Biostatistics Main 1-10.pptx_第1页
Biostatistics Main 1-10.pptx_第2页
Biostatistics Main 1-10.pptx_第3页
Biostatistics Main 1-10.pptx_第4页
Biostatistics Main 1-10.pptx_第5页
免费预览已结束,剩余17页可下载查看

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

BiostatisticsMain1 10 Q1 Acohortstudywasconductedtoassesstherelationshipbetweenhighsaturatedfatconsumptionandtheoccurrenceofcolorectalcarcinomaamongwomen Agroupofwomenaged40 65wasselected Thebaselinesaturatedfatconsumptionwascalculatedusingafoodquestionnaire andthecohortwasfollowedforsevenyearsforthedevelopmentofcoloncancer Thestudyshowedthatwomenwithhighbaselinesaturatedfatconsumptionhavefourtimestheriskofcolorectalcancerina7 yearperiod comparedtowomenwithlowfatconsumption RR 4 0 95 Cl 1 5 6 5 Accordingtothestudyresults whatpercentofcolorectalcarcinomainwomenwithhighfatconsumptioncouldbeattributedtotheirdiet A 25 B 50 C 75 D 90 E 100 A1 Correctanswer CAttributableriskpercent ARP oretiologicfractionisanimportantmeasureoftheimpactofariskfactorbeingstudied ARPrepresentstheexcessriskinapopulationthatcanbeexplainedbyexposuretoaparticularriskfactor Itiscalculatedbysubtractingtheriskintheunexposedpopulation baselinerisk fromtheriskintheexposedpopulation anddividingtheresultbytheriskintheexposedpopulation ARP riskinexposed riskinunexposed riskinexposed AneasierwaytocalculatetheARPistoderiveitfromtherelativerisk RR ARP RR 1 RR Inthiscase ARP 4 0 1 4 0 0 75 75 Accordingtothestudyresults 75 ofcolorectalcarcinomainthehighconsumptiongroupwasattributabletohighsaturatedfatintake EducationalObjective ARPrepresentstheexcessriskintheexposedpopulationthatcanbeattributedtotheriskfactor Itcanbeeasilyderivedfromtherelativeriskusingthefollowingformula ARP RR 1 RR Q2 Acohortstudywasconductedtoassesstherelationshipbetweenahigh fatdietandcolorectaladenocarcinoma Thestudyconcludedthatnoassociationexistsbetweentheexposureandtheoutcomeaftercontrollingforknownriskfactors age fiberconsumption andfamilyhistoryofcancer astherelativeriskwas1 15withapvalueof0 25 Theinvestigatorsalsoreportedthat40 ofthesubjectsinthehigh fatgroupand36 ofthesubjectsinthelow fatgroupwerelosttofollow upbytheendofthestudyandwerenotincludedinthefinalanalysis Accordingtothisinformation whichofthefollowingbiasesismostlikelytobepresent A ObserverbiasB RecallbiasC ReportingbiasD SelectionbiasE Surveillancebias A2 Correctanswer DLosstofollow upisaproblemforprospectivestudiesasitcreatesthepotentialforatypeofselectionbiasKnownasattritionbias Subjectsmaydropoutofastudyforanumberofreasons butifthereasonissomehowrelatedtotheoutcome thelostsubjectswilldifferintheirriskofdevelopingtheoutcomecomparedtotheremainingsubjects Whenasubstantialnumberofsubjectsarelosttofollow up thestudymayoverestimateorunderestimatetheassociationbetweentheexposureandthedisease Inthiscase asubstantialnumberofsubjectswerelostfromboththeexposed high fat andunexposed low fat groups Peopleinthelow fatgroupmayhaveleftthestudyfordifferentreasonsthanthoseinthehigh fatgroup Forinstance maybemostsubjectsinthelow fatgroupleftduetononcompliancewithastrictlow fatdiet whilemoreindividualsinthehigh fatgroupdroppedoutduetohealth relatedproblems eg obesity diabetes cardiovasculardisease Theselectivelossofhigh risksubjectsinthehigh fatgroupwouldthencausethemeasureofassociationbetweenfatconsumptionandcolorectalcancertobeunderestimated Toreducethepotentialforattritionbiasinprospectivestudies investigatorstrytoachievehighralesoffollow up Lossestofollow upmustbereportedinstudyarticlesforreaderstoknowaboutthepotentialforselectionbias ChoiceA Observerbiasoccurswhenobserversmisclassifydataduetoindividualdifferencesininterpretationorpreconceivedexpectationsregardingthestudy Thequestiongivesnoinformationonexactlyhowoutcomeswereclassifiedandrecorded ChoiceB Recallbiasoccursinretrospectivestudieswhensubjectswithnegativeoutcomesaremorelikelythancontrolsubjectstoreportcertainexposures Thisleadstomisclassificationoftheexposurestatus likelymagnifyingtheeffectofanyexposure ChoiceC Reportingbiasoccurswhenasubjectisreluctanttoreportanexposureduetostigmaabouttheexposure eg sexualbehaviors druguse ChoiceE Surveillancebiasoccurswhentheexposedgroupundergoesincreasedmonitoringrelativetothegeneralpopulation Thistendstoincreasediseasediagnosescomparedtothegeneralpopulation Educationalobjective Losstofollow upinprospectivestudiescreatesapotentialforattritionbias asubtypeofselectionbias Whenasubstantialnumberofsubjectsarelosttofollow up thestudymayoverestimateorunderestimatetheassociationbetweentheexposureandthedisease Investigatorstrytoachievehighratesoffollow uptoreducethepotentialforattritionbias Q3 AprospectivecohortstudywasconductedtoassesstherelationshipbetweenelevatedC reactiveproteinlevel exposure andthedevelopmentofacutecoronarysyndrome disease Aftera5 yearfollow upperiod thefollowingdatawereobtained Whatisthe5 yearriskofgettingacutecoronarysyndromeinsubjectswithelevatedC reactiveproteinlevels A 0 5B 0 3C 0 25D 0 2E 0 14 A3 Correctanswer ARiskisameasureofincidenceofadisease Itshowstheprobabilityofgettingadiseaseoveracertainperiodoftime 5yearsinthisscenario Tocalculatetherisk dividethenumberofdiseasedsubjectsbytheoverallnumberofsubjectsatrisk Inthisexample togetthe5 yearriskofacutecoronarysyndromeinsubjectswithelevatedC reactiveproteinlevels exposed dividethenumberofexposeddiseasedsubjects 10 bythetotalnumberofexposedpeople 20 10 20 0 5Thecalculatedriskvalueis0 5rwhichisinterpretedasa50 probabilityofgettingacutecoronarysyndromein5years ChoiceB The5 yearriskofgettingacutecoronarysyndromeinallstudysubjectsis30 100 0 3 30 ChoiceC The5 yearriskofgettingacutecoronarysyndromeinpeoplewithoutelevatedC reactiveproteinlevelsis20 80 thatis 0 25or25 ChoiceD Theprevalenceofexposureintheentirecohort exposedandunexposedcombined is20 100 thatis 0 2 ChoiceE Theprevalenceofexposureinnon diseasedpeopleis10 70 thatis 0 14 EducationalObjective Riskistheprobabilityofgettingadiseaseoveracertainperiodoftime Tocalculatetherisk dividethenumberofdiseasedsubjectsbythetotalnumberofsubjectsatrisk i e allthepeopleatrisk Q4 Astudywasconductedtoassesstheassociationbetweenhormonereplacementtherapy HRT inpost menopausalwomenandthelevelofserumC reactiveprotein CRP Thedatafromthestudyarepresentedbelow WhichofthefollowingisthebeststatisticalmethodtoassesstheassociationbetweenHRTandelevatedCRPlevels A Two samplez testB Two samplet testC Chi squaretestD ANOVAE Meta analysis A4 Correctanswer CThechi squaretestisusedtocomparetheproportionsofacategorizedoutcome 丨nthiscase theoutcome serumCRPlevel iscategorizedaseitherlhhigh and normal 1andthenpresentedwiththeexposure irHRT or noHRTM ina2x2table Inoneofthecommonlyusedchi squaretestsrtheobservedvaluesineachofthecellsarecomparedtoexpected underthehypothesisofnoassociation values Ifthedifferencebetweentheobservedandexpectedvaluesislarge anassociationbetweentheexposureandtheoutcomeisassumedtobepresent ChoicesAandB Thetwo samplez testandtwo samplet testareusedtocomparetwomeans notproportions ChoiceD Analysisofvariance ANOVA isusedtocomparethemeansofthreeormorevariables ChoiceE Meta analysisisanepidemiologicmethodofpoolingthedatafromseveralstudiestodoananalysishavingarelativelybigstatisticalpower EducationalObjective Thechi squaretestisusedtocompareproportions A2x2tablemaybeusedtocomparetheobservedvalueswiththeexpectedvalues Q5 Aprospectivecohortstudyrevealedastrongpositiveassociationbetweensmokingandlivercirrhosis relativerisk 2 8 Theresearchersthendividedthecohortintotwogroups alcoholconsumersandnon consumers Subsequentstatisticalanalysisdidnotrevealanyassociationbetweensmokingandlivercirrhosiswitheithergroup Thescenariodescribedaboveisanexampleofwhichofthefollowing A SelectionbiasB Observer sbiasC MeasurementbiasD RecallbiasE Confounding A5 Correctanswer EConfoundingreferstothebiasthatresultswhentheexposure diseaserelationshipismixedwiththeeffectofextraneousfactors j e confounders Confoundersinfluenceboththeexposureandoutcome Inthegivenstudy crudeanalysisofthedatainitiallyrevealedanassociationbetweensmokingandlivercirrhosis Themostlikelypotentialconfounderisconcomitantalcoholconsumptioninpeoplewhosmoke Itisawell knownfactthatalcoholconsumptionisstronglyassociatedwithlivercirrhosis Furthermore alcoholconsumptioncanexplainatleastpartoftheassociationobservedbetweensmokingandlivercirrhosis Methodstodealwithconfoundingincludematchingofcasesandcontrolsbasedontheconfoundingfactor orstratificationofthestudypopulationbasedontheconfoundingfactor Inthiscase runningseparateanalysesforalcoholconsumersandnon consumers thistechniqueiscalledstratifiedanalysis canunmaskconfoundinganddisclosethetrueunconfoundedvalueoftheRR ChoiceA Selectionbiasresultsfromthemannerinwhichpeopleareselectedforthestudy orfromtheselectivelossesfromfollow up Thescenariodoesnotmentionanyoftheseproblems ChoicesBandC Observer sbiasandmeasurementbiasdistortthemeasureofassociationbymisclassifyingexposed unexposedand ordiseased non diseasedsubjects Thescenariodoesnotdescribethisclassificationprocess ChoiceD Recallbiasresultsfromtheinaccuraterecallofpastexposurebypeopleinthestudy Itappliesmostlytocase controlstudies notcohortstudies EducationalOjective Knowtheconceptofconfounding Distinguishbetweencrudeandadjustedmeasuresofassociation Confoundingreferstothebiasthatcanresultwhentheexposure diseaserelationshipismixedwiththeeffectofextraneousfactors i e confounders Q6 Acase controlstudywasconductedtoevaluatetheassociationbetweenalcoholconsumptionandcanceroftheoralcavity Thecrudeanalysisshowedastrongassociationbetweentheexposureandoutcome oddsratio 4 5 95 confidenceinterval3 4 5 6 Smokingwasconsideredasapotentialconfounderoftheassociation Whichofthefollowingpropertiesofsmokingisessentialinordertobeconsideredasaconfounder A ItshouldnotberelatedtocanceroftheoralcavityB ItshouldbehighlyprevalentinthepopulationofinterestC ItshouldberelatedtoalcoholconsumptionD ItshouldbeobservedonlyinalcoholconsumersE Itshouldbeevenlydistributedamongalcoholconsumersandnon consumers A6 Correctanswer CConfoundingisdefinedasmixingupoftheeffectofexposurewiththeeffectofanextraneousfactor confounder Inordertobeaconfounder theextraneousfactormusthavesomepropertieslinkingitwiththeexposureandoutcomeofinterest Inthisexample smokingisthepossibleconfounder Smokingisrelatedtotheexposure i e peoplewhoconsumealcoholaremorelikelytosmoke aswellastheoutcomeofinterest i e smoking byitself isassociatedwithcanceroftheoralcavity Ifsmokingistheconfounder itexplainsatleastpartoftheassociationobservedbetweenalcoholconsumptionandcanceroftheoralcavity ChoiceA Ifsmokingisnotrelatedtocanceroforalcavity itcannotbeaconfounderinthiscase ChoiceB Theprevalenceofafactorinthepopulationisnotrelatedtoitseffectasaconfounder ChoiceDandE Aconfounderiscommonlyobservedbothinexposedandunexposedsubjectsanditisnotevenlydistributedbetweenthegroups EducationalObjective Aconfounderisanextraneousfactorwhichhaspropertieslinkingitwiththeexposureandoutcomeofinterest Q7 Acase controlstudywasconductedtoassesstherelationshipbetweenalcoholconsumptionandbreastcancer First theinvestigatorsInterviewedpatientswithbreastcancer Theythenselectedtheneighborsofthepatientswiththesameageandrace andusedthemascontrols Suchstudydesignhelpstocontrolwhichofthefollowingproblems A SelectionbiasB RecallbiasC Observer sbiasD AscertainmentbiasE Confounding A7 Correctanswer EMatchingisanefficientmethodtocontrolconfounding Itisfrequentlyusedincase controlstudies Theinitialstepinvolvestheselectionofmatchingvariables whichshouldalwaysbethepotentialconfounders e g rage race Casesandcontrolsarethenselectedbasedonthematchingvariables suchthatbothgroupshaveasimilardistributioninaccordancewiththevariables Inthisscenario neighborhood controls werematchedto cases byageandrace Selectingneighbors3Scontrolsh3sanotheradvantageofmatchingthecasestocontrolsbyvariablesthataredifficulttomeasure eg socioeconomicstatus ChoiceA Selectionbiasisnotcontrolledbymatching becausethecontrolsselectedmaynotreflecttheexposureexperience inthiscase alcoholconsumption ofthegeneralpopulation ChoicesB CandD Recallbias observer sbias andascertainmentbiasresultfrommislabelingexposed unexposedorcases controls Thesearenotaffectedbymatching EducationalObjective Matchingisfrequentlyusedincase controlstudiesbecauseiiisanefficientmethodtocontrolconfounding Remember matchingvariablesshouldalwaysbethepotentialconfoundersofthestudy e g Page race Casesandcontrolsarethenselectedbasedonthematchingvariables suchthatbothgroupshaveasimilardistributioninaccordancewiththevariables Q8 Aclinicalstudyisconductedtoassesstheroleofavasopressinantagonistinoverallsurvivalofpatientswithadvancedheartfailureandhyponatremia Afterprovidinginformedconsent eligiblehospitalizedpatientsareadministeredeitherthenewdrugoramatchingplaceboalongwiththeappropriatestandardcare Assignmenttothe2treatmentarmsisdonerandomlyusingcomputer generatednumbers Thisassignmentstrategyismosthelpfulforcontrollingwhichofthefollowing A ConfoundingB EffectmodificationC Post hocanalysisD RecallbiasE Selectivesurvival A8 Correctanswer ATheeffectsofconfoundingbiascanbereducedthroughgoodstudydesignandproperanalysisoftheresults Methodsusedtocontrolforconfoundingduringdataanalysisincludestratifiedanalysisandstatisticalmodeling eg multivariateanalyses Inaddition methodstocontrolforconfoundersduringstudydesignincludethefollowing 1 Matching Frequentlyusedincase controlstudies thismethodinvolvesmatchingknownorsuspectedconfoundingvariablesbetweenthecasesandcontrols Forexample ifsmokingstatusisaknownconfounderthencontrolswillbeselectedonacase by casebasissothattherearesimilarnumbersofsmokersandnonsmokersinboththecaseandcontrolgroups 2 Restriction ThismethocHnvolveslimitingstudyparticipationtoindividualswithspecificcharacteristics Forexample ifsexisthoughttobeaconfounder thenarestrictedstudymayenrollonlymen However thismethodislimitedasthestudyresultsmaynotbeapplicabletotheexcludedpopulation ie women 3 Randomization Commonlyemployedinclinicaltrials thistechniquehelpstobalancethedistributionofconfoundingvariablesbetweentreatmentandplacebogroupssothattheunconfoundedeffectoftheexposureofinterestcanbeisolated Animportantadvantageofrandomization comparedtoothermethods isthepossibilityofcontrollingknownriskfactors egrageandseverityofheartfailure aswellastheunknownanddifficult to measureconfounders eg levelofstressandsocioeconomicstatus Randomizationalsoeliminatespartialityintreatmentassignments minimizingselectionbias ChoiceB Effectmodificationresultswhenanexternalvariablepositivelyornegativelyimpactstheeffectofariskfactoronthediseaseofinterest Forinstance theriskofvenousthrombosisisincreasedwithestrogentherapy andthiseffectisaugmentedbysmoking ChoiceC Post hocanalysisreferstoperformingunplannedstatisticaltestsonpatternsthatwereidentifiedafterthefactindatafromacompletedstudy Thiscanleadtoincorrectconclusions particularlyiftheappropriatestatisticalmeasureshavenotbeentakentoaccountfortheseadditionaltests Post hocanalysiscanbeproblematicwithnon predefinedsubgroupanalysis Randomizationdoesnotdirectlyimpactpost hocanalysis whichcanbeconductedevenondatafromrandomizedsamples ChoiceD Recallbiasresultsfrominaccuraterecallofpastexposureandappliesprimarilytoretrospectivestudies Peoplewhohavesufferedanadverseeventaremorelikelytorecallriskfactorsthanpeoplewithoutsuchexperiences ChoiceE Selectivesurvivalbiasoccursincase controlstudieswhencasesareselectedfromtheentirediseasepopulationinsteadofjustthosethatarenewlydiagnosed Forinstance astudyoncancersurvivalthatisnotlimitedtonewlydiagnosedpatientswillcontainahigherproportionofrelativelybenignmalignanciesasthesepatientsgenerallylivelonger Educationalobjective Randomizationisusedtocontrolforconfoundersduringthedesignstageofastudy helpstocontrolforknown unknown anddifficult to measureconfounders Q9 AstudywasconductedtoassesstherelationshipbetweenserumHDL2level asubtractionofHDL andcarotidintima mediathicknessasamarkerofatherosclerosis Interpretationoftheresultsrevealedalinearrelationshipbetweenthese2variables withacorrelationcoefficientr 0 25 p 0 005 Whichofthefollowingstatementsabouttheresultsofthestudyisthemostcorrect A AsHDL2levelincreases thereisanassociateddecreaseincarotidintima mediathicknessB DecreasedHD1 2levelisthecauseofcarotidintima mediathickeningC TheassociationisnotstatisticallysignificantD ThereisastrongcorrelationbetweenHDL2levelandcarotidintima mediathicknessE ThereisapositivecorrelationbetweenHDL2levelandcarotidintima mediathickness A9 Correctanswer AThecorrelationcoefficient r assessesalinearrelationshipbetween2variables Thenullvalueforthecorrelationcoefficientis0 noassociation andthesignofthecorrelationcoefficientindicatesapositiveornegativeassociation Thecloserristoitsmargins 1or1 fthestrongertheassociation Inthisstudy astherewasanegativecorrelationbetweenHDL2andcarotidintima mediathickness givenr 0 250 5orr0 wouldhavemeantthatincreasesinHDL2wereassociatedwithincreasesincarotid intimathickness Educationalobjective Thecorrelationcoefficient r showsthestrengthanddirection positive negative oflinearassociationbetween2variables ltdoesno

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论