DEA实验结果(单产出三投入).docx

人力投入X1、物料投入X2、资本投入X3、（投入）赔付支出及其他准备金之和Y1（产出）Results from DEAP Version 2.1 Instruction file = 1234_3.ins Data file = 1234_3.dta Input orientated DEA Scale assumption: VRS Slacks calculated using multi-stage method EFFICIENCY SUMMARY: firmcrstevrstescale10.9511.0000.951drs20.8880.9260.959irs30.7090.7330.967irs41.0001.0001.000-51.0001.0001.000-60.7620.8140.936irs71.0001.0001.000-80.8810.9180.960drs90.3511.0000.351drs100.5950.7570.786irs110.7050.8120.869irs120.6381.0000.638irs130.4120.5090.808irs140.6680.8070.828irs150.4930.6110.806irsmean0.7370.8590.857Note: crste = technical efficiency from CRS DEA vrste = technical efficiency from VRS DEA scale = scale efficiency = crste/vrsteNote also that all subsequent tables refer to VRS results SUMMARY OF OUTPUT SLACKS: firm output: 1 1 0.000 2 0.000 3 0.000 4 0.000 5 0.000 6 0.000 7 0.000 8 0.000 9 0.000 10 0.000 11 0.000 12 0.000 13 0.000 14 0.000 15 0.000 mean 0.000 SUMMARY OF INPUT SLACKS: firm input: 1 2 3 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 2 0.000 3217.802 0.000 3 0.000 1063.973 0.000 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 5 0.000 0.000 0.000 6 4912.998 2343.694 0.000 7 0.000 0.000 0.000 8 0.000 0.000 65.530 9 0.000 0.000 0.000 10 0.000 369.655 0.000 11 1986.631 25.549 0.000 12 0.000 0.000 0.000 13 0.000 245.750 0.000 14 17690.679 604.413 0.000 15 349.037 0.000 323.386 mean 1662.623 524.722 25.928 SUMMARY OF PEERS: firm peers: 1 1 2 4 7 12 3 7 4 12 4 4 5 5 6 7 12 7 7 8 7 4 1 9 9 10 7 12 4 11 7 12 12 12 13 4 7 12 14 7 12 15 7 12 SUMMARY OF PEER WEIGHTS: (in same order as above) firm peer weights: 1 1.000 2 0.212 0.163 0.625 3 0.518 0.039 0.443 4 1.000 5 1.000 6 0.482 0.518 7 1.000 8 0.249 0.647 0.104 9 1.000 10 0.049 0.927 0.024 11 0.280 0.720 12 1.000 13 0.043 0.026 0.931 14 0.208 0.792 15 0.106 0.894 PEER COUNT SUMMARY: (i.e., no. times each firm is a peer for another) firm peer count: 1 1 2 0 3 0 4 5 5 0 6 0 7 9 8 0 9 0 10 0 11 0 12 8 13 0 14 0 15 0 SUMMARY OF OUTPUT TARGETS: firm output: 1 1 98722.000 2 11813.390 3 10330.440 4 40354.400 5 11378.280 6 8258.780 7 15968.630 8 40354.400 9 153322.000 10 2736.300 11 5249.290 12 1070.820 13 3151.920 14 4176.470 15 2656.010 SUMMARY OF INPUT TARGETS: firm input: 1 2 3 1 240226.000 22829.600 45450.000 2 7293.595 3718.903 6835.369 3 15537.655 2151.272 4988.096 4 7181.000 14355.250 24107.020 5 2147.000 3568.100 7966.620 6 14426.077 1517.186 3863.534 7 27749.000 2745.220 6989.530 8 36575.881 12343.933 22063.053 9 576592.000 97652.660 209649.000 10 3396.968 820.647 1795.758 11 9225.560 1037.831 2643.321 12 2005.000 372.280 949.140 13 2885.850 1038.305 2106.014 14 7371.685 866.951 2208.341 15 4744.270 624.771 1591.863 FIRM BY FIRM RESULTS: Results for firm: 1Technical efficiency = 1.000Scale efficiency = 0.951 (drs) PROJECTION SUMMARY: variable original radial slack projected value movement movement value output 1 98722.000 0.000 0.000 98722.000 input 1 240226.000 0.000 0.000 240226.000 input 2 22829.600 0.000 0.000 22829.600 input 3 45450.000 0.000 0.000 45450.000 LISTING OF PEERS: peer lambda weight 1 1.000 Results for firm: 2Technical efficiency = 0.926Scale efficiency = 0.959 (irs) PROJECTION SUMMARY: variable original radial slack projected value movement movement value output 1 11813.390 0.000 0.000 11813.390 input 1 7874.000 -580.405 0.000 7293.595 input 2 7488.710 -552.005 -3217.802 3718.903 input 3 7379.310 -543.941 0.000 6835.369 LISTING OF PEERS: peer lambda weight 4 0.212 7 0.163 12 0.625 Results for firm: 3Technical efficiency = 0.733Scale efficiency = 0.967 (irs) PROJECTION SUMMARY: variable original radial slack projected value movement movement value output 1 10330.440 0.000 0.000 10330.440 input 1 21196.000 -5658.345 0.000 15537.655 input 2 4386.140 -1170.895 -1063.973 2151.272 input 3 6804.610 -1816.514 0.000 4988.096 LISTING OF PEERS: peer lambda weight 7 0.518 4 0.039 12 0.443 Results for firm: 4Technical efficiency = 1.000Scale efficiency = 1.000 (crs) PROJECTION SUMMARY: variable original radial slack projected value movement movement value output 1 40354.400 0.000 0.000 40354.400 input 1 7181.000 0.000 0.000 7181.000 input 2 14355.250 0.000 0.000 14355.250 input 3 24107.020 0.000 0.000 24107.020 LISTING OF PEERS: peer lambda weight 4 1.000 Results for firm: 5Technical efficiency = 1.000Scale efficiency = 1.000 (crs) PROJECTION SUMMARY: variable original radial slack projected value movement movement value output 1 11378.280 0.000 0.000 11378.280 input 1 2147.000 0.000 0.000 2147.000 input 2 3568.100 0.000 0.000 3568.100 input 3 7966.620 0.000 0.000 7966.620 LISTING OF PEERS: peer lambda weight 5 1.000 Results for firm: 6Technical efficiency = 0.814Scale efficiency = 0.936 (irs) PROJECTION SUMMARY: variable original radial slack projected value movement movement value output 1 8258.780 0.000 0.000 8258.780 input 1 23759.000 -4419.925 -4912.998 14426.077 input 2 4743.280 -882.400 -2343.694 1517.186 input 3 4746.540 -883.006 0.000 3863.534 LISTING OF PEERS: peer lambda weight 7 0.482 12 0.518 Results for firm: 7Technical efficiency = 1.000Scale efficiency = 1.000 (crs) PROJECTION SUMMARY: variable original radial slack projected value movement movement value output 1 15968.630 0.000 0.000 15968.630 input 1 27749.000 0.000 0.000 27749.000 input 2 2745.220 0.000 0.000 2745.220 input 3 6989.530 0.000 0.000 6989.530 LISTING OF PEERS: peer lambda weight 7 1.000 Results for firm: 8Technical efficiency = 0.918Scale efficiency = 0.960 (drs) PROJECTION SUMMARY: variable original radial slack projected value movement movement value output 1 40354.400 0.000 0.000 40354.400 input 1 39846.000 -3270.119 0.000 36575.881 input 2 13447.560 -1103.627 0.000 12343.933 input 3 24107.020 -1978.437 -65.530 22063.053 LISTING OF PEERS: peer lambda weight 7 0.249 4 0.647 1 0.104 Results for firm: 9Technical efficiency = 1.000Scale efficiency = 0.351 (drs) PROJECTION SUMMARY: variable original radial slack projected value movement movement value output 1 153322.000 0.000 0.000 153322.000 input 1 576592.000 0.000 0.000 576592.000 input 2 97652.660 0.000 0.000 97652.660 input 3 209649.000 0.000 0.000 209649.000 LISTING OF PEERS: peer lambda weight 9 1.000 Results for firm: 10Technical efficiency = 0.757Scale efficiency = 0.786 (irs) PROJECTION SUMMARY: variable original radial slack projected value movement movement value output 1 2736.300 0.000 0.000 2736.300 input 1 4485.000 -1088.032 0.000 3396.968 input 2 1571.550 -381.248 -369.655 820.647 input 3 2370.930 -575.172 0.000 1795.758 LISTING OF PEERS: peer lambda weight 7 0.049 12 0.927 4 0.024 Results for firm: 11Technical efficiency = 0.812Scale efficiency = 0.869 (irs) PROJECTION SUMMARY: variable original radial slack projected value movement movement value output 1 5249.290 0.000 0.000 5249.290 input 1 13816.000 -2603.809 -1986.631 9225.560 input 2 1310.330 -246.949 -25.549 1037.831 input 3 3257.180 -613.859 0.000 2643.321 LISTING OF PEERS: peer lambda weight 7 0.280 12 0.720 Results for firm: 12Technical efficiency = 1.000Scale efficiency = 0.638 (irs) PROJECTION SUMMARY: variable original radial slack projected value movement movement value output 1 1070.820 0.000 0.000 1070.820 input 1 2005.000 0.000 0.000 2005.000 input 2 372.280 0.000 0.000 372.280 input 3 949.140 0.000 0.000 949.140 LISTING OF PEERS: peer lambda weight 12 1.000 Results for firm: 13Technical efficiency = 0.509Scale efficiency = 0.808 (irs) PROJECTION SUMMARY: variable original radial slack projected value movement movement value output 1 3151.920 0.000 0.000 3151.920 input 1 5666.000 -2780.150 0.000 2885.850 input 2 2521.080 -1237.024 -245.750 1038.305 input 3 4134.890 -2028.876 0.000 2106.014 LIST