量化考核的瓶颈.doc

量化考核的意义与瓶颈 作者：陈瑞摘要： 量化考核是将班级各类工作有形的结合起来的一种考核制度，将班风、学风等有机的联系起来并给予细致合理的评分标准。为班级和同学们建立科学、规范的学习生活环境，但为何有如此前景的制度却在一年多的的实际中没有达到我们预想的效果呢？经过走访，不少同学对量化考核没有好感，仅仅理解为又是一种形式主义的活动。在一定程度上影响这量化工作的开展有持久力，抑制了量化考核原有的能力。因此这不将不是我们要考虑并解决的问题。关键词：量化考核 意义 思维定式 执行力 认同 量化考核工作早已在部分高校开展实施，极大的增强了班级参与各类活动的积极性，将班级的各类工作有形的联系起来，对班级的学风、考风、班会制度、早操体制、班级和个人参与的各类活动的获奖情况均给予细致合理的评分标准。此项研究将有利于将大学错乱无章的学习、生活及各类活动有力的结合起来，为班级和同学建立规范、科学的学习生活环境，也使学校各类评奖制度有据可依、有分可比突出公平公正的校制风貌。 量化考核主要在于将班级日常工作与学生会日常学生工作紧密的结合起来。考核内容包括班级日常管理、思想教育工作、班风建设和学风建设等部分。充分调用现有的学生会体制为同学们营造一种规范的、科学的学习生活环境。学生会四大主要日常工作部门将结合皖西学院学生工作考核办法和同学们日常活动需求制定完善的评分体制，提供大量真实有效地学生数据，定期召开座谈会从才材料和访谈中改善学生工作。有益于校、系领导、老师对班级作出客观、有效地指导，及时发现不足，了解学生动态并能公平公正的给与班级应有的称号。有益于促进各班学习生活进步，营造“追学赶超”的优良班风。增强同学们的班级荣辱意识和团队协作意识。 我系已经实施量化考核工作快一年了，在取得成绩的同时也暴露了不少问题。无论我们怎么修改与适应总有点力不从心，是什么限制了考核制度的优势？我们来重点看看下面问题。 为什么多数同学对量化考核没有好感呢？ 1）思维上的定式。许多同学长期受行政式工作模式的影响，常常遇到活动或制度的第一反应就是：这又是什么活动？ 真麻烦！这应该是我们常常可以听到的抱怨，从上可以看出在许多同学眼里量化考核只是形式上的东西，而普通管理者也只将量化考核定在行政管理的框架内。他们一直认为：加强行政力度，实施从上到下的贯彻执行体制，落实各项工作就能保证量化考核工作的运行与得到想要的效果。因此我们常常会看到这样的情况：“下个月的报表要出来了，怎么办？还没材料，自己做点吧！反正都差不多！“等结果出来后真正关心结果的人也只有少数，许多同学根本就不会有意识，量化考核的成绩好坏会和他有什么关系？ 从上面的情况可以反映两种定式，量化考核的工作者对工作的定式与考核对象对制度的曲解定式。有的工作者从不思考工作的性质，更多的只是照着章程与体制向下走，对一切工作都“一视同仁”。这也不完全是个人的错，只是过多的受到行政管理思维的影响，再加上高校的大多数工作性质是行政事务为主。这就对量化考核产生潜意识的推导，直至将其造成工作性质上的扭曲。这就是为什么随着举办次数和程度的曾加，量化考核的生命力却在直线下滑的潜在原因。作为量化考核对象的同学们也由原始的受益者因心中的排斥变为变相的“受害者”，分析原因则是同学们对量化考核的实质理解不够。本来学生对参与管理活动积极性就不高，加上工作者对量化考核的宣传不足，才造就了如今考核工作日益脱离群众的困境。 如何走出困境，我们在改变管理思维定式的同时更要加强对同学的宣传与帮扶工作。下面我就对量化考核宣传与帮扶工作提出以下建议：1、相关负责人应经常走动学生寝室，从同学们的角度了解同学们心目中的量化考核，无论大家提出什么样的见解，都是他对考核的在意与思考，应认真对待，不仅是对同学们心里上的鼓励更是使量化考核以一种亲和的态度融入同学们的生活学习中去的好方法。也许有的同学对量化考核不太信任，你就应该将量化考核的实效以及将会产生良好学习氛围的前景作为承诺，并给予实现，提高同学们的积极性有利于量化考核的可行度。2、建立意见反馈体制，各班应设立意见箱，一方面可以让大家可以将量化考核中的缺点和不满表达出来（制度总会有人不满应该给他们一个“发泄的方法”，也许在这些方法中会更有利于完善量化考核的缺陷）另一方面时刻为想了解和在工作中遇到困难的同学提供一种解决办法的渠道（注意一定要反馈，无论你能不能解决意见、问题都应给提议者一个答复，这不仅是对他的尊重也反映自己对量化考核的责任与信任。从而能收到奇兵之效，让少数人无话可说、无措可挑。2） 加强工作的执行力认同是执行力的基础（摘自认同与管理），也是对量化考核工作的基本要求。认同是对事物的理解和赞同，它包括对管理目标的认同，对管理职权的认同，对管理者能力和品质的认同等等。在量化工作中，由于缺少同学的认同，许多班委难以将工作开展下去，于是出现了学生阳奉阴违现象和应付作风。因此量化考核能否被认同直接决定了工作的有效性。这就要求我们的学委要有管理职权的认同以及同学们对你管理者能力和品质的认同。目前，我们开展的一些活动多是响应号召式，贯彻落实精神式，领导设计式的决策，少有调查基础，少有民主集中，少有科学的决策机制，少有反馈信息的有效对待。这是天生的缺陷我们没有办法选择但我们可以缓和矛盾。例如，在高校学生做早操有无必要这一事情，许多学生对必要性的理解不够，也通过各种途径多次反映情况并提出了意见，但常常是得不到及时解决和满意的答复，难免会产生“没有办法，这是上头要求这样做的，照办吧”的应付作风和叫人代签（出操）的阳奉阴违现象。同时，学委对目标的弱辅助解释力也会使同学们对目标缺乏理解，产生对体操制度的不认同。如果对早操必要性的解释要点放在做早操是对学生意志力和吃苦精神的锻炼，是军事化要求这个角度，那么学生对早操的必要性认同就强，执行效果就好。由于缺乏对学委职权的认同，产生了学生参与量化考核不力的现象。这里包括学生对学生干部的职权认同和干部对自己职权的认同。一般来讲，在高校学生民主管理的直接管理者中，对教师专职的管理职权认可是普遍的，但对学生管理组织，如学生会，社团等的干部职权认同存在较大的差异。通过公平公开的程序取得职权的认同较好，凭借自己良好的品德、较强的能力和优秀的工作业绩取得职权的认同较好，在工作中注意管理方法和管理艺术，注重为同学服务的职权认同较好。而学生干部如果是通过民主竞选选举产生的，对自己的职权认同是建立在对同学负责的基础上，在工作中就会有较强的民主意识。如果是上级组织任命的，往往在工作的主动性和服务性上对行政命令的成分就会较多，民主决策的观念就会淡薄。这都是影响量化考核执行力重要因素。执行力需要能力的合理分配，学生会从不缺少人才，有的同学工作热情高积极性强、有的同学工作稳重性格随和、有的同学工作细心待人热诚等等，那么在处理量化考核工作时，处理活动素拓考核时就应需要热情高积极性强的同学参与负责，处理文件方案通知等则需要有工作细心待人热诚的同学参与，而工作稳重性格随和的同学适合处理思想与意见反馈工作。如果班委能力不当不仅会拖慢考核进度还会打击量化考核在同学们心中的认知度，循环反复容易给同学们造成形式化的量化考核。所以量化工作是需要活化的分配与合适人才，才能更好的发挥效应增强量化考核的执行力。综上所述，量化考核长久之道是自下而上的认同与支持，应先注重群众基础，变换执行模式，增强班委能力与认知度，这样才能得到同学们真正接受与认同，才能有效的发挥量化考核的作用，达到量化考核的目的，真正营造科学、规范的学习生活环境，实现百年树人的教育目标。 部分论点摘自青年文摘中认同与管理； 感谢：量化考核小组的意见。Quantification assessment of meaning and bottleneckAbstract: Quantification assessment is class combined kinds work tangible an assessment system, will ban feng, style of study organic scenes and give the meticulous reasonable assessment standards. For classes and students establish scientific and normative learning the living environment, but why have such prospects system is did not meet our desired effect? Many students in the quantification assessment, simply understand no opinion for is a kind of formalism activities. To a certain extent influence the development of the quantitative have staying power, inhibit the ability of original quantification assessment. So it is not will not we need to consider the question.Keywords: quantification assessment meaning thinking formulary execution identity Quantification assessment work already in some colleges and universities develop implementation, greatly enhanced class participation in activities of the enthusiasm, all kinds of working class linked to a tangible, the style of study, class examination, the class meeting system, morning exercises system, class and personal participation in the activities of the awards are given meticulous reasonable assessment standards. The study will benefit will be without chapter of the university disorder study, life and all kinds of activities powerful combined for class and classmates, establish a standardized, scientific study life environment, also make the school system to have various awards in, have points, according to the school fair comparable prominent made style. Quantification assessment mainly lies in the class with student daily routine work closely combine student work. Examination content including class daily management, thought education work, the class contruction and style of construction parts. Mobilize existing student system for students to create a standardized, scientific study life environment. Students four major daily work departments will be combined with the WanXi college student work appraisal method and the classmates daily activities demand of perfect rating is formulated, provide lots of truly and effectively students data, from just held regularly symposium materials and interviews to improve student work. Benefit school, department leader, the teacher to class objectively, effectively guide, the timely discovery is insufficient, understand a student of fairness dynamic and can give class due title. Each class are conducive to promoting study life, build after learning progress good ban feng catching-up. Enhance the classmates class honor or disgrace consciousness and teamwork. My department is implementing quantification assessment work for nearly a year, in the achievements of and revealed some problems. No matter how we modify and adapt to what is inadequate, total have a little limits assessment system advantage? We come to point to see the following questions. Why most students have no respect for quantification assessment? 1) on thinking mode. Many students suffer from chronic HangZhengShi working mode influence, often encountered activity or system first reaction was: what is the activity? Troubles! This should be often we can hear complaints from the many students can be found in the eyes of quantification check just form things, and ordinary managers also will only quantification assessment set within the framework of the administrative management. They always think: strengthen administrative strength from top to bottom, implement the implement system, carry out all work can ensure quantification assessment work of operation and want to effect. So we often see this situation: next months statements coming out? Havent materials, do-it-yourself point! Anyway, all about! And so on. After such results out who truly care about results only a few, many students dont conscious quantification assessment of grades will had nothing to do with him? From the above situation can reflect two formulary, quantification assessment of workers to work with the formula of perversion of the assessment system of object by. Some workers never thinking of the nature of the work, more just according to the constitution and system going down, to all work is equally This is not all a persons fault, just too much under the influence of the thinking of by administrative management, coupled with the nature of work is the most university administrative affairs primarily. This to the quantification assessment produce subconscious till it, be nature of the work, as distortion on hold times and degree of have add, quantification assessment vitality was in linear slide. As quantification assessment object classmates are the beneficiaries of heart by the original the repulsion to form of victims, the analysis reason is the students on the essence of quantification assessment inadequate understanding. Originally to participate in the management of students activities is not high, enthusiasm and workers to quantification assessment propaganda is insufficient, just made now assessment work from the peoples plight. Growing The dilemma in change management thinking formulary, while the more to strengthen students propaganda and supporting work. Below I will for quantification assessment propaganda and supporting work put forward the following Suggestions: 1, relevant principals should often ambulating student dormitory, from the Angle of the students understand the classmates idea of the quantification assessment, no matter what kind of you to ask, are all his views on care and thinking, assessment should be taken seriously, not only for the classmates emotional encourages is made with a quantification assessment into intimate attitude classmates life study. Maybe some classmates to quantification assessment dont trust, you should will quantification assessment utility and will produce a good learning environment as a promise, the prospect of improving students enthusiasm and feasible degree. 2, establish feedback system, each class should establish a suggestion box, on the one hand can let everyone can will quantification assessment express the shortcomings and dissatisfaction with another moment for want to know and difficulties in the work of the students to provide a solution of channels. And that can receive Jones effect, make a few people have nothing to say, lessen can pick. 2) strengthening the work of executionIdentification is the executive force based (j. the identity and authority), but also for quantification assessment work basic requirements. Identification is the understanding and acceptance of things, it includes the identity of management objectives of management, the authority of the identity of manager capacity and quality, the identity, etc. In quantitative work, due to the lack of classmate of identity, many class committee difficult to carry out down, then work itself emerged phenomena and cope with style students. Therefore quantification assessment can be affirmed the effectiveness of directly determine the work. This requests us XueWei manage the powers of the identity and students of manager capacity and quality of your identity. At present, we carry out more than some of the activities carried out HaoZhaoShi response, lead the design type mental type of decision-making, few survey foundation, few democratic centralism, few scientific decision-making mechanism, few feedback information effectively treated. This is inherent flaws we have no way to choose. For example, in university students doing morning exercises on the need for this thing, the necessity of a large number of students, inadequate understanding through various channels also reflects a condition and puts forward many ideas, but is often not promptly solve and satisfactory answer, hard to avoid can arise no way, it is above the asking to do it, do it cope with the style and call people the stowage (doing drill) itself phenomenon. Meanwhile, XueWei to target the weak auxiliary explanatory also can make the students on target for lack of understanding, produce systems identity. Gymnastics If the necessity of for morning exercises explain points on doing morning exercises is to the student will power and mental exercise, is suffering from the Angle of militarization, then students request to the necessity of early identification is strong, the implementation effect is good. XueWei powers lack of recognition, produced students to participate in the quantification assessment of the poor phenomenon. This includes the student to student cadre of their recognition and cadres powers of the functions and powers of identity. Generally speaking, in university students democratic management in the direct managers of teachers professional management authority is common, but recognition of student management organizations, such as the student cadres, community, etc is greatly different powers identity. Through the fair and open the authority of the identity of the program is obtained from their good moral character, strong ability and excellent work performance is obtained the approval authority, in work note management methods and management service for students, pay attention to the art of good powers identity. But student cadre is through democratic election, if elected, to their functions identity is based on the basis of classmates, responsible for work will have strong democratic consciousness. If is the higher organizations in work, often appointed the initiative and service of executive orders on the ingredients will be more, democratic decision-making ideas will become indifferent. This is all impact quantitative assessment execution important factors. Execution need ability the reaso