翻译中文化因素异化与归化之原则探析.txt

20013(8) 黯 :黯, ,黯 黯İ :;黯 :h059:a:1009-2536(2001)03-0094-04 黯 , , , ;, 黯 , , , , , 黯, , , 黯, 黯 , , , (漰 );( ), , 硱, , , 黯, 1. , : , ,: , 桢塣(newmark: 1982:113), : 1:if the public officials of higher authorities resort to bribery, those of lower authorities will fol- low. this is calledfish begins to stink at the head. 1:, 2:, 2:a: id rather be a headmaster in a distant uncomfortable town than be a teacher in a nice town. b: youd rather reign in hell than serve in heaven, i suppose. 1:a:, b:, 942:a:, b:, 12,: 2黯, , 黯, 1, , ,塣 , 档, 3:this man is a black sheep of the family. 1: 2: 4:many canadians never read a newspaper though some newspapers are free, because they dont know their abc. 1:, ,abc 2:, , 34,2 1 , 黯 2. ,塣 ,塢 塢塢塢塢 (:133)弴, 塣, , 塣,漰 , 黯, ,黯; ,: 5:john can be relied on. he eats no fish and plays the game. 1:, 2:, 1, , 涨 (), , , 塣 2黯, 塣 6:ignore it as you ignore the cold of last win- ter. (i. b. singer: gimpel the fool) 1:, 2:? the cold of last winter 顱顱 硱, , 黯,硱 , 7:among the blind the one-eyed man is king. 1:, 2:, 8:go to law for a sheep, you lose a cow. 1:, 2:, ,黯 , 3. 庬, 塣,岻 , ,塢(: 9574), 塢, , 塣 , : ,:thank you. :its my duty to do so., , , ,its my duty to do so., ,its my plea- sure. : ?: have you eaten yet?;where are you going? , , , , 硰hello!good morning! :岻 , ,塣 , :仰 he suffers from branchitis., ,:so what? why are you laughing so hard when he is suffering from branchi- tis?, , :he is an obedient husband. he is a hen pecked man 4. bassnett :language, then, is the heart within the body of culture. . in the same way that the surgeon, operating on the heart, cannot neglect the body that surrounds it, so the translator treats the text in isolation from the culture at his peril.(bass- nett: 1991)(, , , ,), , ,: İ , , , , , , 黯, , 黯 , İjoan haste, 黯, , , , , , , ,淶 İ , (67) 96 , , , , , , , , ,;, ;30, ;, ,sidneysydney,rudolf rudolph, , , elizabeth20, ,() ,硰 james earl carter jimmy , , ()e (e ) , (washington, franklin,lincoln,nelson) ( )(goodyear,wordsworth) (,agnessenga) , , , white, leslie a. 1971.the science of culture-a study of man and civilization. toronto:donbleday. ,1998,: ,2000,:硣 ,2000,:硣 ,1994,: 硣 (:) (:) (96) , İ黯 , , 黯, bassnett, susan. 1991.translation studies (revised edition) m. london and new york:routledge. newmark, peter. 1982.approach to translationm. perg- amon press. ,1989m: 硣 ,2000 j(3) ,1988m:硣 ,1998j (5) ,1988m:硣 (:) (:) 67analysis of ambiguous sentences in english, by wang shaobinp46. ambiguity is rather common in languages. ambiguous sentences are not an unusual phenomenon in eng- lish. by sampling, this paper deals with the two major factors causing ambiguities, namely, lexical ambiguity and syntactic ambiguity. it is believed that disambiguation may well be attainable in various ways. a review on intertextuality, by zhang xinjunp75. intertextuality is a catchword in contemporary literary theories. in his intertextuality, graham allen traces the origin and evolution of the termintertextuality, and touches upon www. centering on the con- cept, the book makes a plain introduction to profound literary theories. dialogue between realism and modernism, by li xinyuan re- placing with standard chinese method; the comprehensive method. the author points out the vital importance of the extent to which non-standard utterances should be rendered and presents three general principles, i.e., functional equivalence comes first; resemblance in form second; the third, acceptability. finally, the author suggests two ways to im