已阅读5页,还剩14页未读, 继续免费阅读
版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
A Brief Introduction to Epidemiology - IX (Epidemiologic Research Designs: Case-Control Studies),Betty C. Jung, RN, MPH, CHES,Learning/Performance Objectives,To develop an understanding of: What case-control studies are The value of such studies The basic methodology Pros and Cons of such studies,Introduction,Epidemiology studies the distribution of disease in a number of ways. The two major categories of epidemiological studies are: Observational and experimental studies. Most epidemiological studies are observational.,Epidemiological Study Designs,Observational Studies - examine associations between risk factors and outcomes (Analytical - determinants and risk of disease, and descriptive - patterns and frequency of disease) Intervention Studies - explore the association between interventions and outcomes. (Experimental studies or clinical trials),Research Designs in Analytic Epidemiology,Ecologic Designs Cross-Sectional Study Case-Control Study Cohort Study,Case-Control Studies,“Flashback Studies” (Paffenbarger, 1988) Retrospective - compare cases and controls for presence of disease Includes passage of time. Historical - assess past characteristics or exposures in two groups of people- cases and controls,Examples,The relationship between thalidomide and unusual limb defects in Germany The relationship between meat consumption and enteritis necroticans in Papua New Guinea,Value,Simple to conduct Cost-effective way to study a rare disease,Case-Control Studies: Methodology,Then measure, post-exposure,First Select the Cases and Controls,Cases,(with,disease),Control (without disease),Were Exposed,A,B,Not Exposed,C,D,A+C,B+D,Population Exposed,A/A+C,B./B+D,Case Control Design,Time Direction of Inquiry,Population,Cases with the Disease,Controls without the disease,Exposed,Exposed,Not Exposed,Not Exposed,Case-Control Studies,Cases - Has condition or health outcome of interest. Has higher frequency or greater degree of exposure than non-cases. Controls (non-cases) - Does not have the health condition. Serves as the comparison group Ask about history of contact with or exposure to supposed causes,Case-Control Studies,If controls are well chosen, the only antecedent difference will be in the level of a characteristic that is related causally to the development of a disease (I.e, exposure to a chemical resulted in cancer). Quantify with odds ratios,Strength of Association,Relative Risk;(Prevalence); Odds Ratio Strength of Association 0.83-1.00 1.0-1.2 None 0.67-0.83 1.2-1.5 Weak 0.33-0.67 1.5-3.0 Moderate 0.10-0.33 3.0-10.00 Strong 10.0 Approaching Infinity,Methodology Issue: Matching,Matching - control for confounding variables. If you do not match then control by subject selection (study only males to eliminate gender as a confounding variable) Matching Subject selection Statistical control during data analysis The more variables that need to be matched the greater the universe we need. Problem - match age, sex and SES - Control must be the same.,Methodological Weaknesses,Biased reporting of the antecedent (having lung CA - patients over reporting smoking (from guilt, knowledge or selective memory) Subject selection (decreases with cases and controls in the same facility) Limited to only cases, who have survived at the same time. Selective survival,Pros,Cases easily available Good for less common or rare cases Quick, inexpensive Can be conducted by clinicians in clinical facilities Tend to support, not prove causal hypothesis by establishing associations Historical data available in clinical records Number of subjects needed is small,Cons,Info about antecedents depends on memory, which could lead to bias Clinical data may be inadequate or incomplete “Case group” may not be homogenous - criteria for diagnosis may differ. Clinical cases are selective survivors,Cons,Non-representativeness of cases. Those coming in for treatment may differ from those not seeking treatment and those going somewhere else. Antecedent is not obtained from universe of all antecedents. Berksons fallacy - making generalizations from hospital or clinical samples to the general population. Cannot know what a
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 2025~2026学年河南省许昌市高二下学期期末考试生物试卷
- 2025~2026学年新疆维吾尔自治区和田地区皮山县高一下学期期末考试生物试卷
- 2026 湖南 水利岗事业编易错点巩固训练卷含答案
- 2026年广东省职业院校技能大赛-中职组(饲料营养与检测赛项)考试题库(带答案)
- 中亚电子商务发展调研报告2026
- 医院抗菌药物培训考核试题及答案
- (2026年)数学备课组工作计划
- DB34T5164-2025乡村道路地名方案编制规范
- 2026年ICU 职业暴露防护护理试卷及答案
- 2026年ICU 危重患者伦理困境案例试卷及答案
- 浙江省宁波市2026年七年级上学期期中数学试卷附答案
- 北京中学2025-2026学年九年级上学期语文期中试卷(含答案)
- 2026-2027学年山东省九上语文期中模拟卷
- 工程伦理案例分析 课件 第7章 化学工程的伦理问题
- ISO 14001-2026 新版标准深度解读:修订变化与企业实施指南
- 国开2026年秋《公共行政学》形考任务1-3答案
- 2026年秋季道德与法治五年级上知识点
- 美国白宫 科学:一个新的黄金时代 致总统的报告
- 国土空间规划课件 第八讲 控制性详细规划
- GB/T 14977-2025热轧钢板表面质量的一般要求
- 市政道路工程质量管理资料目录
评论
0/150
提交评论