NetApp-EMC-VNX-存储竞争分析课件

EMCVNX

竞争分析EMCVNX

竞争分析2TargetingEMCVNX-IBMandBusinesspartnersuseonlyEMCVNX基础三个分类:VNXe–仅支持基于以太网协议(NFS,CIFS&iSCSI)VNX5100–仅FCP协议其他VNX–FC&NAS*VNX定位于入门级到中端存储系统Unisphere管理界面VNX被EMC宣传为“世界上最简单和最智能的存储”EMC积极地向客户推广支付的起的$10K起步简单快速应用部署高效最高50%空间节省强大多核&FLASH/FASTCacheenabled*NAS是可选的VNX7500VNX5500VNX5700VNXe3300VNX5100VNX5300VNXe31002TargetingEMCVNX-IBMandBEMCVNXe系列产品3ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonlyVNXe3100VNXe3300Formfactor2U3UMaximumdrives48or96120Drivetypes3.5”SAS,NL-SAS3.5”SAS,NL-SASProtocolsNFS(includingpNFS),CIFS,iSCSIConfigurableI/Oslots1or24EmbeddedI/OportsperSP2or4SASports

2or4GigabitEthernetports4SASports8GigabitEthernetportsStorageprocessors(controllers)1or22Systemmemory4or8GB24GBEMCVNXe系列产品3ChannelPartnersEMCVNX系列产品4ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonly

VNX5100VNX5300VNX5500VNX5700VNX7500Formfactor4U4U–7U4U–7U5U–8U5U–8UNumberofdrives751252505001,000Drivetypes3.5”Flash,SAS,andNL-SASand2.5”SASFilesystemmodulesI/OslotsperX-Bladen/a3445X-Bladesn/a1or21,2,or32,3,or42–8Memoryn/a6GB/blade12GB/blade12GB/blade24GB/blade12GB36GB48GB192GBProtocolsn/aNFS,CIFS,MPFS,pNFSStorage

PoolmodulesStorageProcessors2I/OportsperSP4FibreChannelports,2back-endSASportsn/an/aI/OslotsperSPn/a2255Memory8GB16GB24GB36GB48GBProtocolsFibreChannelFibreChannel,FibreChanneloverEthernet,iSCSIEMCVNX系列产品4ChannelPartnersEMCVNX网关产品5ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonly

VG2VG8Formfactor3U–4U3U–10UStoragecapacitysupport256

TB1.8PBX-Blades1or22to8I/OslotsperX-Blade45Ethernetsupport10/100/1000BaseTand10GbMemory

6GB/blade24GB/blade6or12GB192GBProtocolsNFS,CIFS,MPFS,pNFS,iSCSISystemssupportedUpto4VNX,VMAX,orCLARiiONinanycombinationEMCVNX网关产品5ChannelPartnersEMCVNX统一存储？ControlStation(LinuxOS)监控管理X-BladesVNXX-Blade(DARTOS)独立的控制器X-Blade间无通讯或交互VNX块控制器(FLAREOS)带有静态读和写缓存的块设备PresentLUN’stotheDM’sControlStationVNXX-Blade(2)VNX

DiskArraysVNXBlock

Controller(2)N+1power5U9UNS-120FAS32106ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonlyVNX复杂的硬件架构-ControlStation、X-Blade、SP；三种操作系统-Linux、DART、FLARE，文件和块访问分别由不同的硬件和不同操作系统实现对于同一个存储功能，针对文件和块访问，需要采用不同软件来实现利用Unisphere实现了统一管理EMCVNX统一存储？ControlStationVNX架构7ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonly存储池NL-SASSASSSD)NASStorageProcessorStorageProcessorSANX-bladeX-bladeX-bladeX-bladeX-bladeX-bladeX-bladeX-bladeMPFS/pNFSHost架构没啥大变化，2个SP来处理块访问，多个DataMover来处理文件访问。VNX架构7ChannelPartnersunderNVNX文件级的重复数据删除EMCVNX系列只能实现文件级别的Dedupe，重复数据删除率低，只对文件访问有效只能对非活动数据进行Dedupe。NetAppFAS系列实现了块级别Dedupe，重复数据删除率高。对文件和块均有效，并且对所有数据（包括活动的和非活动的数据）均能进行Dedupe。BasedonEMCRecoverPointandEMCAvamarFileAFileAFileAFileBFileBActive

FileFileCFileBFileAFileCFileAFileAFileAFileCFileBFileB8ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonlyVNX文件级的重复数据删除EMCVNX系列只能实现文件级9存储效率比较:EMC重复数据删除NetAppEMCNetAppAdvantageBackupData90%-90%VMware(VMDKs)70%-70%Geoseismic55%-55%DatabaseBackups55%-55%HomeDirectories35%20%15%GroupShares35%20%15%E-Mail(PSTs)30%-30%Archives25%20%5%EMCDedupe的

限制File-based基于文件不支持LUNs不支持VMDKs不支持PSTs依赖于压缩但没有考虑性能的损耗9ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonly9存储效率比较:EMC重复数据删除NetAppEMCNeEMC存储分层FASTVP目的是降低TCOFASTVP不是动态的-需要数据迁移EMCVNX的分级存储（FASTVP）功能针对FileAccess和BlockAccess分别实现，因此也导致相关的资源没法共享，资源浪费。基于统计的结果进行数据迁移-历史不代表未来。需要专业的服务10ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonlyEMC存储分层FASTVP目的是降低TCO10ChaVNXFASTCache64KB数据块需要镜像RAID-1保护支持读/写需要Warm-Up使用限制SnapViewsnapshots,MirrorView/AandSANCopy没法和其Dedupe功能一起使用。11ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonlyVNXFASTCache64KB数据块11ChanneVNXFLREMCVNX利用FileLevelRetention实现法规遵从，但是管理员还能从LUN级别进行数据删除，因此存在安全漏洞。NetAppFAS的Snaplock不存在此类漏洞，能完全满足最严格的法规遵从需求。FILE-LEVELRETENTION

WORKFLOWNon-File-LevelRetention-enabledfilesSetretentionperiods—enableFile-LevelRetentionCommittedto“WORM”stateRetentionperiodextendedRetentionperiodexpiresEmptyorexpiredfilesFiledeleted7123456Not-lockedLocked

(WORM)124Expired357Append246612ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonlyVNXFLREMCVNX利用FileLevelRetEMCUnisphere收费软件缺少向下兼容

FLARE30和DART6.0以上版本需要在所有服务器上安装UnisphereServerUtility集成了RecoverPoint没有集成ReplicationManager13ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonlyEMCUnisphere收费软件13ChannelPar性价比14ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonlyResponseTime2.751.682.581.662.321.951.921.170.96Memory414195322053240264682801128240Disks112xSATA112xFC224xFC96xSATA224xFC56xFC360xSAS100xSSD324xFC312xFC288xSAS436XSSDCelerraNS-G8(2+1DM)+VMAX/4CelerraNS-G8(1+1DM)+VMAX/4EMC*ListPrice$7MUSDEMC*ListPrice$2.5MUSDEMC*ListPrice$5.5MUSDSPECsfs2008NFSBenchmarkTestNetApp*ListPrice$1.25MUSD性价比14ChannelPartnersunderNDNetApp®FASbeatsEMCVG8/VMAX

40%moreperformance

40%betterlatency45%savingsinsystemcosts33%lowerpowerconsumption40%BetterFileServicePerformance15EMCCelerraVG8NetAppFAS6240135,521190,675NetAppDeliversHigherEfficiencyandUsabilityChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonlyNetApp®FASbeatsEMCVG8/VMAX原有投资保护和系统升级灵活性比较16ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonlyEMC不管是从原有的Celerra/CLARiiON升级到新的VNX/VNXe系列，还是VNXe升级到VNX系列，都只能进行Forklift式升级，通过SANCopy等工具完成数据迁移，升级过程复杂，耗时长，原有投资得不到保护NetAppFAS全系列之间可以进行Data-In-Place式升级，升级操作简单，耗时短，原有投资能得到充分保护原有投资保护和系统升级灵活性比较16ChannelPartFUD回应-集群VNX支持N+1集群，没有性能损失问题:是否意味着2个DataMover支持Active/Active呢？真相:VNX不支持active/active.至少需要一个冷备的DM现实情况:NetApp支持真正的failover并且不浪费客户的投资.ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonly17FUD回应-集群VNX支持N+1集群，没有性能损失ChaFUD回应–性能VNX有更高的NAS性能问题:单个的VNX5700性能如何？如果基于SAS/SATA的测试结果如何？真相:发布了一个不切合实际的测试结果，列表价格$5.5M现实:NetApp公布的测试数据是贴近客户实际配置的。ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonly18VNXVG84+1DataMover4xVNX5700436x200GBSSD21x300GBSAS15k2xControlStationListPrice$5.5MFUD回应–性能VNX有更高的NAS性能Channe总结NetApp具有独一无二的真正统一架构。在存储效率方面，NetApp胜过EMC。

NetApp在任何环境的数据保护方面都处于领先地位，至于适用于虚拟化环境的存储，NetApp更是有许多EMC不具备的明显优势。19ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonly总结NetApp具有独一无二的真正统一架构。19Cha20NetApp存储竞争分析和第三方的市场定位.20NetApp存储竞争分析和第三方的市场定位.IDC最权威的市场定位—FAS3270&VNX7500IDC最权威的市场定位—FAS3270&VNX7500IDC最权威的市场定位—FAS3240&VNX5700IDC最权威的市场定位—FAS3240&VNX5700IDC最权威的市场定位—FAS3210&VNX5500IDC最权威的市场定位—FAS3210&VNX5500NetApp与EMC的市场定位.IDC,两个厂家的定位客观地证明了:

FAS3270与VNX7500竞争的合理性

FAS3240与VNX5700竞争的合理性

FAS3210与VNX5500竞争的合理性/view/239ea8f4f61fb7360b4c655e.htmlNetApp与EMC的市场定位.IDC,两个厂家的定位客观EMCVNX的产品定位25ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonly来自EMC内部VNX白皮书---h8217-introduction-vnx-wp.pdfEMCVNX的产品定位25ChannelPartners26最大磁盘数的比较26最大磁盘数的比较最大磁盘数的比较最大支持磁盘数是存储档次定位其中一个重要的指标。NetAppFAS3270A最大磁盘数是960，EMCVNX7500最大磁盘数是1000，这是匹配的。

NetAppFAS3240最大磁盘数是600，EMCVNX5700最大磁盘数500，这是匹配的。

但是如果FAS3270与VNX5700相比较，最大磁盘数整整相差1倍，明显存在不合理性。FAS/V3210FAS/V3240FAS/V3270MaxSpindles240600960

VNX5500VNX5700VNX7500MaxSpindles4到2504到5004到1,000NetAppStorage:EMCStorage:注:大容量的存储配置已经达到350块磁盘，如果采用了VNX5700,按客户的最基本要求，厂家宣称VNX5700最大支持500块磁盘，500*0.8=400块磁盘，那么350块磁盘与这个最大值400相差无几，之前所有客户的配置根本没有如此接近，都是具有一定的冗余性。最大磁盘数的比较最大支持磁盘数是存储档次定位其中一个重要的28最大Cache的比较

---真实的谎言28最大Cache的比较

---真实的谎言FAS2040ASystemRaw=Usable=8GB

MaxWriteCache=7.5GB(DynamicAdjustment)Controller#14GB4GBController#2256MB3.5GBMirrorMirror256MB256MB256MB512MBNVMEMR/WR/WWW3.5GB512MBNVMEMFAS2040ASystemRaw=Usable=FAS2240ASystemRaw=Usable=12GB

MaxWriteCache=10GB(DynamicAdjustment)Controller#16GB6GBController#21GB4GBMirrorMirror1GB1GB1GBR/WR/WWW4GB2GBNVMEM2GBNVMEM*StillNOTGA!!!FAS2240ASystemRaw=Usable=FAS3210ASystemRaw=Usable=9GB*seenote

MaxWriteCache=8.5GB(DynamicAdjustment)Controller#14GB4GBController#2256MB4GBMirrorMirror256MB256MB256MBR/WR/WWW4GB*Marketingonlyshow8GBmemoryonFAS3210A(excludeNVMEM)

512MBNVMEM512MBNVMEMFAS3210ASystemRaw=Usable=FAS3240ASystemRaw=Usable=16GB

MaxWriteCache=15GB(DynamicAdjustment)Controller#18GB8GBController#2512MB7GBMirrorMirror512MB512MB512MBR/WR/WWW7GB1GBNVMEM1GBNVMEMFAS3240ASystemRaw=Usable=FAS3270ASystemRaw=Usable=36GB*seenote

MaxWriteCache=34GB(DynamicAdjustment)Controller#116GB16GBController#21GB16GBMirrorMirror1GB1GB1GBR/WR/WWW16GB*Marketingonlyshow32GBmemoryonFAS3270A(excludeNVMEM)

2GBNVMEM2GBNVMEMFAS3270ASystemRaw=Usable=FAS6210ASystemRaw=Usable=56GB*seenote

MaxWriteCache=52GB(DynamicAdjustment)Controller#124GB24GBController#22GB24GBMirrorMirror2GB2GB2GBR/WR/WWW24GB*Marketingonlyshow48GBmemoryonFAS6210A(excludeNVRAM)

4GBNVRAM4GBNVRAMFAS6210ASystemRaw=Usable=FAS6240ASystemRaw=Usable=104GB*seenote

MaxWriteCache=100GB(DynamicAdjustment)Controller#148GB48GBController#22GB48GBMirrorMirror2GB2GB2GBR/WR/WWW48GB*Marketingonlyshow96GBmemoryonFAS6240A(excludeNVRAM)

4GBNVRAM4GBNVRAMFAS6240ASystemRaw=Usable=FAS6280ASystemRaw=Usable=208GB*seenote

MaxWriteCache=200GB(DynamicAdjustment)Controller#196GB96GBController#24GB96GBMirrorMirror4GB4GB4GBR/WR/WWW96GB*Marketingonlyshow192GBmemoryonFAS6280A(excludeNVRAM)

8GBNVRAM8GBNVRAMFAS6280ASystemRaw=Usable=37FAS32x0Overview–Controller

FAS32x0ControllerConfigurationsCPUFreq/CPUcorecountMemorycapacity&NVMEMcapacity/channelsSystemCPUPhysicalMemoryPartitionsMain/NVMEMFAS32101x2.3GHzWolfdale

(DualCore)totalcores25GByteMain~41/2GbyteNVMEM~1/2GbyteSingleChanFAS32401x2.3GHzHarpertown

(QuadCore)totalcores48GByteMain7GByteNVMEM1GByte,DualChanFAS32702x3.0GHzWolfdale(DualCore)totalcores420GByteMain18GbyteNVMEM2GByte,DualChan3737FAS32x0Overview–ControlleHowarethe3modelsdifferent?*Absolut-ValsosupportsasingleCPUModuleinthetopchassisslotwithblanksinthelowerchassisslot.Thisisa“C-b”(Sea-bee)

FAS62x0SystemConfigurations-contModelCPUMemoryIOXMController/ChassisPowerFAS6210Dual2.26GHzQuadCoreNehalem(E5520)64GBDIMMs24GBTotalNo2*220VonlyFAS6240Dual2.54GHzQuadCoreNehalem(E5540)124GBDIMMs48GBTotalYes1110Vor220VFAS6280Dual2.93GHzHexCoreWestmere(X5670)128GBDIMMs96GBTotalYes1110Vor220VHowarethe3modelsdifferent39MaxWriteCacheComparisonFASModelsMaxWriteCacheFAS2040A7.5GBFAS2240A10GBFAS3210A8.5GBFAS3240A15GBFASModelsMaxWriteCacheFAS3270A34GBFAS6210A52GBFAS6240A100GBFAS6280A200GB39MaxWriteCacheComparisonFAEMCVNX的真实Cache40ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonlyFromlatestEMCwhitepaperofVNXintroduction,thenewVNX“physicalmemory”vs.“usablecachememory”comparisonshowsabelow…(excludeX-Blade,X-Bladeonlyreadmemory,nowritememory)

Model

PhysicalMEM

UsableCache

UsableCache

UsableCache

UsableCache

(DualController)

(SANonly)

(SAN+NAS/FAST)

(SAN+FASTcache)

(SAN+NAS+FASTCache)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------VNX5100

8GB

0.8GB

0.5GB

0.57GB

0.28GBVNX5300

16GB

4GB

2.78GB

3.07GB

1.86GBVNX5500

24GB

7GB

5.38GB

5.21GB

3.61GBVNX5700

36GB

10.9GB

7.88GB

8.3GB

5.28GBVNX7500

48GB

14.3GB

10.6GB

10.7GB

7.1GBEMCVNX的真实Cache40ChannelPartnEMCVNX的痛点41ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonly不是真正统一架构，只是管理界面的统一。不支持450GB

SAS和1TB

SATA磁盘。SAN存储控制器仍然是windows内核，采用的内存CACHE开销非常大，异于常规的存储系统指标，与NetApp/HDS/IBM/HP存储的内存指标没有可比性。不能和上一代产品兼容，即使是VNX3x00系列、VNX5x00系列和VNX7x00系列之间也无法升级,无法保护存储投资。不能通过更换控制器的方式升级换代。无第三方的性能测试参考。EMCVNX的痛点41ChannelPartnersNetAppFAS和EMC

VNX对应关系NetAppFASEMCVNXFAS2020VNXe3100FAS2040VNXe3300VNXe3300VNX5100FAS3210VNX5100*VNX5300VNXVG2FAS/V3240VNX5500VNX5700VNXVG2FAS/V3270VNX5700VNX7500<4DataMoversFAS/V6210VNX7500<4DataMoversFAS/V6240VNX7500>4DataMovers42ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonly*VNX5100isaFConly,blockbasedarray对应依据：硬件指标，包括最大磁盘数、缓存数量、最大接口数；NetAppFAS和EMCVNX对应关系NetApp比较VNXe3000/5100/FAS2000SpecificationComparisonVNXe3100VNXe3300VNX5100**FAS2020FAS2040FAS3210#ofX-Blades/ControllersIntegratedIntegrated2SPs1-21-21-2MemoryperX-Bade/Controller4GB12GB4GB0.5GB2GB4GBMaximumNumberofDrives961207568136240DriveTypesSAS,NL-SASSAS,NL-SAS,SSD1SSD,SAS,NL-SASFC,SAS,SATAFC,SAS,SATAFC,SAS,SATAInterfacesUpto4x1GbEUpto2x10GbE2x6GbSAS

Upto8x1GbEUpto4X10GbE2x6GbSAS

4x8GbFC2Upto4x4GbFCUpto4x1GbEUpto4x4GbFC

Upto8x1GbEUpto20x4GbFCUpto8x8GbFCUpto20x1GbEUpto8x10GbE43ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonly1SSDdrivesupportplannedfore3300inQ2CY20112VNX5100isablock,FConlyarraywithnoupgradepathtoaunifiedarchitecture比较VNXe3000/5100/FAS2000Sp比较VNX5100/5300/5700/FAS3200SpecificationComparisonVNX51001VNX5300VNX5500FAS3210FAS3240#ofX-Blades/Controllers1or2SP1or21,2or31or21or2MemoryperX-Bade/Controller4GB6GB12GB4GB8GBMaximumNumberofDrives75125250240600DriveTypesSSD,SAS,NL-SASSSD,SAS,NL-SASSSD,SAS,NL-SASFC,SAS,SATASSD,FC,SAS,SATAInterfaces8x8GbFC2x6GbSASUpto20x8GbFCUpto16x1GbEUpto8x10GbEUpto4xFCoE2x6GbSASUpto24x8GbFCUpto40x1GbEUpto20x10GbEUpto8xFCoE2x6GbSASUpto20x4GbFCUpto8x8GbFCUpto20x1GbEUpto8x10GbEUpto20x6GbSASUpto48x4GbFCUpto24x8GbFCUpto52x1GbEUpto24x10GbEUpto52x6GbSAS44ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonly1

VNX5100isablock,FConlyarraywithnoupgradepathtoaunifiedarchitecture比较VNX5100/5300/5700/FAS3200比较VNX7500/FAS3200/FAS6200SpecificationComparisonVNX5700VNX7500FAS3270FAS6210FAS6240FAS6280#ofX-Blades/Controllers2,3or42to81or21or21or21or2MemoryperX-Bade/Controller12GB24GB16GB24GB48GB96GBMaximumNumberofDrives5001000960120014401440DriveTypesSSD,SAS,NL-SASSSD,SAS,NL-SASSSD,FC,SAS,SATASSD,FC,SAS,SATASSD,FC,SAS,SATASSD,FC,SAS,SATAInterfacesUpto72x8GbFCUpto52x1GbEUpto30x10GbEUpto12xFCoE4x6GbSASUpto172x8GbFCUpto128x1GbEUpto68x10GbEUpto16xFCoE8x6GbSASUpto48x4GbFCUpto24x8GbFCUpto52x1GbEUpto24x10GbEUpto52x6GbSASUpto48x4GbFC

Upto32x1Gb(Copper)Upto36x1GbE(Optical)Upto24x10GbEUpto40x6GbSASUpto48x4GbFCUpto48x1GbE(Copper)Upto100x1GbE(Optical)Upto40x10GbEUpto72x6GbSASUpto48x4GbFCUpto48x1GbE(Copper)Upto100x1GbE(Optical)Upto40x10GbEUpto72x6GbSAS45ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonly比较VNX7500/FAS3200/FAS6200比较VG2-VG8/V3200/V6200SpecificationComparisonVG2VG8V3210V3240V3270V6210V6240V6280#ofX-Blades/Controllers1-22-81-21-21-21-21-21-2MemoryperX-Bade/Controller6GB24GB4GB8GB16GB24GB48GB96GBMaximumuseableIPcapacity(X-Blade/System)256TB/256TB256TB/1792TB480TB/480TB1200TB/1200TB1920TB/1920TB2400TB/2400TB2880TB/2880TB2880TB/2880TBDriveTypesSSD,FC,SATASSD,FC,SATAFC,SAS,SATASSD,FC,SAS,SATASSD,FC,SAS,SATASSD,FC,SAS,SATASSD,FC,SAS,SATASSD,FC,SAS,SATAInterfacesUpto4x4/8GbitFCUpto4x1GbitCopperEthernetUpto2x1GbitOpticalUpto2x10GbitOpticalEthernetUpto28x4/8GbitFCUpto112x1GbitCopperEthernetUpto56x1GbitOpticalEthernetUpto28x10GbitOpticalEthernetUpto20x4GbitFCUpto8x8GbitFCUpto20x1GbitCopperEthernetUpto8x10GbitOpticalEthernetUpto20x6GbitSASUpto48x4GbitFCUpto24x8GbitFCUpto52x1GbitCopperEthernetUpto24x10GbitOpticalEthernetUpto52x6GbitSASUpto48x4GbitFCUpto24x8GbitFCUpto52x1GbitCopperEthernetUpto24x10GbitOpticalEthernetUpto52x6GbitSASUpto48x4GbitFCUpto32x1GbitCopperEthernetUpto36x1GbitOpticalUpto24x10GbitOpticalEthernetUpto40x6GbitSASUpto48x4GbitFCUpto48x1GbitCopperEthernetUpto100x1GbitOpticalUpto40x10GbitOpticalEthernetUpto72x6GbitSASUpto48x4GbitFCUpto48x1GbitCopperEthernetUpto100x1GbitOpticalUpto40x10GbitOpticalEthernetUpto72x6GbitSAS46ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonly比较VG2-VG8/V3200/V6200SpecFAS和VNX软件功能对应表功能NetAppEMC本地复制

(snapshots)SnapshotVNXSnapSure(File)VNXSnapView(Block)VNXRecoverPoint/SECDP(Block)TimeFinder/SnapforSymmetrix本地复制

(clones)FlexClonesVNXSnapSure(File)VNXSnapViewClones(Block)TimeFinder/CloneforSymmetrix

远程复制SnapMirrorVNXReplicator(File,async)VNXMirrorView(Block)VNXRecoverPoint/SECRR(File,Block)SRDFforSymmetrix数据恢复管理SnapRestoreVNXSnapSure(File)VNXSnapView(Block)VNXRecoverPoint/SE(Block)TimeFinder/SnapforSymmetrix应用一致性复制SnapManagerReplicationManager(Oracle,SQL,Exchange,VDI)重复数据删除DataDeduplicationVNXFileDeduplicationandCompression47ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonlyFAS和VNX软件功能对应表功能NetAppEMC本地复制

演讲完毕，谢谢观看！演讲完毕，谢谢观看！EMCVNX

竞争分析EMCVNX

竞争分析50TargetingEMCVNX-IBMandBusinesspartnersuseonlyEMCVNX基础三个分类:VNXe–仅支持基于以太网协议(NFS,CIFS&iSCSI)VNX5100–仅FCP协议其他VNX–FC&NAS*VNX定位于入门级到中端存储系统Unisphere管理界面VNX被EMC宣传为“世界上最简单和最智能的存储”EMC积极地向客户推广支付的起的$10K起步简单快速应用部署高效最高50%空间节省强大多核&FLASH/FASTCacheenabled*NAS是可选的VNX7500VNX5500VNX5700VNXe3300VNX5100VNX5300VNXe31002TargetingEMCVNX-IBMandBEMCVNXe系列产品51ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonlyVNXe3100VNXe3300Formfactor2U3UMaximumdrives48or96120Drivetypes3.5”SAS,NL-SAS3.5”SAS,NL-SASProtocolsNFS(includingpNFS),CIFS,iSCSIConfigurableI/Oslots1or24EmbeddedI/OportsperSP2or4SASports

2or4GigabitEthernetports4SASports8GigabitEthernetportsStorageprocessors(controllers)1or22Systemmemory4or8GB24GBEMCVNXe系列产品3ChannelPartnersEMCVNX系列产品52ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonly

VNX5100VNX5300VNX5500VNX5700VNX7500Formfactor4U4U–7U4U–7U5U–8U5U–8UNumberofdrives751252505001,000Drivetypes3.5”Flash,SAS,andNL-SASand2.5”SASFilesystemmodulesI/OslotsperX-Bladen/a3445X-Bladesn/a1or21,2,or32,3,or42–8Memoryn/a6GB/blade12GB/blade12GB/blade24GB/blade12GB36GB48GB192GBProtocolsn/aNFS,CIFS,MPFS,pNFSStorage

PoolmodulesStorageProcessors2I/OportsperSP4FibreChannelports,2back-endSASportsn/an/aI/OslotsperSPn/a2255Memory8GB16GB24GB36GB48GBProtocolsFibreChannelFibreChannel,FibreChanneloverEthernet,iSCSIEMCVNX系列产品4ChannelPartnersEMCVNX网关产品53ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonly

VG2VG8Formfactor3U–4U3U–10UStoragecapacitysupport256

TB1.8PBX-Blades1or22to8I/OslotsperX-Blade45Ethernetsupport10/100/1000BaseTand10GbMemory

6GB/blade24GB/blade6or12GB192GBProtocolsNFS,CIFS,MPFS,pNFS,iSCSISystemssupportedUpto4VNX,VMAX,orCLARiiONinanycombinationEMCVNX网关产品5ChannelPartnersEMCVNX统一存储？ControlStation(LinuxOS)监控管理X-BladesVNXX-Blade(DARTOS)独立的控制器X-Blade间无通讯或交互VNX块控制器(FLAREOS)带有静态读和写缓存的块设备PresentLUN’stotheDM’sControlStationVNXX-Blade(2)VNX

DiskArraysVNXBlock

Controller(2)N+1power5U9UNS-120FAS321054ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonlyVNX复杂的硬件架构-ControlStation、X-Blade、SP；三种操作系统-Linux、DART、FLARE，文件和块访问分别由不同的硬件和不同操作系统实现对于同一个存储功能，针对文件和块访问，需要采用不同软件来实现利用Unisphere实现了统一管理EMCVNX统一存储？ControlStationVNX架构55ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonly存储池NL-SASSASSSD)NASStorageProcessorStorageProcessorSANX-bladeX-bladeX-bladeX-bladeX-bladeX-bladeX-bladeX-bladeMPFS/pNFSHost架构没啥大变化，2个SP来处理块访问，多个DataMover来处理文件访问。VNX架构7ChannelPartnersunderNVNX文件级的重复数据删除EMCVNX系列只能实现文件级别的Dedupe，重复数据删除率低，只对文件访问有效只能对非活动数据进行Dedupe。NetAppFAS系列实现了块级别Dedupe，重复数据删除率高。对文件和块均有效，并且对所有数据（包括活动的和非活动的数据）均能进行Dedupe。BasedonEMCRecoverPointandEMCAvamarFileAFileAFileAFileBFileBActive

FileFileCFileBFileAFileCFileAFileAFileAFileCFileBFileB56ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonlyVNX文件级的重复数据删除EMCVNX系列只能实现文件级57存储效率比较:EMC重复数据删除NetAppEMCNetAppAdvantageBackupData90%-90%VMware(VMDKs)70%-70%Geoseismic55%-55%DatabaseBackups55%-55%HomeDirectories35%20%15%GroupShares35%20%15%E-Mail(PSTs)30%-30%Archives25%20%5%EMCDedupe的

限制File-based基于文件不支持LUNs不支持VMDKs不支持PSTs依赖于压缩但没有考虑性能的损耗57ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonly9存储效率比较:EMC重复数据删除NetAppEMCNeEMC存储分层FASTVP目的是降低TCOFASTVP不是动态的-需要数据迁移EMCVNX的分级存储（FASTVP）功能针对FileAccess和BlockAccess分别实现，因此也导致相关的资源没法共享，资源浪费。基于统计的结果进行数据迁移-历史不代表未来。需要专业的服务58ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonlyEMC存储分层FASTVP目的是降低TCO10ChaVNXFASTCache64KB数据块需要镜像RAID-1保护支持读/写需要Warm-Up使用限制SnapViewsnapshots,MirrorView/AandSANCopy没法和其Dedupe功能一起使用。59ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonlyVNXFASTCache64KB数据块11ChanneVNXFLREMCVNX利用FileLevelRetention实现法规遵从，但是管理员还能从LUN级别进行数据删除，因此存在安全漏洞。NetAppFAS的Snaplock不存在此类漏洞，能完全满足最严格的法规遵从需求。FILE-LEVELRETENTION

WORKFLOWNon-File-LevelRetention-enabledfilesSetretentionperiods—enableFile-LevelRetentionCommittedto“WORM”stateRetentionperiodextendedRetentionperiodexpiresEmptyorexpiredfilesFiledeleted7123456Not-lockedLocked

(WORM)124Expired357Append246660ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonlyVNXFLREMCVNX利用FileLevelRetEMCUnisphere收费软件缺少向下兼容

FLARE30和DART6.0以上版本需要在所有服务器上安装UnisphereServerUtility集成了RecoverPoint没有集成ReplicationManager61ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonlyEMCUnisphere收费软件13ChannelPar性价比62ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonlyResponseTime2.751.682.581.662.321.951.921.170.96Memory414195322053240264682801128240Disks112xSATA112xFC224xFC96xSATA224xFC56xFC360xSAS100xSSD324xFC312xFC288xSAS436XSSDCelerraNS-G8(2+1DM)+VMAX/4CelerraNS-G8(1+1DM)+VMAX/4EMC*ListPrice$7MUSDEMC*ListPrice$2.5MUSDEMC*ListPrice$5.5MUSDSPECsfs2008NFSBenchmarkTestNetApp*ListPrice$1.25MUSD性价比14ChannelPartnersunderNDNetApp®FASbeatsEMCVG8/VMAX

40%moreperformance

40%betterlatency45%savingsinsystemcosts33%lowerpowerconsumption40%BetterFileServicePerformance63EMCCelerraVG8NetAppFAS6240135,521190,675NetAppDeliversHigherEfficiencyandUsabilityChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonlyNetApp®FASbeatsEMCVG8/VMAX原有投资保护和系统升级灵活性比较64ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonlyEMC不管是从原有的Celerra/CLARiiON升级到新的VNX/VNXe系列，还是VNXe升级到VNX系列，都只能进行Forklift式升级，通过SANCopy等工具完成数据迁移，升级过程复杂，耗时长，原有投资得不到保护NetAppFAS全系列之间可以进行Data-In-Place式升级，升级操作简单，耗时短，原有投资能得到充分保护原有投资保护和系统升级灵活性比较16ChannelPartFUD回应-集群VNX支持N+1集群，没有性能损失问题:是否意味着2个DataMover支持Active/Active呢？真相:VNX不支持active/active.至少需要一个冷备的DM现实情况:NetApp支持真正的failover并且不浪费客户的投资.ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonly65FUD回应-集群VNX支持N+1集群，没有性能损失ChaFUD回应–性能VNX有更高的NAS性能问题:单个的VNX5700性能如何？如果基于SAS/SATA的测试结果如何？真相:发布了一个不切合实际的测试结果，列表价格$5.5M现实:NetApp公布的测试数据是贴近客户实际配置的。ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonly66VNXVG84+1DataMover4xVNX5700436x200GBSSD21x300GBSAS15k2xControlStationListPrice$5.5MFUD回应–性能VNX有更高的NAS性能Channe总结NetApp具有独一无二的真正统一架构。在存储效率方面，NetApp胜过EMC。

NetApp在任何环境的数据保护方面都处于领先地位，至于适用于虚拟化环境的存储，NetApp更是有许多EMC不具备的明显优势。67ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonly总结NetApp具有独一无二的真正统一架构。19Cha68NetApp存储竞争分析和第三方的市场定位.20NetApp存储竞争分析和第三方的市场定位.IDC最权威的市场定位—FAS3270&VNX7500IDC最权威的市场定位—FAS3270&VNX7500IDC最权威的市场定位—FAS3240&VNX5700IDC最权威的市场定位—FAS3240&VNX5700IDC最权威的市场定位—FAS3210&VNX5500IDC最权威的市场定位—FAS3210&VNX5500NetApp与EMC的市场定位.IDC,两个厂家的定位客观地证明了:

FAS3270与VNX7500竞争的合理性

FAS3240与VNX5700竞争的合理性

FAS3210与VNX5500竞争的合理性/view/239ea8f4f61fb7360b4c655e.htmlNetApp与EMC的市场定位.IDC,两个厂家的定位客观EMCVNX的产品定位73ChannelPartnersunderNDAandEmployeesonly来自EMC内部VNX白皮书---h8217-introduction-vnx-wp.pdfEMCVNX的产品定位25ChannelPartners74最大磁盘数的比较26最大磁盘数的比较最大磁盘数的比较最大支持磁盘数是存储档次定位其中一个重要的指标。NetAppFAS3270A最大磁盘数是960，EMCVNX7500最大磁盘数是1000，这是匹配的。

NetAppFAS3240最大磁盘数是600，EMCVNX5700最大磁盘数500，这是匹配的。

但是如果FAS3270与VNX5700相比较，最大磁盘数整整相差1倍，明显存在不合理性。FAS/V3210FAS/V3240FAS/V3270MaxSpindles240600960

VNX5500