选择供应商的工具

1、SELECTIONTOOL选择供应商的工具SUPPLIER INFORMATION供应商信息:Supplier name:供应商名称：Phone:电话：Fax:传真：Corporate headquarters address: 总部地址：Supplier web page address: 网址：Contact name/title:联系人：Phone:电话：Fax:传真：Contact address:联系地址：Contact email:EMAIL :Other important information: 其他重要信息：SQE ANALYSISSQE分析：Weight比重Supplie

2、r A供应商ASupplier B供应商BSupplier C供应商CRTS ReadinessSupplier Outgoing Quality Level/DPPM供应商出货品质水平/DPPMSupplier Customers Line Reject Rate 供应商客户的厂内不良率：Supplier Customers Field Reject Rate 供应商客户的市场不良率：Forecasted LRR Customer预估的客户产线不良率Forecasted IFIR CustomerCUSTOMER的预期初始市场不良率Quality System 品质系统：Quality Re

3、sources品质资源：TOTAL (weighted) 总计100%SQE WORKSHEETSQE工作表：RTS READINESSSCORE:分数：Detail:How soon may the product be successfully introduced into Customer manufacturing, and does the compatibility of the design meet Customer ' needs?说明：产品需要多长时间才能成功导入CUSTOMER生产，设计能力是否可以满足CUSTOMER 需求？Scori ng:1Represen

4、tshigh risk to scheduleand quality OR not compatible分数：时间及品质具有高风险性，配合度差2 Representsmedium risk to scheduleor quality; compatible 时间及品质具有中等风险性，配合度好3 Representslow risk to scheduleor quality; compatible 时间及品质具有低风险性，配合度好4 No risk to scheduleor quality; compatible时间及品质无风险性，配合度好Comments 备注：SUPPLIERS OUTG

5、OING QUALITY LEVEL/DPPMSCORE:供应商出货品质等级/DPPMDetail:说明(Supplier hlsSry)供应商的历史状况Supplier should be measuring DPPM rates, analyzing/categorizing reasons for failures, and taking appropriate corrective actions.供应商能够计算出不良率，分析失效原因并加以分类，并能够剔除有效的改善对策。Scori ng:1 Supplier does not measureDPPM rate分数：供应商无法计算出不良

6、率2 Supplier measures DPPM rate, however, there is no analysis (pareto) or corrective action 供应商能够计算出不良率，但无法提供分析及改善对策。3 Supplier measures DPPM rate and performs analysis (pareto), however, no corrective action is taken供应商能够计算出不良率，能够剔除原因分析，但是无法提供改善对策。4 Supplier measures DPPM rate, performs analysis (p

7、areto) and has effective correctiveaction system供应商能够计算出不良率，提供原因分析及有效的改善对策。GENERAL DPPM INFORMA TION:主要的市场不良资讯：a) Agree to Customer ' DPPM goals:Yes, goals are No是否达到CUSTOMER不良率目标：是，目标是：否b) Plan to support achievement of DPPM goals:Yes(plan attached)是否有确保达到不良率目标的计划：Plan promised by是（相关计划）计划确定人：C

8、omments 备注:SCORE分数:SUPPLIER S CUSTOMERS LINE REJECT RATES供应商客户的厂内不良率Detail:说明：(Supplier cusiomers history)(Customer 'cisrent goal)(供应商的历史状况)CUSTOMER的现行目标Scori ng:1 Supplier customers L'R is 2 times worse than Customer ' current goal分数：供应商客户的长期不良率超过CUSTOMER现行目标值的2倍2 Supplier customers LRR

9、 is greaterthan Customer 'current goal, yet lessthan 2 times greater供应商客户的长期不良率超过CUSTOMER现行目标值，但是小于其2倍3 Supplier customers LRR is approximately equal to Customer ' current goal供应商客户的长期不良率基本与CUSTOMER现行目标一致4 Supplier customers LRR is better than Customer ' current goal供应商客户的长期不良率优于CUSTOMER

10、现行目标值SCORE: SUPPLIER S CUSTOMERS FIELD REJECT RATESFORECASTEDLRR CUSTOMERSCORE: 供应商客户的市场不良率分数:Detail:说明：(Supplier customers history)(Customer 'cicrent goal)供应商客户的历史状况CUSTOMER现行目标Scori ng:1 Supplier Customers FIR is 2 times worse than Customer ' current goal分数：供应商客户的市场不良率超过CUSTOMER现行目标值的2倍2 S

11、upplier customers FIR is greater than Customer ' current goal, yet less than 2 times greaterCUSTOMER客户的市场不良率超过 CUSTOMER现行目标，但低于其 2倍3 Supplier customers FIR is approximately equal to Customer ' current goal供应商客户的市场不良率基本与CUSTOMER现行目标值一致4 Supplier customers FIR is betterthan Customer ' curr

12、ent goal供应商客户的市场不良率优于CUSTOMER现行目标值分数预期的CUSTOMER 产线不良率FORECASTEDIFIR CUSTOMERSCORE: DETAIL:(SUPPLIER'S FORECASTED)(CUSTOMERCURRENT GOAL)说明：供应商的预估值CUSTOMER的现行目标Scori ng:1 Supplier LRR is 2 times worse than Customer ' current goal分数：供应商的产线不良率超过CUSTOMER现行目标值的2倍2 Supplier LRR is greaterthan Custo

13、mer ' current goal, yet less than 2 times greater供应商的产线不良率超过CUSTOMER的现行目标值，但低于其 2倍3 Supplier LRR is approximately equal to Customer ' current goal供应商的产线不良率基本与CUSTOMER现行目标值一致4 Supplier LFRR is better tha n Customer 'curre nt goal供应商的产线不良率优于CUSTOMER现行目标值分数预期的CUSTOMER早期市场不良率Detail:(Supplier

14、 forecasted) (Customer 'current goal)说明：供应商的预估值CUSTOMER的现行目标值Scori ng:1Supplier 'IR is 2 times worsethan Customer ' current goal分数供应商的早期市场不良率超过CUSTOMER现行目标值的2倍2Supplier 'IR is greaterthanCustomer ' current goal, yet lessthan 2 times greater供应商的早期市场不良率超过CUSTOMER的现行目标值，但低于其 2倍3Supp

15、lier 'IR is approximately equal to Customer ' currentgoal供应商的早期市场不良率基本于CUSTOMER现行目标值一致4Supplier 'IR is betterthan Customer 'current goal供应商的早期市场不良率优于CUSTOMER现行目标QUALITY SYSTEMSCORE: 品质系统分数Detail 细则：a) ISO Certification:1 Yes (circle one: 9001 9002)0 Noa) ISO认证b) Customer Quality Syst

16、ems Audit scoring ranges:b)品质系统稽核得分0 Less than 70% (Not Approved)2 Between 70 - 89%(Conditionally Approved)4 Between 90 - 100%(Approved)QUALITY RESOURCESSCORE: 品质资源分数Detail 细则：The Supplier should have a dedicated Quality Department with adequate staffing resources to attend to tactical issues and a

17、Quality Manager with time to attend to strategic issues. Additi on ally, Supplier should bewilli ng to appo int a Joint Quality Engin eer for each mfg site. 供应商应当建立专门的品保系统、足够的品保员工参与品质问题的解决，任命品保经 理参与公司决策，另外供应商还要在每个制造厂任命一名JQEScori ng:1In adequate resources系统不健全2Quality staff; however, no Quality Manag

18、er有品保员工，但没有专职品保经理3Quality Department and dedicated Quality Manager有品保员工和专职品保经理4Quality Department. Quality Manager, and willing to appoint a JQE有品保员工和专职品保经理，同意任命一名JQESCORE: LOCAL SUPPORT 支持Detail:细则：Scori ng:Supplier capability to meet Customer ' S SupplieQuality Standard ”供应商目前的状况可以满足客户的“SQS”1 No commitme nt to support and won' be ready un til 3 mon ths after First Customer Ship第一次客户