公司绩效与高阶管理者离职之研究.txt

5% warner et al.(1988)weisbach(1988)denis et al.(1997)dahya(1998)1jensen and murphy(1990)87棬758689为8587logistic model- 岿顣 e 棬 warner watts r. lease and c. smith (1988), “ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments.“ journal of financial economics, 20, pp.267-291. cordtz, d. (1993), “corporate hangmen.“ financial world, 162, pp.24-28. dahya, j.; a. a. lonie and d. m. power (1998), “ownership structure, firm performance and top executive change an analysis of uk firms.“ journal of business finance d. k. denis and a. sarin (1997), “ownership structure and top executive turnover.“ journal of financial economics, 45, pp.193-221. fama, e. f. (1980), “agency problems and the theory of the firm.“ journal of political economy, 88, pp.288-307. gilson, s. c. (1990), “bankruptcy, boards, banks, and blockholdersevidence on changes in corporate ownership and control when firms default.“ journal of financial economics, pp.355-387. gibbons, r. and k. murphy (1990), “relative performance evaluation and chief executives officers.“ industrial and labor relatives, 43, pp.30-51. janakiraman, s. n.; r. a. lambert and d. f. larcker (1992), “an empirical investigation of the relative performance evaluation hypothesis. “ journal of accounting research, 30, pp.53-69. jensen, m. c. and k. j. murphy (1990), “performance pay and top-management incentives.“ journal of political economy, 98, pp.225-255. kang j. and a. shivdasani, (1995), “firm performance, corporate governance, and top executive turnover in japan.“ journal of financial economics, 38, pp.29-58. kaplan, s. (1994), “top executives, turnover, and firm performance: a comparison of germany, japan and the u.s.“, journal of political economy, 102, pp.510-546. kesner, i. f. and d. r. dalton (1987), “composition and ceo duality in boards of directorsan international perspective.“ journal of international business studies, 18, pp.33-42. mcconnell, j. and h. servaes (1990), “additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value.“ journal of financial economics, pp.595-613. morck, r.; a. shleifer and r. vishny (1989), “alternative mechanisms for corporate control.“ american economic review, pp.842-852. ou, j. a. and s. h. penman (1989), “financial statement analysis and the prediction of stock returns.“ journal of accounting and economics,11, pp. 295-329. pound, j. (1988), “ proxy contests and efficiency of shareholder oversight.“ journal of financial economics, 20, pp.237-266. puffer, s. and j. b. weintrop (1991), “corporate performance and ceo turnover: the role of performance expectations.“ administrative science quarterly, 36, pp.1-19. rappaport, a. (1986), “creating shareholders value: the new standard for business performance.“ new york, free press. rechner, p. l. (1989), “corporate governancefact or fiction“ business horizons, 4, pp.11-15. shleifer, a. and r. vishny (1986), “large shareholders and corporate control.“ journal of political economy, pp.461-488. venkatraman, n. and v. ramanujam (1986), “measurement of business performance in strategy research: a comparison of approaches.“ the academy of management review, pp.801-815. wallace, w. (1992), “methodological implication of corporate governance mechanism-the board of directors.“ working paper, college of william and mary. waner, j.; r. watts and k.wruck (1988), “stock price and top management changes.“ journal of financial economics, pp.461-492. watts, r. l. and j. l. zimmerman, (1986), positive accounting theory, new jersey, prentice-hall. weisbach, m. s. (1988), “outsider directors and ceo turnov