新版人力资源管理师(二级)复习资料新教材2级汇总复习提纲重点_百度...（the new human resources management division (level two) 2 new textbook review summary review outline key _ baidu.

新版人力资源管理师二级复习资料新教材2级汇总复习提纲重点_百度（THENEWHUMANRESOURCESMANAGEMENTDIVISIONLEVELTWO2NEWTEXTBOOKREVIEWSUMMARYREVIEWOUTLINEKEY_BAIDU）THECONTRIBUTIONOFTWOSANSHUIXLSDOCUMENTSMAYEXPERIENCEPOORBROWSINGONTHEWAPSIDEITISRECOMMENDEDTHATYOUSELECTTXTFIRSTORDOWNLOADTHESOURCEFILETOTHELOCALMACHINESECONDCHAPTERSRECRUITMENTANDALLOCATIONMATCHINGPRINCIPLEOFPERSONANDPOST2WORKREWARDANDEMPLOYEECONTRIBUTION3BETWEENEMPLOYEESANDEMPLOYEESBETWEEN4POSTSANDPOSITIONSFIRST,THECONSTRUCTIONOFSTAFFQUALITYEVALUATIONSTANDARDSYSTEM,THEBASICPRINCIPLEOFEVALUATION,INDIVIDUALDIFFERENCEPRINCIPLE,WORKDIFFERENCEPRINCIPLE1THE2OBJECTIVEEXISTENCEOFBOTHINNATEORACQUIRED2RESPONSIBILITIESBETWEEN3DIFFERENTWORKDOINGSIMILARWORKTOCOMPLETETHETASKOF3DIFFERENTPEOPLEHAVEDIFFERENTREQUIREMENTSHAVEDIFFERENTEFFECTANDEFFICIENCYOF4DIFFERENTWORKHAVETRAINEDPEOPLETOBEAR1SELECTIONEVALUATIONTOEMPHASIZETHEDISTINCTIONBETWEENRIGIDSTRONGVIEWOFFLEXIBILITYISTRANSFERREDOFFPOINTSORLEVELSEMPLOYEEQUALITYASSESSMENTTYPE2DIAGNOSTICEVALUATION3DIAGNOSTICEVALUATIONWITHTHEDEVELOPMENTOFTHEQUALITYOFTHESTAFFFORTHEPURPOSEOFWHATARETHEADVANTAGESANDDISADVANTAGESOFDIRECTIONOFDEVELOPMENTTOPROVIDEBASISFORTHEORGANIZATIONINTHEEVALUATIONPROCESSAREPUTFORWARDDEVELOPMENTPROPOSALSTOUNDERSTANDTHECURRENTSITUATIONANDFINDOUTTHESOURCEFORTHEPURPOSEOFCONTENTORVERYFINEORCOMPREHENSIVERESULTSDONOTOPENSYSTEMATICINVESTIGATIONFORTHELEVELOFDEMAND4ASSESSMENTITISALSOCALLED“APPRAISALTEST“,WHICHHASAWIDERANGE,THESUMMARYCONTENTISSPECIFIC,ANDTHEGENERALRESULTSREQUIREHIGHRELIABILITYANDVALIDITY1WORKTASKSANDWORKCONTENTDIFFERENCE1JOBREQUIREMENTSANDSTAFFQUALITYMAINPRINCIPLESOFSTAFFQUALITYEVALUATION1OBJECTIVEANDSUBJECTIVECOMBINATION2QUALITATIVEANDQUANTITATIVECOMBINATIONTARGETSYSTEMFORMULATIONMETHODSELECTION,EVALUATIONANDINTERPRETATIONRESULTSAREORGANICCOMBINATIONPROCESS,QUALITATIVE,NOTTHOROUGH,QUANTITATIVEINCOMPLETE3STATICANDDYNAMICCOMBINATIONSTATICINRELATIVELYUNIFIED,SPECIFICTIMEANDSPACE,HORIZONTALCOMPARISONSHORTCOMINGSISTOIGNORETHEORIGINALFOUNDATIONANDFUTUREDEVELOPMENT4QUALITYEVALUATIONANDPERFORMANCEEVALUATIONQUALITYISTHEMEASUREMENTANDEVALUATIONOFHUMANSMORALANDMENTALABILITY5SUBITEMSANDCOMPREHENSIVECOMBINATIONAFTERTHEDECOMPOSITIONHAVECONSEQUENCESFORIMPROVINGTHEACCURACY,BUTTHEOVERALLCHARACTERISTICSISPASSIVEDIATHESISEVALUATIONFORMATIONANDDEVELOPMENTPROCESSOFQUALITYISTOACHIEVEPERFORMANCECONDITIONSTOENSURETHEQUALITY,PERFORMANCEISTHEFACTTHATTHEWEAKENINGOFREALUNDERSTANDINGOFTHEACTUALLEVELOFFAVORABLEGUIDANCEANDSTIMULATEREALDISADVANTAGEISPROVEDWHICHAREINCONVENIENTTHEMAINFORMOFQUANTITATIVEEVALUATIONOFSTAFFQUALITYTHEDIRECTQUANTITATIVEETCHINGOFOBJECTSHASACLEARQUANTITATIVERELATIONSHIP,WHICHDIRECTLYINDICATESTHESUBSTANTIALQUANTIFICATIONOFFEATURESTWOQUANTIZATIONTHEREISNOOBVIOUSQUANTITATIVERELATIONSHIPBETWEENQUALITATIVEDESCRIPTIONANDINDIRECTQUANTIFICATION,BUTTHEDIFFERENCEINQUALITYORDEGREEISCALLEDFORMALQUANTIFICATIONCLASSQUANTIZATIONFIRSTDIVIDEDINTOSEVERALCATEGORIES,EACHOBJECTBELONGSTOONLYONECATEGORY,EACHOBJECTCANNOTBELONGTOTHETWOATTHESAMETIME,JUSTASYMBOLOFNOSIZEFUZZYQUANTIZATIONCATEGORIZEFIRSTSEQUENTIALQUANTIZATIONISOMETRICQUANTIZATIONPROPORTIONALQUANTIZATIONEQUIVALENTQUANTIZATIONACCORDINGTOADEGREEOFMEMBERSHIPASSIGNMENTOROBJECTSTANDARDINQUALITYCHARACTERISTICS,ALLQUALITYEVALUATIONOBJECT22LINEISNOTCLEAR,THECLASSIFICATIONBOUNDARIESORSEQUENCEEVALUATIONANDTHENGIVETHECORRESPONDINGFUZZYUNDERSTANDINGANDGRASPTHEMETHODOFNUMERICALSEQUENCEFURTHERTHANTHESEQUENTIALQUANTIZATION,ARRANGEDFIRSTSELECTACLOSEDEXISTENCEMULTIPLESTRENGTHSIZEHASSYSTEMVARIABLESININTERMEDIARY,INTOTHEDIFFERENCECANBEEQUALTOTHEGAPSIZERATIO,CANBECOMPAREDFORDIFFERENCESINTHEPROPORTIONOFSIMILARHOMOGENEOUSONTHEMDEGREECOMPARISONQUANTITATIVECASE,UNIFIEDTRANSFORMATIONONTHEBASISOFTHETWO,FIRSTVERTICALANDHORIZONTAL,FIRSTVERTICALANDHORIZONTAL,THATIS,ONEQUANTIZATIONANDTHENTWOQUANTIZATIONITSTHETWOQUANTIZATIONDEEPQUANTIFICATIONTHECHARACTERISTICOFEQUIVALENTQUANTIFICATIONISASUBJECTIVEQUANTIZATIONFORM,WHOSEFUNCTIONISTOMAKEDIFFERENTQUALITYEVALUATIONOBJECTSOFDIFFERENTCATEGORIESQUANTIZED,ANDTOCOMPAREANDCARRYOUTNUMERICALSYNTHESISQUALITYEVALUATIONSTANDARDSYSTEM,STANDARDELEMENTSOFSTANDARDSYSTEMTHEINTERNALSTIPULATIONOFTHESYSTEMTWO,THESTRUCTUREOFEVALUATIONSTANDARDSYSTEM,THEHORIZONTALSTRUCTUREOFMARKINGHORIZONTALSTRUCTUREISTHEBASIS,FOCUSINGONTHECOMPLETENESS,CLARITYANDINDEPENDENCEOFEVALUATIONQUALITYSTRUCTURALELEMENTSREFLECTTHECONTENTOFASSESSMENTFROMSTATICSCALINGTHEDIVISIONOFSTANDARDEXTERNALFORMLONGITUDINALSTRUCTUREMEASUREMENTTARGETEVALUATIONINDEXTHE1QUANTIFIERSAREDIVIDEDINTOOBJECTIVE,SUBJECTIVEAND2LEVELSFROMTHECONNOTATION,ANDTHEYARESEMIOBJECTIVEANDSEMISUBJECTIVEINTHERANKORDERTHE3GRADESHOULDBEINORDER,SHOULDBETHEBESTINDIFFERENTSCALE1PHYSICALQUALITYFROMTHEFORMOFCOMMENTPHRASETYPEPROVIDEDWITHEQUIDISTANTGENERALLEVELNUMBER,SAIDINTHE5SIGN,DIDNOTASKTHATTYPEDIRECTIONTYPEWITHIN2PSYCHOLOGICALQUALITYINDEPENDENTCOMMENTTYPECONTAININGAVARIABLENUMBERMORETHAN4TYPESCALE,CONTINUOUSTHEINTERVALANDDISCRETEPOINTTHECORRECTSELECTIONANDEVALUATIONOFTHECONTENTOFTHEPROVISIONSISANIMPORTANTMEANSTOREALIZETHEEVALUATIONOFOBJECTIVEBEHAVIORENVIRONMENTALELEMENTSPERFORMANCEFACTORSFROMTHEDYNAMICANGLEREFERSTOAPERSONS1FROMTHEQUALITYANDCANSTEPISTOANALYZETHESTRUCTURECONDITIONSOFSTRESSLEVELWORTHYOFEVALUATIONFACTORS,COMPREHENSIVEBYCONTENTANALYSISANDCONTENTANALYSISTABLENUMBER2INSIDETHEENVIRONMENTISANALYZEDTHECONTENTANALYSISTABLETABLEREFERSTOTHEINDIVIDUALFACTORSOFLONGITUDINALWORKQUALITYTOTHELISTISTHEOBJECTSTRUCTUREWITHTHEDIFFERENTLEVELSOFEACHNODEISNOTLISTEDINTHETRANSVERSECONSTRUCTIONWORKEFFICIENCYFACTORSISTHECOMPREHENSIVEEVALUATIONOFTHECONTENTOFSCREENINGAFTERTHEPRODUCTQUALITYEVALUATIONTARGETOPERATION,THEREISADIRECTMANIFESTATIONOFTHECONTENTEVALUATIONPOINTOFSCREENINGRESULTSTHEEVALUATIONCONTENTISTOTHESPECIFICOBJECTANDSCOPEOFEVALUATION,EVALUATIONTARGETISTOCLEARGOALSEVALUATIONCONTENTISAREPRESENTATIVECONTENT,BYCLEARLYDEFINED,THEEVALUATIONINDEXISTOACHIEVEQUALITATIVETHEQUANTITATIVEMETHOD,THESPECIFICEVALUATIONGOALSUSINGTHEGENERALDECOMPOSITIONOFDELCONSULTING,QUESTIONNAIRESURVEYANDHIERARCHICALWORDS,COMMONLYUSEDFUZZYVARIABLEWORDS5DEFINEDSTANDARDDEGREE,USINGMANYWORDSTODEFINESCALERANGEANDLEVELDIRECTIONINDICATOR,CANBEDIVIDEDINTOMEASURINGANDEVALUATIONTYPE6COMPREHENSIVESTANDARD,USINGTWOORMORETHEFACTORSOFTHEDIFFERENTLEVELSOFNONDELCONSULTING,QUESTIONNAIRESURVEYANDHIERARCHICALWORKTOGETHER,INTHEMIDDLEOFTHETABLEINTHECOMBINEDANALYSISMETHODOFMULTIVARIATEANALYSISTHE3REFERSTOTHEEXTERNALOBJECTIVEWORLDEXISTS,TYPETHREE,LISTEDTHECONTENTSOFEVALUATIONSYSTEMOFSPECIFICINDIRECTEFFECTS,INCLUDINGWORKGROUPANDTHEPRESTIGEOFTHEPEOPLETHEFABRICBACKGROUNDOFTALENTCULTIVATIONCRITERIONANDNORMMORALEVALUATIONMETHODKNOWLEDGEASSESSMENTABILITYASSESSMENT1GENERALABILITY2SPECIALABILITY3CREATIVITY1PREPARATIONSTAGETHECONCRETEIMPLEMENTATIONOFENTERPRISESTAFFQUALITYEVALUATIONTHE2STAGEOFIMPLEMENTATIONCOREPROCESSCOREPROCESS3EVALUATIONRESULTS1REASONSCAUSEDBYTHE4ADJUSTMENTOFCOMPREHENSIVEANALYSISOFEVALUATIONRESULTS1RESULTSDESCRIBEFIGURESANDTEXTANALYSISOF3CLASSIFICATIONRESULTSOF2EMPLOYEESFACTORANALYSIS,COMPREHENSIVEANALYSIS,CURVEANALYSIS1FRCEVALUATIONBYCALCULATINGTRIBUTEAIDEDANALYSISONPEOPLEKNOWLEDGEANDKNOWLEDGEASSESSMENTMETHOD,THEREPORTCANBEAWAYTOMEASUREINDIVIDUALSTRUCTUREANDLEVELOFKNOWLEDGEBUTALSOACOLLECTIVEQUESTIONNAIRE2QUESTIONNAIRESOF3PROJECTIONTECHNOLOGYORIGINATEDINCLINICALPSYCHOLOGY,EVALUATIONOBJECTIVECONCEALMENT,THECONTENTOFNONSTRUCTURALDEVELOPMENT,FREERESPONSETHEDETERMINATIONOF1COLLECTTHENECESSARYDATAOF2ORGANIZATIONASSESSMENTTEAMTOMOBILIZE1EVALUATIONBEFORETHE3ASSESSMENTPROGRAMDETERMINETHESCOPEANDPURPOSEOFTHEEVALUATIONOBJECTDESIGNREVIEWSTAFFQUALITYABILITYINDEXANDREFERENCESTANDARDERRORREDUCTION,COMPILATIONANDREVISIONOFQUALITYABILITYEVALUATIONMETHODOFMEASURING4REASONABLECHOICEFAIRNESSVALIDITYUTILITYANDCOSTSIXLEVELSOFKNOWLEDGE,UNDERSTANDING,LEARNING,APPLICATION,ANALYSIS,SYNTHESISANDEVALUATIONARETHEPSYCHOLOGICALTESTS,ANDTHESPECIFICAPPLICATIONFORMSARETHREELEVELSOFMEMORYMEMORY,MEMORY,COMPREHENSIONANDAPPLICATIONOFTRIALMEMORY42EVALUATIONTIMEANDTHECHOICEOFENVIRONMENTSYSTEMANDTHESTANDARDISNOTCLEARHARDTIMEISSHORT,SOFTINDEXHALOEFFECT,EMOTIONALEFFECTRECENCYERRORTIMEINALONGTIMEANDLACKOFTRAININGPERSONNELPARTICIPATINGINTHEMIDDLEOFTHEWEEK,MORNING900LEFT3ASSESSMENTPROCEDURES2METHODOFPROCESSINGCENTRALIZEDTREND,OFFREPORTINGEVALUATION,GUIDINGLANGUAGE,SPECIFICTREND,RELATEDFACTORS,DATACOLLECTIONANDEVALUATION3THEMATTERSNEEDINGATTENTIONINTHEOPERATIONPROCESSOFTHESECONDSTAGEIMPLEMENTATIONOFTHESPECIFICIMPLEMENTATIONMATTERSNEEDINGATTENTIONINTHEOPERATIONPROCESSOFTHESECONDPHASEIMPLEMENTATIONSTAGETHEEVALUATIONREPORTCONTAINSINSTRUCTIONS1STAFFQUALITYASSESSMENTPURPOSES2EMPHASIZINGTHEEVALUATIONANDEXAMINATIONSAREDIFFERENT3BEFORECOMPLETINGTHEPREPARATIONANDFILLINGREQUIREMENTS4EXAMPLESREQUIRED5EVALUATIONRESULTSARECONFIDENTIALANDPROCESSING,THEEVALUATIONRESULTSFEEDBACKTHETIMESHOULDBECONTROLLEDWITHIN5MINUTESINTHESPECIFICOPERATIONTHESPECIFICOPERATION1SEPARATEOPERATION,SPENDMORETIME2CONTRASTOPERATION,BEINSTRICTACCORDANCEWITHTHESTANDARDS,INCREASETHESUBJECTIVE,BUTSAVETIMECONCENTRATEDTRENDOFTHECOMMONARITHMETICMEANANDMEDIANDISCRETETRENDOFTHECOMMONDIFFERENCEMEASUREISTHESTANDARDDEVIATION,THEDIFFERENCEOFLARGEAMOUNTOFCONCENTRATEDQUANTITYOFSMALLDIFFERENCES,SMALLAMOUNTOFCONCENTRATEDQUANTITYREPRESENTATIVETHEGREATERISTHEREARETWOSTANDARDSFORCLASSIFYINGEMPLOYEESTWOSTANDARDSFORCLASSIFYINGEMPLOYEES1CLASSIFICATIONCRITERIAITHASTHEUNIVERSALITYANDTHERELATIVESTABILITYOFTHEINVESTIGATIONRANGEISMORECLOSETOTHEREALITY,TODISTINGUISHTHEQUALITYREQUIREMENTSANDSHOULDREACHTHELEVEL,BYINTERVIEWINGSTAFFQUESTIONNAIRESAMPLINGANALYSISMETHOD2MATHEMATICALCLASSIFICATIONCRITERIAACCORDINGTOTHEMATHEMATICALCLASSIFICATIONBYUSINGTHEMETHODOFMATHEMATICALSTATISTICSFACTORANALYSISISBASEDONFACTORANALYSIS,WHICHCANBEDIVIDEDINTOSTRUCTURALANALYSIS,INDUCTIVEANALYSISANDCOMPARATIVEANALYSISINTHEPROCESSOFEVALUATIONDATAPROCESSING,THEDRAWINGQUALITYEVALUATIONCURVEDIAGRAMANDTHESTRUCTUREEVALUATIONCURVEDIAGRAMAREUSUALLYUSED,THATIS,THECOMPETENCYMODELDIAGRAMSECONDSECTIONSINTERVIEWORGANIZATIONANDIMPLEMENTATIONINTERVIEWCONTENT,INTERVIEWTYPE,INTERVIEWDEVELOPMENTTREND,COMMONPROBLEMSININTERVIEW3LACKOFSYSTEMATICINTERVIEW4INTERVIEWPROBLEMDESIGNISUNREASONABLEDIRECTAPPLICANTSTODESCRIBETHEIROWN,POLYNOMIALCHOICEINTERVIEWSKILLS2FLEXIBLEQUESTIONS3MORELISTENINGLESS4GOODATEXTRACTIONREQUIREMENTS5FORPERIODICSUMMARY1TOTALKANDOBSERVEASATOOL,2ISATWOWAYCOMMUNICATIONPROCESS3INTERVIEWHASACLEARPURPOSESTANDARDIZATIONSTRUCTUREDSTANDARDIZED,NON1FORMS,RICH,DIVERSE,STRUCTURED,SEMISTRUCTURED2STRUCTUREDHASBECOMETHEMAINSTREAMWAYSINGLE,GROUP,3QUESTIONSELASTIC4CONTENTCONTINUESTOEXPAND1THEINTERVIEWPURPOSEISNOTCLEAR2INTERVIEWSTANDARDISNOTSPECIFIC1FULLYPREPARED4INTERVIEWISAPROCESSACCORDINGTOTHEPREDESIGNEDPROCEDUREASINGLESTAGE5INTERVIEW,THEEXAMINERANDTHEINTERVIEWEEAREUNEQUALINPOSITIONSITUATIONALEXPERIENCE6ELIMINATEINTERFERENCE5EXAMINERPROFESSIONAL6THEORIESANDMETHODSHAVE5INTERVIEWERBIASTHEFIRSTEFFECT,COMPAREDTO7WITH8NOTPERSONALBIASINLISTENINGATTENTIONTHINKINGSHOWEFFECTHALOEFFECTEMPLOYMENTPRESSURETEST9PAYATTENTIONTOBODYLANGUAGECOMMUNICATIONBASICPROCEDUREOFINTERVIEWTHEPREPARATIONSTAGEOFANINTERVIEW1MAKINGINTERVIEWGUIDELINES1THEESTABLISHMENTOFTHEINTERVIEWTEAM2INTERVIEWPREPARATION3INTERVIEWQUESTIONSDIVISIONANDORDERPAYATTENTIONTOEMPLOYEERECRUITMENTTHREEINTERVIEWSUMMARYSTAGE1COMPREHENSIVEINTERVIEWRESULTS1COMPREHENSIVEEVALUATION2INTERVIEWCONCLUSIONONTHEPREMISEOFCOMPANYPOSTDEMAND,PAYATTENTIONTOLONGTERMDEVELOPMENTPOTENTIALTWOTHEIMPLEMENTATIONPHASEOFTHEINTERVIEW1ESTABLISHMENTSTAGEUSINGCLOSUREPROBLEMFOURINTERVIEWEVALUATIONSTAGE1RESUMEDOESNOTMEANME2WORKEXPERIENCEISMOREIMPORTANTTHANEDUCATION3DONOTIGNORETHEPERSONALITYCHARACTERISTICSOFJOBSEEKERS4LETAPPLICANTSKNOWMOREABOUTORGANIZATION2PREPAREINTERVIEWQUESTIONS1DETERMINETHEPROPORTIONOFJOBABILITY2INTERVIEWQUESTIONS2IMPORTSTAGEUSEOPENPROBLEM3CORESTAGEUSEBEHAVIORALPROBLEMS,COOPERATEWITHOTHERPROBLEMS5GIVECANDIDATESMOREOPPORTUNITIESTOREVIEWTHEENTIREINTERVIEWPROCESS,ATOTALOF4INTERVIEWQUESTIONS1QUESTIONSSKILLSASSESSMENTMETHODSANDSTANDARDSOF4STAGESCONFIRMWITHOPENQUESTIONS,TRYTOUNDERSTANDBOTHTHESPECIFICREQUIREMENTSOF1MOREEXPERIENCE,TODOFORTHENEXT6DONOTPAYATTENTIONTOLOYALTYANDLACKOFSINCERITYOFCANDIDATESBYAVOIDINGCLOSEDQUESTIONS2CONTRACTSIGNED3OFREJECTED5FEEDBACKINTERVIEWSCORESDETERMINETHEINTERVIEWSCOREOF7TO2SPECIALATTENTIONTO8EMPLOYEESCAREFULLYDECIDE4TRAININGINTERVIEWERSENDINGIN5STAGESSUPPLEMENTARYMATTERS,BEHAVIORAND3INTERVIEWRESULTSARCHIVETRAININGINCLUDESSKILLEVALUATIONSTANDARDQUESTIONINGQUESTIONINGSKILLSANDMASTERYOFTHEOPEN9DEGREEEXAMINERSPAYATTENTIONTOTHEIROWNIMAGE3DETERMINETHEEVALUATIONMETHOD2FEEDBACKOFINTERVIEWRESULTSORGANIZATIONANDIMPLEMENTATIONOFSTRUCTUREDINTERVIEWWITHSECONDUNITSTYPE1BACKGROUND2KNOWLEDGE3THINKINGBEHAVIORDESCRIPTIONINTERVIEWBDBEHAVIORDESCRIPTIONINTERVIEWBDCONNOTATION1ISAKINDOFSPECIALSTRUCTUREDINTERVIEWCONNOTATION2,THEKEYELEMENTSOFBEHAVIORALPROBLEMSBASEDONKEYCOMPETENCYFACTOR1CONSTRUCTAMODELOFSELECTIONQUALITY1SETUPEVALUATIONTEAM2,FROMTHEEXCELLENTSTAFFFIRSTOUTOFATESTSAMPLESTRUCTUREDINTERVIEWSTEPSBASEDONTHESELECTIONQUALITYMODELSTRUCTUREDINTERVIEWSTEPSBASEDONTHESELECTIONQUALITYMODEL5,SIXTWODESIGNSTRUCTUREDINTERVIEWOUTLINE1,THEMODELISDIVIDEDINTOASETOFSELECTEDQUALITIES,EACHOFWHICHISANEVALUATIONINDEXTHREEESTABLISHGRADINGSTANDARDSANDGRADINGSCALESFOURTRAININGEXAMINERS,IMPROVETHERELIABILITYANDVALIDITYOFTHESTRUCTURE,TRAININGEXAMINER,1HAVERELEVANTPROFESSIONALKNOWLEDGE,UNDERSTANDTHERELEVANTINFORMATION,CLEARLYREFERSTOSUBSTANCE1PREDICTSTHEFUTUREBEHAVIOROFTHE2GOALBYUSINGPASTBEHAVIOR4EMPIRICAL5SITUATIONAL6STRESS7BEHAVIOR2KEYWORKIDENTIFICATIONREQUIREMENTS3DETECTIONBEHAVIORSAMPLEHYPOTHESIS1INTHEPASTCANINDICATEITSFUTUREBEHAVIORHYPOTHESIS2ISDIFFERENTFROMSECTIONANDDOHARM3ACTIONS4RESULTSSTANDARDTITLEPHASEWILLBEFUNDEDBACKGROUNDINFORMATIONOF3TESTSAMPLESOFPERSONALITYTESTS,SUMMARIZETHEQUALITYCHARACTERISTICSOF2INVITEDEXPERTSTODESIGNASERIESOFPROBLEMSASTHEINDEX,ANDTHERESULTSWEREINTEGRATEDINTO4LISTS,THESELECTIONOFQUALITYTABLEFORREVISEANDIMPROVETHEOPENQUESTIONNAIRE2SOCIALWORKEXPERIENCE,GOODOBSERVATION,OBJECTIVEEVALUATION5TOANALYZEEACHQUALITY,DRAWQUALITYLINE,BUILDMODEL3,THEQUESTIONNAIREWILLBEISSUEDTOSTAFFFORPRETEST43MASTERTHERELEVANTASSESSMENTTECHNIQUES,SKILLEDUSEOFINTERVIEWSKILLS4HAVEAGOODPERSONALCHARACTER,GOODANDFAIRFIVESTRUCTUREDINTERVIEWANDGRADINGDECISIONSIXDECISION1DONOTHAVETOELIMINATEKEYSELECTIONOFCANDIDATESTOTAKETHE2QUALITYOFEACHPERSON,TOOBTAINNEGATIVEPOINTSFORSQUAREANDLARGENUMBER,THESMALLERTHESNUMBERISSMALLTHEINDEXNUMBEROF3POINTSISEQUALTO,ISMUCHMOREEXCELLENTINDICATORSOF4SEQUALPOSITIVEANDEQUAL,WILLBEPOSITIVEINDICATORSOFCUMULATIVESCORES,THEHIGHERTHESCORETHEMOREEXCELLENT5ACCORDINGTOTHEHUMANRESOURCEPLANNINGSTAFFRECRUITMENTREQUIREMENTS,ACCORDINGTOTHESMALLNUMBERTHEDEVELOPMENTOFSTRUCTUREDINTERVIEWTHEDEVELOPMENTOF1EVALUATIONCRITERIA,NAMELYTHECONSTRUCTIONOFRECRUITMENTQUALITYMODELDESIGN2STRUCTUREDINTERVIEWQUESTIONS3TODETERMINETHESTANDARDFOREVALUATIONTHEDEVELOPMENTOFGROUPDECISIONOFTHEORGANIZATIONANDIMPLEMENTATIONOFSTRUCTUREDINTERVIEW1SOURCESOFDECISIONMAKERSISEXTENSIVE,MULTIANGLEEVALUATION,MORECOMPREHENSIVE,MEETTHEENTERPRISECOMPREHENSIVETALENTSELECTIONTHEREQUIREMENTSOFGROUPDECISIONTHEORGANIZATIONANDIMPLEMENTATIONOFTHE2DECISIONMAKERSNOTONLYTOACERTAINEXTENT,WEAKENEDTHEINFLUENCEOFTHESUBJECTIVEFACTORSOFDECISIONMAKERSINDECISIONMAKINGRESULTS,IMPROVEOBJECTIVITYOFRECRUITMENTDECISIONPRINCIPLEOF3GROUPDECISIONMETHODUSINGGROUPDECISIONMAKINGMETHODOFOPERATIONALRESEARCH,IMPROVETHESCIENTIFICANDEFFECTIVERECRUITMENTDECISIONSTHIRDSECTIONSORGANIZATIONANDIMPLEMENTATIONOFLEADERLESSGROUPLECTURES2FORTRAININGDIAGNOSIS,FOCUSONSTAFFSTRENGTHSANDWEAKNESSES,CLEARNEEDFROMWHATASPECTSOFTRAINING3FORSTAFFSKILLSDEVELOPMENT,IMPROVETHEABILITYTOIMPROVETHEIRTRAININGONTHEBASISOFDIAGNOSISMEANINGTHEASSESSMENTCENTERISCOMBINATIONOFVARIOUSMETHODSOFSTANDARDIZEDASSESSMENTOFINDIVIDUALBEHAVIORFROMMULTIPLEPERSPECTIVES1USINGAVARIETYOFEVALUATIONTECHNIQUESTHROUGHMORETHAN2APPRAISERSINTHEEVALUATIONOFSITUATIONSPECIFICBEHAVIORJUDGMENT3THENDISCUSSTHESTATISTICALSUMMARYOFTHEASSESSMENTCENTER1FORTHEMEANINGOFEMPLOYEESELECTION,QUALIFIEDFORTHEPOSITIONREQUIREDFORTHEPOWERORQUALITYOFTHEROLEOFLEADERLESSGROUPDISCUSSION69WASCHOSEN,WITHINTHESPECIFIEDTIMEIS1HOURS,ORHOSTDOESNOTSPECIFYTHETEAMLEADER,DISCUSSIONTYPETHETHEMEHASARUTHLESSENVIRONMENTADVANTAGESHORTCOMINGAPREPARATORYDESIGN2SCORETABLE1EXTRACTIONEVALUATIONINDEXOFSPECIFIC,TARGETED2CANNOTBETOOMUCHTOOCOMPLICATEDPERFORMANCE/ANALYTICAL/PERSONALITYSTYLE2THEEVALUATIONSTANDARDSANDPREPARATIONOFTITLE3CANDIDATES1HIGHERPERFORMANCEWITHOTHERMEMBERSOFTHEGROUPARESUSCEPTIBLETOINFLUENCELEADERLESSGROUPSTEPLEADERLESSGROUPSTEP3STEPSTWOTHEIMPLEMENTATIONPHASE3TIMINGTABLE1READTHEINSTRUCTIONSCOMPILED2DISCUSSIONSTAGEAFFECTINGSPEECHSPEECHFORMANDSPECIALDISCUSSION,ONSTAGE4EXAMINERTRAININGSPEECHEVALUATIONANDSUMMARY1PARTICIPATIONIN2THEINFLUENCEOFTHETHREEEVALUATIONANDSUMMARIZESSELECTEDSITE,5SELECTEDSITES,ROUNDOR3DEGREEOFDECISION4TASK5TEAMTWISTSHAPETOMAINTAINACERTAINDISTANCE,THEEXAMINERANDMEMBERTOEMPATHY1TOPICQUALITYIMPACTASSESSMENTQUALITY1HASVIVIDINTERPERSONALINTERACTIONEFFECT1RUTHLESSENVIRONMENT,WITHOPENQUESTION2CANPRODUCEINTERACTION,2SITUATIONSWHETHERTOASSIGNROLES,1INDEFINITEROLE2SPECIFYROLE3,DISCUSSIONPROCESSISTRUE,EASYTOEVALUATE4,ITISDIFFICULTTOCOVERUPTH