本文是2011年上海高考英语阅读最难的一篇.docVIP

本文是2011年上海高考英语阅读最难的一篇。文章大意说的是英国考古学家反对一项法律条文，因为据此法律条文，英国古代人的残骸将被重新掩埋，这对考古以及科学研究会造成诸多不利。文章可以分为三个部分。前面两段是40位英国考古学家联名上书，提出这个法律条文对考古及科学研究会造成影响的担忧。三、四两段主要是举例说明实行这条法律的后果：会使得将来的考古发现变得没有意义。最后三段说的是政府当局对此法律的态度和做法。英国政府两年前对考古学家保证这条法律是临时的，但至今也未进行修正，并且，相关部门也未对残骸应该如何掩埋，掩埋于何地，以及保存怎样的掩埋记录进行详细规划。分析：科普文一直是许多同学头疼的阅读题材。科普文涉及的面可以很广，并且很多内容与我们同学的生活可能不是很相关，因此它也是高考阅读中最难的部分，碰到此类文章，同学务必要对文章进行分段。理清文章逻辑关系及层次。科普文一般都极有逻辑性。以本文为例，文章首先提出了一个现象，然后通过举例进行后果的阐释，最后给出相关背景知识。高考真题是我们提高英语阅读的最好的材料。仔细做一下，不要急于对答案。精读问题和答案，找到原文的信息点，分析文章的结构，这是做好阅读的关健。Human remains of ancient settlements will be reburied and lost to science under a law that threatens research into the history of humans in Britain, a group of leading archaeologists(考古学家) says. I a letter addressed to the justice secretary, Ken Clarke, 40 archaeologists write of their “deep and widespread concern” about the issue. It centers on the law introduced by the Ministry of Justice in 2008 which requires all human remains unearthed in England and Wales to be reburied within two years, regardless of their age. The decision means scientists have too little time to study bones and other human remains of national and cultural significance.“Your current requirement that all archaeologically unearthed human remains should be reburied, whether after a standard period of two years or further special extension, is contrary to basic principles of archaeological and scientific research and of museum practice,” they write.The law applies to any pieces of bone uncovered at around 400 dig sites, including the remains of 60 or so bodies found at Stonehenge in 2008 that date back to 3,000 BC. Archaeologists have been granted a temporary extension to give them more time, but eventually the bones will have to be returned to the ground.The arrangements may result in the waste of future discoveries at sites such as Happisburgh in Norfolk, where digging is continuing after the discovery of stone tools made by early humans 950,000 years ago. If human remains were found at Happisburgh, they would be the oldest in northern Europe and the first indication of what this species was. Under the current practice of the law those remains would have to be reburied and effectively destroyed.Before 2008, guidelines allowed for the proper preservation and study of bones of sufficient age and historical interest, while the Burial Act 1857 applied to more recent remains. The Ministry of Justice assured archaeologists two years ago that the law was temporary, but has so far failed to revise it.Mike Parker Pearson, an archaeologist at Sheffield University, said: “Archaeologists have been extremely patient because we wee led to believe the ministry was sorting out this problem, but we feel that we cannot wait any longer.”The ministry has no guidelines on where or how remains should be reburied, or on what records should be kept.1. According to the passage, scientists are unhappy with the law mainly because _.A. it is only a temporary measure on the human remainsB. it is unreasonable and thus destructive to scientific researchC. it was introduced by the government without their knowledgeD. it is vague about where and how to rebury human remains2. Which of the following statements is true according to the passage?A. Temporary extension of two years will guarantee scientists enough time.B. Human remains of the oldest species wee dug out at Happisburgh.C. Human remains will have to be reburied despite the extension of time.D. Scientists have been warned that the law can hardly be changed.3. What can be inferred about the British law governing human remains?A. The Ministry of Justice did not intend it to protect human remains.B. The Burial Act 1857 only applied to remains uncovered before 1857.C. The law on human remains hasnt changed in recent decades.D. The Ministry of Justice has not done enough about the law.4. Which of the following might be the best title of the passage?A. New discoveries should be reburied, the government demands.B. Research time should be extended, scientists require.C. Law on human remains needs thorough discussion, authorities say.D. Law could bury ancient secrets for ever, archaeologists warn.“古代居民区的人类遗骸在一部法律之下将重新入土而与科学研究失之交臂，这部法律将会损害英国对人类历史的研究。”一组知名的考古学家这样说。在一封写给司法秘书Ken Clarke的信件中，40位考古学家对这个问题表达了“深切而广泛的关切”。问题的焦点在一部2008年由司法部颁布的法律上，这部法律规定：所有在英格兰或威尔士出土的人类遗骸无论其年代都必须在两年之类入土埋葬。这种决定意味着科学家几乎没有时间来研究遗骨和其他遗物的重大的民族和文化价值。“你们现在要求无论是在标准的两年期限还是特别延长期之后，所有发考古掘出土的的人类遗骸都应该重新埋葬。这是与考古和科学研究以及博物馆运作的基本原则相悖的。”他们写道。这部法律适用于将近400个发掘点尚未出土的遗骨，包括于2008年在Stonehenge发现的大约60具遗体的其它遗物这些遗体可以追溯到公元前3000年。考古学家已被授予暂时的延长期以获取更多的时间，但最终这些遗骨将会重新入土。这种举措可能会导致发掘点（如Norfolk的Happisburgh）未来出土物的浪费。在Happisburgh,已经发现了950000年前早期人类制作的石器，那里的发掘正在进行。如果在Happisburgh发现人类的遗骸，那将是北欧最早的人类遗骸，并且将会第一次表明其所属人种。如果当前这部法律实施的话，这些遗骸