




已阅读5页,还剩63页未读, 继续免费阅读
版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
冠心病介入治疗进展 - 2008,Safety of DES Revascularization: CABG or PCI Treatment for bifurcation: sample is better? Fractional flow-reserve for guiding New generation of DES,Kirtane AJ, Stone GW. Comprehensive meta-analysis of DES vs BMS randomized trials and registries; March 28, 2008; Chicago, IL.,MEGA meta-analysis,a. Fixed-effects model b. Random-effects model,All-cause mortality,Kirtane AJ, Stone GW. Comprehensive meta-analysis of DES vs BMS randomized trials and registries; March 28, 2008; Chicago, IL.,MI,a. Fixed-effects model b. Random-effects model,MEGA meta-analysis,Kirtane AJ, Stone GW. Comprehensive meta-analysis of DES vs BMS randomized trials and registries; March 28, 2008; Chicago, IL.,Target-vessel revascularization,*Random-effects model,MEGA meta-analysis,Safety of DES Revascularization: CABG or PCI Treatment for bifurcation: sample is better? Fractional flow-reserve for guiding PCI in multi-vessel disease New generation of DES,The safety and effectiveness of the *TAXUS Express2 Stent System have not been established in the following patient populations: patients with vessel thrombus at the lesion site; patients with coronary artery lesions longer than 28 mm or requiring more than one TAXUS Stent; lesions located in the unprotected left main coronary artery, or lesions located at a bifurcation/trifurcation; patients with moderate or severe calcification in the lesion or a chronic total occlusion; or patients with multi-vessel disease. The TAXUS Express Stent System has not been specifically indicated for patients with diabetes.,SYNTAX (SYNergy between PCI with TAXUS* and cardiac surgery),Patient Profiling,Local Heart team (surgeon & interventional cardiologist) assessed each patient in regards to: Patients operative risk (EuroSCORE & Parsonnet score) Coronary lesion complexity (newly developed SYNTAX score) The goal of the SYNTAX score is to provide a tool to assist physicians in their revascularization strategies for patients with high risk lesions,Sianos et al, EuroIntervention 2005;1:219-227 Valgimigli et al, Am J Cardiol 2007;99:1072-1081 Serruys et al, EuroIntervention 2007;3:450-459 Coronary tree segments based on the classification proposed by the AHA and modified for the ARTS study Circulation 1975; 51:31-3 4:209-19,Leaman score, Circ 1981;63:285-299 Lesions classification ACC/AHA , Circ 2001;103:3019-3041 Bifurcation classification, CCI 2000;49:274-283 CTO classification, J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:649-656,Tortuosity,Thrombus,Bifurcation,Total Occlusion,3 Vessel,Left Main,Dominance,Calcification,Number & location of lesions,23 US Sites,62 EU Sites,+,SYNTAX Trial Design,Adverse Events to 12 Months,ITT population,Event Rate 1.5 SE, *Fisher exact test,All Death,Revascularization,CVA (Stroke),Myocardial Infarction,TAXUS* (N=903),CABG (N=897),MACCE to 12 Months,P=0.0015*,ITT population,12.1%,17.8%,Event Rate 1.5 SE. *Fishers Exact Test,Symptomatic Graft Occlusion & Stent Thrombosis to 12 Months,MACCE to 12 Months Left Main Subset,P=0.44*,13.6%,15.8%,Event rate 1.5 SE, *Fisher exact test,ITT population,P=0.19*,7.7%,13.0%,Event rate 1.5 SE, *Fisher exact test,Calculated by core laboratory; ITT population,MACCE to 12 Months by SYNTAX Score Tertile Low Scores (0-22) LM Subset,P=0.008*,25.3%,12.9%,Event rate 1.5 SE, *Fisher exact test,Calculated by core laboratory; ITT population,MACCE to 12 Months by SYNTAX Score Tertile High Scores (33) Left Main Subset,Overall MACCE at 12 Months Left Main Subset,ITT population,(n=705),(n=91),(n=138),(n=218),(n=258),P=0.44,P=1.0,P=0.27,P=0.29,P=0.42,Patients (%),MACCE to 12 Months 3VD Subset,P0.001*,19.1%,11.2%,ITT population,Event Rate 1.5 SE, *Fisher exact test,MACCE Components 3VD to 30 Days,P=0.08*,30 Day Event Rate, %,P=0.03*,P=0.02*,P=0.20,TAXUS* (n=546),CABG (n=549),P=0.45*,*chi-square test; Fisher exact test,CABG,TAXUS*,P=0.39,3 Vessel Disease*,n=34,n=43,*per protocol and ITT populations had same outcome,Combined Safety (Death/CVA/MI) 3VD,Patients (%),MACCE to 12 Months vs SYNTAX Score,SYNTAX Score 22,P=0.10,P0.001,P=0.71,12-month MACCE, %,SYNTAX Score,KM Estimates, Event Rate 1.5 SE; *chi square test; raw SYNTAX score for illustrative purposes only,RCT ITT pts; site-reported data,SYNTAX Score 23-32,SYNTAX Score 33,Safety of DES Revascularization: CABG or PCI Treatment for bifurcation: sample is better? Fractional flow-reserve for guiding PCI in multi-vessel disease New generation of DES,BBC ONE,The British Bifurcation Coronary study: Old, New and Evolving strategies a randomized comparison of simple versus complex drug-eluting stenting for bifurcation lesions,Techniques,Simple stepwise provisional T-stenting Complex total lesion coverage: crush or culotte (according to operator preference),Technique (simple),Following main vessel stenting, the side branch should not be treated further unless there is: 90%) of the side branch Threatened side vessel closure Side-branch dissection type A if any of these applies, the operator may Stage 2 Kissing bolloon, T-stent, culotte stent, crush,PRIMARY ENDPOINT Composite (9months) Death, MI, TVF,In-hospital MACCE,CONCLUSIONS,For unselected bifurcation lesions, a stepwise provisional T stent trategy is superior to a systematic dual tenting strategy in all domains: procedural success procedural complications in-hospital and 9-month MACE,Safety of DES Revascularization: CABG or PCI Treatment for bifurcation: sample is better? Fractional flow-reserve for guiding PCI in multi-vessel disease New generation of DES,FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE versus ANGIOGRAPHY FOR GUIDING PCI IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIVESSEL CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE,FAME,Angiography-guided PCI,FFR-guided PCI,Measure FFR in all indicated stenoses,Stent all indicated stenoses,Stent only those stenoses with FFR 0.80,Randomization,Indicate all stenoses 50% considered for stenting,Patient with stenoses 50% in at least 2 of the 3 major epicardial vessels,1-year follow-up,FLOW CHART,FAME study: Procedural Results,30 days 2.9%,90 days 3.8%,180 days 4.9%,360 days 5.3%,Angio-guided,absolute difference in MACE-free survival,FAME study: Event-free Survival,Adverse Events at 1 year,Routine measurement of FFR during DES-stenting in patients with multivessel disease is superior to current angiography guided treatment. It improves outcome of PCI significantly It supports the evolving paradigm of “Functionally Complete Revascularization”, i.e. stenting of ischemic lesions and medical treatment of non-ischemic ones.,FAME study: CONCLUSIONS,Safety of DES Revascularization: CABG or PCI Treatment for bifurcation: sample is better? Fractional flow-reserve for guiding PCI in multi-vessel disease New generation of DES,Drug-eluting Stents 2008,Endeavor,Phosphorylcholine,Zotarolimus,Driver,Drug,Polymer,Xience V*,VDF + HFP copolymer,Everolimus,Vision,*AKA Promus,Stent,SPIRIT II + III: Cardiac Death or MI,0,2,4,6,8,10,0,3,6,9,12,15,18,21,24,Cardiac Death or MI (%),Months,Stone GW,SPIRIT II + III: All Death or MI,0,2,4,6,8,10,0,3,6,9,12,15,18,21,24,All Death or MI (%),Months,Stone GW,SPIRIT II + III: Ischemic MACE,Stone GW,SPIRIT II + III: Ischemic TVF,Ischemic TVF = Cardiac death, MI, or ischemic TVR,Stone GW,SPIRIT II + III: All TLR,All TLR = Ischemic TLR + non ischemic TLR,Stone GW,Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent: Analysis of Six Clinical Trials,Kandzari D,Euro-PCR2009,Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent: Analysis of Six Clinical Trials,Kandzari D,Euro-PCR2009,Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent: Analysis of Six Clinical Trials,Kandzari D,Euro-PCR2009,NEVO RES-ELUTION 1 Trial,Spaulding C, Euro-PCR 2009,NEVO RES-ELUTION 1 Trial,Spaulding C, Euro-PCR 2009,NEVO RES-ELUTION 1 Trial,Spaulding C, Euro-PCR 2009,NEVO RES-ELUTION 1 Trial,Spaulding C, Euro-PCR 2009,ABSORB,The goal of
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 2025年事业单位工勤技能-广西-广西下水道养护工三级(高级工)历年参考题库典型考点含答案解析
- 2025年事业单位工勤技能-广东-广东堤灌维护工二级(技师)历年参考题库含答案解析
- 2025年事业单位工勤技能-安徽-安徽客房服务员三级(高级工)历年参考题库典型考点含答案解析
- 2025年事业单位工勤技能-北京-北京护理员三级(高级工)历年参考题库典型考点含答案解析
- 2025年驾驶证考试-摩托车理论考试-摩托车驾驶证(科目四)历年参考题库含答案解析(5套)
- 2025年职业技能鉴定-铸造造型(芯)工-铸造造型(芯)工(初级)历年参考题库含答案解析(5套)
- 2025年职业技能鉴定-合成氨生产工-合成氨生产工职业技能鉴定(高级)历年参考题库含答案解析(5套)
- 2025年综合评标专家-浙江-浙江综合评标专家(医疗保障局)历年参考题库含答案解析(5套)
- 2025年综合评标专家-山东-山东综合评标专家(咨询类)历年参考题库含答案解析(5套)
- 烫伤家庭急救
- MRI练习题库及参考答案
- 酒店员工接待礼仪培训
- 2024-2025学年高三上学期《为什么要上一个好大学?》主题班会课件
- 管道cctv检测方案
- 职业技术学校物联网应用技术专业调研报告
- GB/T 43934-2024煤矿土地复垦与生态修复技术规范
- 2023年某技术有限公司技术规范
- 秋季传染病预防课件幼儿园
- 江苏农牧科技职业学院单招《英语》考试参考题库(含答案)
- 心得报告模板
- 义务教育数学新课程标准2022年版变化与解读解读课件
评论
0/150
提交评论