版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
国际商法全套课件(英文)2024/4/22STANDARDSOFASSESSMENT
FORTHISCOURSEAttendance10%Homework10%Presentation30%Finalexam50%2024/4/231.1Whatislaw?Thelawiscomprisedofasetofrulescreatedoveraperiodoftimewhichattemptstoregulatethebehaviourofindividuals,businessesandsociety.
relevantconcepts:Law&commerciallaw&commerciallawinternationalChapteroneIntroductiontotheLegalSystemofWesternCountries2024/4/24ChapteroneIntroductiontotheLegalSystemofWesternCountriescommerciallaw:Meansbusinesslawwhichlaysdowntherights,dutiesandobligationsowedbythepersonsinbusiness.therearemanytypesofbusiness,primarilyasfollows:Salesofgoodsandservices;Agency;Employments;Mortgageofland;Insuranceofpropertyandetc.commerciallawinternational:Itlaysdowntherights,dutiesandobligationsowedbythepersonsinbusinesswithinternationalelements.2024/4/25ChapteroneIntroductionto
theLegalSystemofWesternCountrieswhydoweneedlaw???KEEPORDERPROTECTRIGHTSSETTLEDISPUTEPUNISHWRONGDOINGETC.2024/4/26ChapteroneIntroductionto
theLegalSystemofWesternCountries1.2Whatarethemajorsourcesoflaw?twomajorsources:Commonlaw(普通法)andstatuelaw(成文法)
1.3JusticeandthelawJustice(正义):ithasbeendescribedas‘aproductofthespirit’.Law(法律):itembodieswhatsocietybelievesisrightorfair.2024/4/27ChapteroneIntroductionto
theLegalSystemofWesternCountries1.4Whatisruleoflaw(法制的规则)?Ruleoflawinvolvesthreepropositions(主张)basedontheideathatlawshouldconformtoaminimumstandardoffairnessinbothcontentandprocedure:Nopersonmustbepunishedexceptforabreachofthelaw.Allpersonsareequalbeforethelawirrespectiveofstatueorposition.Therightsorfreedomsofcitizensareenforceableinthecourts.2024/4/28ChapteroneIntroductionto
theLegalSystemofWesternCountries1.4Whatisruleoflaw(法制的规则)?Legalrule/NonLegalruletobedistinguishedAlegalruleisalawthatmustbeobeyedbyallcitizens.Anon-legalruleisarulethatismadebyaspecificinstitutionandaffectsonlythoseinvolvedwiththatspecificinstitution.Eg.Schools,Sportingclubs2024/4/29ChapteroneIntroductionto
theLegalSystemofWesternCountries1.5Classificationoflaws?Theclassificationoflawscouldbegeneralizedasfollows:1.5.1civillawandcriminallaw(民法/刑法)1.5.2internationallawanddomesticlaw(国际法/国内法)1.5.3caselawandstatutelaw(判例法/成文法)1.5.4commonlawandequity(普通法/衡平法)2024/4/210CivilLaw
Involvestheregulationoftheactionsofindividualsintheirdealingswitheachother(EGsuccession继承,divorce)theaimistocompensatetheinjuredparty1.5.1CivilLawv.CriminalLaw2024/4/211CriminalLawInvolvestheenforcementbythestateoflawsdesignedtoprotecttheindividualandthecommunityTheaimofcriminallawistopunishthecrime1.5.1CivilLawv.CriminalLaw2024/4/212Internationallawregulatesconductsbetweennations.Therearetwomainsourcesofinternationallaw-Customaryrulesofinternationallaw-Treatiesandconventions(GATT,CISG)
Domesticlawregulatesrelationsorconductsbetweenindividuals&organizationswithinastate.1.5.2InternationalLawv.DomesticLaw2024/4/2131.5.3CaseLawvStatuteLawSourcesofLawParliamentStatuteLaw(Acts)TheCourtsCaseLaw(Precedent)2024/4/2141.5.4CommonlawvEquityLawCommonlaw
wasbasedoncustomandwasdeclaredbythecourtsfromcasetocase.Thelaweventuallybecamecommonknowledgetoall,thustheCOMMONLAW.OnemajorfeatureoftheCommonLawSystemisFOLLOWTHEPRECEDENT(遵循先例)Damages(损害赔偿):mainremedy(救济)ofCommonLaw2024/4/2151.5.4CommonlawvEquityLawlawofequity(equityorequitylaw)
Wherepeoplewereunabletoobtainaremedyfortheirgrievancesincommonlaw,theyturnedtotheKingforhelpsincetheKingwasregardedasthe“fountainofjustice”.King’schancelloronbehalfoftheKingadministeredthelawintheprincipleoffairnessandjusticeratherthancommonlaw,Consequentlylawofequityemerged.
2024/4/2161.5.4CommonlawvEquityLawlawofequityshouldnotbeviewedasacomprehensivesystemaswascommonlaw,itnever,forinstance,hadacriminaljurisdiction.Thelawofequitywasnotseenasarivalsystemtothecommonlawbutassupplementsitbyprovidingremediesthatthecommonlawcourtscouldnotprovide.2024/4/217ChapteroneIntroductionto
theLegalSystemofWesternCountries1.6SeparationofPowers
legislationbody(立法机关如:国会)-toenactormakethelaw
judiciarybody(司法机关如:法院/公安/检察机关)-tointerpret/applyandenforcethelawthroughcourtsystem
administrationexecutivebody
(行政机关如:政府)
-toformulatethepolicyandadministratethroughstategovernment
Thebasicnecessityofseparationofpowers:
-topreventmisuseandabuseofpowers-toraisetheworkingefficiencyofbranchesofpowers
2024/4/218-END-2024/4/219ReflectionandRevisionQuestions??????????????1.1ifyouwereaskedtoprovideadefinitionof“law”,howwouldyoudefineit?1.2wouldyouexplainthenon-legalrulesinwhichSIFTorourclassadopts?1.3explaintherelationshipbetweenjusticeandlaw2024/4/220ReflectionandRevisionTrueorfalse:1.Commonlawemphasisesrights,civillawemphasisesremedies.2.Internationaltreatiesandconventionsautomaticallybecomepartofdomesticlaw.3.Lawsmadebyparliamentsarecalledstatutelaw.4.Commonlawisacode-basedlegalsystem.2024/4/221ChaptertwoLegalSystems2.1TheroleofthepoliceandthecourtsRoleofpolice:-enforcesthelawcreatedbyotherauthority,thatis,topreventcrimes;toapprehendlaw-breakers;tosecuresafetyofthepublic.Roleofcourt:-administrationofthelaw2024/4/222ChaptertwoLegalSystems2.2Originalandappellatejurisdictionofacourt
(第一审和上诉审法院的管辖权)courtoffirstinstance(第一审法院):originaljurisdiction=authoritytohearthecasewhenthecaseisfirstbroughttoacourt
appealcourt(上诉法院):appellatejurisdiction=authoritytoheartheappealsfromdecisionsofcourtofalowerlevelinthesamecourtsystem.
2024/4/223ChaptertwoLegalSystems2.3
ThecourtsystemtakethecourtsystemofChinaforexampleThesupremecourt(最高法院)|thehighcourt(高级法院)|theintermediatecourt(中级法院)|thedistrictcourt(基层法院)
besides,thespecialcourtssuchas:railwaycourt(铁路法院),maritimecourt(海事法院)andetc.2024/4/224ChaptertwoLegalSystems2.4FeaturesofthecourthierarchyAcourthierarchyprovidesasystemofappealsfromlowertohighercourtsforaggrievedparties;Itallowsfordifferentformsofhearingaccordingtothegravityofthecase;Itisinstrumentalinbuildingupprecedent,afundamentalpartofcommonlawandequity.2024/4/225ChaptertwoLegalSystems2.5Thepersonnelincourta.inthecivilcase(民事案件)theplaintiff(原告)v.Thedefendant(被告)
b.inthecriminalcase(刑事案件)thepublicprocurator(公诉人)v.theaccused(嫌疑犯)
c.inthetrialonappeal(eitheracivilorcriminalcase)theappellant(上诉人)v.therespondent(被上诉人)
2024/4/226ChaptertwoLegalSystems2.6Legalprofession(律师)
2.6.1thesolicitor(文书律师):mostoftheirworkisofanon-litigiousnature,thatis,mostofitdoesnotinvolveappearingincourt.Itincludesconveyancing,thepreparationofwillsandotherdocuments,commercialandfamilylawmatters,andpreparationofcourtdocuments.2.6.2thebarrister(出庭律师):theirmainroleistopreparelegalopinionsandputtheseforwardincourt.
2024/4/227ChaptertwoLegalSystems2.7Judges
anofficialsappointedbythegovernment.themainfunctionsjudgesinclude:1.toensuretherulesofevidenceand procedureareadheredto;2.toensurethateachpartyisfairlytreatedaccordingtothelaw; 3.todecidequestionsoflaw;4.todischargethejuryifajuryhasbeenused. 5.toclarifypointsoflaw. 6.toreachaverdict. 7.todecideapenaltyorremedy.2024/4/228ChaptertwoLegalSystems2.8Thejurythejurior(陪审员)vjurypanelorjury(陪审团)2.8.1Juryinciviltrials(1)theuseisdecliningforitshighcosts;(2)theburdenofproofrestwiththeplaintiffevidencebasedonbalanceofprobability;(3)amajorityverdictisrequired.“balanceofprobability”-theevidencewillbeacceptableifitismorereasonablethantheevidencepresentedbytheotherparty.2024/4/229ChaptertwoLegalSystems2.8.2Juryincriminaltrials
“beyondreasonabledoubt”-theevidencewillnotbeacceptediftherestillleavesanyreasonabledoubtontheevidencepresented.Bycomparingthetwoevidencerules,itisobviousthatthestandardof“beyondreasonabledoubt”isstricterthan“balanceofprobability”2024/4/230-END-2024/4/231Chapterthreeprecedent/statuelaw3.1Judicialprecedent
(先例)3.1.1originaldevelopmentofthecommonlaw.
isbasedonprecedentPrecedent:
isjudge-madelawdevelopedthroughcourtshearingofdispute.itisalwaysreferredascaselaw.Theprecedentisacasecreatedtobindthelatercasesofsimilarfacts.2024/4/232Chapterthreeprecedent/statuelaw3.1.2Thedoctrineofprecedent
thedoctrineofprecedentprovidesthattheprecedentwillapplytolaternewcaseifthefactsofthenewcasearesufficientlysimilartothefactsoftheprecedent.
question:towhatextentshouldthefactsofanewcasesimilartothefactsoftheprecedent?
precedent:DonoghuevStevenson[1932]thecasetofollowtheprecedent:GrantvAustralianKnittingMillsLtd[1936]
2024/4/233DONOGHUEVSTEVENSON[1932]AC562FACTS:WhileMs.Donoghuewasinthecourseofdrinkingthecontentsofabottleofgingerbeer,shenoticedtheremainsofadecomposedsnail(腐烂的蜗牛).Asaresultshebecamesickandsufferedshock.Shedidnotsuetheshopbutmanufacturerofthegingerbeer,(Stevenson)arguingthathehadbeencarelessincreatinghisproductbyallowingasnailtobepartofitscontents.2024/4/234DONOGHUEVSTEVENSON[1932]-DECISIONDICISION:isinfavourofDonoghueindespiteofdefenceofprivityofcontract(合同关联性)
theplaintiffwasentitledtorecoverdamagesagainstthemanufacturerinnegligence“Allmanufacturersoweadutyofcaretoconsumers”(neighbourprinciple)2024/4/235GRANTVAUSTRALIANKNITTINGMILLS[1936]ACFACTS:Grant,adoctor,gotaskindiseaseasaresultofchemicalscontainedinwoollenunderwearhewaswearing.Grantsuedthemanufactureroftheunderwear.DECISION:InfavourofGrant.ThecourtappliedtheneighbourprincipleestablishedinDonoghuevStevensonie.Themanufacturerowedadutyofcaretoconsumers.2024/4/236COMPARE
THETWOCASES
PRECEDENTCASETOFOLLOWPLAINTIFF:Ms.DonoghueGrantadoctor,DAMAGE:sickshock.skindiseaseCAUSEOFACTION:torttortDEFENDANT:manufacturermanufacturerDECISION:Thecourthastofollowtheruleestablishedintheprecedent.Themanufacturerowedadutyofcaretocustomers2024/4/237Chapterthreeprecedent/statuelaw
thetypesofprecedents:A.bindingprecedent(具有约束力的先例)
B.persuasiveprecedent(参考性先例)
2024/4/238BINDINGPRECEDENTLowercourtsareboundbydecisionsmadebyhighercourtsinthesamehierarchywherethefactsaresimilar.2024/4/239PERSUASIVEPRECEDENTPersuasiveprecedentdoesnothavetobefollowedbutcanbeinfluentialinfuturecourtdecisions.Thesedecisionsarereferredtobycourtstohelpthemreachaconclusioninthecaseathand.
persuasiveprecedentsmayariseinthefollowingsituations:
Decisionsoflowercourts(referredtobyhighercourts)Decisionsreferredtobycourtsindifferenthierarchies(includingdecisionsfromothercountries)Courtsofequalstandinginthesamehierarchymayrefertoeachothersdecisions2024/4/240Chapterthreeprecedent/statuelaw3.2/3.3Whatisinvolvedinprecedentanditscommonterms?RatioDecidendi(判决理由“reasonfordeciding”)
-isbindingpartofprecedent.ObiterDictum(附带意见‘statementsmadealongtheway’ieopinions,observationsgeneralcomments)theseareonly‘persuasivenotbinding’,maybeinfluentialinthedeterminationofadecision2024/4/241Chapterthreeprecedent/statuelawhowtofindtheratiodecidendiTofindtheratioofaprecedentrequirescarefulanalysisofcourt'sjudgmentandthereisnoacceptedformulaforidentifyingtheratioofacase.However,thefollowingquestionmayprovideuswithratiodecidendi,thatis:whatarethemainreasonswherebytheissuesindispute
decidedinfavorofsuccessfulparty?
2024/4/242Chapterthreeprecedent/statuelaw3.4somejudicialtechniquesonceaprecedenthasbeenincludedinthelawreport,itcouldnotberemovedandchangedincontents,however,inthefollowingsituationsitcouldbeceasedtobelawanditsapplicationmaybemodifiedtoapplytoanewsituation.A.distinguishingB.reversing
C.overruling
D.disapproving2024/4/243HOWDOESCASELAWCHANGE?A.distinguishing(在审案与判例事实不符,拒绝适用判例)
therelevantfactsofprecedentarenotsimilartothenewcase,sothecourtrefusetoapplytheprecedent;2024/4/244HOWDOESCASELAWCHANGE?B.Reversing
(因下级法院适用先例错误而改判)ifadecisionisappealedtoahighercourtthehighercourtmaysetasidetheprincipleestablishedbythelowercourt,thusreversingitsamecase,onappeal,highercourtreachesadifferentdecisionfromthelowercourt2024/4/245EXAMPLEOFREVERSING
TanvJones(1997)VictorianCourtofAppealFACTS:TanislostandentersJones’spropertybymistakebutwithoutpermission.JonesshootsTaninthearm.TansuesJonesfordamagestocoverhismedicalexpenses.DECSION:InfavourofJones“nodutyofcareowedtotrespassers”2024/4/246EXAMPLEOFREVERSING
TanvJones(1998)FullHighCourtofAustraliaTanappealsthedecisionfromtheVictorianCourtofAppealOUTCOME:InfavourofTan.Previousdecisionisreversed-newprinciple“Apropertyownerowesacertaindutyofcaretoanyonewhoenterstheirproperties”2024/4/247HOWDOESCASELAWCHANGE?C.
Overruling(因下级法院所适用的先例不再符合事宜而改判并废弃该先例)highercourtdecidesthatprincipleoflawmadeinalowercourtiswrongandoverrulesthepreviousdecisionoverrulinginvolves2separatecases-appellatecourtinthelatercaseappliesadifferentlegalprincipleandtheearlierdecisionofthelowercourtisnolongerconsideredtobegoodlaw.2024/4/248EXAMPLEOFOVERRULINGRaftervPhillopousisTennisClub(1996)VictorianCourtofAppealFACTS:RaftersuesPhillopousis’sTennisClubduetoanaccidentwhichoccurredintheclubandcauseshimtosustaininjuriesDECISION:infavourofPhillopousis-“acustomerisresponsiblefortheirownactions”2024/4/249EXAMPLEOFOVERRULING
FACTS:WoodbridgevWoodfordeTennisRackets(1998)FullHighCourtWoodbridgesuesWoodfordeaftersustaininginjuriesduetoafallinWoodforde’sshopDECISION:InfavourofWoodbridge-thedecisionintheRaftervPhillopousiscaseisoverruledandanewprincipleisestablished“Abusinessownerowesadutyofcaretoanyonewhoenterstheirpremises”2024/4/250HOWDOESCASELAWCHANGE?D.Disapproving
(议会立法废弃不适宜的判例)
-acourtexpressesanunfavourableopinion(suggestingthattheearlierdecisionisnotgoodlaw)aboutaprinciplesetinanearliercasewithoutoverrulingit.2024/4/251rulesofstatutoryinterpretation3.9Commonlawrulesofstatutoryinterpretation-Theliteralorplainmeaningapproach(通常词意解释规则);-Thegoldenruleapproach(理性解释规则。指如果通常词意解释将导致荒唐、不公正、有违立法意图时,则应避免按通常词意解释,而忽略该词意或另寻新意);
Case:LeevKnapp[1967]-Themischiefapproach(立法解释规则。词意不清时应按立法意图解释)SeeSmithvHughes[1969]1WLR830-Nosciturasociis(词义按前后文相关解释规则);-ejusdemgeneris
(同类解释规则。对位于类举后面的概括词语应按前述同类解释)。2024/4/252rulesofstatutoryinterpretation
3.9.1Theliteralorplainmeaningapproach(通常词意解释规则);3.9.2Thegoldenruleapproach
(理性解释规则)Case:LeevKnapp[1967]RoadTrafficActrequireddriversofvehicleinvolvedto“stop”afteranaccident.thedefendantarguedthatthisrequirementwassatisfiedifadriverstoppedaftertheaccident.2024/4/253rulesofstatutoryinterpretation
-TheThegoldenruleapproach
Courtheld:literalapproachwouldbeabsurdas“stop”shouldbeconstruedtomeanthatthedrivershouldhavestoppedforsuchtimeasitisnecessarytospeaktoallrelevantpersonsandprovidethemwithnecessaryinformation.2024/4/254rulesofstatutoryinterpretation
-Themischiefapproach3.9.3Themischiefapproach(立法解释规则)lawsometimesneedtobeinterpretedforanumberofreasons:wordsofthestatutemaybevagueandunclearParliament’sintentionisnotclearParliamentisunabletoclarifyallfutureapplicationsThePurposeorMischiefApproach:-Thecourtinterpretsthewordsofthestatuteinthewayintendedbyparliament.See:SmithvHughes[1969]2024/4/255rulesofstatutoryinterpretation
-ThemischiefapproachSmithvHughes[1969]1WLR830“solicitingforprostitutioninthestreetwasprohibited“byTheStreetOffencesAct1959UK.
TheCourthadtoconsiderwhether“street”includedactivitiesofprostitutesonbalconiesandwindows?Courtbelievedthattheactwastryingtostopprostitutesfrombotheringpeopleinthestreet.Thereforetheprostituteswhotriedtoattractbusinessfromwindowsandbalconieswerecreatingthesameproblemasthoseactuallyonthestreet.2024/4/256rulesofstatutoryinterpretation
3.9.4Nosciturasociis(词义按前后文相关解释规则);
Seecase:PriorvSherwood(1906)3.9.5ejusdemgeneris(同类解释规则)whenageneralwordorphrasefollowsalistofspecificpersonsorthings,theywillbeinterpretedtoincludeonlypersonsorthingsofthesametypeaslisted.(example:nextslides)2024/4/257rulesofstatutoryinterpretation
3.9.5ejusdemgeneris(同类解释规则)exampleofruleejusdemgeneris:inthephrase:“horse,cattle,sheep,pigs,goatsoranyotherbarnyardanimals(圈养动物)”:Accordingtoruleofejusdemgeneris,thegeneralphrase“anyotherbarnyardanimals”wouldprobablybeheldtoinclude:
Onlyfour-legged,hoofedmammals
(四角四蹄兩皙动物)Thuswouldinclude:
donkey
2024/4/258Caseofconstruction
givewhatyouwanttoher
Jim,fatherofathreechildrenandfaithfulhusbandforover40years,diedoneday.Hislawyer,PeterJim’sbestfriendsincechildhood,informshiswidowthathewillbetheexecutorofthewillofoveramilliondollars’worthofJim’sproperty.InfrontofJim’sfamily,Peterreadsthewill,“Peter,ifyouarereadingthiswill,thenImusthavebeendead.Wehavebeensuchagoodfriendsforsolong,howcanIignoreyouinthiswill?Ontheotherhand,therearemybelovedwifeandmychildrentobelookedafter.Peter,Iknowyoucanmakesurethatmyfamilywillbetakencareofproperly,soPeter,givewhatyouwanttoherandtaketherestforyourself”.2024/4/259Peterthenlooksatthesupervisorsandtellsthemthat:”InaccordancewithJim’swillIwillgive50,000dollarstoJim’swifeandIwilltaketherest.”thefamilyisangry,“itisimpossible!40yearsofmarriageandthenthis?!Itcan’tbe”sothefamilysues.
Constructionofthewords2024/4/260Theirdayincourtarrives,andaftertestimonyfrombothsides,thejudgegiveshisjudgment:”ToPeterIawardyou50,000dollarsofthecontestedmoneytheremaindershallgotoSophieandherchildren.”needlesstosaythefamilyishappy,Peterisangry.“yourhonor,howcanyoudothis?ThewillmadeJim’swishquiteclear:TOGIVEWHATYOUWANTTOHERANDTAKETHERESTFORYOURSELF!Iwantthelion’sshare‘!Whatgives?”
Constructionofthewords2024/4/261Thejudgeanswerback:“Jimknewyouinhiswholelife,hewantedtogiveyousomethingingratitude,healsowantedtoseehisfamilybeingtakencareof.sohedrewuphiswillaccordingly.ButyoumisreadhisinstructionsYousee,Jimknewwhatkindofpersonyouaresowithhisfamily’sinterestinmind,hiswilldidnotmean:TOGIVETHESHARETHATYOUWANTTOGIVETOHERtoher,butmeant“togiveWHATYOUWANTtoherandtherestforyourself,WHATYOUWANTislion’ssharesothisshareshouldbelongtotheJim’sfamily.”
Constructionofthewords2024/4/262TOGIVEWHATYOUWANTTOHERANDTAKETHERESTFORYOURSELF可有两种解释:1把你想给她的那份给她;2把你想要的那份给她。
Constructionofthewords2024/4/263GetpreparedforthequestionsinReflectionandRevision-END-2024/4/264
INTRODUCTIONTOCONTRACTLAWAmIlumberedwithadodgycontract?2024/4/265Chapter6-Contractlaw-Introduction6.1DefinitionofContract(tbp187)
Anagreementmadebetweentwoormorepersons,withtheintentionofcreatingcertainlegalrightsandduties,whichisenforceableatlaw.2024/4/266
Chapter6-Contractlaw-Introduction
Contract(合同)&agreement(协议)tobedistinguished(tbp188)-strictlyspeaking,contractisacombinationofagreementsandothercompulsoryrequirementsbycontractlaw.
-noteveryagreementleadstoalegalcontract,butacontractmustcontainalegallyenforceableagreement.2024/4/267Chapter6-Contractlaw-Introduction
6.2
Elementsofanapparentsimplecontract(tbp189)typeofcontractcontractelementsTypeofcontractapparentsimplecontract(相当于合同的成立)(1)Intention(订约意图)(2)agreement(协议)(3)consideration(对价)Validsimplecontract(相当于合同的生效)(4)capacity(订约能力)(5)consent(意思表示真实)(6)legality(订约目的合法)(7)form(合同形式合法)2024/4/268Chapter6-Contractlaw-Introduction6.3ClassificationofContracts6.3.1formalcontractandsimplecontract
FormalContracts
(正式合同)Formalcontractsaredrawninaspecialwayandtheyoftenlackconsideration.(对价)whichisthemostoutstandingfeaturedifferentfromsimplecontract.e.g.-ContractsofjudicialRecord:settlementindivorceproceedings-ContractsunderSeal(签字腊封合同)
2024/4/269Chapter6-Contractlaw-IntroductionContractsUnderSeal-alsoknownasDeeds,
mustbecompletedinaparticularway(form)inordertobevalid,i.einwriting;signedbybothparties;Witnessed;Sealed.2024/4/270Chapter6-Contractlaw-Introduction
SimpleContracts(简式合同)
Notrequiredtobeinanyparticularformbutarerequiredtohaveconsideration(对价).simplecontractcouldbemadeeitherexpresslyorimpliedly,orallyorwritingform.
Therearestatuteswhichrequiresomesimplecontractstobeinwriting,eg.contractofrealestatesorevidencedinwritingeg.billoflading(提单).2024/4/271Chapter6-Contractlaw-Introduction
6.3.2Avoidablecontract/Unenforceablecontract/Voidcontract/Illegalcontract
Avoidablecontract(可撤销合同):-remainsvaliduntilrepudiatedbyplaintiff
Unenforceablecontract(不可强制执行的合同):
-validonitsfacebutnolegalactioncanbebroughtonit.eg.Contractneedstobeevidencedinwriting,butnoevidencecouldbepresented.
2024/4/272Chapter6-Contractlaw-Introduction
Voidcontract(无效合同):-nolegalrightsandduties.-VoidcontractisofcivilnaturerelatingtoextremeunfairnessIllegalcontract(非法合同):-itcontravenesastatuteandthentreatedasbeingvoidsotherearenolegalrightsandduties.-Illegalcontractisofcriminalnaturesuchasrobbingabankwithafriend.2024/4/273Chapter6-Contractlaw-Introduction6.3.3ExpressContractandImpliedContractExpressContract(明示合同)
Termsofthecontractexpresslyagreeduponinwriting,orallyorcombinationofboth.
ImpliedContract(默示合同)
contractreachedthroughactsorconductsofbothparties,notthroughwritingorwords.2024/4/274
essentialelementsofavalidcontract
Intentiontocreatelegalrelations.(订约意图)OfferandAcceptance-anagreement.(协议)Consideration.(合同须有对价)Capacityoftheparties.(合同当事人须有订约能力)GenuineconsentbythepartiesorCertaintyofterms.(当事人订约意图真实或合同条款真实)Legalityofobject(purpose).(合同标的或目的合法)Inordertocreateavalidsimplecontract,certainessentialelementsmustbepresent:2024/4/275
Contractlaw-Intention(step1)2024/4/276intentionofthepartiestocreatelegalrelations
Thepartiesmusthaveintendedtoenterintoa legallybindingagreement.2typesofagreements - Family/domesticorsocialagreements. - Businessorcommercialagreements.2024/4/277Chapt
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 果园技术苹果病虫害防治方案
- 财务预算与投资回报分析
- 中医解析糖尿病:病因与症状
- 儿童防疫:传染病及其预防知识
- 旅游区绿化改造施工合同
- 写字楼物业前期规划与筹备
- 婚庆行业:转型中开新局面
- 丹参注射液在糖尿病治疗中的应用探讨
- 公司合并协议范本
- 业主收楼承诺书互联网企业
- 纳斯达克融资上市简介课件
- 个人住房公积金提取申请表
- STEAM教育在初中生物教学中的运用
- 2022年国防知识竞赛中学生部分答案
- 循证护理课件
- DB33T 1235-2021 城镇生活垃圾分类管理信息系统技术标准
- 高速公路改扩建经验交流会总结报告(11页)
- 新《安全生产法》全面解读“三管三必须”完整ppt
- Q∕GDW 11514-2021 变电站智能机器人巡检系统检测规范
- 广州万菱汇案列研究
- GB∕T29069-2012无损检测工业计算机层析成像(CT)系统性能测试方法.pdf
评论
0/150
提交评论