使绩效考核更有价值 - 人力资源 - 管理e栈 管理e栈 - powered by discuz!(make performance evaluation more valuable - human resources - management, e stack management, e stac_第1页
使绩效考核更有价值 - 人力资源 - 管理e栈 管理e栈 - powered by discuz!(make performance evaluation more valuable - human resources - management, e stack management, e stac_第2页
使绩效考核更有价值 - 人力资源 - 管理e栈 管理e栈 - powered by discuz!(make performance evaluation more valuable - human resources - management, e stack management, e stac_第3页
使绩效考核更有价值 - 人力资源 - 管理e栈 管理e栈 - powered by discuz!(make performance evaluation more valuable - human resources - management, e stack management, e stac_第4页
使绩效考核更有价值 - 人力资源 - 管理e栈 管理e栈 - powered by discuz!(make performance evaluation more valuable - human resources - management, e stack management, e stac_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩11页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

使绩效考核更有价值人力资源管理E栈管理E栈POWEREDBYDISCUZ(MAKEPERFORMANCEEVALUATIONMOREVALUABLEHUMANRESOURCESMANAGEMENT,ESTACKMANAGEMENT,ESTACKPOWERED,BY,DISCUZ)MAKEPERFORMANCEEVALUATIONMOREVALUABLEHUMANRESOURCESMANAGEMENT,ESTACKMANAGEMENT,ESTACKPOWERED,BY,DISCUZTOURISTREGISTRATIONLOGIN|MEMBERSHIPSTATISTICS|HELPMANAGEESTACKHUMANRESOURCEMAKEPERFORMANCEEVALUATIONMOREVALUABLEONTHETHEMEOF|NEXTTHEMEONTHEOTHERHAND,THEASSESSMENTRESULTSANDBONUSESARECLOSELYLINKEDEVERYONEISVERYSENSITIVETOTHEASSESSMENTRESULTS,EVENOFFENDEDTHEBOSS,BONUSWILLBEWASTED,SOCHECKDURINGTHECOMPANYSATMOSPHEREISALWAYSNERVOUSWHENTHEEXAMINATIONRESULTSCOMEOUT,THECOMMUNICATIONBETWEENTHESUPERIORANDTHESUBORDINATEISNOTENOUGHINORDERTOAVOIDANYCONTRADICTION,THESUPERIOROFTENTELLSTHEINDIVIDUALONLYTHERESULT,ANDSELDOMMENTIONSTHEPLACEWHICHNEEDSTOBEIMPROVEDINTHEWORKEACHASSESSMENTSEEMSTOBEABATTLE,SOTHATBOTHSIDESAREEXHAUSTEDASSESSMENT,ANDWEARELOOKINGFORWARDTOTHEASSESSMENTOFTHEPASTTHEAPPRAISALSYSTEMOFTHECOMPANYMANAGEMENTLAYER,EXAMINERSANDEXAMINEESARENOTSATISFIED,BECAUSEITISINTHEINVESTMENTMANAGEMENTOFRESOURCES,CANWELLIMPROVETHEPERFORMANCEOFEMPLOYEES,CANIMPROVETHESTAFFSWORKINGENTHUSIASMEFFECTIVELYWHERESTHEPROBLEMALMOSTALLHRMANAGERSUNDERSTANDTHATFROMTHEABOVEEXAMPLEITCANBESEENTHATTHEREAREALWAYSSOMEUNSATISFACTORYPLACESINPERFORMANCEAPPRAISALFOREXAMPLE,WILLREFLECTONOTHERPEOPLESLIKESORDISLIKESINPERFORMANCEAPPRAISAL,MANAGERSCANNOTEFFECTIVELYMONITORANDRECORDTHEBEHAVIOROFEMPLOYEES,MANAGEMENTISDIFFICULTTOACCURATELYEVALUATETHEPERFORMANCEOFEMPLOYEES,THEREISNOGOODEXAMINATIONRESULTSOFFEEDBACKANDCOMMUNICATION,WHICHISSOLELYFORTHEPURPOSEOFASSESSMENTBONUS,RATHERTHANPROMOTEINDIVIDUALSANDORGANIZATIONSPERFORMANCEIMPROVEMENTATTHESAMETIME,WEINTHEPERFORMANCEAPPRAISALOFTENDUETOSUBJECTIVEFACTORSISTHESUBJECTOFEXAMINATION,THEREWILLBESOMECOMMONASSESSMENTERRORS,SUCHASHALOEFFECT,CLASSIEFFECTANDSOONAND,MANAGERSWILLOFTENSTAFFPERFORMANCEACCORDINGTOTHEARRANGEMENTOF“U“MODEL,RESULTINGINMOSTOFTHESTAFFPERFORMANCEAPPRAISALRESULTSINTHEMIDRANGE,DOESNOTHAVETHEDISTINCTION,THEINCENTIVEEFFECTONTHEPERFORMANCEOFGOODEMPLOYEESWILLBECOMESMALLER,ANDTHEPERFORMANCEISPOORBUTINTHEASSESSMENTOFTHEEMPLOYEEFELLUNDERTHEMIDRANGEALARMINGANOTHERPROBLEMISTHATHRANDLINEMANAGERSLOOKATEMPLOYEESDIFFERENTLYHRDAILYWORKISCARRIEDOUTAROUNDTHEPEOPLE,FROMTHESTAFFTOATTRACTANDDEVELOP,EMPLOYEERETENTIONANDUSE,HRAREGENERALLYAWAREOFTHEIMPORTANCEOFEMPLOYEESTOTHEORGANIZATIONANDFORTHEASSESSMENTOFTHEMAINLINEASTHEYARECONCERNED,THISAWARENESSWILLBEWEAKERTHANHR,THEREFORE,MAYINADDITION,PERSONALLIKESSOMESUBJECTIVEFACTORSINTHEASSESSMENT,AFFECTEDTHEFAIRNESSOFTHEEXAMINATION,IFNOTHANDLEDPROPERLY,ITWILLLEADTOTHOSEWHOFEELUNFAIRASSESSMENTRESULTSOFEMPLOYEETURNOVERMANYHREXPERTSAREALSOTRYINGTOSOLVETHESEPROBLEMS,BUTMANYSOLUTIONSTHEMSELVESBRINGNEWPROBLEMSFOREXAMPLE,INORDERTOIMPROVETHERELIABILITYOFPERFORMANCEAPPRAISAL,WEOFTENUSETHEMANDATORYRATIOMETHOD,THEDETAILDESCRIPTIONMETHODANDTHECRITICALEVENTMETHODTHEPROPORTIONOFCOMPULSORYMETHODCANOVERCOMETHEASSESSMENTTOOLARGEORSTRICTSITUATION,BUTITWILLALSOHAVEARIGID,SUCHASTHEPROVISIONSOFOUTSTANDINGSTAFFRATIOOF20,WHENTHEEXCELLENTSTAFFRATIOOFMORETHAN20,WILLBEPARTOFTHEEXCELLENTSTAFFCANNOTGETTHECORRECTEVALUATIONTHEREFORE,TOIMPROVETHEPERFORMANCEEVALUATION,ONLYBYONEORTWOMETHODSORLINKSONTHEIMPROVEMENTISNOTSATISFACTORY,WENEEDTOCONSIDERTHEFOLLOWINGASPECTSGETREADYINORDERTOIMPROVEPERFORMANCEAPPRAISAL,WEMUSTDOSOMEPREPARATORYWORKFIRSTTHISWILLINCREASETHELEVELOFSTANDARDIZATIONOFINDIVIDUALPERFORMANCEINFORMATION,MAKETHEWHOLEPROCESSSMOOTHERANDREDUCEBARRIERSTHATMAYARISEINTHEMIDDLETHISISGOODFORBOTHTHEEMPLOYEESANDTHEEXAMINERSREDUCEACCIDENTS“INPERFORMANCEAPPRAISAL,WESHOULDMINIMIZETHEOCCURRENCEOF“ACCIDENT“GOODEMPLOYEESGETTHEPERFORMANCEAPPRAISALRESULTSTOREFLECTHIS/HERPERFORMANCEINTHEMAXIMUMEXTENTTHEPOORPERFORMANCEOFTHESTAFFANDTHOSEWHOARENOTBYSOMEMEANSORCONNECTIONSTOTHERANKSOFOUTSTANDINGPERFORMANCEINTHROUGHGOODCOMMUNICATION,YOUCANSOLVETHEPROBLEMINTHEINITIALSTAGE,ANDTHEREWILLBENOSTAFFCOMPLAINTSORCOMPLAINTSABOUTUNSATISFACTORYPERFORMANCEAPPRAISALRESULTSREVIEWLASTASSESSMENTBEFORETHEFIRSTREVIEWOFTHEIMPLEMENTATIONPROCESSOFPERFORMANCEAPPRAISAL,APERFORMANCEAPPRAISALCYCLE,ANDSUMMARIZETHEEXPERIENCEANDIMPROVETHEDEFICIENCIES,SOASTOAVOIDTAKINGUNNECESSARYDETOURS,INTHEDESIGNOFTHEPERFORMANCEOBJECTIVESANDTARGETSWILLHAVECONTINUITYANDCHANGETHEPERFORMANCEAPPRAISALPROCESSSHOULDKEEPAGOODRECORDINTHEPERFORMANCEAPPRAISAL,THERECORDCANGUARANTEETHEQUALITYOFTHEASSESSMENTRESULTWELL,BUTTHEREISALSOADEFICIENCYINDOINGSOIFTHELINEMANAGERSDONOTKNOWHOWTODOISTORECORDORPOORPERFORMANCERECORDSFORSTAFFCONTROLORTHREAT,SO,THEPERFORMANCEAPPRAISALWILLBECOMETHEMANAGEMENTCONTROLTOOLSTHATEMPLOYEESCANEASILYCAUSEEMPLOYEEDISSATISFACTIONWITHTHEIMMEDIATESUPERIOREMOTIONS,THEWORSTCASEMAYLEADTOEMPLOYEETURNOVERALSO,THELINEMANAGERSDONTPUTTHEIRSUBJECTIVEUNDERSTANDINGINTOTHEOBJECTIVEFACTSWHENMAKINGTHEUSUALRECORDS,BUTSIMPLYRECORDTHEACTUALEVENTSFOREXAMPLE,DONOTRECORD“ZHANGDELIBERATELY10MINUTESLATEFORWORKTODAY“OR“PERFORMANCEINTHEWORKOFLIISNOTPOSITIVE,“ZHANGSHOULDRECORD10MINUTESLATEFORWORKTODAY“AND“TODAYITOLDMIKESENDTHEFORMTOTHEHEADQUARTERSHEDOESNTWANTTOGO“WHENEVALUATEDINTHEPERFORMANCEAPPRAISALCYCLE,WECANREFERTOTHESESPECIFICEXAMPLES,TOMARKFOREMPLOYEESIFTHEREISNOSPECIFICEXAMPLES,JUSTSAY“WHOSHOWEDACTIVEORNONACTIVE,NOTASABASISFOREVALUATION,THUSAFFECTINGTHEASSESSMENTRESULTSAVOIDEXTREMESSOMEEVALUATORSGIVESUBORDINATESTHEEVALUATIONWILLBEVERYHIGH,ANDSOMEOFTHEASSESSMENTTOSUBORDINATEEVALUATIONWILLBEVERYLOW,THISISINTHEASSESSMENTOFTHEMORECOMMON“WIDE“AND“STRICT“TENDENCYIFTHEFINALEXAMINATIONRESULTSONLYCOMPARETHEINTERNALASSESSMENTRESULTS,STILLHASCERTAINFAIRNESSIFTHEDIFFERENTDEPARTMENTSOFTHEASSESSMENTRESULTOFHORIZONTALCOMPARISON,THEN,TOTHEDEPARTMENTOFPERFORMANCEWILLBESIGNIFICANTLYRELAXEDTOGIVEPREFERENCE,STRICTEMPLOYEE,EXAMINATIONRESULTSWILLMAKETHEMFEELUNFAIR,WILLHAVEOPINIONSONTHEMANAGEMENTOFTHEIRPARTYLINETHEREFORE,INPRACTICE,WEOFTENUSETHEFORCEDDISTRIBUTIONMETHODTOAVOIDTHISPHENOMENONINVOLVEEMPLOYEESTHEPERFORMANCEAPPRAISALISAPARTOFTHERESPONSIBILITYOFTHEEMPLOYEESTHEMSELVES,NOTONLYTOBREAKTHESTATEOFSUPERIORMANAGEMENT,REDUCELINEMANAGEMENTWORK,ALSOCANREDUCEEMPLOYEERESENTMENT,LETEMPLOYEESMOREEASILYACCEPTTHEASSESSMENTRESULTSUNDERNORMALCIRCUMSTANCES,WECANUSETHEMETHODOFEMPLOYEESELFASSESSMENTTOCOLLECTRELEVANTINFORMATION,ANDTHENASSESSEDBYTHEEXAMINERGENERALLYSPEAKING,EMPLOYEESELFASSESSMENTSHOULDINCLUDETHEFOLLOWINGTHREEQUESTIONS1PLEASESUMMARIZEYOUROVERALLPERFORMANCEINTHISASSESSMENTCYCLETHEAVERAGEEMPLOYEEISMORESTRICTINHISPERFORMANCEAPPRAISALTHANTHEMANAGERHOWEVER,EMPLOYEESWITHLOWPERFORMANCEWILLJUDGETHEIRPERFORMANCEEXCESSIVELYINTHEACTUALSITUATION,WEWILLSEETHATGOODPEOPLENEVERSAYTHATTHEYAREGOOD,WHILESMALLCONTRIBUTIONSOFTENEMPHASIZETHEIRCONTRIBUTIONSTOTHEORGANIZATIONFORTHOSEWHOHAVEPOORPERFORMANCEFORTHEIRHIGHEVALUATIONOFEMPLOYEES,MANAGEMENTANDTALK,ANDACCORDINGTOTHESPECIFICRECORDSBYTHEPOORPERFORMANCEOFTHEBEHAVIOR,THEISSUEOFTHEIRWRITTENWARNINGS,MAKEHIMAWAREOFTHEIRSHORTCOMINGS,FINALLYTOACCORDWITHITSPERFORMANCEEVALUATIONINTHEASSESSMENTLEVELTHEREFORE,MANAGERSINREFERENCETOSTAFFPERFORMANCESELFASSESSMENT,ACCORDINGTOTHEIROWNRECORDSTOSTRICTLYDISTINGUISHBETWEENGOODANDBADPERFORMANCE,INORDERTOGIVEEMPLOYEESAFAIREVALUATION2WHATAREASOFWORKDOYOUFEELNEEDTOBESUPPORTEDANDDIRECTEDMANAGERSSHOULDNOTONLYMANAGETHEIREMPLOYEES,BUTALSOGUIDEANDHELPTHEIREMPLOYEESTHEYSHOULDBEMENTORSORCOACHESTOHELPEMPLOYEESIMPROVETHEIRWORKANDPROVIDEGUIDANCEINCAREERPLANNINGACCORDINGTOTHEEMPLOYEESRESPONSE,ANDACCORDINGTOTHEORGANIZATIONSACTUAL,ASFARASPOSSIBLETOPROVIDESUPPORTFORSTAFF3WHATAREYOURGOALSFORTHENEXTASSESSMENTCYCLEALLOWINGEMPLOYEESTODEVELOPTHEIROWNPERSONALDEVELOPMENTPLANSWILLHELPMANAGERSREASONABLYDISTRIBUTEPERFORMANCEAPPRAISALGOALSANDTARGETSTHISALLOWSEMPLOYEESTODOWHATTHEYWANT,ACCOMPLISHWHATTHEYEXPECT,ANDALLOWEMPLOYEESTORECOGNIZETHEIRGOALSANDIMPROVEEMPLOYEECOMMITMENTTOTHEORGANIZATIONBUILDINGGOODRELATIONSHIPSWITHEMPLOYEESANDMANAGERSANDORGANIZATIONSISNOTONLYTHEKEYTOGOODPERFORMANCE,BUTALSOTHEKEYTORETAININGGOODEMPLOYEESAPPLYPERFORMANCERESULTSTOTRAININGFROMTHERESULTSOFPERFORMANCEEVALUATIONONACYCLE,IDENTIFYTHECAUSESOFPOORPERFORMANCE,IFITISDUETOLACKOFKNOWLEDGE,SKILLSANDATTITUDESOFTHEINDIVIDUAL,SHOULDBETHECONTENTSOFTHECORRESPONDINGTRAINING,INORDERTOAVOIDTHESAMEPROBLEMINTHENEXTASSESSMENTPERIODTHEPURPOSEOFPERFORMANCEAPPRAISALISNOTTOFINDOUTTHESHORTCOMINGSOFEMPLOYEESANDPUNISHTHEM,BUTTOIDENTIFYTHECAUSESOFPOORPERFORMANCEANDIMPROVETHEMINORDERTOIMPROVESTAFFPERFORMANCEANDIMPROVETHEOVERALLPERFORMANCEOFENTERPRISESPAYATTENTIONTOTHEWORDINGINPERFORMANCEAPPRAISAL,WESHOULDPAYATTENTIONTOTHEWORDINGOFEVALUATION,ANDTHEINACCURATEEVALUATIONTERMWILLNOTONLYAFFECTTHEVALIDITYOFEVALUATION,BUTALSOSOMETIMESMAKETHESTAFFCONFLICTINTHEEXAMINATION,WESHOULDPAYATTENTIONTOTHEFOLLOWINGPROBLEMSAVOIDTHESUBJECTIVEEVALUATIONOFTHE“ATTITUDE“CATEGORYTHEUSEOFTHISKINDOFSUBJECTIVEEVALUATIONWORDS,WHENRECORDING,HASALREADYINCLUDEDTHEMANAGEMENTINDIVIDUALCOGNITIONINIT,ALREADYNOTBELONGTOTHEMOSTPRIMITIVEEVALUATIONMATERIALTHEREFORE,WHENMAKINGRECORDS,WESHOULDRECORDSOMEDETAILSANDPROBLEMSINTHEWORKOFANEMPLOYEE,ASWELLASTHEIMPACTOFTHEIRPERFORMANCEONTHEJOBEXAMPLESAREOFTENUSEDTOILLUSTRATETHEPROBLEMDETAILEDDESCRIPTIONSOFSPECIFICINSTANCESCANWELLREFLECTEMPLOYEEPERFORMANCEWECANDESCRIBETHESTAFFCOMPLETEDTHEPREVIOUSPERFORMANCEOBJECTIVES,ANDDESCRIBESPECIFICBEHAVIOROFTHESENTENCE,SUCHAS“THESTAFFBY3DAYSAND3NIGHTSOFCONTINUOUSWORK,ACCESSTOTHE200RELATEDDATA,CONSULTED5SENIORMANAGEMENTEXPERTS,FINALLYCOMPLETEDTHEPLANWRITINGWORK“THISDESCRIPTIONISMORETHANJUSTWRITE“THEEFFORTOFTHESTAFFCOMPLETEDTHEPLANWRITINGWORK“ISMORESPECIFICANDVIVID,INTHEEXAMINATIONTIME,CANSEETHEDIFFERENCEBETWEENSTAFFANDOTHEREMPLOYEESANDTHEIRPERSONALITYCHARACTERISTICS,TOPROVIDEAGOODBASISFORTHEFUTUREDEVELOPMENTANDUTILIZATIONOFTALENTSIMILARLY,WECANUSETHISMETHODTOWRITEDOWNSPECIFICEXAMPLESOFUNDERPERFORMINGEMPLOYEES,SUCHAS“A,B,ANDC“OFTHEEMPLOYEE,WHICHLEDTOTHEFAILURETOCOMPLETETHEPROJECTONTIME“REASONABLEDIVISIONOFPERFORMANCEGRADESTHEREAREMANYWAYSOFCLASSIFYINGPERFORMANCEGRADES,SUCHASFROM1TO5,FROMATOE,ORWITHSPECIFICTEXTDESCRIPTIONSFROM“GOOD“TO“UNSATISFACTORY“INGENERAL,MOSTOFTHEPEOPLEINTHEASSESSMENTOFPERFORMANCEAPPRAISALSCORESWILLFALLINTHEMIDDLEREGION,BUTINFACT,INTHECOR3ANDSOONARENOTMANY,BECAUSETHEMANAGERSOFTHE3THATISANEGATIVEEVALUATION,MAYHAVEADVERSEEFFECTSONEMPLOYEESSOLEADTOMANAGEMENTGIVEN4ORMOREBSCOREHERE,WECANUSETHETEXTDESCRIPTIONMETHODTOPARTITIONTHEPERFORMANCELEVEL,SOTHATWECANAVOIDTHEABOVESITUATION“5“OR“EXCELLENCE“THEPERFORMANCEOFEMPLOYEESISEXEMPLARY,ANDCANALWAYSEXCEEDTHEEXPECTEDPERFORMANCESTANDARDS“4“OR“EXCELLENT“THEPERFORMANCEOFEMPLOYEESISALWAYSBEYONDTHEEXPECTEDPERFORMANCESTANDARDS“3“OR“COMPETENT“THEPERFORMANCEOFEMPLOYEESALWAYSMEETSTHEPERFORMANCEOFTHEPOSITION2OR“NEEDTOIMPROVE“EMPLOYEEPERFORMANCEISOCCASIONALLYLOWERTHANEXPECTEDPERFORMANCESTANDARDSANDNEEDSTOBEIMPROVED“1“OR“NOTSATISFIED“THEPERFORMANCEOFSTAFFISNOTUPTOSTANDARD,HRINTERVENTIONISNECESSARYTOMAKEMANDATORYIMPROVEMENTSESTABLISHPERFORMANCEAPPRAISALSCHEDULEINORDERTOENSURETHATTHEPERFORMANCEAPPRAISALCANBECARRIEDOUTONTIME,WENEEDTODOAGOODJOBPERFORMANCEEVALUATIONPLAN,ANDTHEASSESSMENTPROCESSTOGRASPSOMEKEYPOINTSINTIMEAMONTHPRIORTOPERFORMANCEAPPRAISAL,COMMUNICATEANDEXPLAINWITHTHESTAFFINTHEIMPROVEMENTPARTOFTHEPERFORMANCEAPPRAISALSYSTEMSUCHASASSESSMENTMETHODS,ASSESSMENTOBJECTIVESANDINDICATORS,ANDSEEKTHEMAXIMUMCOOPERATIONAMONGEMPLOYEESTWOWEEKSPRIORTOTHEPERFORMANCEAPPRAISALMEETING,HANDOUTTHEWORKINSTRUCTIONSFORTHEPOSITIONANDREVIEWTHEPERFORMANCEREVIEWOFTHEPREVIOUSYEARTOALLOWEMPLOYEESTOWORKREGULARLYONTHECURRENTJOBDESCRIPTIONOFTHEIRTASKSANDRESPONSIBILITIESTOWEIGHT,TODETERMINETHEFOCUSOFTHEWORKANDASSESSMENTCENTEREMPLOYEESAREASKEDTOCOMPLETEASELFASSESSMENTQUESTIONNAIRETHATINCLUDESINFORMATIONABOUTTHEIRSTRENGTHS,WHERETHEYNEEDTOBEIMPROVED,ANDQUANTIFIABLEGOALSTHATCANBEQUANTIFIEDINTHEFUTUREINAWEEKBEFORETHEFORMALEVALUATION,EMPLOYEESELFEVALUATIONANDFUTUREDEVELOPMENTPLANANDSTAFFONEONONEINTERVIEWS,THISINTERVIEWISTOGIVEMANAGERSANDEMPLOYEESASINCEREEXCHANGEOPPORTUNITIESTHATALLOWMANAGERSTOUNDERSTANDTHEIRIDEASANDPLANSFORFUTUREDEVELOPMENT,WHICHCANHELPTOACHIEVETHEPERFORMANCEOBJECTIVESINPERFORMANCEDURINGTHEASSESSMENTPROCESSGIVEFEEDBACKONTHEPERFORMANCEOFTHEEMPLOYEEONTHEDAYOFEVALUATIONFIRSTOFALL,AFFIRMTHEACHIEVEMENTSOFTHEEMPLOYEESINTHEWORK,THENDISCU

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论