Fundamentals of Financial Management-CHAPTER 11 The Basics of Capital Budgeting.ppt

,should we build this plant?,chapter 11 the basics of capital budgeting,what is capital budgeting?,analysis of potential additions to fixed assets. long-term decisions; involve large expenditures. very important to firms future.,steps,1. estimate cfs (inflows & outflows). 2. assess riskiness of cfs. 3. determine k = wacc (adj.). 4. find npv and/or irr. 5. accept if npv 0 and/or irr wacc.,what is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive projects?,projects are: independent, if the cash flows of one are unaffected by the acceptance of the other. mutually exclusive, if the cash flows of one can be adversely impacted by the acceptance of the other.,an example of mutually exclusive projects,bridge vs. boat to get products across a river.,normal cash flow project:,cost (negative cf) followed by a series of positive cash inflows. one change of signs.,nonnormal cash flow project:,two or more changes of signs. most common: cost (negative cf), then string of positive cfs, then cost to close project. nuclear power plant, strip mine.,inflow (+) or outflow (-) in year,0,1,2,3,4,5,n,nn,-,+,+,+,+,+,n,-,+,+,+,+,-,nn,-,-,-,+,+,+,n,+,+,+,-,-,-,n,-,+,+,-,+,-,nn,what is the payback period?,the number of years required to recover a projects cost, or how long does it take to get our money back?,payback for project l (long: large cfs in later years),10,60,0,1,2,3,-100,=,cft,cumulative,-100,-90,-30,50,paybackl,2 + 30/80 = 2.375 years,0,100,2.4,80,project s (short: cfs come quickly),70,20,50,0,1,2,3,-100,cft,cumulative,-100,-30,20,40,paybackl,1 + 30/50 = 1.6 years,100,0,1.6,=,strengths of payback:,1. provides an indication of a projects risk and liquidity. 2. easy to calculate and understand.,weaknesses of payback:,1. ignores the tvm. 2. ignores cfs occurring after the payback period.,discounted payback: uses discounted rather than raw cfs.,10,80,60,0,1,2,3,cft,cumulative,-100,-90.91,-41.32,18.79,discounted payback,2 + 41.32/60.11 = 2.7 years,pvcft,-100,-100,10%,9.09,49.59,60.11,=,recover invest. + cap. costs in 2.7 years.,npv: sum of the pvs of inflows and outflows.,whats project ls npv?,10,80,60,0,1,2,3,10%,project l:,-100.00,9.09,49.59,60.11,18.79 = npvl,npvs = $19.98.,calculator solution,enter in cflo for l:,-100 10 60 80 10,cf0,cf1,npv,cf2,cf3,i,= 18.78 = npvl,rationale for the npv method,npv = pv inflows cost = net gain in wealth. accept project if npv 0. choose between mutually exclusive projects on basis of higher npv. adds most value.,using npv method, which project(s) should be accepted?,if projects s and l are mutually exclusive, accept s because npvs npvl . if s npv 0.,internal rate of return: irr,0,1,2,3,cf0,cf1,cf2,cf3,cost,inflows,irr is the discount rate that forces pv inflows = cost. this is the same as forcing npv = 0.,npv: enter k, solve for npv.,irr: enter npv = 0, solve for irr.,whats project ls irr?,10,80,60,0,1,2,3,irr = ?,-100.00,pv3,pv2,pv1,0 = npv,enter cfs in cflo, then press irr:,irrl = 18.13%.,irrs = 23.56%.,40,40,40,0,1,2,3,irr = ?,find irr if cfs are constant:,-100,or, with cflo, enter cfs and press irr = 9.70%.,3 -100 40 0 9.70%,inputs,output,n,i/yr,pv,pmt,fv,90,1090,90,0,1,2,10,irr = ?,q. how is a projects irr related to a bonds ytm?,a. they are the same thing. a bonds ytm is the irr if you invest in the bond.,-1134.2,irr = 7.08% (use tvm or cflo).,.,rationale for the irr method,if irr wacc, then the projects rate of return is greater than its cost-some return is left over to boost stockholders returns. example: wacc = 10%, irr = 15%. profitable.,irr acceptance criteria,if irr k, accept project. if irr k, reject project.,decisions on projects s and l per irr,if s and l are independent, accept both. irrs k = 10%. if s and l are mutually exclusive, accept s because irrs irrl .,construct npv profiles,enter cfs in cflo and find npvl and npvs at different discount rates:,k 0 5 10 15 20,npvl 50 33 19 7 (4,npvs 40 29 20 12 5,(4),-10,0,10,20,30,40,50,60,5,10,15,20,23.6,npv ($),discount rate (%),irrl = 18.1%,irrs = 23.6%,crossover point = 8.7%,k 0 5 10 15 20,npvl 50 33 19 7 (4),npvs 40 29 20 12 5,s,l,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,npv and irr always lead to the same accept/reject decision for independent projects:,k irr and npv 0. reject.,npv ($),k (%),irr,irr k and npv 0 accept.,mutually exclusive projects,k 8.7 k,npv,%,irrs,irrl,l,s,k npvs , irrs irrl conflict,k 8.7: npvs npvl , irrs irrl no conflict,to find the crossover rate,1. find cash flow differences between the projects. see data at beginning of the case. 2. enter these differences in cflo register, then press irr. crossover rate = 8.68%, rounded to 8.7%. 3. can subtract s from l or vice versa, but better to have first cf negative. 4. if profiles dont cross, one project dominates the other.,two reasons npv profiles cross,1. size (scale) differences. smaller project frees up funds at t = 0 for investment. the higher the opportunity cost, the more valuable these funds, so high k favors small projects. 2. timing differences. project with faster payback provides more cf in early years for reinvestment. if k is high, early cf especially good, npvs npvl.,reinvestment rate assumptions,npv assumes reinvest at k (opportunity cost of capital). irr assumes reinvest at irr. reinvest at opportunity cost, k, is more realistic, so npv method is best. npv should be used to choose between mutually exclusive projects.,managers like rates-prefer irr to npv comparisons. can we give them a better irr?,yes, mirr is the discount rate that causes the pv of a projects terminal value (tv) to equal the pv of costs. tv is found by compounding inflows at wacc.,thus, mirr assumes cash inflows are reinvested at wacc.,mirr = 16.5%,10.0,80.0,60.0,0,1,2,3,10%,66.0 12.1,158.1,mirr for project l (k = 10%),-100.0,10%,10%,tv inflows,-100.0,pv outflows,mirrl = 16.5%,$100 =,$158.1 (1 + mirrl)3,to find tv with hp 10b, enter in cflo:,i = 10,npv = 118.78 = pv of inflows.,enter pv = -118.78, n = 3, i = 10, pmt = 0. press fv = 158.10 = fv of inflows.,enter fv = 158.10, pv = -100, pmt = 0, n = 3. press i = 16.50% = mirr.,cf0 = 0, cf1 = 10, cf2 = 60, cf3 = 80,why use mirr versus irr?,mirr correctly assumes reinvestment at opportunity cost = wacc. mirr also avoids the problem of multiple irrs. managers like rate of return comparisons, and mirr is better for this than irr.,pavilion project: npv and irr?,5,000,-5,000,0,1,2,k = 10%,-800,enter cfs in cflo, enter i = 10.,npv = -386.78,irr = error. why?,we got irr = error because there are 2 irrs. no