内容真题2007 2019超话f5 2015 sep_第1页
内容真题2007 2019超话f5 2015 sep_第2页
内容真题2007 2019超话f5 2015 sep_第3页
内容真题2007 2019超话f5 2015 sep_第4页
内容真题2007 2019超话f5 2015 sep_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩2页未读, 继续免费阅读

付费下载

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

PAGE

11

FundamentalsLevel–SkillsModule,PaperF5

PerformanceManagement September/December2015Answers

SectionB

(a)Targetcostingsteps

Derivingatargetcost

Step1:Aproductorserviceisdevelopedwhichisperceivedtobeneededbycustomersandthereforewillattractadequatesalesvolumes.

Step2:Atargetpriceisthensetbasedonthecustomers’perceivedvalueoftheproduct.Thiswillthereforebeamarketbasedprice.

Step3:Therequiredtargetoperatingprofitperunitisthencalculated.Thismaybebasedoneitherreturnonsalesorreturnoninvestment.

Step4:Thetargetcostisderivedbysubtractingthetargetprofitfromthetargetprice.

Step5:Ifthereisacostgap,attemptswillbemadetoclosethegap.Techniquessuchasvalueengineeringmaybeperformed,whichlooksateveryaspectofthevaluechainbusinessfunctionswithanobjectiveofreducingcostswhilesatisfyingcustomerneeds.

Step6:Negotiationwithcustomersmaytakecebeforedecidingwhethertogoaheadwit

ApplicationatCCoDifficultiesinimplementation

CCoisaservice tenmoredifficulttofindaprecisedefinitionforsomeoftheservices.Inorderfortargetcostingtobeuseful,itisnecessar Coactuallyprovidesarangeofservicesto ismeansthatthedefinitionoftheservicesbeingprovidedwillvary.Differenttargetcostswillneed erivedforthedifferentservicesprovided.

CCohastwotypesofviceforregularsisbeingrepeated,itshouldberelativelyeasytosetatargetcostforthesejobs.However,forthe nycomparativedataavailableandthereforesettingthetargetcostwillbedifficult.

Similarly,someoftheworkavailableisveryspecialist.Forexample,cleaningrestaurantsand noutb

offoodpoisoningwillrequirespecialisttechniquesandadherencetoasetofregulationswithwh notbefamiliar.Itmaybedifficulttoestablishthemarketpriceforaservicelikethis,thusmakingitdifficulttoderiveatargetcost.

BenefitstoCCo

Targetcostingisusefulincompetitivemarketswherea

acceptamarketpricefortheirproducts.CCoisoperatinginacompetitivemarketandwhilsttheserviceofferedbyCCoismorespecialist,itisclearfromtherecentdropinsalesthatpriceincreasesdoleadtolossofcustomers.CCocannotthereforeignorethemarketpriceforcleaningservicesandsimplypassoncostincreasesasithasdone.TargetcostingwouldthereforehelpCCotofocusonthemarketpriceofsimilarservicesprovidedbycompetitors,wherethisinformationisavailable.

IfaftercalculatingatargetcostCCofindsthostgapexists,itwillthenbedtoexamineitsinternalprocessesandcostsmoreclosely.Itshouldestablishwhythepricesoftheproductsituseshaveincreasedinthefirstce.Ifitcannotachieveanyreductionintheseprices,itshouldconsiderwhetheritcansourcecheapernon-chemicalproductsfromalternativers.So,targetcostingwillbenefitCCobyhelittofocusoncostreductionandconsequentlycustomerretention.

Note:Morepointscouldbemadeandwouldearnmarks.

(a)Calculations

Bus:(0·4x0·67)+(0·32x0·8)+(0·28x0·82)=75·36%Prime:(0·4x0·58)+(0·32x0·76)+(0·28x0·83)=70·76%

Express:(0·4x0·67)+(0·32x0·76)+(0·28x0·89)=76·04%

Accuracyofstatement

TheMD’sstatementsaysthatBusCo’scustomersarethemostsatisfiedofanynationalbusoperator.However,thisisnotquitethecasesince,whenthe‘overallsatisfaction’levelsarecalculated,Express’slevelis76·04%comparedtoBusCo’s75·36%.So,thefirstpartoftheMD’sstatementisuntrue.

TheMDthengoesontosaythatBusCoisleadingthewayonwhatmattersmosttocustomers–valueformoneyandpunctuality.Giventheweightingsattachedtothesetwocriteria,itappearstruetosaythatthesearethefactorswhiatter

mosttocustomers.Similarly,itistruetosaythatBusCoisleadingasregardspunctuality,being4percentagepointsaheadofPrimeandExpressonthiscriterion.However,giventhatExpressalsohasthesamelevelofsatisfactionasregardsofferingvalueformoney,BusCoisonlyleadingaheadofPrimeonthiscriterion,notaheadofExpress.Therefore,whilstitcansaythatitistheleaderonpunctuality,itcanonlysaythatitisthejointleaderonvalueformoney.

VFM

‘Efficiency’focusesontherelationshipbetweeninputsandoutputs,consideringwhethertheumoutputisbeingachievedfortheresourcesused.

Performancemeasure:

Occupancyrateofbuses

Utilisationrateforbuses(utilisationrate=hoursontheroad/totalhoursavailable)

Utilisationratefordrivers

(Manyotherscouldbegiventoobutonlyonewasaskedfor.)

‘Effectiveness’focusesontherelationshipbetweenanorganisation’sobjectivesandoutputs,consideringwhethertheobjectivesarebeingmet.

Possibleperformancemeasures:

PercentageofcustomerssatisfiedwithcleanlinessofbusesPercentageofcarbonemissionsrelativetotargetset

(Manyotherscouldbegiventoobutonlyonewasaskedfor.)

(a)VariancecalculationsMixvariance

Perquestion,totalgofmaterialsperstandardbatch=610g.Thereandardtytoproduce950units=950x610g=579·5kgPerquestion,actualtotalkgofmaterialsusedtoproduce950units=570·5kg

Material Actualty Actualty Variance Standard Variance

instandardmix

kg

inactualmix

kg

kg

costperkg

$

$

Whiteflour

570·5x450/610= 420·86

408·5

12·36

1·80

22·25

Wholegrainflour

570·5x150/610= 140·29

152

(11·71)

2·20

(25·76)

Yeast

570·5x10/610= 9·35

10

(0·65)

20

(13)

–––––– –––––– ––––– ––––––

570·5 570·5 20·5 (16·51)A

–––––– –––––– ––––– ––––––

Yieldvariance

Material StandardtyActualty Variance Standard Varianceinstandardmix instandardmix costperkg

kg kg kg $ $Whiteflour 450/610x579·5= 427·5 420·86 6·64 1·80 11·95Wholegrainflour 150/610x579·5= 142·5 4·86

Yeast 10/610x579·5= 9·5 9·35 0·15 20 3

–––––– –––––– ––––––

579·5 570·5 19·81F

–––––– –––––– ––––––

Alternativeyieldcalculation

570·5kgshouldyield(÷0·61kg)=935·25loaves570·5kgdidyield =950loavesDifference 14·75F

Valuedatstandardmaterialcost =14·75Fx$1·34=$19·77F

Materialyieldvariance

Threereasonswhyanadversematerialyieldvariancemayarise:

Themixmaynotberemovedcompleyoutofthemachine,leavingsomemixbehind.

Sincetheloavesaremadebyhand,theymaybemadeslightlytoolarge,meaningthatfewerloavescanbebaked.

Errorsorchangesinthemixmaycausesomeloavestobesub-standardandthereforerejectedbythequalityinspector.

Theloavesmightbebakedatthewrongtemperatureandthereforeberejectedbythequalityinspector.

Note:Manymorereasonscouldbegiven.

(a)WeightedaverageC/Sratio

Weightedaveragecontributiontosalesratio(WAC/Sratio)=totalcontribution/totalsalesrevenue.

Perunit: T C R

$ $ $ $ $ $

Sellingprice 1,600 1,800 1,400

Material (430) (500) (360)

Variablelabour(40%) (88) (96) (76)

Variableoverheads (110) (120) (95)

–––– –––– ––––

Totalvariablecosts

Contribution

(628)––––––

972––––––

(716)––––––1,084

––––––

(531)––––––

869––––––

Salesunits

TotalsalesrevenueTotalcontribution

420

$672,000

$408,240

400

$720,000

$433,600

380

$532,000

$330,220

WAC/Sratio=($408,240+$433,600+$330,220)/($672,000+$720,000+$532,000)

=$1,172,060/$1,924,000=60·92%.

Marginofsafety

Marginofsafety=budgetedsales–breakevensalesBudgetedsalesrevenue=$1,924,000

Fixedlabourcosts={(420x$220)+(400x$240)+(380x$190)}x0·6=$156,360k.Thereforetotalfixedcosts=$156,360+$55,000=$211,360.

Breakevensalesrevenue=fixedcosts/weightedaverageC/Sratio

=$211,360/60·92%=$346,947

Thereforemarginofsafety=$1,924,000–$346,947=$1,577,053.

2,500

2,000

1,500

Totalrevenue

1,000

Totalcosts

500

BEP

Fixedcosts

0

0

200

400

600

Salesunits

800

1,000 1,200 1,400

Costsandrevenues$’000

Multi-productbreakevenchart

Workings

Totalrevenue=$1,924,000

Totalvariablecosts=$1,924,000–$1,172,060=$751,940Thereforetotalcosts=$211,360+$751,940=$963,300

BEPifproductssoldinorderofprofitability

Ifthemoreprofitableproductsaresoldfirst,thismeansthatthewillcoveritsfixedcostsmor

thebreakevenpointwillbereachedearlier,i.e.fewersaleswillneedtobemadeinordertobreakeven.So,thebreakevenpointwillbelower.

(a)DivisionF

Controllableprofit=$2,645k.

Totalassetslesstradepayables=$9,760k+$2,480k–$2,960k=$9,280k.ROI=28·5%.

DivisionN

Controllableprofit=$1,970k.

Totalassetslesstradepayables=$14,980k+$3,260k–$1,400k=$16,840k.ROI=11·7%.

Inbothcalculationscontrollableprofithasbeenusedtoreflectprofit,ratherthannetprofit.ThisisbecausethemanagersdonothaveanycontrolovertheHeadOfficecostsandresponsibilityaccountingdeemsthatmanagersshouldonlybeheldresponsibleforcostswhichtheycontrol.Thesameprincipleisbeingappliedinthechoiceofassetsfiguresbeingused.Thecurrentassetsandcurrentliabilitiesfigureshavebeentakenintoaccountinthecalculationbecauseofthefactthatthemanagershavefullcontroloverbothofthese.

Bonus

Bonustobepaidforeachpercentagepoint=$120,000x2%=$2,400.umbonus=$120,000x0·3=$36,000.

DivisionF:ROI=28·5%=18wholepercentagepointsaboveminimumROIof10%.18x$2,400=$43,200.

Thereforemanagerwillbepaidthe

DivisionN:ROI=11·7%=1wholeThereforebonus=$2,400.

Discussion

ThemanagerofDivisionNwillbepaidafarsm useofthelargeassetbaseonwhichtheROIfigurehasbeencalcu thetotalassetsof

DivisionF.Thisislargelyattributabletothefactthat ntduringtheyear.If

thisinvestmenthadnotbeenmade,netassetswouldha DivisionNwouldhavebeen19·62%.Thiswouldhaveledtothepaymentofa$2 rthanthe$2,400bonus.Consequently,DivisionN’smanagerisbeingpenalisedform einthebestinterestsofhisdivision.Itisverysurprisingthathediddecidetoinvest,giventh ouldreceivealowerbonusasaresult.Hehasactedtotallyinthebestinterestsofthe,ontheotherhand,hasbenefittedfromthefactthathehasmadenoinvestmenteventhoughitisbadlynee isanexampleofsub-optimaldecisionmaking.

DivisionF’stradepayablesfigureismuchhigherthanDivisionN’s.ThisysapartinreducingthenetassetsfigureonwhichtheROIhasbeenbased.DivisionF’stradepayablesar blethoseofDivisionN.Inpart,onewouldexpectthisbecausesalesareover50%higher(nopurchases However,itisclearthatitisalsobecauseoflowcashlevelsatDivisionF.Thefactthatthemanag beingrewardedforthis,eventhoughrelationshipswith optimaldecisionmaking.

Ifthecontrollableprofitmarginiscalculated,itis18·24%fo N.Therefore,ifcapitalemployedisignored,itcanbeseenthatDivisionNisperf vision’sperformancelookworsebecauseofitsinvestmentinassets.Divi motivatedbyhiscomparativelysmallbonusand,inthefuture,he sehisbonus.

Managersnotinvestinginnewequipmentandt ithindustrychangesandaffectitsoverallfuturecompetiti

Tosummarise,theuseofROIisleadingt ood

forthemanagersisnotgoodforthe

actingforthebenefitofthebuttheothermanagerisnot.Thefactthatonemanagerisreceivingamuchbiggerbonusthantheotheristotallyunfairhereandmayleadtointhelongrun.Thisisnotgoodfortheparticularlyiftherecomesatimewhenthedivisionsneedtoworktogether.

PAGE

17

FundamentalsLevel–SkillsModule,PaperF5

PerformanceManagement September/December2015MarkingScheme

1

(a)

Targetcosting

Eachstep

1

–––

3–––

(b)

Targetcosting

Benefits–perpoint

1

Difficulties–perpoint

1

–––

7

–––

Totalmarks

10

–––

2

(a)

Calculations

2–––

(b)

Accuracyofstatement

Firstpartuntrue,Expresshashigher%age

1

Correctrewhatcustomersv

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

最新文档

评论

0/150

提交评论