PRISMA-P中英文版.doc

PRISMA-P (preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols) 2015 checklist: recommended items to addressin a systematic review protocolSection and topicItem NoChecklistitemAdministrative informationTitle:Identification1aIdentify the report as a protocol of a systematic reviewUpdate1bIf the protocol is for an update of a previous systematic review, identify as suchRegistration2If registered, provide the name of the registry (such as PROSPERO) and registration numberAuthors:Contact3aProvide name, institutional affiliation, e-mail address of all protocol authors; provide physical mailing address of corresponding authorContributions3bDescribe contributions of protocol authors and identify the guarantor of the reviewAmendments4If the protocol represents an amendment of a previously completed or published protocol, identify as such and list changes;otherwise, state plan for documenting important protocol amendmentsSupport:Sources5aIndicate sources of financial or other support for the reviewSponsor5bProvide name for the review funder and/or sponsorRole of sponsor or funder5cDescribe roles of funder(s), sponsor(s), and/or institution(s), if any, in developing the protocolIntroductionRationale6Describe the rationale for the review in the context of what is already known.aObjectives7Provide an explicit statement of the question(s) the review will address with reference to participants, interventions, comparators, and outcomes (PICO)MethodsEligibility criteria8Specify the study characteristics (such as PICO, study design, setting, time frame) and report characteristics (such as years considered, language, publication status) to be used as criteria for eligibility for the reviewInformation sources9Describe all intended information sources (such as electronic databases, contact with study authors, trial registers or other grey literature sources) with planned dates of coverageSearch strategy10Present draft of search strategy to be used for at least one electronic database, including planned limits, such that it could be repeatedStudy records:Data management11aDescribe the mechanism(s) that will be used to manage records and data throughout the reviewSelection process11bState the process that will be used for selecting studies (such as two independent reviewers) through each phase of the review (that is, screening, eligibility and inclusion in meta-analysis)Data collection process11cDescribe planned method of extracting data from reports (such as piloting forms, done independently, in duplicate), any processes for obtaining and confirming data from investigatorsData items12List and define all variables for which data wil lbe sought (such as PICOitems, funding sources), any pre-planned data assumptions and simplificationsOutcomes and prioritization13List and define all outcomes for which data will be sought, including prioritization of main and additional outcomes, with rationaleRisk of bias in individual studies14Describe anticipated methods for assessing risk of bias of individual studies, including whether this will be done at the outcome or study level, or both; state how this information will be used in data synthesisData synthesis15aDescribe criteria under which study data will be quantitatively synthesised15bIf data are appropriatefor quantitative synthesis, describe planned summary measures, methods of handling data and methods of combining data from studies, including any planned exploration of consistency (such as I2, Kendalls )15cDescribe any proposed additional analyses (such as sensitivity or subgroup analyses, meta-regression)15dIf quantitative synthesisis not appropriate, describe the type of summary plannedMeta-bias(es)16Specify any planned assessment of meta bias(es) (such as publication bias across studies, selective reporting within studies)Confidence in cumulative evidence17Describe how the strength of the body of evidence will be assessed (such as GRADE)中文翻译版：PRISMA-P 2015清单: 系统综述和荟萃分析计划书优先报告适用于系统评价计划书的推荐条目章节和主题条目编号清单条目管理信息标题识别1a从标题可以识别报告是系统评价的计划书更新1b从标题可以识别计划书是对之前发表的的系统评价进行更新注册2如果已经注册,请提供注册处和注册号作者联系3a提供参与计划书的所有作者姓名,所属机构单位,以及邮箱;提供通讯作者的详细通讯地址贡献3b描述计划书中各个作者的贡献,并且明确担保人修正4如果该计划书是对之前已完成或已发表的计划书的修正,请确认并列出修改清单;否则,阐述记录计划书重大修正的计划支持来源5a标明资金来源或其它支持赞助5b提供资助者姓名或者赞助商名称资助者或赞助商的角色5c如果资助者,赞助商和/或机构参与计划书其中,请描述他们的角色介绍论据6在已知的背景下陈述该系统评价的立题依据目标7根据人群、干预、对照和结局(PICO)对系统评价的研究问题进行明确清晰的阐述方法纳入标准8明确系统评价纳入研究的特点(比如PICO、研究设计、试验场所、时间点)以及其他研究报告特点（比如发表年代、语种、发表状态）信息来源9描述所有的信息来源(比如电子数据库、联系作者、注册试验或者其他灰色文献)以及计划检索的时间范围检索策略10请起草至少一个数据库的检索策略以及相应的限制策略,从而保证检索是可以重复的研究报告数据处理11a描述系统评价过程中处理记录和数据的方法研究选择11b描述文献筛选过程(比如两个研究人员独立筛选)以及系统评价中研究帅选的每一个过程(也就是,文献筛查、合格研究以及最终纳入定量合成研究）数据收集11c描述数据提取方法(比如预先设计的数据提取表、独立完成、一式两份),以及其它任何从研究者那里获取和确认数据的过程数据条目12列出并定义所有数据变量(比如PICO条目、基金来源)以及任何计划前进行的数据假定和简化结局和次序13列出并定义所有结局指标,并给出主要结局和其他结