新高考英语二轮复习重难题型专项突破考点2 阅读理解之观点态度（原卷版）

考点2阅读理解之观点态度Part1题型详解：观点态度是高考中的常考点。作者写文章总有自己的观点和主张，也会自然流露出对某事的态度；篇章中个别人物也会对某事表达观点。做这类题时，我们一定要站在文章作者或者文章中人物的角度上看问题，寻找相关题目中作者或者某个人物说过的话，做过的事，从而根据所做作为判断人物的态度。预测在2024高考中，观点态度可能会在高考阅读理解中呈现。Part2常见设问方式：Theauthor’sattitudetowards...is_____________.Whatissb’sattitudetowards...?Whichwordbestdescribestheauthor’sattitudeto......?Regarding...,sb.is___________.Part3解题方法指导:熟练掌握选项中表示观点态度的形容词，并能区分积极、消极等对立的形容词。关注作者的主观评论和感受，如相关的形容词、副词和动词。作者如列举一定的事例，要理清所举的例子与其观点、态度是否一致。Part4常见的表示观点态度的词:envious__________irritated__________sympathetic________uneasy___________tolerant_________cautious___________responsible___________ambitious____________considerate__________indifferent__________objective__________critical___________optimistic__________concerned___________suspicious_________uncaring______positive_________negative__________doubtful__________hopeful_________relieved__________worried___________ambiguous___________unfavorable___________intolerant___________uninterested____________dismissive____________approving________unclear_________supportive___________favorable__________disapproval___________objection__________criticism__________puzzling_________neutral_____unprejudiced___________reserved__________ironic___________mixed__________Part5真题演练（三年高考）2023年北京卷英语真题Whatislife?Likemostgreatquestions,thisoneiseasytoaskbutdifficulttoanswer.Thereasonissimple:weknowofjustonetypeoflifeandit’schallengingtodosciencewithasamplesizeofone.Thefieldofartificiallife-calledALifeforshort—isthesystematicattempttospelloutlife’sfundamentalprinciples.Manyofthesepractitioners,so-calledALifers,thinkthatsomehowmakinglifeisthesurestwaytoreallyunderstandwhatlifeis.Sofarnoonehasconvincinglymadeartificiallife.ThistrackrecordmakesALifearipetargetforcriticism,suchasdeclarationsofthefield’sdoubtfulscientificvalue.AlanSmith,acomplexityscientist,istiredofsuchcomplaints.Askingabout“thepoint”ofALifemightbe,well,missingthepointentirely,hesays.“Theexistenceofalivingsystemisnotabouttheuseofanything.”Alansays.“Somepeopleaskme,‘Sowhat’stheworthofartificiallife?’Doyoueverthink,‘Whatistheworthofyourgrandmother?’”AsmuchasmanyALifershateemphasizingtheirresearch’sapplications,theattemptstocreateartificiallifecouldhavepracticalpayoffs.ArtificialintelligencemaybeconsideredALife’scousininthatresearchersinbothfieldsareenamoredbyaconceptcalledopen-endedevolution(演化).Thisisthecapacityforasystemtocreateessentiallyendlesscomplexity,tobeasortof“noveltygenerator”.TheonlysystemknowntoexhibitthisisEarth’sbiosphere.IfthefieldofALifemanagestoreproducelife’sendless“creativity”insomevirtualmodel,thosesameprinciplescouldgiverisetotrulyinventivemachines.ComparedwiththedevelopmentsofAl,advancesinALifearehardertorecognize.OnereasonisthatALifeisafieldinwhichthecentralconcept—lifeitself—isundefined.ThelackofagreementamongALifersdoesn’thelpeither.Theresultisadiverselineofprojectsthateachadvancealongtheiruniquepaths.Forbetterorworse,ALifemirrorstheverysubjectitstudies.Itsmuddled(混乱的)progressionisastrikingparallel(平行线)totheevolutionarystrugglesthathaveshapedEarthbiosphere.Undefinedanduncontrolled,ALifedrivesitsfollowerstorepurposeoldideasandgeneratednovelty.Itmaybe,ofcourse,thatthesecharacteristicsaren’tinanywaysurprisingorsingular.Theymayapplyuniversallytoallactsofevolution.UltimatelyALifemaybenothingspecial.Buteventhisdismissalsuggestssomething：perhaps,justlikelifeitselfthroughouttheuniverse,theriseofALifewillproveunavoidable.1．RegardingAlanSmith’sdefenceofALife,theauthoris.A．supportive B．puzzled C．unconcerned D．doubtful2023年全国甲卷英语真题Iwasabout13whenanunclegavemeacopyofJosteinGaarder’sSophie’sWorld.Itwasfullofideasthatwerenewtome,soIspentthesummerwithmyheadinandoutofthatbook.Itspoketomeandbroughtmeintoaworldofphilosophy(哲学).ThatloveforphilosophylasteduntilIgottocollege.NothingkillstheloveforphilosophyfasterthanpeoplewhothinktheyunderstandFoucault,Baudrillard,orConfuciusbetterthanyou—andthentrytoexplainthem.EricWeiner’sTheSocratesExpress:InSearchofLifeLessonsfromDeadPhilosophersreawakenedmyloveforphilosophy.Itisnotanexplanation,butaninvitationtothinkandexperiencephilosophy.Weinerstartseachchapterwithasceneonatrainridebetweencitiesandthenframeseachphilosopher’sworkinthecontext(背景)ofonethingtheycanhelpusdobetter.TheendresultisareadinwhichwelearntowonderlikeSocrates,seelikeThoreau,listenlikeSchopenhauer,andhavenoregretslikeNietzsche.This,morethanabookaboutunderstandingphilosophy,isabookaboutlearningtousephilosophytoimprovealife.Hemakesphilosophicalthoughtanappealingexercisethatimprovesthequalityofourexperiences,andhedoessowithplentyofhumor.Weinerentersintoconversationwithsomeofthemostimportantphilosophersinhistory,andhebecomespartofthatcrowdintheprocessbydecoding(解读)theirmessagesandaddinghisowninterpretation.TheSocratesExpressisafun,sharpbookthatdrawsreadersinwithitsapparentsimplicityandgraduallypullsthemindeeperthoughtsondesire,loneliness,andaging.Theinvitationisclear:Weinerwantsyoutopickupacoffeeorteaandsitdownwiththisbook.Iencourageyoutotakehisoffer.It’sworthyourtime,eveniftimeissomethingwedon’thavealotof.8．WhatdoestheauthorthinkofWeiner’sbook?A．Objectiveandplain.B．Daringandambitious.C．Seriousandhardtofollow.D．Humorousandstraightforward.2023年新课标全国Ⅰ卷英语真题OnMarch7,1907,theEnglishstatisticianFrancisGaltonpublishedapaperwhichillustratedwhathascometobeknownasthe“wisdomofcrowds”effect.Theexperimentofestimationheconductedshowedthatinsomecases,theaverageofalargenumberofindependentestimatescouldbequiteaccurate.Thiseffectcapitalizesonthefactthatwhenpeoplemakeerrors,thoseerrorsaren’talwaysthesame.Somepeoplewilltendtooverestimate,andsometounderestimate.Whenenoughoftheseerrorsareaveragedtogether,theycanceleachotherout,resultinginamoreaccurateestimate.Ifpeoplearesimilarandtendtomakethesameerrors,thentheirerrorswon’tcanceleachotherout.Inmoretechnicalterms,thewisdomofcrowdsrequiresthatpeople’sestimatesbeindependent.Ifforwhateverreasons,people’serrorsbecomecorrelatedordependent,theaccuracyoftheestimatewillgodown.ButanewstudyledbyJoaquinNavajasofferedaninterestingtwist(转折)onthisclassicphenomenon.Thekeyfindingofthestudywasthatwhencrowdswerefurtherdividedintosmallergroupsthatwereallowedtohaveadiscussion,theaveragesfromthesegroupsweremoreaccuratethanthosefromanequalnumberofindependentindividuals.Forinstance,theaverageobtainedfromtheestimatesoffourdiscussiongroupsoffivewassignificantlymoreaccuratethantheaverageobtainedfrom20independentindividuals.Inafollow-upstudywith100universitystudents,theresearcherstriedtogetabettersenseofwhatthegroupmembersactuallydidintheirdiscussion.Didtheytendtogowiththosemostconfidentabouttheirestimates?Didtheyfollowthoseleastwillingtochangetheirminds?Thishappenedsomeofthetime,butitwasn’tthedominantresponse.Mostfrequently,thegroupsreportedthatthey“sharedargumentsandreasonedtogether”.Somehow,theseargumentsandreasoningresultedinaglobalreductioninerror.AlthoughthestudiesledbyNavajashavelimitationsandmanyquestionsremain,thepotentialimplicationsforgroupdiscussionanddecision-makingareenormous.12．Whatistheauthor’sattitudetowardNavajas’studies?A．Unclear. B．Dismissive. C．Doubtful. D．Approving.2022年北京卷英语真题Quantum(量子)computershavebeenonmymindalotlately.Afriendhasbeensendingmearticlesonhowquantumcomputersmighthelpsolvesomeofthebiggestchallengeswefaceashumans.I’vealsohadexchangeswithtwoquantum-computingexperts.OneiscomputerscientistChrisJohnsonwhoIseeassomeonewhohelpskeepthefieldhonest.TheotherisphysicistPhilipTaylor.Fordecades,quantumcomputinghasbeenlittlemorethanalaboratorycuriosity.Now,bigtechcompanieshaveinvestedinquantumcomputing,ashavemanysmallerones.AccordingtoBusinessWeekly,quantummachinescouldhelpus“curecancer,andeventakestepstoturnclimatechangeintheoppositedirection.”Thisisthesortofhype(炒作)thatannoysJohnson.Heworriesthatresearchersaremakingpromisestheycan’tkeep.“What’snew,”Johnsonwrote,“isthatmillionsofdollarsarenowpotentiallyavailabletoquantumcomputingresearchers.”Asquantumcomputingattractsmoreattentionandfunding,researchersmaymisleadinvestors,journalists,thepublicand,worstofall,themselvesabouttheirwork’spotential.Ifresearcherscan’tkeeptheirpromises,excitementmightgivewaytodoubt,disappointmentandanger,Johnsonwarns.Lotsofothertechnologieshavegonethroughstagesofexcitement.Butsomethingaboutquantumcomputingmakesitespeciallypronetohype,Johnsonsuggests,perhapsbecause“‘quantum’standsforsomethingcoolyoushouldn’tbeabletounderstand.”AndthatbringsmebacktoTaylor,whosuggestedthatIreadhisbookQforQuantum.AfterIreadthebook,Taylorpatientlyansweredmyquestionsaboutit.HealsoansweredmyquestionsaboutPyQuantum,thefirmheco-foundedin2016.TaylorsharesJohnson’sconcernsabouthype,buthesaysthoseconcernsdonotapplytoPyQuantum.Thecompany,hesays,iscloserthananyotherfirm“byaverylargemargin(幅度)”tobuildinga“useful”quantumcomputer,onethat“solvesanimpactfulproblemthatwewouldnothavebeenabletosolveotherwise.”Headds,“Peoplewillnaturallydiscountmyopinions,butIhavespentalotoftimequantitativelycomparingwhatwearedoingwithothers.”CouldPyQuantumreallybeleadingallthecompetition“byawidemargin”,asTaylorclaims?Idon’tknow.I’mcertainlynotgoingtoadvisemyfriendoranyoneelsetoinvestinquantumcomputers.ButItrustTaylor,justasItrustJohnson.13．RegardingJohnson’sconcerns,theauthorfeels________.A．sympathetic B．unconcerned C．doubtful D．excited2021年北京市英语高考真题Hundredsofscientists,writersandacademicssoundedawarningtohumanityinanopenletterpublishedlastDecember:Policymakersandtherestofusmustengageopenlywiththeriskofglobalcollapse.Researchersinmanyareashaveprojectedthewidespreadcollapseas“acrediblescenario(情景)thiscentury”.Asurveyofscientistsfoundthatextremeweatherevents,foodinsecurity,andfreshwatershortagesmightcreateglobalcollapse.Ofcourse,ifyouareanon-humanspecies,collapseiswellunderway.Thecallforpublicengagementwiththeunthinkableisespeciallygermaneinthismomentofstill-uncontrolledpandemicandeconomiccrisesintheworld'smosttechnologicallyadvancednations.Notverylongago,itwasalsounthinkablethataviruswouldshutdownnationsandthatsafetynetswouldbeprovensodisastrouslylackinginflexibility.Theinternationalscholars’warningletterdoesn'tsayexactlywhatcollapsewilllooklikeorwhenitmighthappen.Collapseology,thestudyofcollapse,ismoreconcernedwithidentifyingtrendsandwiththemthedangersofeverydaycivilization.Amongthesignatories(签署者)ofthewarningwasBobJohnson,theoriginatorofthe“ecologicalfootprint”concept,whichmeasuresthetotalamountofenvironmentalinputneededtomaintainagivenlifestyle.Withthecurrentfootprintofhumanity,“itseemsthatglobalcollapseiscertaintohappeninsomeform,possiblywithinadecade,certainlywithinthiscentury,”Johnsonsaidinanemail.“Onlyifwediscusstheconsequencesofourbiophysicallimits,”theDecemberwarninglettersays,“canwehavethehopetoreducetheirspeed,severityandharm”.Andyetmessengersofthecomingdisturbancearelikelytobeignored.Weallwanttohopethingswillturnoutfine.Asapoetwrote,Manisavictimofdope(麻醉品)Intheincurableformofhope.Thehundredsofscholarswhosignedtheletterareintent(执着)onquietinghopethatignorespreparedness.“Let'slookdirectlyintotheissueofcollapse,”theysay,“anddealwiththeterriblepossibilitiesofwhatweseetheretomakethebestofatroublingfuture.”18．Asforthepublicawarenessofglobalcollapse,theauthoris________.A．worriedB．puzzledC．surprisedD．scaredPart6模拟练习2024届广东省河源中学高三上学期一调考试英语试题CouldanewtreatmentdevelopedbytheUScompanyLillymean“thebeginningoftheend”ofAlzheimer’s?Couldweevencureitsomeday?Theseareheadlinesandquestionsswirling(流传)aroundafternewsofanewdrug,calleddonanemab,showedpromisingresultsinphase-3trials.ThebrainsciencebehindAlzheimer’siscomplex,butCTandMRJscanssuggestthatpoisonouschangesoccurinthebrain,includingtheabnormalbuild-upofproteinscalledamyloidplaquesandtautangles.Thedamagestartsinthepartsofthebrainessentialforformingmemoriesbutthenspreadsthroughouttheorgan,withbraintissueshrinkingsignificantly.DevelopingtreatmentsforAlzheimer’shasbeenachallenge,withalmost20yearspassingwithnonewdrugs.Butinthelastyear,twonewoneshaveemerged:donanemabandlecanemab.Neitherarecuresormagicbulletsforthedisease,buttheydoaddresskeysymptoms.Theytargettheamyloidproteinsthatcanaccumulateinthebrainanddamageneurons,slowingdownitsprogression.Whilethisnewsisexciting,therearemajorcaveats.OneiswhetheritwilleverbecomeavailableontheNHS.Thecostisestimatedtobeabout£20,000perpersonperyearoftreatment.Anotheristheserioussideeffects:inthestudy,brainswellingoccurredin24%ofparticipantsandbrainbleedingoccurredin31.4%onthedrugcomparedwith13.6%intheplacebo(安慰剂)group.Therewerealsothreedeathsduringthetrial.Partoftheproblemforme,asanacademic,inassessingthedrugisthatthefullresultsofthetrialhaven’tyetbeensharedpubliclyorpublishedinapeer-reviewjournal.Wecannotaccessthefulldataorexaminethetrialyet,andthereisalwaysamotivationforprivatecompaniestooverstatetheeffectivenessofnewdrugs.Trialresultsneedtobeassessedbyanindependentbodyofexperts.Whileitisunlikelytochangeclinicalpracticeuntilatleast2025,thenewsofdonanemabisagainanindicationthatscienceiscontinuingtomakeprogresswhenitcomestotreatingthemajorcausesofillnessanddeath,evenonerelatedtothehighlycomplexinnerworkingsofthebrain,So,therearecaveatsandtheneedforcaution,butthesenewdrugsareindeedthegroundsforthatrarethingthesedays:hope.4．Whatistheauthor’sattitudetowardsthenewdrug?A．Approving. B．Doubtful. C．Unclear. D．Indifferent.2024届湖南省永州市高三上学期第一次模拟考试英语试题Theblanketofpollutionresultingfromcarbondioxideemissionsfromfossilfuelsisalreadywarmingtheplanetandcausingmoreextremeweatherdisasters.Onewaytokeepclimatechangefromgettingworseistotakesomeofthosehistoricemissionsoutoftheatmosphere.Morethan200scientistshavesignedontoaletterpushingfor“responsible”researchintowaystotrapplanet-heatingcarbondioxideintheworld’soceans.Oceansalreadydothatforus,absorbingandholdingaround50timesmorecarbonthantheatmosphere.Whatifhumanscouldsuperchargethatability?That’swhatscientistswanttobetterunderstand,alongwithanysideeffectsthatmightcomewithmessingwiththechemistryofouroceans.Startupsarealreadydevelopingnewtechnologiestosequester(隔绝)moreCO2inthesea.Butthere’sstillalotwedon’tknowaboutwhatimpactthatmighthaveorwhatstrategiesmightbemostsuccessful,thelettersays.Theseareallprettyearlyefforts,andhackingthehighseasisnoreplacementforpreventinggreenhousegasemissionsfromaccumulatingintheatmospherebygettingridoffossilfuels.SomeenvironmentaladvocatesarealsoworriedaboutnewCO2-filteringtechnologiesharmingmarinelife.Thelettertodaycallsforcontrolledfieldtrialstoevaluatecarbonremovalstrategies,alongwithathird-partyreviewoftheresults.Therealsoneedtobesafetymeasuresinplacetoaddressany“unintendedorharmfulconsequences”andinclusivepoliciestoengagedifferentstakeholders(利益相关者).Somebignamesinclimateandenvironmentalscienceshavesignedon.“Ihaveseenthesemassivedeclinesinoceanhealth...Doingnothingisunethical(不道德的)essentially,”saysDébora,Ecology,Evolution,andMarineBiologydepartmentchairattheUniversityofCalifornia,SantaBarbara,whosignedtheletterreleasedtoday.Whenitcomestostudyingnewwaystouseoceanstotackleclimatechange,shesays,“Weneedtoatleastfigureouttherisksandthebenefits,seewhetherwecanhelpresolvetheproblemwehavecreated.”8．WhatisDébora’sattitudetowardthestudiesofnewways?A．Unclear.B．Approving.C．Dismissive.D．Doubtful.2024届辽宁省本溪市平山区本溪市高级中学高三一模英语试题WhenImentionedtosomefriendsthatweallhaveaccents,mostofthemproudlyreplied,“Well,IspeakperfectEnglish/Chinese/etc.”Butthiskindofmissesthepoint.Moreoftenthannot,whatwemeanwhenwesaysomeone“hasanaccent”isthattheiraccentisdifferentfromthelocalone,orthatpronunciationsaredifferentfromourown.Butthisdefinitionofaccentsislimitingandcouldgiverisetoprejudice.Funnilyenough,intermsofthelanguagestudy,everypersonspeakswithanaccent.Itistheregulardifferencesinhowweproducesoundsthatdefineouraccents.Evenifyoudon’thearityourself,youspeakwithsomesortofaccent.Inthissense,it’spointlesstopointoutthatsomeone“hasanaccent“.Wealldo!Everypersonspeaksadialect,too.Inthefieldoflanguagestudy,adialectisaversionofalanguagethatischaracterizedbyitsvariationsofstructure,phrasesandwords.Forinstance,“Yougoteatornot?”(meaning“Haveyoueaten?”)isanacceptableandunderstoodquestioninSingaporeOralEnglish.ThefactthatthisexpressionwouldcauseastandardAmericanEnglishspeakertotakepausedoesn’tmeanthatSingaporeOralEnglishis“wrong”or“ungrammatical”.Thesentenceiswell-formedandclearlycommunicative,accordingtonativeSingaporeEnglishspeakers’solidsystemofgrammar.Whyshoulditbewrongjustbecauseit’sdifferent?Weneedtomovebeyondanarrowconceptionofaccentsanddialects—forthebenefitofeveryone.Languagedifferencesliketheseprovideinsightsintopeople’sculturalexperiencesandbackgrounds.Inaglobalage,thewayonespeaksisadistinctpartofone’sidentity.Mostpeoplewouldbehappytotalkabouttheculturesbehindtheirspeech.We’dlearnmoreabouttheworldweliveinandmakefriendsalongtheway.12．Whatistheauthor’sattitudetowardsaccent?A．FavourableB．IntolerantC．Doubtful D．Unclear2023届广东省广州市荔湾区广州市协和中学高三下学期一模英语试题Althoughsocialmediacanbeenjoyableandbeneficial,onlinerelationshipssimplycannotreplacereallifeconnection.Butsimplybeinginthefleshwithsomeonedoesnotmakealasting,meaningfulrelationship,whichgotmethinking:what,exactly,does?Mysearchtoanswerthisquestiontookmebackmorethan2,000yearstoAristotle’sNichomacheanEthics.WhatIfoundcouldn’tbemoreinsightful,anditringsjustastruetodayasitmusthavethen.Aristotlewritesthattherearethreedifferentkindsoffriendship:FRIENDSHIPSBASEDONUTILITY,inwhichoneorbothofthepartiesgainsomethingasaresultofthefriendship(think:muchofthemodern“networking”enterprise,orbecomingfriendswithsomeonebecauseyouthinktheycanhelpyou).FRIENDSHIPSBASEDONPLEASURE,orthosecenteredaroundpleasantexperiences(think:peoplewithwhomyoucanhaveagood,carefreetime).FRIENDSHIPSBASEDONVIRTUE,inwhichbothindividualssharethesamevalues(think:peoplewhomyouadmireandrespect,andwithwhomyousharewhatyoufindmostimportantinlife).It’sfascinatingthat,centuriesago,Aristotleofferedthatmanyindividualoftenpursuefriendshipsprimarilyforutility.Andit’seasytoseethatsomethingsneverchange.Likewise,hewrote,“Thosewholovebecauseofwhatisgoodforthemselves,andthosewholovebecauseofpleasuredosobecauseofwhatispleasanttothemselves.Yetwhatonefindsusefulorpleasurable,isnotpermanentbutisalwayschanging;thus,whenthereasonforthefriendshipisdoneaway,thefriendshipisdissolved.”It’sOKtohavesomefriendshipsmainlyforutilityandpleasure,butit’simportanttorealizethatthesefilladifferentpurposeandarelikelytohaveashorterlifespanthanonebuiltuponsharedvirtue.Anditisthefriendshipsbasedonvirtuethatareworthprotectingandcherishing.Buttheyrequireconsiderableenergytomaintain--asAristotlewrote,“lackofconversationhasbrokenmanyafriendship”--butwhatyougetoutofthesefriendshipseasilyoutweighswhatyouputin.13．Whatistheauthor’sattitudetowardsAristotle’sgroupingoffriendship?A．Supportive. B．Opposed. C．Doubtful. D．Unclear.2023届浙江省杭州市高三下学期教学质量检测（二模）英语试题ChatGPT,designedbyOpenAItocarryonconversationsjustlikehumans,hasbecomeaviralexcitement.TheAI-poweredtoolwentfromzerotoamillionusersinjustfivedays!Itsabilitytoprovidein-depthanswerstouserquestionshasevendrawntheattentionofdistinguishedtechnologycompanies.Theintelligentrobotunderstandswhattheusersaysortypesandthenrespondsinawaythatmakessense.Itsvastbodyofknowledgehasbeengatheredfromtheinternetandarchivedbooks.Itisfurthertrainedbyhumans.ThismakesChatGPTausefultoolforresearchingalmostanytopic.“Wehavealotofinformationontheinternet,butyounormallyhavetoGoogleit,thenreaditandthendosomethingwithit,”saysRicardo,chiefscienceofficerandco-founderofAIcompanyErudit.“Nowyou’llhavethisresourcethatcanprocessthewholeinternetandalloftheinformationitcontainsforyoutoansweryourquestion.”ChatGPTcannotthinkonitsown.Itdependsontheinformationthatithasbeentrainedon.Asaresult,theAItoolworkswellforthingsthathaveaccuratedataavailable.However,whenunsure,ChatGPTcangetcreativeandflowoutincorrectresponses.OpenAIcautionsuserstochecktheinformationnomatterhowlogicalitsounds.Also,ChatGPThasonlybeentrainedwithinformationtill2021.Hence,itcannotberelieduponforanythingthathappenedafterthat.ExpertsbelieveChatGPThaslimitlesspotentialtosolvereal-worldproblems.Itcantranslatelongtextsintodifferentlanguages,createcontentonalmostanytopic,andevensummarizebooks.However,ChatGPThasreceivedmixedreactionsfromeducators.Somebelieveitcouldserveasavaluabletooltohelpbuildliteracyskillsintheclassroom.Itcouldalsobeusedtoteachstudentsdifficultscienceormathconcepts.ButothereducatorsthinkChatGPTwillencouragestudentstocheat.Theyfearthiswillpreventthemfrombuildingcriticalthinkingandproblem-solvingskills.Asaresult,manydistrictsarestartingtobanitsuseinschools.20．Whatistheauthor’sattitudetowardsChatGPT?A．Favorable. B．Disapproving. C．Objective. D．Intolerant.浙江省金华十校2022-2023学年下学期高三4月模拟考试（二模）预演英语试题Solarfarmsofferonewaytomeettheworld’sdecarbonizationtargets,buttheycouldalsobeusedtodealwithanotheroftheplanet’sbigproblems:lossofbiodiversity.Theapproachisstartingtotakeoff.ResidentsofBarnsdale,forexample,willsoonplayhosttoanewsolarfarmlinedwithgrassfieldofwildflowersandnativegrasses,whichBanksGroup,thedeveloper,sayswillpromotepollinatinginsects.Theideacomesfromthecombinationoftwolong-termtrends:decliningnumbersofpollinatinginsectsandthegrowingamountoflanddistributedtosolarfarms.AccordingtotheCenterforBiologicalDiversityinArizona,morethan40percentofinsectpollinatorsgloballyarelistedas“highlythreatened”—anissuethatcouldseriouslythreatenfoodsecurity.Meanwhile,solar-energycompetencehasbeenincreasing.MatthewO’Neal,ascientistatIowaStateUniversity,wouldliketoseemoresolardevelopersseizethisopportunity.Thebenefitsofsuchprojectsdon’tstopattheinsects.ResearchfromYale’sCenterforBusinessandtheEnvironmentindicatesthatpollinator-friendlysolarfarmscanraisecropoutputonnearbyfarmland,increasetherechargingofgroundwaterandreducesoilerosion.In2018,aUSDepartmentofEnergystudyfoundthatifallexistingandplannedsolarfacilitiesnearsoybeanandcranberrycropsincludedpollinatorhomeandincreasedoutputbyjustonepercent,annualcropvaluescouldrisebyUS$1.75million,US$4millionandUS$233,000,respectively.“Farmerscouldidentifyunprofitableareas,suchaspoor,highlyerodiblelands,ascandidatesforapollinator-friendlysolarfarm.There’sthepotentialtoincreasetheirnetincomewithpollinatormotivationprojects,”saysO’Neal.Withenoughforwardthinking,thesestudiesshow,cleanenergycanprovidenewenvironmentalopportunities.“We’reataturningpointwithenergyproductionandwe’reseeingmoreopportunitiestoprovideextrabenefitsthatwouldn’thavebeenconsideredwitholdermethodsofenergygeneration,”saysO’Neal.“Youneverheardofacoalmineplanningpollinatorconservation.”23．WhatisO’Neal’sattitudetowardsthesolarfarm?A．Supportive. B．Conservative. C．Skeptical. D．Uncertain.2023届浙江省金华十校高三下学期二模英语试题Astheclimatecrisisspeedsup,Europeiswarmingfasterthananyotherregion,accordingtoanewStateofthe

ClimateinEuropereportfromtheWorldMeteorologicalOrganization.TheWMOreportcomesaheadoftheUN’sinternationalclimatesummitinEgypt,andisoneinaseriesofreportsoverthepastseveralweeksthatshowhowtheworldisoff-trackonitsclimategoals.Notonlyarecountries

missing

themarkontheireffortstoreduceplanet-warmingfossilfuelemissions(排放物),butmeasurementsshowtemperaturesarealreadyskyrocketing.Somecontinentsarefeelingthatrisemorethanothers.Wednesday’sreportshowstemperaturesinEuropehaveincreasedatmorethantwicetheglobalaverageoverthepast30year