2024年广西职业院校技能大赛高职组《英语口语》赛项赛题(Debate)_第1页
2024年广西职业院校技能大赛高职组《英语口语》赛项赛题(Debate)_第2页
2024年广西职业院校技能大赛高职组《英语口语》赛项赛题(Debate)_第3页
2024年广西职业院校技能大赛高职组《英语口语》赛项赛题(Debate)_第4页
2024年广西职业院校技能大赛高职组《英语口语》赛项赛题(Debate)_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩4页未读 继续免费阅读

付费下载

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

2024年广西职业院校技能大赛

高职组《英语口语》赛项

赛题

职场辩论(Debate)

每队参赛选手自行分配一辩、二辩角色,根据抽签结果与另

一队就一道辩题进行现场辩论。先由正方一辩陈述1分钟,然后

由反方一辩陈述1分钟;接下来由正反双方进行3分钟的自由辩

论,最后先由反方二辩作1分钟总结陈词,再由正方二辩作1分

钟总结陈词。

本环节现场备赛10分钟,比赛时长7分钟,分值10分。

No.1

Background:SomeprimaryschoolsinHangzhou,Zhejiang

Province,askedstudents’parentstocleanthe

classroomsfortheirchildrenbeforethenewsemester

starts.Someparents,whoweretoobusytodothe

cleaning,chosetohirepeopletodothisjob.

Motion:Doyouthinkitisreasonablethattheseschools

askparentstocleanclassroomsfortheirchildren?

Pro:Ithinkitisreasonablethattheseschoolsask

parentstocleanclassroomsfortheirchildren.

1

Con:Idon’tthinkitisreasonablethattheseschools

askparentstocleanclassroomsfortheirchildren.

No.2

Background:Havingadreamtopursueisalwaysadmirable

andthusshouldbeencouraged.However,whenthedream

becomesapipedream,somethingmustbedonetoprevent

unnecessarywasteandharm.

Motion:whenourfriendschaseanunrealisticdream,

shouldwediscouragethemornot?

Pro:Yes,weshoulddiscouragefriendsfrompursuing

unrealisticdreams.

Con:No,weshouldn’tdiscouragefriendsfrompursuing

unrealisticdreams.

No.3

Background:Sincetheimplementationofthetwo-child

policyin2016,therehasbeenanoticeabletrendof

well-educatedwomenoptingtoleavetheworkforceto

devotethemselvestochild-rearing.

Motion:doesitrepresentawasteoftalentwhenahighly

educatedwomanchoosestobeastay-at-homemother?

2

Pro:Yes,itisawaste;

Con:No,itisnotawaste.

No.4

Background:China,oneoftheworld'smostpopulous

countries,istryingtoaddressitsdecliningbirthrate

byofferingsubsidiestoparentswhohavemorechildren.

Hangzhoucityisofferingaone-offsubsidyof20,000

yuantonewparentshavingathirdchild,whileWenzhou

cityisofferingsubsidiesofover3,000yuanperchild.

Motion:Shouldgovernmentsencouragetheircitizensto

havemorechildrenthroughcashincentives?

Pro:Yes,governmentsshouldencouragecitizenstohave

morechildrenthroughcashincentives.

Con:No,governmentsshouldnotencouragecitizensto

havemorechildrenthroughcashincentives.

No.5

Background:Knownas"doublereduction"-reducing

students'homeworkandafter-schooltutoringpressure-

thepolicyissuedin2021,aimstoeasestudents'

educationburden.Nevertheless,manyfamiliestryto

3

hireone-on-oneprivatetutorsinstead,whichactually

ismuchmoreexpensivethantutoringcenters.

Motion:Doesthebanonafter-schooltutoringreallyease

students’burden?

Pro:Yes,itcanreallyeasestudents’burden.

Con:No,itcan’treallyeasestudents’burden.

No.6

Background:Chinaiscurrentlytheworld'slargest

emitterofgreenhousegases.Inanefforttocombat

climatechange,thegovernmenthaspledgedtoachieve

carbonneutralityby2060.Oneproposedsolutionisto

implementacarbontax,whichwouldincentivizeboth

companiesandindividualstoreducetheircarbon

footprint.However,thereareconcernsthatsuchatax

couldhavenegativeimpactsontheeconomy,whichis

currentlysomewhatfragile.

Motion:ShouldChinaimplementanationwidecarbontax

toreducegreenhousegasemissions?

Pro:Yes,weshouldimplementcarbontax.

Con:No,weshouldnotimplementcarbontax.

4

No.7

Background:Theabilityofartificialintelligence(AI)

togeneratewritinghasadvancedsignificantly.Although

theseAIgeneratorsseemtobeahelpfultoolforthose

whostrugglewithwriting,thewideuseofthese

generatorshasraisedsomeethicalissues.

Motion:ShouldstudentsbeallowedtouseAIgenerators

tocompletetheirwritingassignments?

Pro:IthinkstudentsshouldbeallowedtouseAI

generatorstocompletetheirwritingassignments.

Con:Idon’tthinkstudentsshouldbeallowedtouseAI

generatorstocompletetheirwritingassignments.

No.8

Background:LaunchedNovember30,2022,asan

applicationontheOpenAIwebsite,ChatGPTquicklytook

theworldbystorm.Somepeoplewonderifthepowerful

functionsofChatGPTwillleadtojoblossesinthe

future.

Motion:WillthepowerfulfunctionsofChatGPTleadto

joblossesinthefuture?

5

Pro:IthinkthepowerfulfunctionsofChatGPTwilllead

tojoblossesinthefuture.

Con:Idon’tthinkthepowerfulfunctionsofChatGPT

willleadtojoblossesinthefuture.

No.9

Background:Millionsofpeoplevisitzoosandaquariums

everyyear.Despitetheirimmensepopularity,zooshave

becomeincreasinglycontroversialinstitutions.An

increasingnumberofanimalrightsadvocatesandanimal

protectionorganizationsarequestioningtheroleof

zoosinmodernsocietiesandclaimthatanimalsshould

notbekeptinzoos.

Motion:Shouldanimalsbekeptinzoos?

Pro:Animalsshouldbekeptinzoos.

Con:Animalsshouldnotbekeptinzoos.

No.10

Background:China'sbigtechcompanieshavebecome

globalplayersinfieldslikee-commerce,socialmedia,

andmobilepayments.However,thereareconcernsabout

theirmarketdominance,dataprivacy,andinfluenceon

6

publicdiscourse.Somearguethatthegovernmentshould

supportthesecompaniesasasourceofinnovationand

economicgrowth,whileothersbelievethattighter

regulationisneededtoprotectconsumersandprevent

abusesofpower.

Motion:ShouldtheChinesegovernmentcontinueto

supportthedevelopmentofbigtechcompanies,orshould

itregulatethemmoreclosely?

Pro:Yes,weshouldregulatebigtechcompaniesmore

closely.

Con:No,weshouldnotregulatebigtechcompaniesmore

closely.

7

2024年广西职业院校技能大赛

高职组《英语口语》赛项

赛题

职场辩论(Debate)

每队参赛选手自行分配一辩、二辩角色,根据抽签结果与另

一队就一道辩题进行现场辩论。先由正方一辩陈述1分钟,然后

由反方一辩陈述1分钟;接下来由正反双方进行3分钟的自由辩

论,最后先由反方二辩作1分钟总结陈词,再由正方二辩作1分

钟总结陈词。

本环节现场备赛10分钟,比赛时长7分钟,分值10分。

No.1

Background:SomeprimaryschoolsinHangzhou,Zhejiang

Province,askedstudents’parentstocleanthe

classroomsfortheirchildrenbeforethenewsemester

starts.Someparents,whoweretoobusytodothe

cleaning,chosetohirepeopletodothisjob.

Motion:Doyouthinkitisreasonablethattheseschools

askparentstocleanclassroomsfortheirchildren?

Pro:Ithinkitisreasonablethattheseschoolsask

parentstocleanclassroomsfortheirchildren.

1

Con:Idon’tthinkitisreasonablethattheseschools

askparentstocleanclassroomsfortheirchildren.

No.2

Back

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论