版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
11ManagingEconomiesofScaleinaSupplyChain:CycleInventoryLearningObjectivesBalancetheappropriatecoststochoosetheoptimallotsizeandcycleinventoryinasupplychain.Understandtheimpactofquantitydiscountsonlotsizeandcycleinventory.Deviseappropriatediscountingschemesforasupplychain.Understandtheimpactoftradepromotionsonlotsizeandcycleinventory.Identifymanagerialleversthatreducelotsizeandcycleinventoryinasupplychainwithoutincreasingcost.RoleofCycleInventory
inaSupplyChainLotorbatchsizeisthequantitythatastageofasupplychaineitherproducesorpurchasesatatimeCycleinventoryistheaverageinventoryinasupplychainduetoeitherproductionorpurchasesinlotsizesthatarelargerthanthosedemandedbythecustomer Q:Quantityinalotorbatchsize
D:DemandperunittimeInventoryProfileFigure11-1RoleofCycleInventory
inaSupplyChainAverageflowtimeresultingfromcycleinventoryRoleofCycleInventory
inaSupplyChainLowercycleinventoryhasShorteraverageflowtimeLowerworkingcapitalrequirementsLowerinventoryholdingcostsCycleinventoryisheldtoTakeadvantageofeconomiesofscaleReducecostsinthesupplychainRoleofCycleInventory
inaSupplyChainAveragepricepaidperunitpurchasedisakeycostinthelot-sizingdecision Materialcost=CFixedorderingcostincludesallcoststhatdonotvarywiththesizeoftheorderbutareincurredeachtimeanorderisplaced Fixedorderingcost=SHoldingcostisthecostofcarryingoneunitininventoryforaspecifiedperiodoftime Holdingcost=H=hCRoleofCycleInventory
inaSupplyChainPrimaryroleofcycleinventoryistoallowdifferentstagestopurchaseproductinlotsizesthatminimizethesumofmaterial,ordering,andholdingcostsIdeally,cycleinventorydecisionsshouldconsidercostsacrosstheentiresupplychainInpractice,eachstagegenerallymakesitsownsupplychaindecisionsIncreasestotalcycleinventoryandtotalcostsinthesupplychainRoleofCycleInventory
inaSupplyChainEconomiesofscaleexploitedinthreetypicalsituationsAfixedcostisincurredeachtimeanorderisplacedorproducedThesupplierofferspricediscountsbasedonthequantitypurchasedperlotThesupplieroffersshort-termpricediscountsorholdstradepromotionsEstimatingCycleInventoryRelatedCostsinPracticeInventoryHoldingCostCostofcapitalwhere
E =amountofequity
D =amountofdebt
Rf =risk-freerateofreturn
b =thefirm’sbeta
MRP =marketriskpremium
Rb =rateatwhichthefirmcanborrowmoney
t =taxrateInventoryHoldingCostCostofcapitalEstimatingCycleInventoryRelatedCostsinPracticeAdjustedforpre-taxsettingEstimatingCycleInventoryRelatedCostsinPracticeInventoryHoldingCostObsolescencecostHandlingcostOccupancycostMiscellaneouscostsTheft,security,damage,tax,insuranceEstimatingCycleInventoryRelatedCostsinPracticeOrderingCostBuyertimeTransportationcostsReceivingcostsOthercostsEconomiesofScale
toExploitFixedCostsLotsizingforasingleproduct(EOQ) D
= Annualdemandoftheproduct S
=
Fixedcostincurredperorder C
=
Costperunit H
=
HoldingcostperyearasafractionofproductcostBasicassumptionsDemandissteadyatD
unitsperunittimeNoshortagesareallowedReplenishmentleadtimeisfixedEconomiesofScale
toExploitFixedCostsMinimizeAnnualmaterialcostAnnualorderingcostAnnualholdingcostLotSizingforaSingleProductLotSizingforaSingleProductFigure11-2LotSizingforaSingleProductTheeconomicorderquantity(EOQ)TheoptimalorderingfrequencyEOQExampleAnnualdemand,D=1,000x12=12,000unitsOrdercostperlot,S=$4,000Unitcostpercomputer,C=$500Holdingcostperyearasafractionofunitcost,h=0.2EOQExampleEOQExampleLotsizereducedtoQ=200unitsLotSizeandOrderingCostIfthelotsizeQ*=200,howmuchshouldtheorderingcostbereduced?Desiredlotsize,Q*=200Annualdemand,D=1,000×12=12,000unitsUnitcostpercomputer,C=$500Holdingcostperyearasafractionofinventoryvalue,h=0.2ProductionLotSizingTheentirelotdoesnotarriveatthesametimeProductionoccursataspecifiedratePInventorybuildsupatarateofP
–DAnnualsetupcostAnnualholdingcostAggregatingMultipleProducts
inaSingleOrderSavingsintransportationcostsReducesfixedcostforeachproductLotsizeforeachproductcanbereducedCycleinventoryisreducedSingledeliveryfrommultiplesuppliersorsingletruckdeliveringtomultipleretailersReceivingandloadingcostsreducedLotSizingwithMultiple
ProductsorCustomersOrdering,transportation,andreceivingcostsgrowwiththevarietyofproductsorpickuppointsLotsizesandorderingpolicythatminimizetotalcost
Di: Annualdemandforproducti
S: Ordercostincurredeachtimeanorderisplaced,independentofthevarietyofproductsintheorder
si: Additionalordercostincurredifproducti
isincludedintheorderLotSizingwithMultiple
ProductsorCustomersThreeapproachesEachproductmanagerordershisorhermodelindependentlyTheproductmanagersjointlyordereveryproductineachlotProductmanagersorderjointlybutnoteveryordercontainseveryproduct;thatis,eachlotcontainsaselectedsubsetoftheproductsMultipleProductsOrderedandDeliveredIndependentlyDemand
DL
=12,000/yr,DM
=1,200/yr,DH
=120/yrCommonordercost
S
=$4,000Product-specificordercost
sL
=$1,000,sM
=$1,000,sH=$1,000Holdingcost
h
=0.2Unitcost
CL
=$500,CM=$500,CH=$500MultipleProductsOrderedandDeliveredIndependentlyLiteproMedproHeavyproDemandperyear12,0001,200120Fixedcost/order$5,000$5,000$5,000Optimalordersize1,095346110Cycleinventory54817355Annualholdingcost$54,772$17,321$5,477Orderfrequency11.0/year3.5/year1.1/yearAnnualorderingcost$54,772$17,321$5,477Averageflowtime2.4weeks7.5weeks23.7weeksAnnualcost$109,544$34,642$10,954Table11-1Totalannualcost=$155,140LotsOrderedandDeliveredJointlyProductsOrderedandDeliveredJointlyAnnualordercost=9.75x7,000=$68,250Annualorderingandholdingcost =$61,512+$6,151+$615+$68,250 =$136,528ProductsOrderedandDeliveredJointlyLiteproMedproHeavyproDemandperyear(D)12,0001,200120Orderfrequency(n∗)9.75/year9.75/year9.75/yearOptimalordersize(D/n∗)1,23012312.3Cycleinventory61561.56.15Annualholdingcost$61,512$6,151$615Averageflowtime2.67weeks2.67weeks2.67weeksTable11-2AggregationwithCapacityConstraintW.W.Graingerexample
Demandperproduct,Di
=10,000 Holdingcost,h
=
0.2 Unitcostperproduct,Ci
=
$50 Commonordercost,S
=
$500 Supplier-specificordercost,si
=
$100AggregationwithCapacityConstraintAnnualholdingcostpersupplierAggregationwithCapacityConstraintTotalrequiredcapacitypertruck=4x671=2,684unitsTruckcapacity=2,500unitsOrderquantityfromeachsupplier=2,500/4=625Orderfrequencyincreasedto10,000/625=16Annualordercostpersupplierincreasesto$3,600Annualholdingcostpersupplierdecreasesto$3,125.LotsOrderedandDeliveredJointlyforaSelectedSubsetStep1: IdentifythemostfrequentlyorderedproductassumingeachproductisorderedindependentlyStep2: Forallproductsi≠
i*,evaluatetheorderingfrequencyLotsOrderedandDeliveredJointlyforaSelectedSubsetStep3: Foralli≠
i*,evaluatethefrequencyofproducti
relativetothemostfrequentlyorderedproducti*tobemiStep4: Recalculatetheorderingfrequencyofthemostfrequentlyorderedproducti*tobenLotsOrderedandDeliveredJointlyforaSelectedSubsetStep5: Evaluateanorderfrequencyofni=n/mi
andthetotalcostofsuchanorderingpolicyTailoredaggregation–higher-demandproductsorderedmorefrequentlyandlower-demandproductsorderedlessfrequentlyOrderedandDeliveredJointly–FrequencyVariesbyOrderApplyingStep1ThusOrderedandDeliveredJointly–FrequencyVariesbyOrderApplyingStep2ApplyingStep3OrderedandDeliveredJointly–FrequencyVariesbyOrderLiteproMedproHeavyproDemandperyear(D)12,0001,200120Orderfrequency(n∗)11.47/year5.74/year2.29/yearOptimalordersize(D/n∗)1,04620952Cycleinventory523104.526Annualholdingcost$52,307$10,461$2,615Averageflowtime2.27weeks4.53weeks11.35weeksTable11-3OrderedandDeliveredJointly–FrequencyVariesbyOrderApplyingStep4ApplyingStep5Annualordercost Totalannualcost$130,767EconomiesofScaleto
ExploitQuantityDiscountsLotsize-baseddiscount–discountsbasedonquantityorderedinasinglelotVolumebaseddiscount–
discountisbasedontotalquantitypurchasedoveragivenperiodTwocommonschemesAll-unitquantitydiscountsMarginalunitquantitydiscountormulti-blocktariffsQuantityDiscountsTwobasicquestionsWhatistheoptimalpurchasingdecisionforabuyerseekingtomaximizeprofits?Howdoesthisdecisionaffectthesupplychainintermsoflotsizes,cycleinventories,andflowtimes?Underwhatconditionsshouldasupplierofferquantitydiscounts?Whatareappropriatepricingschedulesthatasupplierseekingtomaximizeprofitsshouldoffer?All-UnitQuantityDiscountsPricingschedulehasspecifiedquantitybreakpointsq0,q1,…,qr,whereq0=0Ifanorderisplacedthatisatleastaslargeasqibutsmallerthanqi+1,theneachunithasanaverageunitcostofCiUnitcostgenerallydecreasesasthequantityincreases,i.e.,C0>C1>…>Cr
Objectiveistodecideonalotsizethatwillminimizethesumofmaterial,order,andholdingcostsAll-UnitQuantityDiscountsFigure11-3All-UnitQuantityDiscountsStep1: EvaluatetheoptimallotsizeforeachpriceCi,0≤i≤rasfollowsAll-UnitQuantityDiscountsStep2: WenextselecttheorderquantityQ*iforeachpriceCi1.2.3.Case3canbeignoredasitisconsideredforQi+1ForCase1if,thensetQ*i=QiIf,thenadiscountisnotpossibleSetQ*i =qitoqualifyforthediscountedpriceofCiAll-UnitQuantityDiscountsStep3: CalculatethetotalannualcostoforderingQ*iunitsAll-UnitQuantityDiscountsStep4: SelectQ*iwiththelowesttotalcostTCiCutoffpriceAll-UnitQuantityDiscountExampleOrderQuantityUnitPrice0–4,999$3.005,000–9,999$2.9610,000ormore$2.92q0=0,q1=5,000,q2=10,000C0=$3.00,C1=$2.96,C2=$2.92D=120,000/year,S=$100/lot,h=0.2All-UnitQuantityDiscountExampleStep1Step2Ignorei=0becauseQ0=6,324>q1=5,000Fori=1,2All-UnitQuantityDiscountExampleStep3Lowesttotalcostisfori=2Order
bottlesperlotat$2.92perbottleMarginalUnitQuantityDiscountsMulti-blocktariffs–themarginalcostofaunitthatdecreasesatabreakpointForeachvalueofi,0
≤i≤r,letVi
bethecostoforderingqi
unitsMarginalUnitQuantityDiscountsFigure11-4MarginalUnitQuantityDiscountsMaterialcostofeachorderQ
isVi+(Q–qi)CiTotalannualcostMarginalUnitQuantityDiscountsStep1: EvaluatetheoptimallotsizeforeachpriceCiMarginalUnitQuantityDiscountsStep2: SelecttheorderquantityQi*foreachpriceCi1.2.3.MarginalUnitQuantityDiscountsStep3: CalculatethetotalannualcostoforderingQi*Step4: SelecttheordersizeQi*withthelowesttotalcostTCiMarginalUnitQuantityDiscountExampleOriginaldatanowamarginaldiscountOrderQuantityUnitPrice0–4,999$3.005,000–9,999$2.9610,000ormore$2.92q0=0,q1=5,000,q2=10,000C0=$3.00,C1=$2.96,C2=$2.92D=120,000/year,S=$100/lot,h=0.2MarginalUnitQuantityDiscountExampleStep1MarginalUnitQuantityDiscountExampleStep2Step3WhyQuantityDiscounts?QuantitydiscountscanincreasethesupplychainsurplusforthefollowingtwomainreasonsImprovedcoordinationtoincreasetotalsupplychainprofitsExtractionofsurplusthroughpricediscriminationQuantityDiscountsforCommodityProductsD=120,000bottles/year,SR
=$100,hR
=0.2,CR
=$3SM
=$250,hM
=0.2,CM
=$2Annualsupplychaincost(manufacturer+DO)=$6,009+$3,795=$9,804LocallyOptimalLotSizesAnnualcostforDOandmanufacturerAnnualsupplychaincost(manufacturer+DO)=$5,106+$4,059=$9,165DesigningaSuitableLotSize-BasedQuantityDiscountDesignasuitablequantitydiscountthatgetsDOtoorderinlotsof9,165unitswhenitsaimstominimizeonlyitsowntotalcostsManufacturerneedstoofferanincentiveofatleast$264peryeartoDOintermsofdecreasedmaterialcostifDOordersinlotsof9,165unitsAppropriatequantitydiscountis$3ifDOordersinlotssmallerthan9,165unitsand$2.9978forordersof9,165ormoreQuantityDiscountsWhen
FirmHasMarketPowerDemandcurve=360,000–60,000pProductioncost=CM=$2perbottleptomaximizeProfRQuantityDiscountsWhen
FirmHasMarketPowerCR=$4perbottle,p=$5perbottleTotalmarketdemand=360,000–60,000p=60,000ProfR
=(5–4)(360,000–60,000×5)=$60,000ProfM=(4–2)(360,000–60,000×5)=$120,000ProfSC=(p–CM)(360,000–60,000p)CoordinatedretailpriceProfSC=($4–$2)x120,000=$240,000Two-PartTariffManufacturerchargesitsentireprofitasanup-frontfranchisefeeff
SellstotheretaileratcostRetailpricingdecisionisbasedonmaximizingitsprofitsEffectivelymaximizesthecoordinatedsupplychainprofitVolume-BasedQuantityDiscountsDesignavolume-baseddiscountschemethatgetstheretailertopurchaseandsellthequantitysoldwhenthetwostagescoordinatetheiractionsLessonsfromDiscountingSchemesQuantitydiscountsplayaroleinsupplychaincoordinationandimprovedsupplychainprofitsDiscountschemesthatareoptimalarevolumebasedandnotlotsizebasedunlessthemanufacturerhaslargefixedcostsassociatedwitheachlotEveninthepresenceoflargefixedcostsforthemanufacturer,atwo-parttarifforvolume-baseddiscount,withthemanufacturerpassingonsomeofthefixedcosttotheretailer,optimallycoordinatesthesupplychainandmaximizesprofitsLessonsfromDiscountingSchemesLotsize–baseddiscountstendtoraisethecycleinventoryinthesupplychainVolume-baseddiscountsarecompatiblewithsmalllotsthatreducecycleinventoryRetailerswilltendtoincreasethesizeofthelottowardtheendoftheevaluationperiod,thehockeystickphenomenonWithmultipleretailerswithdifferentdemandcurves
optimaldiscountcontinuestobevolumebasedwiththeaveragepricechargedtotheretailersdecreasingastherateofpurchaseincreasesPriceDiscriminationtoMaximizeSupplierProfitsFirmchargesdifferentialpricestomaximizeprofitsSettingafixedpriceforallunitsdoesnotmaximizeprofitsforthemanufacturerManufacturercanobtainmaximumprofitsbypricingeachunitdifferentlybasedoncustomers’marginalevaluationateachquantityQuantitydiscountsareonemechanismforpricediscriminationbecausecustomerspaydifferentpricesbasedonthequantitypurchasedShort-TermDiscounting:
TradePromotionsTradepromotionsarepricediscountsforalimitedperiodoftimeKeygoalsInduceretailerstousepricediscounts,displays,oradvertisingtospursalesShiftinventoryfromthemanufacturertotheretailerandthecustomerDefendabrandagainstcompetitionShort-TermDiscounting:
TradePromotionsImpactonthebehavioroftheretailerandsupplychainperformanceRetailerhastwoprimaryoptionsPassthroughsomeorallofthepromotiontocustomerstospursalesPassthroughverylittleofthepromotiontocustomersbutpurchaseingreaterquantityduringthepromotionperiodtoexploitthetemporaryreductioninprice(forwardbuy)ForwardBuyingInventoryProfileFigure11-5ForwardBuyCoststobeconsidered–materialcost,holdingcost,andordercostThreeassumptionsThediscountisofferedonce,withnofuturediscountsTheretailertakesnoactiontoinfluencecustomerdemandAnalyzeaperiodoverwhichthedemandisanintegermultipleofQ*ForwardBuyOptimalorderquantityRetailersareoftenawareofthetimingofthenextpromotionImpactofTradePromotions
onLotSizesQ*=6,324bottles,C=$3perbottled=$0.15,D=120,000,h=0.2 CycleinventoryatDO =Q*/2=6,324/2=3,162bottles Averageflowtime =Q*/2D=6,324/(2D)=0.3162monthsImpactofTradePromotions
onLotSizes CycleinventoryatDO =Qd/2=38,236/2=19,118bottles Averageflowtime =Qd/2D=38,236/(20,000) =1.9118monthsWithtradepromotionsForwardbuy=Qd–Q*=38,236–6,324=31,912bottlesHowMuchofaDiscountShouldtheRetailerPassThrough?ProfitsfortheretailerProfR=(300,000–60,000p)p–(300,000–60,000p)CROptimalpricep=(300,000+60,000CR)/120,000DemandwithnopromotionDR=30,000–60,000p=60,000Optimalpricewithdiscountp=(300,000+60,000x2.85)/120,000=$3.925DR=300,000-60,000p=64,500DemandwithpromotionTradePromotionsTradepromotionsgenerallyincreasecycleinventoryinasupplychainandhurtperformanceCountermeasuresEDLP(everydaylowpricing)Discountappliestoitemssoldtocustomers(sell-through)notthequantitypurchasedbytheretailer(sell-in)ScanbasedpromotionsManagingMultiechelon
CycleInventoryMulti-echelonsupplychainshavemultiplestageswithpossiblymanyplayersateachstageLackofcoordinationinlotsizingdecisionsacrossthesupplychainresultsinhighcostsandmorecycleinventorythanrequiredThegoalistodecreasetotalcostsbycoordinatingordersacrossthesupplychainManagingMultiechelon
CycleInventoryFigure11-6IntegerReplenishmentPolicyDivideallpartieswithinastageintogroupssuchthatallpartieswithinagrouporderfromthesamesupplierandhaveth
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 2024芒果种植基地无人机喷洒农药服务合同3篇
- 仪器设备采购合同5篇
- 经济法关于大学生就业维权方面
- 赞助合同模板(5篇)
- 山东特殊教育职业学院《医学基本技能》2023-2024学年第一学期期末试卷
- 2025年度政府投资项目财务监管代理合同3篇
- 钟山职业技术学院《商务英语视听说(4)》2023-2024学年第一学期期末试卷
- 2024年矿山石料直供采购协议纲要版B版
- 2025年度新疆棉花采摘机械化作业合同范本3篇
- 南京师范大学泰州学院《口腔临床医学概论(口腔修复学)》2023-2024学年第一学期期末试卷
- 职业暴露处理方法与报告流程图
- 苏教版一年级上册《科学》期末知识点汇总 重点知识梳理 总复习【版 】课件
- 青岛版小学科学三年级下册课程纲要
- 目标、计划与行动课件
- 动态变形模量Evd试验记录
- 2020-2021学年浙江省温州市八年级(上)期末数学试卷(附答案详解)
- 蔬菜籽种采购清单
- 工期定额-民用建筑
- 低压电能表安装作业指导书
- 能见度不良时船舶航行须知
- 软胶囊的制备
评论
0/150
提交评论