中美陪审团差异及司法案例中文解析

1、Jury system not perfect, but it works 陪审团不完美，但是它仍然有效The American jury system originated in England and China sfrom Continental law system. 美国陪审团制度是英美法系，中 国是大陆法系And what is the jury system? The jury system, it is to point to by the number of specific have the participation of citizens in the decision

2、 whether suspects prosecution, whether the system of the guilty.The England law system is underline the jury, combined with people; the Continental law system is pay attention to evidence.英美法系重视陪审团，在意公众意见；大陆法系只注重证据The case of Simpson killed his wife can reflect the defects of the jury system perfect

3、ly! 辛普森杀妻案可以完美地反映出Now, let me tell you this judicial case, which to illustrate their love-hate relationship with the rule of law.我们来讲述这个案In the summer of the 1994, the American football playerSimpson murder of his wife and another man.The trial of the case was very dramatic, as police and several im

4、portant mistakes of the failure of evidence, which makes Simpson, escaped the legal sanction.On October 3, 1995, the western United States time 10 o clock in the morning, when the Simpson case to be announced award, the whole American stalled at that time. PresidentClinton pushed the state military;

5、 Former secretary of state baker delayed speech; Wall Street light trading; Long distance telephone lines silence. CNN statistics show that about 140 million Americans watch or listen to the century trial the final decision.The jury brought results: Simpson not guilty. 陪审团给出的结 果：辛普森无罪I think if this

6、 case occurred in China, the result will completely different!Chinese believe that the truth of the jury power far less than the United States of the jury. There is evidence to prove that the suspect in the facts of the crime premise, although some access to the evidence exists faults, the judge wil

7、l still be the defendant guilty verdict.Jury system not perfect, but it works.For centuries now, the institution of the jury has helped assure English-speaking people all over the world that they got the kind of justice they wanted.In the American legal system, if the prosecution wants tocharge the guilty, must be conclusive credible evidence to p rove the defendant crimes. There is no doubt that any evidence would have some doubts, but the jury only in