to have our defenses up and our strategies all in order. We want killer arguments. Thats the kind of argument we want. It is the dominant way of thinking about arguments. When Im talking about arguments, th
20、ats probably what you thought of, the adversarial model.But the war metaphor, the war paradigm(范例) or model for thinking about arguments, has, I think, negative effects on how we argue. (9) First, it elevates tactics over substance. You can take a class in logic argumentation. You learn all about th
21、e strategies that people use to try and win arguments and that makes arguing adversarial; its polarizing(分化的). And the only foreseeable outcomes are triumph glorious triumph or disgraceful(可耻的) defeat. I think those are very destructive effects, and worst of all, (10) it seems to prevent things like
22、 negotiation and collaboration(合作). Um, I think the argument-as-war metaphor inhibits(阻止) those other kinds of resolutions to argumentation.(11) And finally this is really the worst thing arguments dont seem to get us anywhere; theyre dead ends(死胡同). We dont anywhere. Oh, and one more thing. (12) Th
23、at is, if argument is war, then theres also an implicit(绝对的) aspect of meaning learning with losing.And let me explain what I mean. Suppose you and I have an argument. You believe a proposition(命题) and I dont. And I say, “Well, why do you believe that?” And you give me your reasons. And I object and
24、 say, “Well, what about?” And I have a question: “Well, what do you mean? How does it apply over here?” And you answer my question. Now, suppose at the end of the day, Ive objected, Ive questioned, (13) Ive raised all sorts of questions from an opposite perspective and in every case youve responded
25、to my satisfaction. And so at the end of the day, I say, “You know what? I guess youre right.” Maybe finally I lost my argument. But isnt it also a process of learning? So you see arguments may also have positive effects.(14) So, how can we find new ways to achieve those positive effects? We need to
26、 think of new kinds of arguments. Here I have some suggestion. If we want to think of new kinds of argument, what we need to do is think of new kinds of arguers people who argue.So try this: Think of all the roles that people play in arguments. (1) (5) Theres the proponent and the opponent in an adv
27、ersarial, dialectical argument(对话式论证). Theres the audience in rhetorical arguments. Theres the reasoner in arguments as proofs. All these different roles. Now, can you imagine an argument in which you are the arguer, but youre also in the audience, watching yourself argue? Can you imagine yourself watching yourself argue? (15) That means you need to be supported by yourself. Even when you lose the argument,
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 工程力学:第五章 材料的力学性能
- 分析化学:1.5 课程的基本任务和要求
- 【课件】电源和电流+课件高一下学期物理人教版(2019)必修第三册
- 市政工程促进城市环保局
- 市政改善城市环保紧迫
- 2024年生化化工药品技能考试-橡胶硫化工笔试参考题库含答案
- 2024年特种设备作业人员技能考试-金属焊接操作笔试参考题库含答案
- 2024年火电电力职业技能鉴定考试-电厂燃料运行工笔试参考题库含答案
- 2024年湖北住院医师-湖北住院医师神经外科笔试参考题库含答案
- 2024春江苏开放大学教育研究方法形成性作业1-3
- 湖北省武汉市2022-2023学年五年级下学期语文期中试卷(含答案)
- 2024-2029年中国空气质量自动监测系统行业市场现状分析及竞争格局与投资发展研究报告
- 2024-2030年中国数控机床行业市场全景评估及发展趋势研究预测报告
- 肺结节中医知识讲座
- 齐齐哈尔市碾子山区事业单位招聘笔试真题2023
- 癫痫治疗进展
- 红旗LINUX案例教程第1章
- 征兵体检相关知识考核试题及答案
- 2024年江西省电力交易员竞赛选拔考试题库(含答案)
- 港珠澳大桥项目案例课件
- 控制高血压预防脑卒中
评论
0/150
提交评论