GRE作文argument模板.docx_第1页
GRE作文argument模板.docx_第2页
GRE作文argument模板.docx_第3页
GRE作文argument模板.docx_第4页
全文预览已结束

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

Argument开头段:The argument is well-presented, but not thoroughly well-reasoned. this claims that .To support this claim the applicant pointed out that he also cites various other evidence that careful examination of this supporting evidence, however, reveals that it lends little credible support to the applicants claim. In this .recommends that .to support this recommendation .this argument rests on a series of unsubstantiated assumptions, and is therefore unpersuasive as it stands. applausible as it may seem,.this is a gratuitous assumption.结尾段:in conclusion ,to persuade us that the arguer must supply clear evidence that in conclusion ,the loan applicants argument is not persuasive. To bolster it he must provide clearer evidence that .such evidence might include the following kezunlong开头段:The argument is well-presented, however is not thoroughly well-reasoned. The arguer claims that . To justify the conclusion, he points out . Additionally, he also points out he cites a study/research that . The argument is logically deficient, and therefore is unconvincing, in several respects.结尾段:In sum, this argument rests on a myriad of unsubstantiated assumptions, therefore unpersuasive as it stands. To bolster it, the arguer must provide substantial evidence that . To better assess the conclusion, he should also supply clear evidence that to warrant the gratuitous assumption. Moreover, I would need to know the .北美句子:Without better evidence that the survey is statistically reliable the mayor cannot rely on it to draw any firm conclusions about the overall recycling commitment ofWest Egg residents-let alone about how quickly the landfill will reach capacity.Even if the 100 participants are statistically representative statistics showing that a significant number ofif the number of experimental subjects is statistically significant. Without evidence of the experiments methodological and statistical reliability, the speakers conclusion is unjustifiable.In conclusion, the argument is unconvincing as it stands.To better assess the argument, we would need a clear definition of insomnia, as well as more information about whether the researchers conducted the experiment in a controlled environment.It is entirely possible that the weight training, not the supplements, was responsible for preserving bone mass.The argument also overlooks many other possible explanations for the comparatively low incidence of hip fractures among this group of women. For example, perhaps these women were more physically fit than average to begin with.Finally, to better assess the usefulness of the survey I would need specific information about the surveys sampling methodology.错误类型:调查的准确性 基数问题Samples for the survey should be statistically reliable. Unfortunately, from the survey we find little sign of such procures for sampling, thus doubting whether the respondents constitute a sufficiently large sample so as to be representative of the overall. report 的真实性?A92 攻击随机性 since the author makes a claim about . In general, samples for the survey should be able to represent all_. However, from the survey quoted in this argument, we find no sign of such procedures for random sampling, and have good reason to doubt if the sample is representative enough to reflect the general altitude of _as a whole. From the survey we found no sign for random sampling, thus doubting whether the respondents are representative of the overall population of the nation. If the subjects are only limited to a certain city of geographic region, the results of survey will be unconvincing. 利润 Profitability is a function of both revenue and expense.Thus it is entirely possible that the restaurants costs of obtaining high-quality, healthful seafood, or of promoting the new restaurant, might render it unprofitable despite its popularity.Without weighing revenue against expenses the arguments conclusion is premature at best. unless the surveyor sampled a sufficient number of _and did so randomly across the entire spectrum. the survey results are not reliable to gauge _generally. the number of samples ,in itself, does not ensure representativeness . for example ,if the examples includes only _,the result would be unconvincing. or if the grosses are considerable _,which would account for only a little percentage, will undoubtedly render the result of the survey meaningless.the editors recommendation depends on the assumption that no factors other than A caused B. however, common sense informs me that this assumption is a poor one. A myriad of other factors including C and D might be the cause of B. to be specific, _. without ruling out these and other possible causes ,the author cannot justifiably conclude that only by A- than B-the arguer fails to establish the causal relationship between the fact that and the claim that _.this argument is unacceptable unless there is compelling evidence to support the connection between these two events. Perhaps ,for example, this restriction were not implemented, than any change in B cannot be attributed to them results from _ /it is highly possible that other factors contribute to B. for instance ,B might have resulted from C. it is also likely that D caused B. lacking evidence that links A to B, it is presumptuous to suggest that A was responsible for B.based on the fact that A occurred after B. the editor infers that B should be responsible for A. however ,the sequence of these event, in itself, does not suffice. to prove that the earlier development caused the later one. It might have result from some other events instead: property values are a function of supply and demand. perhaps the demand for housing in the area has increased due to an influx of major employers. or perhaps the supply of housing has decreased. either scenario would provide an alternative explanation for the increase in property values. to just a few possibilities. Without ruling out scenarios such as these, the author cannot establish a cause-and-effect relationship between A and B upon which the editors recommendation depends.the argument observes a correlation between A and B, then concludes that the former is the cause of the latter. however, the argument fails to rule out other possible explanation for _B_ for example,_. Any of these factors might lead to _B_. Without ruling out other factors it is unfair to conclude that _A_ is responsible for B.攻击概念不同:a threshold(起点,开端)problem involves the definition of _A_. the arguer fails to define this critical term. If A is defined as B, then _C_, is irrelevant to whether_. In short, without a clear definition of _A_. It is impossible to assess the strength of the argument. 由个体推整体: the argument resets on the assumption that 个体案例 typify nationwide 整体情况。if this is not the case then it is entirely possible that 另一地方,上述个案不会发生。thus ,lacking more marketing information about _nationwide ,it is difficult to assess the merit of the memos recommendation. 整体推个体:one problem with the argument is that it assumes that the nationwide statistic about _applies equally to 个体成员,Yet this might not be the case for a variety of reasons. Perhaps _; or _.without ruling out such possibility, the author cannot justifiably conclude that_. the arguers conclusion that _is unwarranted. profit is a factor related to not only revenue but also cost. It is entirely possible that the cost of _A_ ,or other costs associated with _BC_ ,will offset, even outweigh the revenue. besides a myriad of other unexpected occurrences such as unfavorable economic depression might prevent _from being as profitable as the argument predicts.the author claim that _将来,because _过去、现在_ 。 This assumption is unwarranted, because things rarely remain the same over extended period of time. there are likely all kind of difference between _过去_and 将来_;For example, PAST, however FUTURE. Any of these scenarios(情节,剧本) ,if true, would serve to undermine the claim that _.the arguers commendation relies on what might be a poor analogy between A and B. the analogy falsely depends on the assumption that _in A and B are similar. However , it is entirely possible that A 与B的差异potential house buyers might be less interested in a homes exterior appearance than B。 In short , without accounting for such possible differences between A and B.the arguer cannot prove that B will reap the similar benefits from the proposed methodthe author assumes without warrant that the shortcoming/disadvantages may outweigh its benefit.1 even assuming A is not the reason for C, the author falsely assumes that _c_ must be attributable to B. this either or argument is fallacious in that it ignores other possible causes of _C_ perhaps _D_, or perhaps _E_. 2 the editor seems to make two irreconcilable claims. one is that _A_ ;the other is _B_. however ,this assumption presents a false dilemma, since _A,B_ are not necessarily mutually exclusive alternatives.Nor does the mere fact that lend significant support to the applicants claim.古代人对现代人 all living creatures are evolving and so are human beings .both the environment and the physical situation have changed a lot from ancient to present.替换词:condition; requirement

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论