托福独立写作分类例文.docx

1.包含should,important, necessary的简单话题P75 2009.5.30 Younger school children (aged between five and ten) should be required to study art and music in addition to math, science, history and language. In order to broaden the horizon of younger school children, it is suggested that they should study art and music as well as other common courses. I agree with it because of the following reasons. First of all, art and music can help students to relax. Campus life is stressful even for younger children who aged between five and ten, with all kinds of homework and assignments. However, by having music and art classes, students can get a much-needed escape from the heavy work. It can help them to relax their mind and study more efficient in other classes. Second, music and art classes help improve students personal relationships. Students will meet together to talk about a same topic if they have common interests. For example, students attending art classes can talk about the masterpiece or life story of a famous painter. Students having music classes will enjoy the beautiful melody or sing songs together. By communicating with each other, they will build a strong friendship and learn how to behave in various situations. Third, music and art classes provide students with plenty of information about great artists and their works. By learning knowledge in artistic fields students can acquire different cultures from different country. The artists and musicians describe what they see or hear in their works, showing feelings meanwhile, which bring the students the atmosphere at that time. To sum up, art and music classes should be taken by younger school students to broaden their horizon.(248w)2.包含比较(better, prefer)的简单话题2010.10.9NA Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People can take care of their family members better when they live in big cities than in the countryside.No matter where people live, in big cities or in the countryside, they must take care of their family members. Basically I prefer the former one. Living in big cities has more advantages than living in the countryside. Firstly, for old people, Living in big cities can be convenient. There are a large number of hospitals which are available to all kinds of diseases. When the old people catch a cold, have a fever or even heart attack, they could be taken to the best hospital nearby and received treat in time and recover as soon as possible. But in the countryside, situations in hospitals are obvious terrible. Secondly, children should receive good education, so living in big cities is a wise choice. Schools in big cities which get finance support from government provide sufficient teaching facilities for the students in order that the students can study more easily and do more experiments. Moreover, the teaching levels of the teachers in big cities are higher on average than that of the teachers in the countryside. Admittedly, Living in big cities may have a few downsides. For example, the air may be not as fresh as it in the countryside and the noise may make people crazy sometimes. However, government is taking measures to prevent the pollutions and people are also becoming aware of the importance of environmental protection. It is sure that the problems can be solved in the future.In a word, people can take care of their family members much better when they live in big cities than in the countryside, because advanced society welfares are everywhere in big cities.Word Count: 2723.比较的一种变体2009.2.27 A job with more vacation but a low salary is better than a job with a high salary but less vacation.Nowadays, people always have difficulty in dealing with the relationship between vacation and salary. Some people may prefer high salary to more vacation, while others probably want more vacation than a high salary. In my opinion, a job with more vacation is better, so I agree with the statement.First, more vacation means more opportunities to relax. People today live a much busier life than before, pursuing reputation, status and wealth, which makes them very tired. Why not stop doing this and get a job with more vacation and lead a relaxed life? People can gain more time to relax and find their own interest instead of spending all day long working in the office by taking such a job. Moreover, if you have a good rest in the vacation, you will work more efficiently.Second, more vacation means more health. Being a workaholic may do a lot of harm to peoples health. For example, staring at the computer screen all day will hurt your eyes. If you want to recover, you should have a vacation. Furthermore, people can spare more time to accompany their families and friends. By doing this, people may have a happy mood and be optimistic all the time.Admittedly, a low salary is surely a downside. However, money is not everything. Whether you live a good life or not cannot depend on how much money you make. As long as you can live without cold and starvation, more money is unnecessary. People should not insist on seeking for money and there are what we should care most. A relaxed mind and a healthy body are much more important than wealth.In conclusion, I consider a job with more vacation but a low salary better than one with a high salary but less vacation. The reasons above firmly support my opinion.4.包含抽象或宽泛话题的价值判断2010.8.21NA We should never be impolite to another person.To be polite to other people is a good character of a person. Nevertheless, I disagree with the opinion that people should always be polite to any other people. Though in most cases, people should not be impolite, there must be some special situations that we neednt be polite.Admittedly, being polite is necessary in most occasions. A student must say hello to the teachers, bow before the class and listen carefully during the class. An interviewee should behave modestly and does not say any rude words so that he will have a higher chance to be hired. These are both politeness, which are the symbols of your good education and high quality. However, to say that we should never be impolite to another person is an overstatement because exceptions do exist.Firstly, consider the person who promotes some products that you really dont like or even something illegal. If he keeps on knocking your door for several times to persuade you to buy the products, can you be polite to him? Of course not! To person like him, you must not be polite and warn him that if he disturbs you again, you will call the police.Secondly, consider the criminals. When we are trapped in a crime, it is ridiculous for us to be polite to criminals. Although you are a polite person in daily life, you cant consider your ceremony at the emergency. You should try your best to save the lives of the people in danger and help the police arrest them.To sum up, to be polite to others isnt a bad thing for people, but it doesnt mean that we should be polite whenever. If we encounter someone who may do harm to us, we mustnt be polite to them. These are the reasons which support my opinion.Word Count: 3045.包含绝对词（never, always, only, no longer,最高级等）2007.8.4 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Printed books will no longer exist.With the development of technology, digital books are increasingly coming into use while printed book are less used in our lives. It has been argued that printed books will no longer exist in the future. I disagree although the statement has a grain of truth.First of all, admittedly, digital books have some advantages over printed books. First, it is cheaper to download a digital version from the internet than to buy a hardcover printed book. You may download Harry Potter for only half the price of the paper version. Second, the digital book is very convenient for us to carry because it is much lighter than the printed book. We can download thousands of articles into our mp4 or electronic book to read them everywhere instead of carrying several heavy books.However, to say that printed books will disappear from our lives in the future is unacceptable. First, hardcover printed books are worth collecting. They are usually very valuable with their beautiful cover and plentiful content. Second, the printed books made by papers are good for peoples eyes. If we stare at a digital book all the time, our eyes will be tired or even hurt. Reading for a long period may do enormous harm to peoples health, especially to children. Third, printed books are of great importance in some special ceremonies. They are usually the symbols of holy things. It is ridiculous for a minister to read with a digital book in a church.To sum up, although the digital books are more and more useful, it is sure that printed books will exist forever.(w267)6.包含条件关系2010.6.19 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? If you need to discuss upsetting or controversial problems with others, you should use e-mail or text message rather than use the telephone or voice-messaging.There are always some upsetting or controversial problems we should discuss inevitably. Which way should we choose to deal with it, direct way or indirect way? I think indirect way better, so I agree with that we should use e-mail or text message rather than use the telephone or voice-messaging.First of all, e-mail or text messages may help avoid embarrassment. Talking about something sad often make people embarrassed. For example, if a teacher tells his student directly that she does not pass the exam, she might be very sad or even cannot help bursting into tears. The teacher may be at a loss and doesnt know what to do. Therefore, he should tell her by e-mail or text messages in order to avoid the embarrassment like this.Moreover, using e-mail and text messages may prevent the collision from happening. When discussing some controversial problems, people are easy to get angry with who hold an opposite view on the problem if they talk face to face or by telephone. Therefore, using e-mail or text messages is much better than telephone or voice-messaging. It will take long for people to calm down and think about the problem twice, then they will write details to explain the problem and discuss it with a tranquil mood and a wise mind, which make the issue much easier to solve.Besides, there is another problem that if you quarrel with others on the telephone, it may cost a lot of time and money. So sending an e-mail is usually an economical way. It is another advantage over the direct way.Based on the above reasons, I firmly hold my opinion that we should use e-mail or text messages rather than use the telephone or voice-messaging when discussing some upsetting or controversial problems with others. (300w)7.包含因果关系P15 2010.3.20NA Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People today can solve many important problems so they do not need help from the government.With the development of society, people can do more things by themselves nowadays. But I disagree with the statement that people can solve many important problems, therefore the government does not need to help them. There are three reasons as follows: Firstly, People today still cannot solve many important problems by themselves in fact, such as education, unemployment, war, starvation, poverty and so on. These are international problems all over the world, a single person or even a group of people may not have the abilities to solve them. For example, if a person wants to stop a war between two countries, even he is powerful or wealthy, he cannot prevent them from fighting with each other without the help of others. Secondly, people today need more help from the government. As the life standards are getting a higher level, people have more requirement than before. They ask for all kinds of utilities in public for entertainment or exercise. They need various insurance to make their lives more comfortable. They also require more schools and hospitals to take care of the young people and patients. Thirdly, whether the people today can solve many problems or not has nothing to do with whether they need the governments help. It is the responsibility of the government to help people. The government must give people help no matter how powerful they are. In a word, the statement that people today do not need help from the government because they can solve many important problems is wrong. The reasons above can firmly support my idea.260w8.今昔对比2010.9.25NA Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Young people in today are less dependent on their parents than in the past.With the development of society in recent years, Young people become more and more independent on their family, while in the past they did rely on their parents. I agree with the statement for the following three reasons. First of all, the development of technology at a surprising speed allows young people to live independently in the contemporary society. It is easy and convenient for them to use the advanced facilities to take care of themselves. For example, young children can learn to cook food with a microwave oven, just pressing the button. However, in the past times, people should cut the branches of the trees and burn them to cook a meal, which young people couldnt do it by themselves. Second, the information high way makes young people come up with more ideas about the society. Nowadays, computer and internet come into every home, and young people can get a large amount of information of all kinds through the internet, which make them come up with a lot of creative ideas. With these ideas, young people think deeper about the society and become more independent from their parents than whom in the past. They can deal with most problems and perform well. Third, the financial support from the government and other social communities gives the young people economic independence. A robust welfare system has been set up in order to help people who need extra assistance. Now elementary and middle school students can receive education for free and there are a lot of scholarships for students offered by the government, companies or individuals. The financial support allows young people to live an independent life to some degree. In a word, young people depended on their family in the past, but it has changed that they become less dependent on their parents nowadays because of the development of society. Word Count: 3099. 现象证明2010.10.31NA Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People are now easier to become educated than in the past.Education is the foundation of a country. People today have a stronger concept of being educated than in the past. I agree with the statement that people gain an easier access to all kinds of educations at current times.Firstly, there are much more schools available today than in the past. No matter where you live, in big cities or in the countryside, the local government spends a large amount of money on the constructions of various types of schools, such as primary schools, middle schools, high schools and even schools for adults. More and more universities and colleges have been built to ensure a higher education for top students. If you want to study in schools, you will always find a proper one to attend. Secondly, the teaching approach diversifies. Except for blackboard and chalks, many advanced teaching devices are being used today in most schools, including computers, multiply media and some other instruments. Moreover, labs and libraries have also come into use for students to study deeper and wider. What is more, the teachers teaching levels are greatly improved by communicating with other educators from all over the world. The technology becomes more developed than in the past, so it is easier now to study.Thirdly, people have equal rights to receive education. As we all know, People in the past were in terrible discrimination because of their sex and race. For example, women and black people were used to be considered as people in lower classes or even slaves and werent allowed to go to school. However, they have equal rights to study in schools nowadays.To sum up, people do have an easier way to receive education now than in past times. These are my reasons to support my opinions.Word Count: 29410. 政府投资2009.11.7NA For the successful development of a country, a government should spend more money on education of very young children (3-10 year old) than the education of universities.Nowadays, in order to make the development of a country successful, educati