《高老庄》 《还乡》 原型批评 比较文学论文.doc

高老庄论文：原型批评视野下高老庄与还乡之比较研究【中文摘要】原型批评理论的出现为大量文学巨作,如古希腊悲剧、圣经和莎士比亚戏剧等,提供了全新的分析切入点。本文运用原型批评相关理论对中国当代作家贾平凹的高老庄和英国小说家托马斯哈代的还乡两部小说进行了平行比较研究。高老庄与还乡在情节安排上有着共同的“回归故里”大背景,两位主人公都是在离乡数年后的选择性回归；在故事设置上也有相似之处,比如主人公的所处环境；在故事发生的文化背景上,两者都处在社会工业化和城镇化的转型时期。两部作品的相似点奠定了比较的基础,在此之上,本文运用原型批评理论主要创始人诺思洛普弗莱的原型主题和原型意象对两部作品进行了诠释与比较。在高老庄与还乡中,随着故事情节的发展,本文发掘出了原型主题中的逃离主题与成长主题；通过将书中主要人物的对应展开,具体呈现出了四个典型原型意象,即荒漠意象、希腊女神意象、基督教精神意象以及影子意象。通过对四个意象和两个主题的挖掘,证明了原型批评理论应用于比较文学方面的可行性和正确性,该理论将单一的文学作品纳入到文学大系统中,而“原型”就是连接单一文学作品之间的桥梁。同时,通过对两部小说的平行比较阐发了一个事实,即不同国家在特定历史时.【英文摘要】Under the rational light of archetypal criticism, a group of great works have been understood and analyzed from a new perspective. These works include Greek tragedy, the Bible and Shakespeares dramas. The thesis is to attempt a parallel comparative study between Chinese writer Jia Pingwas Gao Lao Zhuang and English novelist Thomas Hardys The Return of the Native from the perspective of archetypal criticism.Despite these differences, both Gao Lao Zhuang and The Return of the Native share a similar nat.【关键词】高老庄 还乡 原型批评 比较文学【英文关键词】Gao Lao Zhuang The Return of the Native archetypal criticism comparative study【目录】原型批评视野下高老庄与还乡之比较研究摘要4-5Abstract5Table of Contents6-8Chapter One Introduction8-141.1 Jia Pingwa and Thomas Hardy8-91.2 Gao Lao Zhuang and The Return of the Native9-101.3 The Foundations of the Comparative Study10-121.3.1 The Similarities between the Two above Novelists111.3.2 The Similarities between the Two above Novels11-121.4 The Structure of the Thesis12-14Chapter Two Literature Review14-182.1 Literature Review of Gao Lao Zhuang14-152.2 Literature Review of The Return of the Native15-162.3 Literature Review of Comparative Studies upon the Two Novels16-18Chapter Three Theoretical Rationale-Archetypal Criticism18-263.1 An Overview of Archetypal Criticism18-203.2 Frazer and Jung and Archetypal Criticism20-213.2.1 Frazer and Archetypal Criticism203.2.2 Jung and Archetypal Criticism20-213.3 Frye and Archetypal Criticism21-233.4 The Impact of Archetypal Criticism23-243.4.1 The Impact of Archetypal Criticism on Western Literary Works233.4.2 The Impact of Archetypal Criticism on Chinese Literary Works23-243.5 The Implementations of Archetypal Criticism upon the Comparative Literature24-26Chapter Four Analysis of Archetypal Motifs in Gao Lao Zhuang andThe Return of the Native26-324.1 Escape Motif26-284.1.1 Definition of Escape Motif26-274.1.2 Displacement of Escape Motif27-284.1.3 The Affinity of Escape Motifs between Gao Lao Zhuang and The Return of the Native284.2 Initiation Motif28-314.2.1 Definition of Initiation Motif28-294.2.2 Displacement of Initiation Motif29-304.2.3 The Affinity of Initiation Motifs between Gao Lao Zhuang and The Return of the Native30-314.3 Summary31-32Chapter Five Analysis of Archetypal Images in Gao Lao Zhuang andThe Return of the Native32-495.1 The Desert Image32-375.1.1 Stones in Gao Lao Zhuang33-355.1.2 Egdon Heath in The Return of the Native35-375.1.3 Stones-The Desert-Egdon Heath375.2 The Greek Goddess Image37-415.2.1 Xi Xia in Gao Lao Zhuang38-395.2.2 Eustacia in The Return of the Native39-405.2.3 Xi Xia-The Greek Goddness-Eustacia40-415.3 The Christian Spirit Image41-445.3.1 Shi Tou in Gao Lao Zhuang41-435.3.2 Clym in The Return of the Native43-445.3.3 Shi Tou-The Christian Spirit-Clym445.4 The Shadow Image44-475.4.1 Gao Zilu in Gao Lao Zhuang45-465.4.2 Wi