




已阅读5页,还剩4页未读, 继续免费阅读
版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
1. 文章来源:THE LANCET. Vol. 351. January 17, 1998Department of Surgery, Gastrointestinal Unit, Norfolk and Norwich NHS Trust Hospital, Norwich NR1 3SR, UK (M Rhodes FRCS, L Sussman FRCS, L Cohen FRCS, M P Lewis FRCS)Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones胆总管腹腔镜探查术与术后内镜逆行胆管造影治疗胆总管结石的随机比较试验Summary摘要Background: The management of stones in the common bile duct in the laparoscopic era is controversial. The three major options are preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP), laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct (LECBD), or postoperative ERCP.背景:在腹腔镜时代,处理胆总管结石是有争议的。三种主要选择是:术前内镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP),腹腔镜胆总管探查术(LECBD),或术后内镜逆行胆管造影。Methods: Between August, 1995, and August, 1997, 471 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were done in our department. In 427 (91%), satisfactory preoperative cholangiography was obtained. In 80 (17%) of these cases there were stones in the common bile duct. 40 patients were randomised to LECBD and 40 to postoperative ERCP. If LECBD failed, patients had either open exploration of the common bile duct or postoperative ERCP. If one postoperative ERCP failed, the procedure was repeated until the common bile duct was cleared of stones or an endoprosthesis was placed to prevent stone impaction. The primary endpoints were duct-clearance rates, morbidity, operating time, and hospital stay. Analyses were by intention to treat.方法:1995年8月至1997年8月,471患者行腹腔镜胆囊切除术。其中427例(91%)获得满意的术前胆管造影结果。80例(17%)存在胆总管结石。40名患者随机进行了腹腔镜胆总管探查术,40名患者随机进行了术后内镜逆行胆管造影。若腹腔镜胆总管探查术失败,患者可行开腹探查胆总管或术后内镜逆行胆管造影。如一次术后内镜逆行胆管造影不行,可行多次直至清除胆总管结石或者放置内镜置管防止结石嵌顿。主要检测指标为,胆道清除率、发病率、手术时间和住院时间。统计学采用意向性分析。Findings: Age and sex distribution of patients was similar in the randomised groups. Duct clearance after the first intervention was 75% in both groups. By the end of treatment, duct clearance was 100% in the laparoscopic group compared with 93% in the ERCP group. Duration of treatment was a median of 90 min (range 25310) in the laparoscopic group (including ERCPs for failed LECBD) compared with 105 min (range 60255) in the postoperative ERCP group (p=0.1, 95% CI for difference -5 to 40). Hospital stay was a median of 1 day (range 126) in the laparoscopic group compared with 3.5 days (range 111) in the ERCP group (p=0.0001, 95% CI 12). 发现(结果):随机分组中年龄和性别分配相同。两组中首次术后胆道清除率达75%。治疗结束时,腹腔镜组胆道清除率达到100%,ERCP组也达到了93%。腹腔镜组中位治疗时间(包括腹腔镜胆总管探查术失败后行内镜逆行胆管造影)为90分钟(范围25-310),而术后胆管造影组为105分钟(p=0.1,95%可信区间差异-5至40)。腹腔镜手术组中位住院时间为1天(范围1-26),胆管造影组为3.5天(p=0.0001,95%可信区间差异1-2)。Interpretation: LECBD is as effective as ERCP in clearing the common bile duct of stones. There is a non-significant trend to shorter time in the operating theatre and a significantly shorter hospital stay in patients treated by LECBD.解释(结论):在清除胆总管结石方面,腹腔镜胆总管探查术和内镜逆行胆管造影效果相同。腹腔镜胆总管探查术,手术时间不明显缩短,但住院时间明显缩短。(梁平修订)2文章来源:Lancet 2005; 365: 171826Pierre J Guillou, Philip Quirke, Helen Thorpe, Joanne Walker, David G Jayne, Adrian MH Smith, Richard M Heath, Julia M Brown, for the MRC CLASICC trial groupShort-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial常规与腹腔镜手术治疗大肠癌患者的短期疗效(MRC CLASICC试验):多中心随机对照试验Summary摘要Background: Laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer has been widely adopted without data from large-scale randomised trials to support its use. We compared short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer to predict long-term outcomes.背景:腹腔镜辅助大肠癌手术已经被广泛应用,但缺乏大规模随机试验的数据支持。我们比较常规与腹腔镜辅助手术治疗大肠癌患者的短期效果以预测其长期的结果。Methods: Between July, 1996, and July, 2002, we undertook a multicentre, randomised clinical trial in 794 patients with colorectal cancer from 27 UK centres. Patients were allocated to receive laparoscopic-assisted (n=526) or open surgery (n=268). Primary short-term endpoints were positivity rates of circumferential and longitudinal resection margins, proportion of Dukes C2 tumours, and in-hospital mortality. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial has been assigned the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number ISRCTN74883561.方法:1996年7月至2002年7月,我们在来自英国27个医疗中心的794名大肠癌患者中进行了多中心随机临床实验。患者或分配实施腹腔镜手术(n=526)或分配实施开放手术(n=268)。主要短期疗效指标为,周围及纵向切除的阳性率(周围转移及蔓延率)、Dukes C2期肿瘤比例和院内死亡率。统计学采用意向性分析。本试验为国际标准随机对照试验编号ISRCTN74883561。Findings: Six patients (two open, four laparoscopic) had no surgery, and 23 had missing surgical data (nine, 14). 253 and 484 patients actually received open and laparoscopic-assisted treatment, respectively. 143 (29%) patients underwent conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery. Proportion of DukesC2 tumours did not differ between treatments (18 7% patients, open vs. 34 6%, laparoscopic; difference 0.3%, 95% CI 3.9 to 3.4%, p=0.89), and neither did in-hospital mortality (13 5% vs. 21 4%; 0.9%, 3.9 to 2.2%, p=0.57). Apart from patients undergoing laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer, rates of positive resection margins were similar between treatment groups. Patients with converted treatment had raised complication rates.结果:六名患者(开放手术组2名,腹腔镜手术组4名)没有进行手术,23名患者手术数据丢失(开放手术组9名,腹腔镜手术组14名)。253名和484名患者分别接受了开放手术和腹腔镜辅助手术。143名患者(29%)由腹腔镜手术转为开腹手术。两种治疗的Duckes C2期肿瘤患者没有显著性差异(18例7%开腹,34例6%腹腔镜,差异-0.3%,95%可信区间-3.9至3.4%,p=0.89),两种治疗的住院死亡率也没有显著性差异(13例5%开腹,21例4%腹腔镜,差异-0.9%,95%可信区间-3.9至2.2%,p=0.57)。除了接受前入路腹腔镜切除直肠的病例,两种治疗组的切除阳性率基本相同。转换治疗方法的患者并发症发生率较高。Interpretation: Laparoscopic-assisted surgery for cancer of the colon is as effective as open surgery in the short term and is likely to produce similar long-term outcomes. However, impaired short-term outcomes after laparoscopic assisted anterior resection for cancer of the rectum do not yet justify its routine use.解释:腹腔镜辅助手术治疗大肠癌在短期内与开腹手术效果相同,长期效果也可能相同。然而,直肠癌前入路腹腔镜手术切除的短期疗效不佳,不适合常规进行。(梁平修订)3文章来源:Circulation ( Journal of the American Heart Association ), 2007 March 12; 15;1544-1550; 2007SCI影响因子10.116 Caroline S. Fox, MD, MPH; Sean Coady, MA; Paul D. Sorlie, PhD; Ralph B. DAgostino, Sr, PhD; Michael J. Pencina, PhD; Ramachandran S. Vasan, MD; James B. Meigs, MD, MPH; Daniel Levy, MD; Peter J. Savage, MDThe Framingham Heart Study弗雷明汉心脏研究所Increasing Cardiovascular Disease Burden Due to Diabetes Mellitus糖尿病增加心血管疾病比例BackgroundMarked reductions in cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality have occurred in the United States over the last 50 years. We tested the hypothesis that the relative burden of CVD attributable to diabetes mellitus (DM) has increased over the past 5 decades.背景在过去的50年里,美国心血管疾病(CVD)的发病率和死亡率明显减少。我们推测并检验,50年来因糖尿病引起的心血管疾病的相对比例在增加。Methods and Results方法和结果Participants aged 45 to 64 years from the Framingham Heart Study, who attended examinations in an “early” time period (1952 to 1974), were compared with those who attended examinations in a later time period (1975 to 1998). 参与者都来自弗雷明汉心脏研究所,年龄在45至64岁之间,比较早期(1952年至1974年)受检者与后期(1975年至1998年)受检者。 The risk of CVD events (n133 among those with and 1093 among those without DM) attributable to DM in the 2 time periods was assessed with Cox proportional hazards models; population attributable risk of DM as a CVD risk factor was calculated for each time period. 用考克斯比例风险模型来评估两个时期由糖尿病引起的心血管事件的风险(糖尿病者中133例和无糖尿病者中1093例);计算每一时期的作为心血管疾病危险因素的糖尿病的人口危险因素。The age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratio for DM as a CVD risk factor was 3.0 (95% CI, 2.3 to 3.9) in the earlier time period and 2.5 (95% CI, 1.9 to 3.2) in the later time period. 作为心血管疾病危险因素 的糖尿病的年龄和性别调整风险比率在早期是3.0 (95% CI, 2.3 to 3.9),在后期是2.5 (95% CI, 1.9 to 3.2)。The population attributable risk for DM as a CVD risk factor increased from 5.4% (95% CI, 3.8% to 6.9%) in the earlier time period to 8.7% (95% CI, 5.9% to 11.4%) in the later time period (P for attributable risk ratio0.04), although multivariable adjustment resulted in attenuation of these findings (P0.12); most of these observations were found among men. 作为心血管疾病危险因素的糖尿病人口危险因素从早期的5.4% (95% CI, 3.8% to 6.9%)增加到后期的8.7% (95% CI, 5.9% to 11.4%)(P0.04),尽管多变量调整使这些结果有所减弱(P0.12);这些结果大都是在男性中发现的。ConclusionsThe proportion of CVD attributable to DM has increased over the past 50 years in Framingham. These findings emphasize the need for increased efforts to prevent DM and to aggressively treat and control CVD risk factors among those with DM.结论在弗雷明汉心脏研究所,50年来由糖尿病引起的心血管疾病的比例在增加,警示我们要加大努力去预防糖尿病,以及在糖尿病人群中大力治疗和控制心血管疾病的危险因素。(梁平修订)4文章来源:CANCER RESEARCH 63, 58215828, September 15, 2003Sheila K. Singh, Ian D. Clarke, Mizuhiko Terasaki, Victoria E. Bonn, Cynthia Hawkins, Jeremy Squire, and Peter B. DirksIdentification of a Cancer Stem Cell in Human Brain Tumors人类脑肿瘤的肿瘤干细胞的识别ABSTRACT摘要Most current research on human brain tumors is focused on the molecular and cellular analysis of the bulk tumor mass. 大多数人类脑部肿瘤的研究都关注大肿瘤块的分子和细胞分析。However, there is overwhelming evidence in some malignancies that the tumor clone is heterogeneous with respect to proliferation and differentiation. 然而,大量证据表明在某些恶性脑肿瘤中肿瘤克隆在增殖和分化上是异质性的。In human leukemia, the tumor clone is organized as a hierarchy that originates from rare leukemic stem cells that possess extensive proliferative and selfrenewal potential, and are responsible for maintaining the tumor clone. 在人类白血病中,肿瘤克隆由源于罕见的白血病干细胞的不同层次的细胞完成,因为肿瘤干细胞具有较强的增殖和自我更新的能力,能够维持肿瘤的克隆。We report here the identification and purification of a cancer stem cell from human brain tumors of different phenotypes that possesses a marked capacity for proliferation, self-renewal, and differentiation. 在本文中,我们报道了对来自不同表型的人脑肿瘤的肿瘤干细胞的识别和纯化,肿瘤干细胞具有显著的增殖、自我更新和分化能力。The increased self-renewal capacity of the brain tumor stem cell (BTSC) was highest from the most aggressive clinical samples of medulloblastoma compared with low-grade gliomas. 与低级别的胶质瘤相比,来自恶性化程度最高的髓母细胞瘤的临床样本,其脑肿瘤干细胞的自我更新的能力最高。The BTSC was exclusively isolated with the cell fraction expressing the neural stem cell surface marker CD133. 脑肿瘤干细胞完全用表达神经干细胞表面标志物CD133的细胞碎片进行分离。These CD133 cells could differentiate in culture into tumor cells that phenotypically resembled the tumor from the patient. 这些CD133细胞在培养物中可以分化为表型类似于患者肿瘤的肿瘤细胞。The identification of a BTSC provides a powerful tool to investigate the tumorigenic process in the central nervous system and to develop therapies targeted to the BTSC. 肿瘤干细胞的识别(分离)为研究中枢神经系统的肿瘤发生过程,为开发针对肿瘤干细胞的治疗方法,提供了一个有力的工具。(梁平修订)5文章来源:Chan A T, Ogino S, Fuchs C S. Aspirin Use and Survival After Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer J. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 2009, 302(6): 649-658.Aspirin Use and Survival after Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer结肠直肠癌确诊后阿司匹林的服用与生存率Abstract 摘要Context 背景 Aspirin reduces risk of colorectal neoplasia in randomized trials and inhibits tumor growth and metastases in animal models. 阿司匹林,在随机试验中能减少结肠直肠新生肿物的危险,在动物模型试验中能抑制肿瘤的生长和转移。 However, the influence of aspirin on survival after diagnosis of colorectal cancer is unknown. 然而,在结肠直肠癌确诊后,服用阿司匹林对患者的生存率有何影响,仍不清楚。Objective 目的 To examine the association between aspirin use after colorectal cancer diagnosis on colorectal cancerspecific and overall survival. 确定结肠直肠癌确诊后服用阿司匹林与该疾病的特定生存率以及总生存率之间的联系。Design, Setting, and Participants 设计,场所和参与者 Prospective cohort study of 1279 men and women diagnosed with stage I, II, or III colorectal cancer. 前瞻性队列研究,1279名诊断患有I, II, 或 III期结肠直肠癌的男仕和女仕。Participants were enrolled in 2 nationwide health professional cohorts in 1980 and 1986 prior to diagnosis and followed up through June 1, 2008. 诊断前,参与者在1980年和1986年曾加入两个全国的健康专业人士的队列研究,随访至2008年6月1日。Main Outcome Measure 主要结果的测量Colorectal cancerspecific and overall mortality. 结肠直肠癌-特定死亡率与总死亡率。Results 结果 After a median follow-up of 11.8 years, there were 193 total deaths (35%) and 81 colorectal cancerspecific deaths (15%) among 549 participants who regularly used aspirin after colorectal cancer diagnosis, compared with 287 total deaths (39%) and 141 colorectal cancerspecific deaths (19%) among 730 participants who did not use aspirin. 平均随访11.8年,诊断为结肠直肠癌后常规服用阿司匹林的患者549名,其中总死亡人数193名(35%),结肠直肠癌特定性死亡81名 (15%);没有服用阿司匹林的患者730名,总死亡人数287名 (39%),结肠直肠癌特定性死亡141名 (19%)。Compared with nonusers, participants who regularly used aspirin after diagnosis experienced a multivariate hazard ratio (HR) for colorectal cancerspecific mortality of 0.71 (95% confidence interval CI, 0.53-0.95) and for overall mortality of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.65-0.97). 与没服用者相比, 确诊后常规服用阿司匹林的参与者,其多变量危险度比(HR)为,结肠直肠癌-特定死亡率为0.71 (95% 可信区间 CI, 0.53-0.95),总死亡率为0.79 (95% 可信区间, 0.65-0.97)。Among 719 participants who did not use aspirin before diagnosis, aspirin use initiated after diagnosis was associated with a multivariate HR for colorectal cancerspecific mortality of 0.53 (95% CI, 0.33-0.86). 在719名诊断前没有服用阿司匹林的参与者中,诊断后开始服用的多变量危险度比为0.53 (95% CI, 0.33-0.86)的结肠直肠癌-特定死亡率。(719名诊断前没有服用阿司匹林的参与者,诊断后开始服用,其多变量危险度比为0.53 (95% CI, 0.33-0.86)的结肠直肠癌-特定死亡率。)Among 459 participants with colorectal cancers that were accessible for immunohistochemical assessment, the effect of aspirin differed significantly according to cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) expression (P for interaction = .04). 459名有免疫组化评估的结肠直肠癌患者,阿司匹林的效果随着环氧合酶2 (COX-2)表达的不同有显著差异(交互作用的P值= .04)。Regular aspirin use after diagnosis was associated with a lower risk of colorectal cancerspecific mortality among participants in whom primary tumors overexpressed COX-2 (multivariate HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.20-0.76), whereas aspirin use was not associated with lower risk among those with primary tumors with weak or absent expression (multivariate HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.36-4.18). 在原始肿瘤过表达COX-2的参与者中,诊断后常规服用阿司匹林与结肠直肠癌-特定死亡率的低风险有关(多变异危险度比, 0.39; 95%可信区间, 0.20-0.76);反之,在原始肿瘤弱或缺失表达的参与者中,阿司匹林服用与低风险无关联(多变异危险度比, 1.22; 95%可信区间, 0.36-4.18)。Conclusion 结论Regular aspirin use after the diagnosis of colorectal cancer is associated with lower risk of colorectal cancerspecific and overall mortality, especially among individuals with tumors that overexpress COX-2. 诊断为结肠直肠癌后常规服用阿司匹林与结肠直肠癌-特定死亡率和总死亡率的低风险有关,特别是在肿瘤过表达COX-2的患者中。(梁平修订)6文章来源:NATURE| Vol 444|23 November 2006Correspondence to: Stephen W. Scherer5,6Matthew E. Hurles1 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to M.E.H. (Email:mehsanger.ac.uk) or S.W.S (Email:stevegenet.sickkids.on.ca).Global variation in copy number in the human genome人类基因组拷贝数的全球性变异Abstract摘要Copy number variation (CNV) of DNA sequences is functionally significant but has yet to be fully ascertained. DNA序列的拷贝数变异的功能意义重大,但是至今还未被完全阐明清楚。We have constructed a first-generation CNV map of the human genome through the study of 270 individuals from four populations with ancestry in Europe, Africa or Asia (the HapMap collection). DNA from these individuals was screened for CNV using two complementary technologies: single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping arrays, and clone-based comparative genomic hybridization. 我们研究了祖先为欧洲、非洲和亚洲的4个种群共270名个体(HapMap图集),构建了人类基因组第一代拷贝数变异图谱。用两个互补的技术单核苷酸多态性(SNP)基因分型和基于克隆的比较基因组杂交方法,筛选这些个体的拷贝数变异DNA。A total of 1,447 copy number variable regions (CNVRs), which can encompass overlapping or adjacent gains or losses, covering 360 megabases (12% of the genome) were identified in these populations. 在这些人群中共发现了1,447个拷贝数变异区域(CNVRs),由重叠或相邻的获得或丢失组成,覆盖了360巨碱基(占基因组的12)。These CNVRs contained hundreds of genes, disease loci, functional elements and segmental duplications. 这些拷贝数变异区域还包含成百上千的基因、致病基因座、功能元件和片段性重复。Notably, the CNVRs encompassed more nucleotide content per genome than SNPs, underscoring the importance of CNV in genetic diversity and evolution. 值得注意的是,拷贝数变异区域比单核苷酸多态性包含更多的核苷酸,突出显示了拷贝数变异在遗传多样性和进化中的重要性。The data obtained delineate linkage disequilibrium patterns for many CNVs, and reveal marked variation in copy number among populations. 所得数据描绘了许多拷贝数变异的连锁不平衡模式,也揭示了在不同种群中拷贝数的显著变异。 We also demonstrate the utility of this resource for genetic disease studies. 我们还表明,这一资源可以利用到遗传疾病研究上。(梁平修订)7文章来源:SCIENCE VOL 317 20 JULY 2007Florian T. Merkle, Zaman Mirzadeh, Arturo Alvarez-Buylla*Department of Neurosurgery and Developmental and Stem Cell Biology Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 941430525, USA.Mosaic Organization of Neural Stem Cells in the Adult Brain成年脑中神经干细胞的组织呈马赛克样分布The in vivo potential of neural stem cells in the postnatal mouse brain is not known, but because they produce many different types of neurons, they must be either very versatile or very diverse. 出生后鼠脑中的神经干细胞的在体潜能还是未知的,但是因为它们会产生许多不同种类的神经元,因此它们要么非常多能,要么非常多变。By specifically targeting stem cells and following their progeny in vivo, we showed that postnatal stem cells in different regions produce different types of neurons, even when heterotopically grafted or grown in culture. 通过在体特异定位干细胞并跟踪其子细胞,我们发现不同区域的出生后的干细胞会产生不同类型的神经元,即使对干细胞进行异位移植或者培养都会有同样的结果。This suggests that rather than being plastic and homogeneous, neural stem cells are a restricted and diverse population of progenitors. 以上提示,神经干细胞并非是可塑性与同源性的,而是一种有限的多变的前期细胞(先祖细胞)群落。(梁平修订)8文章来源:Engl J Med 2004; 350:664-71. February 12, 2004.Kitt Falk Petersen, M.D., Sylvie Dufour, Ph.D. 美国康涅狄格州纽黑文,耶鲁大学医学院内科,等。Impaired Mitochondrial Activity in the Insulin-Resistant Offspring of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes在2型糖尿病病人的对胰岛素抵抗的后代中存在线粒体活性受损ABSTRACT Background: Insulin resistance appears to be the best predictor of the development of diabetes in the children of patients with type 2 diabetes, but the mechanism responsible is unknown. 背景 在2型糖尿病病人的子女中,胰岛素抵抗似乎是发生糖尿病的最佳预测因素,但引起的机制尚不清楚。Methods: We performed hyperinsulinemiceuglycemic clamp studies in combination with infusions of 6,6-2H2glucose in healthy, young, lean, insulin-resistant offspring of patients with type 2 diabetes and insulin-sensitive control subjects matched for age, height, weight, and physical activity to assess the sensitivity of liver and muscle to insulin. Proton (1H) magnetic resonance spectroscopy studies were performed to mea
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 3.1伟大的改革开放(教学设计)2024-2025学年高一政治上学期同步教学教学设计+教学设计+练习(统编版必修1)
- 股份有限公司拆分合同6篇
- 6.3.2角的比较与运算第1课时角的比较与运算说课稿 2024-2025学年人教版(2024)数学七年级上册
- 高中信息技术 算法与程序设计-选择结构说课稿 教科版
- 1.2 有理数及其大小比较说课稿2024-2025学年人教版数学七年级上册
- 浙教版信息技术八上第2课《 常用数据类型》说课稿3
- 2025公司员工详细劳动合同样本
- 2025年的技术服务合同将如何塑造未来合同的样貌
- 2025中国员工劳务劳动合同范本
- 化肥厂化肥出口检验细则
- 农业现代化种植技术培训课件
- 中城汽车(山东)有限公司审计报告
- 大学博士竞赛试题及答案
- 钢结构彩钢瓦施工工艺与技术交底
- 2025版煤矿安全规程宣贯培训课件
- 梁启超家教家风课件
- 第5课 我们说方言教学设计-2025-2026学年小学地方、校本课程浙教版(2024)人·自然·社会
- (2025秋新版)青岛版科学三年级上册全册教案
- 顾客联络服务 人工与智能客户服务协同要求 编制说明
- 2025年全国通信专业技术人员职业水平考试(通信专业实务·传输与接入·无线)历年参考题库含答案详解(5套)
- DB31∕T 1545-2025 卫生健康数据分类分级要求
评论
0/150
提交评论