国际商法-全套课件(英文)_第1页
国际商法-全套课件(英文)_第2页
国际商法-全套课件(英文)_第3页
国际商法-全套课件(英文)_第4页
国际商法-全套课件(英文)_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩246页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

国际商法全套课件(英文)2024/4/22STANDARDSOFASSESSMENT

FORTHISCOURSEAttendance10%Homework10%Presentation30%Finalexam50%2024/4/231.1Whatislaw?Thelawiscomprisedofasetofrulescreatedoveraperiodoftimewhichattemptstoregulatethebehaviourofindividuals,businessesandsociety.

relevantconcepts:Law&commerciallaw&commerciallawinternationalChapteroneIntroductiontotheLegalSystemofWesternCountries2024/4/24ChapteroneIntroductiontotheLegalSystemofWesternCountriescommerciallaw:Meansbusinesslawwhichlaysdowntherights,dutiesandobligationsowedbythepersonsinbusiness.therearemanytypesofbusiness,primarilyasfollows:Salesofgoodsandservices;Agency;Employments;Mortgageofland;Insuranceofpropertyandetc.commerciallawinternational:Itlaysdowntherights,dutiesandobligationsowedbythepersonsinbusinesswithinternationalelements.2024/4/25ChapteroneIntroductionto

theLegalSystemofWesternCountrieswhydoweneedlaw???KEEPORDERPROTECTRIGHTSSETTLEDISPUTEPUNISHWRONGDOINGETC.2024/4/26ChapteroneIntroductionto

theLegalSystemofWesternCountries1.2Whatarethemajorsourcesoflaw?twomajorsources:Commonlaw(普通法)andstatuelaw(成文法)

1.3JusticeandthelawJustice(正义):ithasbeendescribedas‘aproductofthespirit’.Law(法律):itembodieswhatsocietybelievesisrightorfair.2024/4/27ChapteroneIntroductionto

theLegalSystemofWesternCountries1.4Whatisruleoflaw(法制的规则)?Ruleoflawinvolvesthreepropositions(主张)basedontheideathatlawshouldconformtoaminimumstandardoffairnessinbothcontentandprocedure:Nopersonmustbepunishedexceptforabreachofthelaw.Allpersonsareequalbeforethelawirrespectiveofstatueorposition.Therightsorfreedomsofcitizensareenforceableinthecourts.2024/4/28ChapteroneIntroductionto

theLegalSystemofWesternCountries1.4Whatisruleoflaw(法制的规则)?Legalrule/NonLegalruletobedistinguishedAlegalruleisalawthatmustbeobeyedbyallcitizens.Anon-legalruleisarulethatismadebyaspecificinstitutionandaffectsonlythoseinvolvedwiththatspecificinstitution.Eg.Schools,Sportingclubs2024/4/29ChapteroneIntroductionto

theLegalSystemofWesternCountries1.5Classificationoflaws?Theclassificationoflawscouldbegeneralizedasfollows:1.5.1civillawandcriminallaw(民法/刑法)1.5.2internationallawanddomesticlaw(国际法/国内法)1.5.3caselawandstatutelaw(判例法/成文法)1.5.4commonlawandequity(普通法/衡平法)2024/4/210CivilLaw

Involvestheregulationoftheactionsofindividualsintheirdealingswitheachother(EGsuccession继承,divorce)theaimistocompensatetheinjuredparty1.5.1CivilLawv.CriminalLaw2024/4/211CriminalLawInvolvestheenforcementbythestateoflawsdesignedtoprotecttheindividualandthecommunityTheaimofcriminallawistopunishthecrime1.5.1CivilLawv.CriminalLaw2024/4/212Internationallawregulatesconductsbetweennations.Therearetwomainsourcesofinternationallaw-Customaryrulesofinternationallaw-Treatiesandconventions(GATT,CISG)

Domesticlawregulatesrelationsorconductsbetweenindividuals&organizationswithinastate.1.5.2InternationalLawv.DomesticLaw2024/4/2131.5.3CaseLawvStatuteLawSourcesofLawParliamentStatuteLaw(Acts)TheCourtsCaseLaw(Precedent)2024/4/2141.5.4CommonlawvEquityLawCommonlaw

wasbasedoncustomandwasdeclaredbythecourtsfromcasetocase.Thelaweventuallybecamecommonknowledgetoall,thustheCOMMONLAW.OnemajorfeatureoftheCommonLawSystemisFOLLOWTHEPRECEDENT(遵循先例)Damages(损害赔偿):mainremedy(救济)ofCommonLaw2024/4/2151.5.4CommonlawvEquityLawlawofequity(equityorequitylaw)

Wherepeoplewereunabletoobtainaremedyfortheirgrievancesincommonlaw,theyturnedtotheKingforhelpsincetheKingwasregardedasthe“fountainofjustice”.King’schancelloronbehalfoftheKingadministeredthelawintheprincipleoffairnessandjusticeratherthancommonlaw,Consequentlylawofequityemerged.

2024/4/2161.5.4CommonlawvEquityLawlawofequityshouldnotbeviewedasacomprehensivesystemaswascommonlaw,itnever,forinstance,hadacriminaljurisdiction.Thelawofequitywasnotseenasarivalsystemtothecommonlawbutassupplementsitbyprovidingremediesthatthecommonlawcourtscouldnotprovide.2024/4/217ChapteroneIntroductionto

theLegalSystemofWesternCountries1.6SeparationofPowers

legislationbody(立法机关如:国会)-toenactormakethelaw

judiciarybody(司法机关如:法院/公安/检察机关)-tointerpret/applyandenforcethelawthroughcourtsystem

administrationexecutivebody

(行政机关如:政府)

-toformulatethepolicyandadministratethroughstategovernment

Thebasicnecessityofseparationofpowers:

-topreventmisuseandabuseofpowers-toraisetheworkingefficiencyofbranchesofpowers

2024/4/218-END-2024/4/219ReflectionandRevisionQuestions??????????????1.1ifyouwereaskedtoprovideadefinitionof“law”,howwouldyoudefineit?1.2wouldyouexplainthenon-legalrulesinwhichSIFTorourclassadopts?1.3explaintherelationshipbetweenjusticeandlaw2024/4/220ReflectionandRevisionTrueorfalse:1.Commonlawemphasisesrights,civillawemphasisesremedies.2.Internationaltreatiesandconventionsautomaticallybecomepartofdomesticlaw.3.Lawsmadebyparliamentsarecalledstatutelaw.4.Commonlawisacode-basedlegalsystem.2024/4/221ChaptertwoLegalSystems2.1TheroleofthepoliceandthecourtsRoleofpolice:-enforcesthelawcreatedbyotherauthority,thatis,topreventcrimes;toapprehendlaw-breakers;tosecuresafetyofthepublic.Roleofcourt:-administrationofthelaw2024/4/222ChaptertwoLegalSystems2.2Originalandappellatejurisdictionofacourt

(第一审和上诉审法院的管辖权)courtoffirstinstance(第一审法院):originaljurisdiction=authoritytohearthecasewhenthecaseisfirstbroughttoacourt

appealcourt(上诉法院):appellatejurisdiction=authoritytoheartheappealsfromdecisionsofcourtofalowerlevelinthesamecourtsystem.

2024/4/223ChaptertwoLegalSystems2.3

ThecourtsystemtakethecourtsystemofChinaforexampleThesupremecourt(最高法院)|thehighcourt(高级法院)|theintermediatecourt(中级法院)|thedistrictcourt(基层法院)

besides,thespecialcourtssuchas:railwaycourt(铁路法院),maritimecourt(海事法院)andetc.2024/4/224ChaptertwoLegalSystems2.4FeaturesofthecourthierarchyAcourthierarchyprovidesasystemofappealsfromlowertohighercourtsforaggrievedparties;Itallowsfordifferentformsofhearingaccordingtothegravityofthecase;Itisinstrumentalinbuildingupprecedent,afundamentalpartofcommonlawandequity.2024/4/225ChaptertwoLegalSystems2.5Thepersonnelincourta.inthecivilcase(民事案件)theplaintiff(原告)v.Thedefendant(被告)

b.inthecriminalcase(刑事案件)thepublicprocurator(公诉人)v.theaccused(嫌疑犯)

c.inthetrialonappeal(eitheracivilorcriminalcase)theappellant(上诉人)v.therespondent(被上诉人)

2024/4/226ChaptertwoLegalSystems2.6Legalprofession(律师)

2.6.1thesolicitor(文书律师):mostoftheirworkisofanon-litigiousnature,thatis,mostofitdoesnotinvolveappearingincourt.Itincludesconveyancing,thepreparationofwillsandotherdocuments,commercialandfamilylawmatters,andpreparationofcourtdocuments.2.6.2thebarrister(出庭律师):theirmainroleistopreparelegalopinionsandputtheseforwardincourt.

2024/4/227ChaptertwoLegalSystems2.7Judges

anofficialsappointedbythegovernment.themainfunctionsjudgesinclude:1.toensuretherulesofevidenceand procedureareadheredto;2.toensurethateachpartyisfairlytreatedaccordingtothelaw; 3.todecidequestionsoflaw;4.todischargethejuryifajuryhasbeenused. 5.toclarifypointsoflaw. 6.toreachaverdict. 7.todecideapenaltyorremedy.2024/4/228ChaptertwoLegalSystems2.8Thejurythejurior(陪审员)vjurypanelorjury(陪审团)2.8.1Juryinciviltrials(1)theuseisdecliningforitshighcosts;(2)theburdenofproofrestwiththeplaintiffevidencebasedonbalanceofprobability;(3)amajorityverdictisrequired.“balanceofprobability”-theevidencewillbeacceptableifitismorereasonablethantheevidencepresentedbytheotherparty.2024/4/229ChaptertwoLegalSystems2.8.2Juryincriminaltrials

“beyondreasonabledoubt”-theevidencewillnotbeacceptediftherestillleavesanyreasonabledoubtontheevidencepresented.Bycomparingthetwoevidencerules,itisobviousthatthestandardof“beyondreasonabledoubt”isstricterthan“balanceofprobability”2024/4/230-END-2024/4/231Chapterthreeprecedent/statuelaw3.1Judicialprecedent

(先例)3.1.1originaldevelopmentofthecommonlaw.

isbasedonprecedentPrecedent:

isjudge-madelawdevelopedthroughcourtshearingofdispute.itisalwaysreferredascaselaw.Theprecedentisacasecreatedtobindthelatercasesofsimilarfacts.2024/4/232Chapterthreeprecedent/statuelaw3.1.2Thedoctrineofprecedent

thedoctrineofprecedentprovidesthattheprecedentwillapplytolaternewcaseifthefactsofthenewcasearesufficientlysimilartothefactsoftheprecedent.

question:towhatextentshouldthefactsofanewcasesimilartothefactsoftheprecedent?

precedent:DonoghuevStevenson[1932]thecasetofollowtheprecedent:GrantvAustralianKnittingMillsLtd[1936]

2024/4/233DONOGHUEVSTEVENSON[1932]AC562FACTS:WhileMs.Donoghuewasinthecourseofdrinkingthecontentsofabottleofgingerbeer,shenoticedtheremainsofadecomposedsnail(腐烂的蜗牛).Asaresultshebecamesickandsufferedshock.Shedidnotsuetheshopbutmanufacturerofthegingerbeer,(Stevenson)arguingthathehadbeencarelessincreatinghisproductbyallowingasnailtobepartofitscontents.2024/4/234DONOGHUEVSTEVENSON[1932]-DECISIONDICISION:isinfavourofDonoghueindespiteofdefenceofprivityofcontract(合同关联性)

theplaintiffwasentitledtorecoverdamagesagainstthemanufacturerinnegligence“Allmanufacturersoweadutyofcaretoconsumers”(neighbourprinciple)2024/4/235GRANTVAUSTRALIANKNITTINGMILLS[1936]ACFACTS:Grant,adoctor,gotaskindiseaseasaresultofchemicalscontainedinwoollenunderwearhewaswearing.Grantsuedthemanufactureroftheunderwear.DECISION:InfavourofGrant.ThecourtappliedtheneighbourprincipleestablishedinDonoghuevStevensonie.Themanufacturerowedadutyofcaretoconsumers.2024/4/236COMPARE

THETWOCASES

PRECEDENTCASETOFOLLOWPLAINTIFF:Ms.DonoghueGrantadoctor,DAMAGE:sickshock.skindiseaseCAUSEOFACTION:torttortDEFENDANT:manufacturermanufacturerDECISION:Thecourthastofollowtheruleestablishedintheprecedent.Themanufacturerowedadutyofcaretocustomers2024/4/237Chapterthreeprecedent/statuelaw

thetypesofprecedents:A.bindingprecedent(具有约束力的先例)

B.persuasiveprecedent(参考性先例)

2024/4/238BINDINGPRECEDENTLowercourtsareboundbydecisionsmadebyhighercourtsinthesamehierarchywherethefactsaresimilar.2024/4/239PERSUASIVEPRECEDENTPersuasiveprecedentdoesnothavetobefollowedbutcanbeinfluentialinfuturecourtdecisions.Thesedecisionsarereferredtobycourtstohelpthemreachaconclusioninthecaseathand.

persuasiveprecedentsmayariseinthefollowingsituations:

Decisionsoflowercourts(referredtobyhighercourts)Decisionsreferredtobycourtsindifferenthierarchies(includingdecisionsfromothercountries)Courtsofequalstandinginthesamehierarchymayrefertoeachothersdecisions2024/4/240Chapterthreeprecedent/statuelaw3.2/3.3Whatisinvolvedinprecedentanditscommonterms?RatioDecidendi(判决理由“reasonfordeciding”)

-isbindingpartofprecedent.ObiterDictum(附带意见‘statementsmadealongtheway’ieopinions,observationsgeneralcomments)theseareonly‘persuasivenotbinding’,maybeinfluentialinthedeterminationofadecision2024/4/241Chapterthreeprecedent/statuelawhowtofindtheratiodecidendiTofindtheratioofaprecedentrequirescarefulanalysisofcourt'sjudgmentandthereisnoacceptedformulaforidentifyingtheratioofacase.However,thefollowingquestionmayprovideuswithratiodecidendi,thatis:whatarethemainreasonswherebytheissuesindispute

decidedinfavorofsuccessfulparty?

2024/4/242Chapterthreeprecedent/statuelaw3.4somejudicialtechniquesonceaprecedenthasbeenincludedinthelawreport,itcouldnotberemovedandchangedincontents,however,inthefollowingsituationsitcouldbeceasedtobelawanditsapplicationmaybemodifiedtoapplytoanewsituation.A.distinguishingB.reversing

C.overruling

D.disapproving2024/4/243HOWDOESCASELAWCHANGE?A.distinguishing(在审案与判例事实不符,拒绝适用判例)

therelevantfactsofprecedentarenotsimilartothenewcase,sothecourtrefusetoapplytheprecedent;2024/4/244HOWDOESCASELAWCHANGE?B.Reversing

(因下级法院适用先例错误而改判)ifadecisionisappealedtoahighercourtthehighercourtmaysetasidetheprincipleestablishedbythelowercourt,thusreversingitsamecase,onappeal,highercourtreachesadifferentdecisionfromthelowercourt2024/4/245EXAMPLEOFREVERSING

TanvJones(1997)VictorianCourtofAppealFACTS:TanislostandentersJones’spropertybymistakebutwithoutpermission.JonesshootsTaninthearm.TansuesJonesfordamagestocoverhismedicalexpenses.DECSION:InfavourofJones“nodutyofcareowedtotrespassers”2024/4/246EXAMPLEOFREVERSING

TanvJones(1998)FullHighCourtofAustraliaTanappealsthedecisionfromtheVictorianCourtofAppealOUTCOME:InfavourofTan.Previousdecisionisreversed-newprinciple“Apropertyownerowesacertaindutyofcaretoanyonewhoenterstheirproperties”2024/4/247HOWDOESCASELAWCHANGE?C.

Overruling(因下级法院所适用的先例不再符合事宜而改判并废弃该先例)highercourtdecidesthatprincipleoflawmadeinalowercourtiswrongandoverrulesthepreviousdecisionoverrulinginvolves2separatecases-appellatecourtinthelatercaseappliesadifferentlegalprincipleandtheearlierdecisionofthelowercourtisnolongerconsideredtobegoodlaw.2024/4/248EXAMPLEOFOVERRULINGRaftervPhillopousisTennisClub(1996)VictorianCourtofAppealFACTS:RaftersuesPhillopousis’sTennisClubduetoanaccidentwhichoccurredintheclubandcauseshimtosustaininjuriesDECISION:infavourofPhillopousis-“acustomerisresponsiblefortheirownactions”2024/4/249EXAMPLEOFOVERRULING

FACTS:WoodbridgevWoodfordeTennisRackets(1998)FullHighCourtWoodbridgesuesWoodfordeaftersustaininginjuriesduetoafallinWoodforde’sshopDECISION:InfavourofWoodbridge-thedecisionintheRaftervPhillopousiscaseisoverruledandanewprincipleisestablished“Abusinessownerowesadutyofcaretoanyonewhoenterstheirpremises”2024/4/250HOWDOESCASELAWCHANGE?D.Disapproving

(议会立法废弃不适宜的判例)

-acourtexpressesanunfavourableopinion(suggestingthattheearlierdecisionisnotgoodlaw)aboutaprinciplesetinanearliercasewithoutoverrulingit.2024/4/251rulesofstatutoryinterpretation3.9Commonlawrulesofstatutoryinterpretation-Theliteralorplainmeaningapproach(通常词意解释规则);-Thegoldenruleapproach(理性解释规则。指如果通常词意解释将导致荒唐、不公正、有违立法意图时,则应避免按通常词意解释,而忽略该词意或另寻新意);

Case:LeevKnapp[1967]-Themischiefapproach(立法解释规则。词意不清时应按立法意图解释)SeeSmithvHughes[1969]1WLR830-Nosciturasociis(词义按前后文相关解释规则);-ejusdemgeneris

(同类解释规则。对位于类举后面的概括词语应按前述同类解释)。2024/4/252rulesofstatutoryinterpretation

3.9.1Theliteralorplainmeaningapproach(通常词意解释规则);3.9.2Thegoldenruleapproach

(理性解释规则)Case:LeevKnapp[1967]RoadTrafficActrequireddriversofvehicleinvolvedto“stop”afteranaccident.thedefendantarguedthatthisrequirementwassatisfiedifadriverstoppedaftertheaccident.2024/4/253rulesofstatutoryinterpretation

-TheThegoldenruleapproach

Courtheld:literalapproachwouldbeabsurdas“stop”shouldbeconstruedtomeanthatthedrivershouldhavestoppedforsuchtimeasitisnecessarytospeaktoallrelevantpersonsandprovidethemwithnecessaryinformation.2024/4/254rulesofstatutoryinterpretation

-Themischiefapproach3.9.3Themischiefapproach(立法解释规则)lawsometimesneedtobeinterpretedforanumberofreasons:wordsofthestatutemaybevagueandunclearParliament’sintentionisnotclearParliamentisunabletoclarifyallfutureapplicationsThePurposeorMischiefApproach:-Thecourtinterpretsthewordsofthestatuteinthewayintendedbyparliament.See:SmithvHughes[1969]2024/4/255rulesofstatutoryinterpretation

-ThemischiefapproachSmithvHughes[1969]1WLR830“solicitingforprostitutioninthestreetwasprohibited“byTheStreetOffencesAct1959UK.

TheCourthadtoconsiderwhether“street”includedactivitiesofprostitutesonbalconiesandwindows?Courtbelievedthattheactwastryingtostopprostitutesfrombotheringpeopleinthestreet.Thereforetheprostituteswhotriedtoattractbusinessfromwindowsandbalconieswerecreatingthesameproblemasthoseactuallyonthestreet.2024/4/256rulesofstatutoryinterpretation

3.9.4Nosciturasociis(词义按前后文相关解释规则);

Seecase:PriorvSherwood(1906)3.9.5ejusdemgeneris(同类解释规则)whenageneralwordorphrasefollowsalistofspecificpersonsorthings,theywillbeinterpretedtoincludeonlypersonsorthingsofthesametypeaslisted.(example:nextslides)2024/4/257rulesofstatutoryinterpretation

3.9.5ejusdemgeneris(同类解释规则)exampleofruleejusdemgeneris:inthephrase:“horse,cattle,sheep,pigs,goatsoranyotherbarnyardanimals(圈养动物)”:Accordingtoruleofejusdemgeneris,thegeneralphrase“anyotherbarnyardanimals”wouldprobablybeheldtoinclude:

Onlyfour-legged,hoofedmammals

(四角四蹄兩皙动物)Thuswouldinclude:

donkey

2024/4/258Caseofconstruction

givewhatyouwanttoher

Jim,fatherofathreechildrenandfaithfulhusbandforover40years,diedoneday.Hislawyer,PeterJim’sbestfriendsincechildhood,informshiswidowthathewillbetheexecutorofthewillofoveramilliondollars’worthofJim’sproperty.InfrontofJim’sfamily,Peterreadsthewill,“Peter,ifyouarereadingthiswill,thenImusthavebeendead.Wehavebeensuchagoodfriendsforsolong,howcanIignoreyouinthiswill?Ontheotherhand,therearemybelovedwifeandmychildrentobelookedafter.Peter,Iknowyoucanmakesurethatmyfamilywillbetakencareofproperly,soPeter,givewhatyouwanttoherandtaketherestforyourself”.2024/4/259Peterthenlooksatthesupervisorsandtellsthemthat:”InaccordancewithJim’swillIwillgive50,000dollarstoJim’swifeandIwilltaketherest.”thefamilyisangry,“itisimpossible!40yearsofmarriageandthenthis?!Itcan’tbe”sothefamilysues.

Constructionofthewords2024/4/260Theirdayincourtarrives,andaftertestimonyfrombothsides,thejudgegiveshisjudgment:”ToPeterIawardyou50,000dollarsofthecontestedmoneytheremaindershallgotoSophieandherchildren.”needlesstosaythefamilyishappy,Peterisangry.“yourhonor,howcanyoudothis?ThewillmadeJim’swishquiteclear:TOGIVEWHATYOUWANTTOHERANDTAKETHERESTFORYOURSELF!Iwantthelion’sshare‘!Whatgives?”

Constructionofthewords2024/4/261Thejudgeanswerback:“Jimknewyouinhiswholelife,hewantedtogiveyousomethingingratitude,healsowantedtoseehisfamilybeingtakencareof.sohedrewuphiswillaccordingly.ButyoumisreadhisinstructionsYousee,Jimknewwhatkindofpersonyouaresowithhisfamily’sinterestinmind,hiswilldidnotmean:TOGIVETHESHARETHATYOUWANTTOGIVETOHERtoher,butmeant“togiveWHATYOUWANTtoherandtherestforyourself,WHATYOUWANTislion’ssharesothisshareshouldbelongtotheJim’sfamily.”

Constructionofthewords2024/4/262TOGIVEWHATYOUWANTTOHERANDTAKETHERESTFORYOURSELF可有两种解释:1把你想给她的那份给她;2把你想要的那份给她。

Constructionofthewords2024/4/263GetpreparedforthequestionsinReflectionandRevision-END-2024/4/264

INTRODUCTIONTOCONTRACTLAWAmIlumberedwithadodgycontract?2024/4/265Chapter6-Contractlaw-Introduction6.1DefinitionofContract(tbp187)

Anagreementmadebetweentwoormorepersons,withtheintentionofcreatingcertainlegalrightsandduties,whichisenforceableatlaw.2024/4/266

Chapter6-Contractlaw-Introduction

Contract(合同)&agreement(协议)tobedistinguished(tbp188)-strictlyspeaking,contractisacombinationofagreementsandothercompulsoryrequirementsbycontractlaw.

-noteveryagreementleadstoalegalcontract,butacontractmustcontainalegallyenforceableagreement.2024/4/267Chapter6-Contractlaw-Introduction

6.2

Elementsofanapparentsimplecontract(tbp189)typeofcontractcontractelementsTypeofcontractapparentsimplecontract(相当于合同的成立)(1)Intention(订约意图)(2)agreement(协议)(3)consideration(对价)Validsimplecontract(相当于合同的生效)(4)capacity(订约能力)(5)consent(意思表示真实)(6)legality(订约目的合法)(7)form(合同形式合法)2024/4/268Chapter6-Contractlaw-Introduction6.3ClassificationofContracts6.3.1formalcontractandsimplecontract

FormalContracts

(正式合同)Formalcontractsaredrawninaspecialwayandtheyoftenlackconsideration.(对价)whichisthemostoutstandingfeaturedifferentfromsimplecontract.e.g.-ContractsofjudicialRecord:settlementindivorceproceedings-ContractsunderSeal(签字腊封合同)

2024/4/269Chapter6-Contractlaw-IntroductionContractsUnderSeal-alsoknownasDeeds,

mustbecompletedinaparticularway(form)inordertobevalid,i.einwriting;signedbybothparties;Witnessed;Sealed.2024/4/270Chapter6-Contractlaw-Introduction

SimpleContracts(简式合同)

Notrequiredtobeinanyparticularformbutarerequiredtohaveconsideration(对价).simplecontractcouldbemadeeitherexpresslyorimpliedly,orallyorwritingform.

Therearestatuteswhichrequiresomesimplecontractstobeinwriting,eg.contractofrealestatesorevidencedinwritingeg.billoflading(提单).2024/4/271Chapter6-Contractlaw-Introduction

6.3.2Avoidablecontract/Unenforceablecontract/Voidcontract/Illegalcontract

Avoidablecontract(可撤销合同):-remainsvaliduntilrepudiatedbyplaintiff

Unenforceablecontract(不可强制执行的合同):

-validonitsfacebutnolegalactioncanbebroughtonit.eg.Contractneedstobeevidencedinwriting,butnoevidencecouldbepresented.

2024/4/272Chapter6-Contractlaw-Introduction

Voidcontract(无效合同):-nolegalrightsandduties.-VoidcontractisofcivilnaturerelatingtoextremeunfairnessIllegalcontract(非法合同):-itcontravenesastatuteandthentreatedasbeingvoidsotherearenolegalrightsandduties.-Illegalcontractisofcriminalnaturesuchasrobbingabankwithafriend.2024/4/273Chapter6-Contractlaw-Introduction6.3.3ExpressContractandImpliedContractExpressContract(明示合同)

Termsofthecontractexpresslyagreeduponinwriting,orallyorcombinationofboth.

ImpliedContract(默示合同)

contractreachedthroughactsorconductsofbothparties,notthroughwritingorwords.2024/4/274

essentialelementsofavalidcontract

Intentiontocreatelegalrelations.(订约意图)OfferandAcceptance-anagreement.(协议)Consideration.(合同须有对价)Capacityoftheparties.(合同当事人须有订约能力)GenuineconsentbythepartiesorCertaintyofterms.(当事人订约意图真实或合同条款真实)Legalityofobject(purpose).(合同标的或目的合法)Inordertocreateavalidsimplecontract,certainessentialelementsmustbepresent:2024/4/275

Contractlaw-Intention(step1)2024/4/276intentionofthepartiestocreatelegalrelations

Thepartiesmusthaveintendedtoenterintoa legallybindingagreement.2typesofagreements - Family/domesticorsocialagreements. - Businessorcommercialagreements.2024/4/277Chapt

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论