安乐死_baidu翻译_英语辩论

1、（！）安乐死是杀人。每一个生命是如此的重要。人不能只为自己而活，但他们也活在他们的家庭和社会。如果他们选择离开这个世界，他们不为自己负责，他们的家庭和社会。安乐死是轻视生命。生命是如此的珍贵。患者应该珍惜自己的生命。他们应该尽力战胜绝症。每个人都应该表现出对生命的基本尊重。无论发生什么，我们应该面对事实，我们应该生活在巨大的勇气，我们应该相信奇迹。没有什么是不可能的。我们认为，安乐死不应legeled（！）安乐死停药的发展。如果患者需要使用安乐死，医生不会尽力挽救病人。这药会停止进步。如果安乐死合法化，安乐死的病人使用将受到法律保护。医生的权利将是显而易见的。医生有太多的权力，可以是错误的或不

2、道德的。病人把自己的信仰和信任医生的意见。人们滥用安乐死合法化时，它会危害人的生命。在安乐死的名义，进行自杀。能发生奇迹般的治疗或复苏。你永远不能低估了人的精神力量。它把人的生命价值。在这个国家，人的生命意味着什么。它可以打开闸门非危重病人自杀和滥用。任何松动的协助自杀的法律最终可能导致特权的滥用。许多宗教禁止自杀和他人的故意杀人。最基本的戒律是“不可杀人”。保险公司可以把不必要的压力，避免孤注一掷的措施或建议医生协助自杀的过程。健康保险提供者保持保费下降在巨大的压力下。安乐死可以成为一种手段，遏制医疗成本。医生和其他医护人员不应参与直接导致死亡。安乐死在道德上是不正确的，应该被法律所禁止的。

3、这是一个杀人和杀害别人不能合理化在任何情况下。人的生命是特殊的安全保护。先进的医疗技术已经使得有可能提高人类的寿命和生活质量。姑息治疗和康复中心是更好的选择来帮助残疾人或病人接近死亡生活的痛苦自由和更好的生活。家庭成员的影响病人的决定为安乐死以权谋私喜欢财富传承是另一个问题。你是没有办法可以知道是否真的对协助自杀是自愿或被迫由别人决定。安乐死会导致医疗保健和最脆弱的社会造成受害下降。将安乐死将自己从“死的权利”，“杀”吗？如何评估是否有心理性障碍使安乐死？如果疼痛阈值低于最优和病人感知的情况下是不值得活吗？如何知道死的愿望是不平衡的思维过程或精神病患者的逻辑决定的结果？如果个人选择协助自杀作为

4、一种选择和家人不同意吗？面对离别，无奈，失去自控，死亡和悲伤，恐惧，所以多数患者会经历精神上的痛苦。在这种心理需求下的“安乐死”，我们可以说他是合理的吗？”根据研究自杀，自杀和治愈的精神疾病本质上是相关的，但不是致命的疾病，研究发现，在44例晚期癌症患者，只有三想过自杀，但有一个严重的抑郁症。另一项研究表明，85的人自杀，只有一个人患了绝症，和90-100%的自杀都患有明显的心理疾病。不可否认，现代医学实践中缓慢死亡的过程中，经常提到的病人梅，尊严个人特色的丧失，独立性和自主性。然而，安乐死是个人的自主行为表达，这是错误的。原因：（一）自主动安乐死需要帮助，那么它就不是一个人的事情，而是开放的

5、或公共的东西。（b）在公开承认自卫，战争的形式正义，死刑和谋杀，只为大家保卫生命，不被杀死的人的利益。所以，即使死亡是痛苦的解脱，不能轻易带走生命权致力于个人。（C）即使人的自决权确认选择死亡，这并不意味着权利要求别人杀死自己，并不包括有权授权自杀别人。（D）自治，包括奴隶制的权利从来不是自己的，换句话说，这(!)Euthanasia is to kill people. Life is so important for every one. People dont only live for themselves, but they also live for their families

6、and the society. If they choose to leave the world, they are not responsible for themselves, their families and the society. Euthanasia is disparagement of life. Life is so precious. Patients should cherish their life. They should try their best to prevail incurable disease. Everyone should show bas

7、ic respect for life. No matter what happens, we should face up to the facts, we should live on with great courage, we should believe in wonder. Nothing is impossible.so we view that Euthanasia should not be legeled(!) Euthanasia stops the medicine developing. If the patients require using euthanasia

8、, doctors wont try their best to save patients. The medicine will stop progress. If making euthanasia is made legal, patients who use euthanasia will be protected by law. The doctors right will be obvious. Doctors are given too much power, and can be wrong or unethical. Patients put their faith and

9、trust in the opinions of their doctor.people abuse euthanasia when it is legalized, it can harm people lives. In the name of euthanasia, carry out committing suicide. Miracle cures or recoveries can occur. You can never underestimate the power of the human spirit.It demeans the value of human life.

10、In this country, human life means something.It could open the floodgates to non-critical patient suicides and other abuses. Any loosening of the assisted-suicide laws could eventually lead to abuses of the privilege.Many religions prohibit suicide and the intentional killing of others. The most basi

11、c commandment is "You shall not kill".Insurance companies may put undue pressure on doctors to avoid heroic measures or recommend the assisted-suicide procedure. Health insurance providers are under tremendous pressure to keep premiums down.Euthanasia can become a means of health care cost

12、 containment.Physicians and other medical care people should not be involved in directly causing death.Mercy killing is morally incorrect and should be forbidden by law.It's a homicide and murdering another human cannot be rationalized under any circumstances.Human life deserves exceptional secu

13、rity and protection. Advanced medical technology has made it possible to enhance human life span and quality of life. Palliative care and rehabilitation centers are better alternatives to help disabled or patients approaching death live a pain-free and better life.Family members influencing the pati

14、ent's decision into euthanasia for personal gains like wealth inheritance is another issue. There is no way you can be really sure if the decision towards assisted suicide is voluntary or forced by others.Mercy killing would cause decline in medical care and cause victimization of the most vulne

15、rable society. Would mercy killing transform itself from the "right to die" to "right to kill"?How would one assess whether a disorder of mental nature qualifies mercy killing? What if the pain threshold is below optimum and the patient perceives the circumstances to be not worth

16、y of living? How would one know whether the wish to die is the result of unbalanced thought process or a logical decision in mentally ill patients? What if the individual chooses assisted suicide as an option and the family wouldn't agree?As to face the parting, helplessness, loss of self-contro

17、l, fear of death and sorrow and so the majority of patients will experience mental suffering. In this psychological requirement under the "Euthanasia", we can say that he is reasonable? "According to the study of suicide, suicide and treatable mental illness is intrinsically related,

18、but not the fatal disease, a study found that in 44 patients with advanced cancer, only three thought about suicide, but are there is a serious depression. Another study shows that 85 suicides, only one person suffering from terminal illness, and 90-100% of the suicides were suffering from obvious m

19、ental illness. Undeniably, the modern medical practice slow death process, often cited the loss of personal characteristics of patients Mei, dignity, independence and autonomy. However, the expression of active euthanasia as acts of personal autonomy, it is wrong. Reasons: (a) Since active euthanasi

20、a need help, then it is not an individual matter, but the open or in the public thing. (B) under the public recognition to self-defense, capital punishment and justice in the form of war, murder, only to defend the life for everyone, not to the benefit of those killed. So, even if death is painful r

21、elief, can not be lightly taken away the right to life committed to personal. (C) even if the person's self-determination recognized the right to choose to die, that does not mean the right to ask others to kill themselves, does not include the right to authorize self to kill others. (D) autonom

22、y, including the right of slavery has never been their own, in other words, the right to freedom does not mean the right not to freedom. So to maintain the autonomy, the need to protect life, to give others their right to life is not trampling the principle of maintaining independence. Therefore, in

23、dividual autonomy and social need and public objectives and values to be consistent.所以要保持自主性，需要保护的生命，给他人的生命权是不践踏独立自主的原则。因此，个人的自主性和社会需要和公共目标和价值观是一致的。 结尾active euthanasia may gradually lose its spontaneity, and thus out of (i) "secret euthanasia", meaning that without their own consent, to b

24、e a doctor euthanized. (Ii) "forced euthanasia", meaning patients suffering from terminal illness would be coercion to lure choose euthanasia to relieve their families in the economic and psychological pressures, and save limited resources of society, the patients chose to die, do not feel

25、 life is a burden or tired of life, but he felt the burden of someone else, and that others dislike. (Iii) "Deputy euthanasia" means to allow patients who lack capacity to self-determination by the people "proxy decision" to euthanasia. (Iv) "Discrimination against euthanasi

26、a," the crisis is the number of types of patients such as the poverty stricken or belonging to ethnic minorities, may be "clever" to force that "euthanasia" requirement, the mercy of others. Made ill patients caught in the dilemma of both the opposition between the yield, re

27、sulting in additional unnecessary fear and anxiety. The information may be heard: "Death is terrible! Your best choice of euthanasia." of the slip waves, is once the "euthanasia" is legalized, its use will inevitably extend to other types of patients but not the dying, if not cur

28、e patients, but not incurable disease, then the risk of Alzheimer's disease or brain degradation, even those born with severe disabilities Down syndrome baby. . And so on. So, if this argument, once established, will only create panic and fear that they will be forcibly sent to "euthanasia&

29、quot; in the ranks. Therefore, I agree Frasen say, "human life, merely the possibility of error, is enough to completely reject the" euthanasia. " "Euthanasia is humane because it helps to hasten the death of terminally ill patient.Death, as natural as birth, is sometimes a hard

30、process that requires assistance, and euthanasia is part of such assistance.People have the right to die.It is unnecessary to maintain life artificially beyond the point when people will never regain consciousness.Extending an incurably ill patients life means the same as aggravating his pain.Effort

31、s should not be made to perpetuate what has become a meaningless existence.Euthanasia can bring mental and physical release to the patient and his family when he is terminally ill and has no prospect of recovering.Mercy killing is motivated by nothing but love and sympathy for the dying patient.Most

32、 of the terminally ill patients themselves want to die with dignity and peace instead of agony and degradation. Medical treatment for a comatose patient cause great burden economically for the hospital and the patients family.It is inhumane to perform euthanasia no matter how painless the process is

33、.Anyone who voluntarily, knowingly or premeditatedly takes the life of another, even one minute prior to death, is a killer.Euthanasia is a criminal offense because it involves the killing of a person.Legalized euthanasia will invite abuse of human life because any form of murder many be convenientl

34、y dubbed “mercy killing ”by unscrupulous people.Euthanasia raises many moral issues since it implies that active measures are taken to terminate human life.Doctors and nurses should do everything they can to save dying patients instead of hastening their death by active measures.The instinct for sel

35、f-preservation is the strongest instinct that human beings possess. It is untrue that any patient himself should want to die.Doctors and nurses involved in euthanasia have discredited their profession, for euthanasia is a violation of the fundamental medical principle to save human life. 积极安乐死可能会逐渐失

36、去它的自发性，因此在（我）“秘密安乐死”，这意味着没有自己的同意，是医生实施安乐死。（二）“被迫安乐死”，意味着患有绝症的病人会威逼引诱选择安乐死以减轻经济和心理压力，他们的家庭，节约有限的社会资源，患者选择了死，不觉得生活是一种负担或厌倦了生活，但他觉得别人的负担，而别人不喜欢。（三）“副安乐死”是让患者缺乏能力的自决”代理决策人“安乐死。（四）“歧视”，“危机是患者如贫困或少数民族种类数，可能是“聪明”的力量，“安乐死”的要求，对他人的怜悯。使病人陷入两反对派之间产量的困境，从而导致额外的不必要的恐惧和焦虑。信息可以听到：“死亡是可怕的！你对安乐死的最佳选择。”的滑波，一旦“安乐死”合法化

37、，它的使用将不可避免地延伸到其他类型的患者，但不是死的，如果没有治愈的患者，但不是不治之症，那么阿尔茨海默病或脑退化的风险，即使是那些有严重残疾的唐氏综合征婴儿出世。等。所以，如果这种说法，一旦建立，只会造成恐慌，担心他们会被强行送往“安乐死”的行列。因此，我同意frasen说，“人的一生，只是错误的可能性，足以完全拒绝“安乐死”。”安乐死是人道的因为它有助于加速病人的死亡。死亡，就像出生一样自然，有时是一个艰难的过程，需要协助，安乐死就是这种协助的一部分。人有死的权利。这是不必要的人为保持超越点生活的人们再也不会恢复意识。延伸的一个绝症病人的生活方式，加重了他的痛苦一样。努力不应该永远成为一

38、个毫无意义的存在是什么。安乐死可以当他是身患绝症无望恢复带来的身心释放到病人和他的家人。安乐死的动机只是对临终病人的爱与同情。大多数的绝症病人自己想死而不是痛苦和退化的尊严与和平。一个昏迷的病人造成很大的负担，在经济上为医院和患者的家庭治疗。这是不人道的执行安乐死无论是无痛。谁自愿，故意或预谋以另一个生命，甚至死前一分钟，是一个杀手。安乐死是犯罪，因为它涉及到一个人的死亡。安乐死合法化会招致对人类生命的滥用，因为任何形式的谋杀许多被方便地称为“安乐死”不择手段的人。安乐死提出了很多道德问题，因为它意味着要采取主动措施终止生命。医生和护士应该尽他们所能挽救垂死的病人而不是采取积极措施加速其死亡。

39、自我保护的本能，是人类拥有的最强大的本能。它是不真实的，任何病人他自己应该死。执行安乐死的医生和护士已经让他们的职业，因为安乐死违反基本医疗原则拯救人的生命。安乐死是医学界最具争议的问题之一。以上图所示，一晚生病的母亲拼命生病的儿子请求安乐死。但的儿子是削减这。无助，因为他是束手无策了。这幅画确实发人深省。这意味着，人们对安乐死的态度。有些人认为这是什么别人认为so.now让我们听听大家的不同意见Mercy killing is one of the most controversial issues in the world of medicine. As the picture given

40、 above depicts, A late sick mother desperately ill son request for euthanasia. But the son was cut for this。 feeling helpless because he is at a loss what to do about it. The picture really sets me thinking. It implies that people differ in their attitudes towards the mercy killing .Some people thin

41、k it is right.but others dont think so.now let us listen to everyone's different opinions安乐死是医学界最有争议的问题之一。正如上面所示的视频所描绘的，一位晚期患病母亲病入膏肓，请求儿子实施安乐死。但儿子且为此获罪，感到无能为力，因为他们不知道该怎么办。这幅画确实发人深省。它暗示，人们在对待安乐死上看法不一致。有些人认为他是对的，但其他的不这样认为，现在让我们听听大家的不同观点赞成1.If a person loses the survivability of the community has n

42、ot contributed to lose the meaning of life.reduce reliance on others and a burden on society.如果一个人失去了生存能力，对社会没有了贡献，也就失去了生命的意义，减少对别人的倚赖和对社会的负担。2.the complete elimination of euthanasia patients can be painful diseases, mental stress and depression thinking exists.安乐死可以彻底消除病人的疾病痛苦，精神压力和思想懮愁3.a person b

43、ound to die sooner or later die; One hundred dead, the living dead are free, patients and relatives reflex happy人总难免一死，早晚都是死；一死百了，死人活人都解脱，患者与亲朋皆大欢 4.the lives of their own people, individuals have the right to end their lives, which is opposed to the human rights and personal freedom. 人的生命属于自己，个人有权结

44、束生命，这是个人自由和独享的人权5.we believe that euthanasia is a form of respect for life.安乐死是尊重生命的一种方式。 6.首先，从主观方面来讲，安乐死对于病人自身，是一种减少生命痛苦的方式。人，总是趋利避害的，没有人会说“我要去寻找痛苦，我要去远离快乐”。当一个人处于精神和躯体的极端痛苦之下，当生命的存在已成为一场噩梦，我们难道还要 提及道德和伦理吗？生存这个基本的“长度”都已经不能够维持，还要来谈及生命的宽度，还要去顾及伦理的重量吗？First,from a subjective point of view.Euthanasia

45、for the patients themselves, is a way to reduce human suffering.People always seek advantages and avoid disadvantages, and no one would say, "I am going to look painful, I had to go far from happy."When a person is under extreme suffering in the body and the spirit, when the very existence of life has become a nightmare.Should we mention the moral