资料：网络实名制利弊之争

1、主题：网络实名制利弊之争（我组为正方）Internet real-name system , Network real-name syetem2002年，“李希光事件”一一清华大学新闻学教授李希光，建议中国人大应该禁止任何人网上匿名”。认为网络也应该严格的受到版权和知识产权的保护，“同时网上写东西要负法律责任。”“包括传统媒体，应该提倡用真名，不用笔名发表文章。利用假名发表东西是对公众的不负责。”利弊利大于弊的论证规范互联网管理方 式，保护青少年免受 网络不良信息的影响限制个人言论自由青少年“门事件”时有发生，很多就是网友不受 限制不受监管顾虑而上传视频，影响最大的群体 就是青少年，无论身心健

2、康还是精力时间，都受 到极大的破坏。光靠青少年自律不能解决问题， 必须先“清扫网络垃圾”。此外，可以参照韩国，前台匿名，后台实名注册。快速获得有用信息、 资源，不用大海捞针散播虚假信息，制 造信息垃圾提高网络信息利用率经济安全，商业诚信， 保护消费者利益，促 进中国电子商务的发 展（远洛后于美国）网上经济诈骗，交 易损失时有发生（冒名淘宝、交易 平台等，或汇款诈 骗，银行诈骗，虚 假信息等）林永青，2004年创办“价值中国网”一一中国第 一个实名制经济交易网络平台（成功范例）保证言论真实、负责 网络诚信（不虚 假捏造，不散布谣言） 网络言论过于“自由”，没有监督和 约束网络举报怕遭报 复、因名

3、获罪难以 界定一一网络监督 难以执行“爆料”， 网络言论自由受到 顾虑的限制“有限实名制”，如专门举报平台，而不是随意 在自己的空间博客或浏览的网站爆料， 举报可以 采用匿名，但必须规范具体的举报资料要求，不 能有言过其实或造成调查成本过高的虚假情报。网络行为更负责网络捐款不需要留 名“有限实名制”，如网络社区、政府部门、官员、 公众人物网络实名制。此外，可以参照韩国，前台匿名，后台实名注册。 或者，规定要实名制留言的网络领域采用实名 制，其他可以适当放宽。实名制不是绝对的全民 的只有唯一的操作方法，同样要分层管理。网络不只是虚拟空 间，也变成了社交网 络个人信息泄露清华大学BBS, 2005

4、年高校内部网络社区实名 制，现在各高校的“校内网” “人人网”就如此， 并在大学生中推广得很好，拓展人际关系，保持 联络（成功范例）。关于信息泄漏，可以在个人 信息输入程度上，对实名制用户在技术上保护。 政府可以保证自己网站的安全，同样就有能力保 证实名制用户的安全，只是愿不愿意做而已。人际互动更真实个人信息泄露微博的流行，受到追捧。很多人的微博就是“实 名制”，并且因此而在个人的人际交往圈中产生 了可推行的实际效果。个人交往（如电子邮件等） 不能受到实名制的限制，但是公共空间的互动（如论坛、BBS等）则需要立法监督。推行网络身份证VIEID实名制监管成本过 咼，谁来负责不能因为成本冋题而损害

5、公众利益， 监管有待立 法完善实名制需要立法规 范，需要全民配合说得容易，推行困难重重2003年，网吧凭身份证进入。2006年，博客实名制部分推行。2010年，提倡论坛、BBS网络互动实名制。 对无身份证的青少年，另行管理。我们不能一味地凭空论证、担忧，不妨“局部实 验”，可以就推广，有过多弊病就废除，但是， 要实践为先，肯定其“先进性”，再审视其“适 用性”。拓展资料：网络实名制，适合中国网民吗？Is it appropriate for the Chinese netizens to have real name over the internet?从5月1日起，杭州市计算机信息网络安全保

6、护管理条例将开始实施。条例规定，互联网信息服务提供者应该建立并落实安全保护制度和安全保护技术措施，“提供电子公告、网络游戏和其他即时通信服务的，具有用户注册信息和发布信息审核功能，并如实登记向其申 请开设上述服务的用户的有效身份证明。”“Hanzhou Computer Information Network Security and Protection Management Regulations” wilbe enacted from May, 1st. It states that the internet information provider should establish t

7、he system of security & protection and carry out the technical measuresof security and protection. “ When BBS, video game or other on-Iine services are provided, the information of the users will be registered and the information released will be examined & verified, and then the identity of

8、 the users appl ying the above men ti oned services will be accordi ngly registered.”根据条例解释，这意味着从 5月1日起，杭州网民发帖、写博需要登记身份。听说网络 要实行实名制后，网民们在网上纷纷发表看法，关于是否该实行网络实名制的辩论异常激烈。 有支持者、有反对者，也有无所谓者。According to the “ Regulations ” , netizens of Hangzhou will have to register their identity when they try to releas

9、e a post or publish a blog since May, 1st. Netize ns bega n to talk about their opinions after the n ews of adopti ng real n ame system over the in ternet. The debate on whether the real n ame should be adopted was fierce. Some support it, some oppose it, and there are also those who are in differe

10、nt正方：防人身攻击防欺诈“保护网民权益”Yes: preve nting from being attracted and cheated, protect ing n etize ns' right.反方：限制“自由空间”肯定削弱网络魅力No: The “ freedom ” will be limited and the charm of the internet will be weakened.The goverment of Hangzhou had allowed the netizens adroping the real name and ID card on the

11、 internet since May, 1st. Different people had different opinions. As every thing has two aspect, on one hand, this regulation could protect the right of people, nobody could attact others on the internet freely because the system could recgnize him. This regulation also can reduce the cheat and oth

12、er crime behaviour, keep internet environment more safety. On the other hand, this regulation could limit the freedom, people could not say something freely.According to the“ Regulations ”, all netizens must have real name over the internet. In my opinon, it isn'tappropriate to carry out the Reg

13、ulation right now in Hangzhou without considering the background of whole internet.As we all know, internet is another fictitious world contrast to real society. Internet has its own game rules by itself. Nobody know whther the regulations from true world has effect to internet. The real personal in

14、formation will be released to network once it couldn't protect netizens with real names.I regard "real name system" should not only for the netizens but for all the Chinese people during their normal daily lives. In the advanced countries, they build their lives based on the "cred

15、ibility". While some one lost his credibility he may lose a lot: job, chance, allowance and respect. But in China, why there are so many cheatings? Why the pirated and faked goods can not be banned from the root? Why it is so hard to buy a hometown return ticket during a festival? In my opinion

16、, they are all caused by "less of credibility". In the way of building a national' s credibility, we need to put much more effort.One unique and attractive characteristic of internet is its freedom: one can freely speak out his opinions and comments, even on very sensitive issues and i

17、n a quite aggressive way, which may not be allowed or encouraged in the real world life. Where does this freedom come from? It' s the anonyof internet. One can sit in any corner of the world, register an alphabet consisting id, and then say what you want, without any concern that someone may kno

18、w you. Such freedom encourages more and more people participate into the virtual communities on the internet and gradually gave the birth to the culture of internet, blog, BBS and various types of online services enrich people 'dsaily life a lot. However, freedom also hurts when it is overwhelmi

19、ng: immoral people could utilize internet to spread rumors, publish un-verified and fake commercial advertisement, and even commit cheating crimes which could damage others ' property and life.While we are all clear about the benefits of internet freedom and potential negative effects if someone

20、 misuse the freedom, we should not go to either of extremes: totally free or totally restricted. It is well known that responsibility is naturally associated with freedom, and anonymity right now does not force any responsibility on netizens, therefore I think it' s reasonable and important to r

21、egulate inteproper way. Registration with real name will somehow affect the enthusiasm of netizens in the current stages, but in the long run such operation can provide a very good basis for any laws to be issued for the internet, which will further facilitate the development of internet. Government

22、 should also clarify the privacy information are well protected in general, and can only be accessed by specialized department when someone break the laws. Also some helpful suggestions and discussions within netizens could alsobe incorporated into the finalized regulation items, and I think one will able to understand and support such measure through publicity and com muni cati ons.Network Real Name SystemNow whether it should use network real name system has become a