功能对等理论相关文献

Literature review-The history and development of functional equivalenceThose who insist functional equivalence define that translation is a unique way of human beings activity with specific intentions, which is language service item for customers 、readers 、function and aims of the text in society circumstance. Baker tell us that the process of translation should not been limited by original text and its influence to the translated or even the certain function which author use in the text. Meanwhile, he got the result that translation is certainly depend on the needs that readers and users aims to translate text eventually. Eugene A. Nada, a famous America translator, got the functional Equivalence in his book of Language and Culture: Translation Context in 2001. First of all, a minimal, realistic definition of functional equivalence: The readers of a translated text should be able to comprehend it to the point that they can conceive of how the original readers of the text must have understood and appreciated it. Secondly, idealistic of functional equivalence: The readers of a translated text should be able to understand and appreciate it in essentially the same manner as the original readers did. Nada start his research of translation theory, which has significantly influenced on people in the field of translation. Because he gave his ideas that combine this two concepts of function and meanings will be better for a word to have the true meaning in specific language context. The theory of functional equivalence was widely used in translation research and practice; however, it was just used in the field of literature translation. In 70 to 80s of last century, there came to German functional equivalence scholars, which is a sign of transforming from functions alone to combine with communication for researching. (Chen Juan, foreign studies of Shanghai university, 2008)The functional Equivalence emphases that translation is a process of which use the most suitable and natural words to reproduce the original in the text from its meanings to terms. On the one hand, functional equivalence describes equivalence as the standard of translation and also a part of the core concept in modern translation. Many western language scholars always adopt the functional equivalence when they give their ideas about translation. While the earliest one gave the functional equivalence is George Camber, the founder of equivalence, who insists to connect the meanings of word with intention of using it in 18th century. In 1934, the Soviet Union literature scholar Seamier gave his idea of equivalence, which explains it theoretically in the writers prospective and then the Equivalence formed initially. (Zhang Li, Journal of XianNing College , 2010, 76-77)Alexander Fraser Tyler figured out the Three Principles in his Essay on the Principles of Translation, which sets three criteria rules for translating in 1790. The translation should give a complete transcript of the ideas of the original work, which means that the translated should be as functional as possible in transforming the original information to readers. The style and manner of writing in the translation should be of the same character with that of the original. It gives the translator a implying that they need to describe character of the original as fairly as possible, otherwise the translated would not be properly understood by readers. Liu Chong De, a well-known Chinese translator, gave his views of faithfulness、expressiveness of translation in 1994. Faithfulness, namely, the translated should be faithful to the content of the original. Expressiveness means to be as expressive as the original. 参考文献Jan De Ward. Eugene Albert Nada. From One Language to Another. Functional Equivalence in Bible Translating. Nelson. 1986电影字幕中文化因素的翻译 中国电力教育2008 年第19 期窦强 浅谈电影字幕翻译 大众商务 2009 年第08期Eugene Albert Nada Language. Culture and Translation. Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press. 1993Eugene A, Nada & Charles R. Taber. The Theory and Practice of Translation. Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.2004.方琰， 曹莉编. 经典电影精彩片断语言评析.北京； 清华大学出版社. 2001.Grossman, The Translation Debate 75.高捷;从Nida的功能对等理论看中国民俗词语的翻译D;西安电子科技大学;2011年郝琨 功能派视觉下的英语导游词研究 长春教育学院学报 2010 第2期金丽;功能对等理论指导下的科技英语长句翻译J;宁波广播电视大学学报;2010年01期 金1等效翻译探索(增订版) 1 北京:中国对外翻译出版公司,1998李运兴 字幕翻译的策略 中国翻译2001 年第04 期 李养龙 刘颖 字幕英译策略的句法分析 四川外国语学报2007 年第 01 期 李弘梅； 奈达“功能对等”理论在品牌翻译中的应用j; 齐齐哈尔大学学报（哲学社会科学版）；2007年04期. 李红霞 动态功能对等翻译的合理性及其破缺奈达翻译理论一瞥 广东行政学院 510053 李波;张晶;浅谈尤金奈达的“功能对等”和德国功能派“目的论”的差异性J;黑龙江教育学院学报;2010年02期Li Yupeng. Journal of Beijing Electric Power college. 2010 H315刘四龙，重新认识翻译理论的作用 对奈达翻译思想转变的反思J中国翻译，2001；（2）.Nada, Eugene A &Taber, G,R. Theory and Practice of Translation. Leiden; E, J.Brill.1969.Nida.EugeneA.TowardsaScienceofTranslatingM.Leiden:E.J.Nada, Eugene A Language, Culture and Translating. Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press. 1993.Nada, Eugene A &Taber, G,R. Theory and Practice of Translation. Leiden; E, J.Brill.1982.Nord ,Christian.目的性行为 析功能翻译理论,上海:上海外语教育出版社,2001R. Graves, “The Polite Lie,” The Atlantic 215（June1965）80.单文波.对奈达动态对等论的再思考J.海南师范学院学报,2003(4).功能对等理论在医学翻译中的运用沈向怡袁媛中国高等医学教育2010年05期绍 巍 功能对等理论对电影字幕翻译的启示 北京第二外语学院 100024Journal of Xian International Studies UniversityTaylor， C The Subtitling of Film; reaching another community. Italy ; University of Trieste, 2001. 谭载喜，西方翻译简史M北京；商务印书馆， 1991.谭载喜， 新编奈达 论翻译M北京；中国对外翻译出版.王海涛;刘楠;中文电影片名文化蕴含词语的英译J;长城;2009年04期谢奎奈达“功能对等”理论视域中的中文菜单英译研究 西南石油大学外国语学院 2010 第20 期 肖愈;文化翻译视域下电影片名的翻译策略研究D;西北大学;2010年肖陆锦；英语影片汉译技法探讨J；江汉石油学院学报（社科版）; 2001年01期。 杨山青;饶家林;奈达与纽马克的翻译理论在旅游资料翻译中的运用A;贵州省翻译工作者协会2010年年会暨学术研讨会