详解托福写作考试中正确举例方法.doc

1、详解托福写作考试中正确举例方法要想举出高分的例子，最好是写两种例子：1.举例于美国人所熟知的历史、文化的例子，但一定要有一些新意。2.讲自己身边的故事。假设是考生可以选用第一种例子，用得恰当的话自然能让考官眼前为之一亮。例如在讨论媒体对人们的影响时，选用美国人所熟知的脱口秀女王 Oprah frey 作为例子。或是在讨论学生是否都应该学习历史的时候，选用美国历史上知名的总统，如Thomas Jefferson, Herbert Hoover等进展论证都非常好。这样做既进展了有效论证，又不落入俗套。然而，举这类例子对于考生考前的积累要求比拟高。假如间隔 考试还有三个月或以上的时间，我建议考生可以

2、在考前多准备一些类似的人物或事件的例子，以备考试之用。对于大多数备考时间比拟紧的考生来说，花大量的时间去准备第一种例子显得有些不太划算。因此，性价比比拟高的第二种例子更合适于备考时间比拟短的考生。托福考试仅仅是语言才能考试，只要能用恰当的例子阐述清楚问题就可以，因此用自己或身边人的例子对于考官来说也有很大的说服力。有的考生仍然会问，那我身边没有那么多的例子可以用怎么办这个时候，对待ETS的考官就不能这么死心眼了，就要学会编例子。但是编例子也要有技巧，也要让考官信服，绝非信口胡编。总之，在文章中的例子除了新意之外，还是要有一定的真是可信性。所以，在平时阅读中的积累，对于写作中的举例是非常重要的。

3、托福写作开头和中间段托福综合写作模板可以帮助我们理清思路，迅速组织语言和逻辑构造，节省考虑时间，写出正确率较高的托福作文。托福综合写作模板：开头段In this argument, the arguer concludes that.To support the conclusion, the arguerpoints out that.In addition, the arguerreasons that.This argument suffers fromseveral crital fallacies.In this argument, the arguer remendsthat.To

4、 justify this claim, the arguer providesthe evidence that .In addition, he cites theresult of a recent study that .A careful eamination of this argument would reveal howgroundless the conclusion is.In this analysis, the arguer claims that .To substantiate the conclusion, the arguercites the ele that

5、.In addition, the arguer assumes that .This argument isunconvincing for several crital flaws.In this argument, the arguer advocates that .The remendation is based on theobservation that.Meanwhile, the arguer assumes that.The argument isproblemat for two reasons.The conclusion in this argument is tha

6、t.In support of this predtion, the arguerclaims that .Moreover, the arguer assumes that.This argument is fraught withvague, oversimplified and unwarranted assumptions.托福综合写作模板：中间段First, the argument is based on a false analogy.The arguer simply assumes that, buthe does not provide any evidence that.

7、Second, the arguer mits a fallacy of hasty generalization.Even if, it does notfollow that。Besides, the arguer does not provide any solid information concerning that.Actually, the arguers remendation of would most probably turns out to beineffective and misleading.In the first place, the arguer fails

8、 to take into account the factors in the analysis.While we are informed that , the arguer fails to make clear that.In the second place, the parison in this argument is inplete and selective, thearguer discovers that .However the arguer fails to provide any information regarding.Furthermore .Unless t

9、he arguer also takes these factors into consideration, the parison isunconvincing.First of all, the argument is based on a hasty generalization.According to the citedstudies, .The fact tells very little about .Even if we accept the arguersassumption that, it is unwarranted to assume that.In addition

10、, the arguer fails to consider several other relevant factors that.Forinstance, .What s more,.Finally, the arguer hints that, but he fails to analyze that.The major problem with this argument is that the arguer fails to convince us that .First, the fact that does indate that.Second, , whh makes it i

11、mpossiblefor us to evaluate thatAnother point worth considering is the arguers hasty generalization.We are informedthat, but we do not know that.We can believe that , but based on this sliminformation, we can never evaluate the overall performance of discount.One major assumption in short of letimac

12、y is that.First, .Second, .This may prove misleading and counterproductive in the end.In addition, the conclusion is based on a gratuitous assumption that.This,however, is unwarranted.In summary, the conclusion reached in this argument is in valid and misleading.To makethe argument more convincing,

13、the arguer would have to prove that.Moreover, I wouldsuspend my judgment about the credibility of the remendation until the arguer canprovide concrete evidence that.Otherwise, the arguer is simply begng the questionthroughout the argument.To conclude, the argument is not persuasive as it stands.Befo

14、re we accept theconclusion, the arguer must present more facts that.To solidify the argument, thearguer would have to produce more evidence concerning.As it stands, the argument is not well reasoned.To make it logally acceptable, thearguer would have to demonstrate that .Additionally, the arguer must provide evidenceto .To sum up, the conclusion lacks credibility because the evidence cited in the analysisdoes not lend strong support to what the arguer maintains.To strengthen the argument thearguer would hav