版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
1、小时糖耐量试验的临床意义特荐2小时糖耐量试验的临床意义小时糖耐量试验的临床意义 Finnish Academy Research Fellow芬兰赫尔辛基大学及芬兰赫尔辛基大学及 国立公共卫生研究院国立公共卫生研究院北大糖尿病论坛北大糖尿病论坛2007年年 5 月月12日,日, 北京北京乔青乔青 MD, Ph.D 小时糖耐量试验的临床意义特荐糖尿病诊断试验糖尿病诊断试验:历史回顾历史回顾糖尿病糖尿病症状症状尿糖尿糖空腹血糖空腹血糖糖耐量糖耐量 (1913年年) Jacobsen A. Biochem Z 51:443, 1913小时糖耐量试验的临床意义特荐Normal Glucose Home
2、ostasis Daytime Profile (N=12, health; Mean + 95%CI)Owens D ,Zinman B & Bolli G : Lancet 358,739,2001Meal Times80400Insulin (mU/L)08.0013.0016.00 19.00 hGlucose (mmol/L)8426小时糖耐量试验的临床意义特荐什么是糖耐量异常什么是糖耐量异常?1. 高于均值高于均值+2标准差可诊断糖尿病标准差可诊断糖尿病: 根据年轻根据年轻 (20-30 岁岁) 健康人群资料健康人群资料, 纯统计!纯统计!不考虑临床,预后及年龄不考虑临床,
3、预后及年龄 (50年代年代) 2h全血血糖全血血糖=120mg/dl (100g糖耐量糖耐量)诊断诊断糖尿病糖尿病 (血浆血糖比全血高血浆血糖比全血高14-16%!) 发病率高发病率高 诊断标准混乱诊断标准混乱 (血样,服糖量,时间血样,服糖量,时间) 直到直到70年代年代Mosenthal H.O. and Barry E (Ann Intern Med 33: 1175, 1950)小时糖耐量试验的临床意义特荐什么是糖耐量异常什么是糖耐量异常?1. 均值均值+2标准差标准差2. 血糖双峰分布血糖双峰分布,小血管病变小血管病变 (眼病,肾病等眼病,肾病等): 糖尿病高发人群糖尿病高发人群,
4、如如Pima Indians (1971), Mexican-Americans, Micronesians, Polynesians 小时糖耐量试验的临床意义特荐Bimodal distribution of glucoseand prevalence of retinopathy and proteinuria in Pima Indians Knowler WC etc. Diabetes Metab Rev 6: 1-27, 1990小时糖耐量试验的临床意义特荐Copyright 1994 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.McCane, D R et al. BMJ
5、1994;308:1323-85 year cumulative incidence (top) and prevalence (bottom) of retinopathy in relation to tenths of 2hPG, FPG, and HBa1c 小时糖耐量试验的临床意义特荐现用诊断标准现用诊断标准 NDDG1979: FPG=7.8 mmol/l and 75g OGTT at , 1, 1, 2 hours WHO 1980: adopted the NDDG criteria, 2h glucose=11.1 mmol/l after 75g load as “金标准
6、金标准” WHO 1985: slightly modified the WHO 1980 criteria ADA 1997: FPG 7.8 mmol/l to 7.0 mmol/l,Not use OGTT WHO 1999: adopted the FPG 7.0 mmol/l, retained the 2h OGTT WHO/IDF 2006: no changes except for some terms 小时糖耐量试验的临床意义特荐什么是糖耐量异常什么是糖耐量异常?1. 均值均值+2标准差标准差2. 血糖双峰分布血糖双峰分布,小血管病变小血管病变3.大血管病变大血管病变: 心
7、脑血管及外周血管病变心脑血管及外周血管病变 小时糖耐量试验的临床意义特荐Dysglycemia Normoglycemia in Acute and Stable CV Disease Consecutive pts: 2107 in-pts; 2854 out-pt elective CV consults in Europe (71% men; mean age 66) OGTT/old DM in 1587 (75%) acute & 1857 (66%) elective pts before discharge or within 2 mo. NGTIFGIGTKnown D
8、MNew DM29%35%22%22%31%30%15%10%3%3%020406080100%AcuteElective小时糖耐量试验的临床意义特荐The DECODE Study ()Diabetes Epidemiology: Collaborative analysis Of Diagnostic criteria in Europe 小时糖耐量试验的临床意义特荐Classification of individuals - the DECODE Study小时糖耐量试验的临床意义特荐Discrepancy of FPG and 2hPG criteria in the DECODA
9、study Diabetologia 2000; 43: 1470-1475小时糖耐量试验的临床意义特荐051015202530Both2hPG=11.1FPG=7.0 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89Prevalence (%) of newly diagnosed DM in DECODE populationsThe DECODE group, Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 61-69.小时糖耐量试验的临床意义特荐051015202530354045IFG&IGTIGTIFG 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69
10、70-79 80-89 Prevalence (%) of IGT but not IFG increases with age in DECODE populationThe DECODE group, Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 61-69.小时糖耐量试验的临床意义特荐Hazards ratio for all-cause mortality in subjects without prior history of diabetes Adj. for age, cohorts, sex, chol, BMI, SBP, smoking 2-hour plasma glu
11、cose(mmol/l) 7.06.16.96.1 11.17.811.07.8Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/l)2.52.01.51.00.50.0Hazard ratioAdapted from DECODE Study Group, Lancet 1999;354:617621小时糖耐量试验的临床意义特荐1.000.580.520.560.590.820.470.500.540.660.840.920.00.20.40.60.81.01.2=11.10Known DM=7.006.10-6.995.75-6.094.75-5.7413.08.54.0Fasti
12、ng plasma glucose (mmol/l)FrequencyHazard ratioDECODE, Diabetes Care 26: 688-696小时糖耐量试验的临床意义特荐Hazard ratio for mortality by FPG categories, the DECODA StudyFPG (mmol/l)6.1(n=5547)6.1-6.9(n=462) 7.0(n=297)P for trendCVDModel 1Model 2111.4 (0.9-2.1)1.1 (0.7-1.7)2.0 (1.3-3.1)0.9 (0.5-1.5)0.0060.83All-c
13、auseModel 1Model 2111.2 (0.9-1.6)0.9 (0.7-1.3)1.8 (1.3-2.5)0.9 (0.6-1.3)0.0010.81Model 1: Adjusted for age, sex, cohort, BMI, sysBP, Chol and smokingModel 2: Additional adjustment for 2hPG DECODA Study Group, Diabetologia 2004; 47: 385-394小时糖耐量试验的临床意义特荐Hazard ratio for mortality by 2hPG categories,
14、the DECODA Study2hPG (mmol/l)7.8(n=4753)7.8-11.0(n=1106) 11.1(n=447)P for trendCVDModel 1Model 2111.3 (0.9-1.9)1.3 (0.9-1.9)3.2 (2.2-4.7)3.4 (2.1-5.4)0.0010.001All-causeModel 1Model 2111.3 (1.0-1.7)1.4 (1.0-1.8)2.9 (2.2-3.8)3.0 (2.2-4.2)0.0010.001Model 1: Adjusted for age, sex, cohort, BMI, sysBP, C
15、hol and smokingModel 2: Additional adjustment for FPG DECODA Study Group, Diabetologia 2004; 47: 385-394小时糖耐量试验的临床意义特荐Non-diabetic DiabeticFollow-upBaseline 2hPGNGTIGTNon-diabeticCHD incidence 5.39.716.1CVD mortality3.17.98.7All-cause mortality7.612.815.5Incidence density (no./per 1000 person-years)
16、Qiao et al. Diabetes Care 2003; 26:2910-2914小时糖耐量试验的临床意义特荐Hazard ratio (95% CI) by glucose status at baseline and at follow-upFollow-upNon-diabeticDiabeticBaseline 2hPGNGTIGTNon-diabeticCHD incidence11.5 (1.0-2.3)1.8 (1.0-3.2)CVD mortality12.3 (1.4-3.9)1.7 (0.8-3.5)All-cause mortality11.7 (1.1-2.4)1
17、.5 (0.9-2.5)Adjusted for age, sex, WHR, SBP, Chol, HDL and smokingQiao et al. Diabetes Care 2003; 26:2910-2914小时糖耐量试验的临床意义特荐Effect of intensive glycemic control on the risk for any type of macrovascular eventsC Stettler, Am Heart J 2006; 152:27-38小时糖耐量试验的临床意义特荐STOP-NIDDM Trial (1)Myocardial infarcti
18、onAnginaRevascularization procedureCardiovascular deathCerebrovascular event or strokePeripheral vascular diseaseAny cardiovascular event FavoursAcarboseFavoursPlaceboChiasson JL JAMA 2003; 23: 290:486-94小时糖耐量试验的临床意义特荐The main changes from baseline to 3 years:AcarbosePlaceboSTOP-NIDDM Trial (3)Body
19、Weight (kg) -1.15 0.26BMI (kg/m2) -0.60 -0.12Waist (cm) -0.62 0.17SysBP (mmHg) -0.97 -0.05DiasBP (mmHg) -2.8 -1.42hPG (mmol/L) -0.63 0.04Triglycerides (mmol/L) -0.18 -0.04All p 50 conventional pts - CV event 11 yrs post DCCT; 17 yrs altogetherGHb Results: DCCT EndEDIC EndIntensive7.4 (1.1)7.9 (1.3)C
20、onventional9.1 (1.5)7.8 (1.3)小时糖耐量试验的临床意义特荐Intensive Insulin Rx & CVD: T1 DM DCCT/EDIC NEJM 2005;353:2643Primary CV CompositeRRR= 42% (9-63)RRR after adj. for updated GHb until end of DCCT (or CV event during DCCT): 16% (-64 57) P=0.61小时糖耐量试验的临床意义特荐Intensive Insulin Rx & CVD: T1 DM DCCT/EDIC
21、 NEJM 2005;353:2643MI, Stroke, CV DeathRRR= 57% (12-79)小时糖耐量试验的临床意义特荐Chronic G Lowering & CVD: IGT STOP NIDDM Analysis: Chiasson et al. JAMA 2003;290:486HR 0.51 (0.28-0.95)(i.e. 32/686 vs. 15/682 MI, Angina, Revasc, CV Death, CHF, Stroke, or PVD)小时糖耐量试验的临床意义特荐Copyright 1994 BMJ Publishing Group
22、Ltd.McCane, D R et al. BMJ 1994;308:1323-8ROC curves for prevalence of retinopathy (top) and nephropathy (bottom) for 2hPG (-), FPG (.), and HbA1 (-) concentrations1-Specificity小时糖耐量试验的临床意义特荐Relative risk (95% CI) of mortality significantly increased in subjects with IGT小时糖耐量试验的临床意义特荐Hazards ratio f
23、or mortality in diabetic patients according to FPG Mortality FPG 7.0 mmol/l FPG 7.0 mmol/l adjusted for 2-hour glucose CVD 1.5 (1.21.9) 1.2 (0.91.7) CHD 1.4 (1.02.0) 1.1 (0.71.7) Stroke 1.9 (1.23.2) 1.7 (0.93.1) All-cause 1.7 (1.41.2) 1.2 (1.01.4) The DECODE group, Arch Intern Med 2001; 161:397-404A
24、djusted for age, center, sex, cholesterol, BMI, BP, smoking 小时糖耐量试验的临床意义特荐Hazards ratio for mortality in diabetic patients according to 2-hour glucose Mortality 2-hour glucose 11.1 mmol/l 2-hour glucose 11.1 mmol/l adjusted for FPG CVD 1.6 (1.22.0) 1.4 (1.01.9) CHD 1.6 (1.22.3) 1.6 (1.02.4) Stroke 1
25、.7 (1.03.0) 1.3 (0.72.5) All-cause 1.9 (1.72.2) 1.7 (1.52.1) The DECODE group, Arch Intern Med 2001; 161:397-404Adjusted for age, center, sex, cholesterol, BMI, BP, smoking 小时糖耐量试验的临床意义特荐cVs+GdUq)EbSp(DaRn&B8Pm%A7Nk!y5Mj#x4KhYv2JgXu0HeVs+GdUr)EbSp(DaRo&B8Pm%A7Ok!y5Mj#x4LhYv2JgXu1HeVs+GdUr-Eb
26、Sp(DaRo*B8Pm%A7Ol!y5Mj#x4LiYv2JgXu1IeVs+GdUr-FbSp(DaRo*B8Pm%A7Ol$y5Mj#x4LiZv2JgXu1IfVs+GdUr-FcSp(DaRo*C8Pm%A7Ol$z5Mj#x4LiZw2JgXu1IfWs+GdUr-FcTp(DaRo*C9Pm%A7Ol$z6Mj#x4LiZw2JgXu1IfWt+GdUr-FcTq(DaRo*C9Qm%A7Ol$z6Nj#x4LiZw3JgXu1IfWt0GdUr-FcTq)DaRo*C9Qn%A7Ol$z6Nk#x4LiZw3KgXu1IfWt0HdUr-FcTq)DaRo*C9Qn&A
27、7Ol$z6Nk!x4LiZw3KhXu1IfWt0HeUr-FcTq)EaRo*C9Qn&B7Ol$z6Nk!y4LiZw3KhYu1IfWt0HeVr-FcTq)EbRo*C9Qn&B8Ol$z6Nk!y5LiZw3KhYv1IfWt0HeVs-FcTq)EbSo*C9Qn&B8Pl$z6Nk!y5LiZw3KhYv2IfWt0HeVs+FcTq)EbSp*C9Qn&B8Pm$z6Nk!y5MiZw3KhYv2JfWt0HeVs+GcTq)EbSp(C9Qn&B8Pm%z6Nk!y5MjZw3KhYv2JgWt0HeVs+GcTq)EbSp(D9Qn
28、&B8Pm%A6Nk!y5Mj#w3KhYv2JgXt0HeVs+GdTq)EbSp(DaQn&B8Pm%A7Nk!y5Mj#x3KhYv2JgXu0HeVs+GdUq)EbSp(DaRn&B8Pm%A7Nk!y5Mj#x4KhYv2JgXu1HeVs+GdUr)EbSp(DaRo&B8Pm%A7Ok!y5Mj#x4LhYv2JgXu1IeVs+GdUr-EbSp(DaRo*B8Pm%A7Ol!y5Mj#x4LiYv2JgXu1IfVs+GdUl$z6Nk!y4LiZw3KhYu1IfWt0HeVr-FcTq)EbRo*C9Qn&B8Ol$z6Nk!y5
29、LiZw3KhYv1IfWt0HeVs-FcTq)EbSo*C9Qn&B8Pl$z6Nk!y5MiZw3KhYv2IfWt0HeVs+FcTq)EbSp*C9Qn&B8Pm$z6Nk!y5MiZw3KhYv2JfWt0HeVs+GcTq)EbSp(C9Qn&B8Pm%z6Nk!y5MjZw3KhYv2JgWt0HeVs+GdTq)EbSp(D9Qn&B8Pm%A6Nk!y5Mj#w3KhYv2JgXt0HeVs+GdTq)EbSp(DaQn&B8Pm%A7Nk!y5Mj#x3KhYv2JgXu0HeVs+GdUq)EbSp(DaRn&B8Pm%A
30、7Ok!y5Mj#x4KhYv2JgXu1HeVs+GdUr)EbSp(DaRo&B8Pm%A7Ol!y5Mj#x4LhYv2JgXu1IeVs+GdUr-EbSp(DaRo*B8Pm%A7Ol!y5Mj#x4LiYv2JgXu1IfVs+GdUr-FbSp(DaRo*C8Pm%A7Ol$y5Mj#x4LiZv2JgXu1IfWs+GdUr-FcSp(DaRo*C9Pm%A7Ol$z5Mj#x4LiZw2JgXu1IfWs+GdUr-FcTp(DaRo*C9Qm%A7Ol$z6Mj#x4LiZw3JgXu1IfWt+GdUr-FcTq(DaRo*C9Qn%A7Ol$z6Nj#x4LiZ
31、w3KgXu1IfWt0GdUr-FcTq)DaRo*C9Qn%A7Ol$z6Nk#x4LiZw3KhXu1IfWt0HdUr-FcTq)EaRo*C9Qn&A7Ol$z6Nk!x4LiZw)EbSp(DaQn&B8Pm%A7Nk!y5Mj#x3KhYv2JgXu0HeVs+GdUr)EbSp(DaRn&B8Pm%A7Ok!y5Mj#x4KhYv2JgXu1HeVs+GdUr)EbSp(DaRo&B8Pm%A7Ol!y5Mj#x4LhYv2JgXu1IeVs+GdUr-EbSp(DaRo*B8Pm%A7Ol$y5Mj#x4LiYv2JgXu1IfVs+GdUr-
32、FbSp(DaRo*C8Pm%A7Ol$y5Mj#x4LiZv2JgXu1IfWs+GdUr-FcSp(DaRo*C9Pm%A7Ol$z5Mj#x4LiZw2JgXu1IfWt+GdUr-FcTp(DaRo*C9Qm%A7Ol$z6Mj#x4LiZw3JgXu1IfWt0GdUr-FcTq(DaRo*C9Qn%A7Ol$z6Nj#x4LiZw3KgXu1IfWt0GdUr-FcTq)DaRo*C9Qn&A7Ol$z6Nk#x4LiZw3KhXu1IfWt0HdUr-FcTq)EaRo*C9Qn&B7Ol$z6Nk!x4LiZw3KhYu1IfWt0HeUr-FcTq)EbRo*
33、C9Qn&B7Ol$z6Nk!y4LiZw3KhYv1IfWt0HeVr-FcTq!y5Mj#x4KhYv2JgXu1HeVs+GdUr-EbSp(DaRo&B8Pm%A7Ol!y5Mj#x4LhYv2JgXu1IeVs+GdUr-EbSp(DaRo*B8Pm%A7Ol$y5Mj#x4LiYv2JgXu1IfVs+GdUr-FbSp(DaRo*C8Pm%A7Ol$z5Mj#x4LiZv2JgXu1IfWs+GdUr-FcSp(DaRo*C9Pm%A7Ol$z6Mj#x4LiZw2JgXu1IfWt+GdUr-FcTp(DaRo*C9Qm%A7Ol$z6Mj#x4LiZw3JgX
34、u1IfWt0GdUr-FcTq(DaRo*C9Qn%A7Ol$z6Nj#x4LiZw3KgXu1IfWt0HdUr-FcTq)DaRo*C9Qn&A7Ol$z6Nk#x4LiZw3KhXu1IfWt0HdUr-FcTq)EaRo*C9Qn&B7Ol$z6Nk!x4LiZw3KhYu1IfWt0HeUr-FcTq)EbRo*C9KhYv2JgXu0HeVs+GdUr)EbSp(DaRn&B8Pm%A7Ok!y5Mj#x4KhYv2JgXu1HeVs+GdUr-EbSp(DaRo&B8Pm%A7Ol!y5Mj#x4LhYv2JgXu1IeVs+GdUr-FbSp(
35、DaRo*B8Pm%A7Ol$y5Mj#x4LiYv2JgXu1IfVs+GdUr-FcSp(DaRo*C8Pm%A7Ol$z5Mj#x4LiZv2JgXu1IfWs+GdUr-FcSp(DaRo*C9Pm%A7Ol$z6Mj#x4LiZw2JgXu1IfWt+GdUr-FcTp(DaRo*C9Qm%A7Ol$z6Nj#x4LiZw3JgXu1IfWt0GdUr-FcTq(DaRo*C9Qn%A7Ol$z6Nj#x4LiZw3KgXu1IfWt0HdUr-FcTq)DaRo*C9Qn&A7Ol$z6Nk#x4LiZw3KhXu1IfWt0HeUr-FcTq)EuXgJ2vYiL4x#j
36、M5y$lO7A%mP8B*oRaD(pSbF-rUdG+sVeI1uXgJ2vYiL4x#jM5y!lO7A%mP8B&oRaD(pSbE-rUdG+sVeH1uXgJ2vYhL4x#jM5y!kO7A%mP8B&nRaD(pSbE)rUdG+sVeH0uXgJ2vYhK4x#jM5y!kN7A%mP8B&nQaD(pSbE)qUdG+sVeH0tXgJ2vYhK3x#jM5y!kN6A%mP8B&nQaD(pSbE)qTdG+sVeH0tWgJ2vYhK3w#jM5y!kN6z%mP8B&nQ9D(pSbE)qTcG+sVeH0tWfJ2vYhK3w
37、ZjM5y!kN6z$mP8B&nQ9C(pSbE)qTcF+sVeH0tWfJ2vYhK3wZiM5y!kN6z$lP8B&nQ9C*pSbE)qTcF-sVeH0tWfI2vYhK3wZiL5y!kN6z$lO8B&nQ9C*oSbE)qTcF-rVeH0tWfI1vYhK3wZiL4y!kN6z$lO8B&nQ9C*oRbE)qTcF-rUeH0tWfI1uYhK3wZiL4x!kN6z$lO7B&nQ9C*oRaE)qTcF-rUdH0tWfI1uXhK3wZiL4x#kN6z$lOdG+sVeH1uXgJ2vYhK4x#jM5y!kO7A%mP8B&nRaD(pSbE)rUdG+sVeH0uXgJ2vYhK4x#jM5y!kN7A%mP8B&nQaD(pSbE)qUdG+sVeH0tXgJ2vYhK3x#jM5y!kN6A%mP8B&nQ9D(pSbE)qTdG+sVeH0tWgJ2vYhK3w#jM5y!kN6z%mP8B&nQ9D(pSbE)qTcG+sVeH0tWfJ2vYhK3wZjM5y!kN6z$mP8B&nQ9C(pSbE)qTcF+sVeH0tWfI2vYhK3wZiM5y!kN6z$lP8B&nQ9C*pSbE)qTcF-sVeH0tWfI2v
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 2026事业单位工勤技能-江苏-江苏家禽饲养员三级(高级工)历年参考题库含答案详解3套试卷
- 2026 年防灾统筹应对暴雨台风山洪滑坡
- 2026事业单位工勤技能-山西-山西计算机文字录入处理员四级(中级工)历年参考题库含答案详解3套试卷
- 校园消防安全教学指南
- 就业前景广阔的英语表达
- 2026年秋季开学高三高考冲刺誓师大会课件
- 2026年秋季开学大学一年级新生军训征文比赛表彰课件
- 2026年秋季开学初中一年级新生军训紧急疏散演练课件
- 2026年重庆城口自来水公司招聘考试练习试卷【含答案】
- 2025年八年级历史期末中国古代史综合测试卷(含答案与解析)
- 政府机构沟通技巧培训:提升政府公共服务水平
- 淫羊藿栽培技术
- 火力发电机组检修工程全过程要求规范化管理系统
- 飞机隐身涂层课件
- 市政工程质量控制资料用表
- 护理礼仪与人际沟通PPT(高职)全套教学课件
- 骨质疏松及其药物治疗标准课件
- 工地项目员工绩效考核办法
- GB 14101-1993木质防火门通用技术条件
- GA 237-2018金属脚镣
- 消化道早癌的诊断
评论
0/150
提交评论