Unit-7lifewithoutfather.doc_第1页
Unit-7lifewithoutfather.doc_第2页
Unit-7lifewithoutfather.doc_第3页
全文预览已结束

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

Life without father1The United States is becoming an increasingly fatherless society .a generation ago, a child could reasonably expect to grow up with his or her father .today, a child can reasonably expect not to. Fatherlessness is approaching a rough parity with fatherhood as a defining feature of childhood.2This astonishing fact is reflected in many statistics, but here are the two most important: tonight, about 40 percent of U.S. children will go to sleep in homes in which their fathers do not live. More than half of our children been voluntarily abandoned by their fathers .never before in this country have so many children grown up without knowing what it means to have a father. 3Fatherlessness is the most harmful demographic trend of this generation. It is the leading cause of the decline in the well-being of children .it is also the engine driving our most urgent social problems, from crime to adolescent pregnancy to domestic violence. Yet, despite its scale and social consequences, fatherlessness is frequently ignored or denied .especially within our elite discourse; it remains a problem with no name.4Surely a crisis of this scale merits a name and a response .at a minimum, it requires a serious debate: why is fatherhood declining? What can be done about it? Can our society find ways to invigorate effective fatherhood as a norm of male behavior? Yet, to date, our public discussion has been remarkably weak and defeatist. There is a prevailing belief that not much can or even should be done to reverse the trend.5As a society, we are changing our minds about mens role in family life. Our inherited understanding of fatherhood is under siege. Men are increasingly viewed as superfluous to family life: either expendable or part of the problem, masculinity itself often is treated with suspicion and even hostility, in our cultural discourse. Consequently, our society is unable to sustain fatherhood as a distinctive domain of male activity.6The core question is simple: does every child need a father? Increasingly, our societys answer is no. few idea shifts in this century are as consequential as this one. At stake is nothing less than what is means to be a man, who our children will be and what kind of society we will become.7My criticism is not simply of fatherlessness but of a culture of fatherlessness. For ,in addition to fathers, we are losing something larger:our idea of fatherhood.unlike earlier periods of father avsence in our history, such as wartime, we now face more than a physical loss affecting some homes. The 1940s child could say :my father had to leave for a while to do something important,the 90s child must say :my father left me permanently because he wanted to.8This is a cultural criticism because fatherhood, much more than motherhood, is a cultural invention; its meaning is shaped less by biology than man into certain ways of acting and understanding himself.9Like motherhood ,fatherhood is made up of both a biological and a social dimension .yet ,across the world,mothers are far more successful than fathers at fusing these dimensions into a coherent identity.is the nursing mother playing a biological or a social role?feeding or bonding?we can hardly separate the ptwo .so seamlessly are they woven together.but fatherhood is a different matter.a father makes his sole biological contribution at the moment of conception,linked only indirectly to biological paternity,a connection cannot be assumed, the phrase”to father a child” usually refers only to the act of insemination,not the responsibility for raising the child .what fathers contribute after conception is largerly a matter of cultural devising.10Moreover, dispite their other virtues,men are not ideally suited to responsible fatherhood.men are inclined to sexual promiscuity and paternal waywardness .anthropologically , fatherhood constitutes what might be termed a necessary problem. Ti is necessary because child well-being and societal success hinge largerly on a high level of paternal investment :mens willingness to devote energy and resources to the care of their offspring .it is a problem because men frequently are unwilling or unable to make that vital investment.11Because fatherhood is universally problematic , cultures must mobilize to enforce the father role, guiding men with legal and extralegal pressures that require them to maintain a close alliance with their childrens mather and invest in their children.because men do not volunteer for fatherhood as much as they are conscripted into it by the surrounding culture, only an authoritative cultural commitment to fatherhood can fuse biological and social paternity into a chherent male identity.for exactly this reason ,anthropologist Margaret Mead and others have observed that the supreme test of any civilization is whether it can socialize men by teaching them to nurture their offspring .12The stakes could hardly be higher .our societys conspicuous failure to sustain norms of fatherhood reveals a failure of collective memory and a collapse of moral imagination. It undermines families, neglects children, causes or aggravates our worst social problems and makes individual adult happiness, both female ,and male, harder to achieve.13Ultimately ,this failure reflects nothing less than a culture gone awry, unable to establish the boundaries and erect the signposts that can harmonize individual happiness with collectibe well-being .in short ,it reflects a culture that fails to “enculture” individual men and women ,mothers and fathers .14In personal terms, the main result of this failure is the spread of a me-first egotism hostile to all except the most puerile understandings of personal happiness ,in social terms, the results are a decline in childrenswell-being and a rise in male violence,especially against women .the most significant result is our societys steady fragmentation into atomized individuals , isolated from one another and estranged from the aspirations and realities of common membership in a family, a community, a nation ,bound by mutual commitment and shared memory.15Many voices today , including many expert voices, urge us to accept the decline of fatherhood with equanimity. Be realistic, they tell us . divorce and out-of-wedlock childbearing are here to stay. Growing numbers of children will not will not have fathers .nothing can be done to reverse the trend itself .the only solution is to remedy some of its consequences: more help for poor children. More sympathy for single mothers .better divorce .more child-support payments .more prisons.more programs aimed at substituting for fathers.16Yet what avraham Lincoln called the better angels of our nature always have guided us in the opposite direction, passivity in the face of crisis is inconsistent with the American tradition . managing decline never has been the hallmark of American expertise . in the inevitable and valuable tension between conditions and aspirations-between the social “is ” and the moral “ought” our birthright as Americans always has been our confidence that we can change for the better.17Does every child need a father? Our current answer hov

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论