未来能源研究所-清洁炼钢:向低碳未来过渡 Clean Steelmaking Transitioning to a Low-Carbon Future_第1页
未来能源研究所-清洁炼钢:向低碳未来过渡 Clean Steelmaking Transitioning to a Low-Carbon Future_第2页
未来能源研究所-清洁炼钢:向低碳未来过渡 Clean Steelmaking Transitioning to a Low-Carbon Future_第3页
未来能源研究所-清洁炼钢:向低碳未来过渡 Clean Steelmaking Transitioning to a Low-Carbon Future_第4页
未来能源研究所-清洁炼钢:向低碳未来过渡 Clean Steelmaking Transitioning to a Low-Carbon Future_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩72页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

CleanSteelmaking:

TransitioningtoaLow-CarbonFuture

Jhih-ShyangShih,EthanZiegler,AlanKrupnick,MarcHafstead,andAaronBergman

WorkingPaper25-23October2025

AbouttheAuthors

Jhih-ShyangShihisafellowatResourcesfortheFuture(RFF).Hehasextensive

experienceinenergyandenvironmentalmodeling.Hisresearchfocusesonintegrated

systemanalysisofenvironmentalandresourcepolicyanddecisionmaking.Hiswork

hasbeenpublishedinleadingjournals,includingPNAS,EnvironmentalScience&

Technology,theReviewofEconomicsandStatistics,andtheEuropeanJournalof

OperationalResearch.

EthanZieglerisaresearchanalystatRFF,whereheworksonE4ST.Hepreviously

studiedeconomicsandenvironmentalscienceatAmericanUniversity,wherehe

conductedoptimizationmodelingresearchontheeffectsoffoodwaste.

AlanKrupnickisanRFFseniorfellowanddirectoroftheIndustryandFuelsProgram.

Krupnickisanexpertontheoilandgassector,reducinggreenhousegasemissions

fromthisandtheindustrialsectors,andcost-benefitanalysis.Inparticular,Krupnick’s

recentresearchfocusesongreenpublicprocurement,decarbonizedhydrogenand

taxcredits,anddevelopingmarketsforgreennaturalgas.Hisportfolioalsoincludes

guidingthevalueofinformationagendacoveredbyourVALUABLESinitiativewith

NASA,thevaluationofreducingasthmarisks,estimatingthevalueofstatisticallife,

andissuesofregulatoryreform.

MarcHafsteadisanRFFfellowanddirectoroftheCarbonPricingInitiative

andtheClimateFinanceandFinancialRiskInitiative.Hisresearchhasprimarily

focusedontheevaluationanddesignoffederalandstate-levelclimateandenergy

policiesusingsophisticatedmulti-sectormodelsoftheUSeconomy.WithStanford

ProfessorandRFFUniversityFellowLawrenceH.Goulder,hewroteConfrontingthe

ClimateChallenge:USPolicyOptions(ColumbiaUniversityPress)toevaluatethe

environmentalandeconomicimpactsoffederalcarbontaxes,cap-and-tradeprograms,

cleanenergystandards,andgasoline.Hisresearchhasalsoanalyzedthedistributional

andemploymentimpactsofcarbonpricingandthedesignoftaxadjustment

mechanismstoreducetheemissionsuncertaintyofcarbontaxpolicies.

AaronBergmanisafellowatRFF.PriortojoiningRFF,hewastheLeadfor

MacroeconomicsandEmissionsattheEnergyInformationAdministration(EIA),

managingEIA’smodelinginthoseareas.BeforeworkingatEIA,Bergmanspentalmost

adecadeinthepolicyofficeattheDepartmentofEnergy,workingonabroadarray

ofclimateandenvironmentalpolicies.BergmanhasworkedintheWhiteHouseatthe

OfficeofScienceandTechnologyPolicy,managingtheQuadrennialEnergyReview

andhandlingthemethanemeasurementportfolio,andattheCouncilonEnvironmental

Quality,workingoncarbonregulation.Bergmanenteredthefederalgovernmentin

2009asaScienceandTechnologyPolicyFellowwiththeAmericanAssociationforthe

AdvancementofScience,afterworkinginhighenergyphysics.

ResourcesfortheFuturei

CleanSteelmaking:TransitioningtoaLow-CarbonFutureii

Acknowledgements

WegratefullyacknowledgediscussionswithDallasBurtraw,MilanElkerbout,AlArmendariz,JanMares,andAndrewGossett.

AboutRFF

ResourcesfortheFuture(RFF)isanindependent,nonprofitresearchinstitutionin

Washington,DC.Itsmissionistoimproveenvironmental,energy,andnaturalresourcedecisionsthroughimpartialeconomicresearchandpolicyengagement.RFFis

committedtobeingthemostwidelytrustedsourceofresearchinsightsandpolicysolutionsleadingtoahealthyenvironmentandathrivingeconomy.

Workingpapersareresearchmaterialscirculatedbytheirauthorsforpurposesof

informationanddiscussion.Theyhavenotnecessarilyundergoneformalpeerreview.TheviewsexpressedherearethoseoftheindividualauthorsandmaydifferfromthoseofotherRFFexperts,itsofficers,oritsdirectors.

SharingOurWork

OurworkisavailableforsharingandadaptationunderanAttribution-

NonCommercial-NoDerivatives4.0International(CCBY-NC-ND4.0)license.Youcancopyandredistributeourmaterialinanymediumorformat;youmustgive

appropriatecredit,providealinktothelicense,andindicateifchangesweremade,andyoumaynotapplyadditionalrestrictions.Youmaydosoinanyreasonable

manner,butnotinanywaythatsuggeststhelicensorendorsesyouoryouruse.

Youmaynotusethematerialforcommercialpurposes.Ifyouremix,transform,orbuilduponthematerial,youmaynotdistributethemodifiedmaterial.Formoreinformation,visit

/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

.

ResourcesfortheFutureiii

Abstract

Thesteelindustry,accountingforapproximately7–9percentofglobalCO2emissions,isacriticalsectorforindustrialdecarbonization.Transitioningfromcoal-based

blastfurnacestolow-carbonpathwayssuchashydrogen-baseddirectreducediron(DRI)andelectrifiedfurnacesofferssignificantmitigationpotentialwhilereducing

exposuretocarbonpricingandtrademeasures.Thisstudydevelopsalow-carbon

steelproduction(LCSP)optimizationmodeltosupportindustrypractitionersand

policymakersinstrategicplanningforsustainabledecarbonization.Themodel

incorporatesnaturalgas-andhydrogen-basedDRIironmaking,scrap-DRIblending

inelectricarcfurnaces,andlifecycleCO2emissionsandimpurityconsiderationsto

ensureproductqualityrequirementsaremetatminimumcost.Thecurrentframeworkisadeterministic,single-periodlinearprogrammingmodelwithdecisionvariables

includingDRIfeedstockblendingratiosandscrapsteel-(new)DRIsteelmaking

proportions.Theobjectivefunctionminimizesnetsystemcostsbyaccountingfor

revenues,operationalexpenditures,CO2offsetandcapturecosts,andrenewable

energycredits.TheLCSPmodelisimplementedintheGAMSprogramminglanguageandprovidesaflexibleplatformforassessingtrade-offsbetweencost,emissions,andmaterialqualityinlow-carbonsteelmaking1

1See

.

CleanSteelmaking:TransitioningtoaLow-CarbonFutureiv

Contents

1.Introduction1

2.LiteratureReview3

2.1.ModelAnalyses3

2.2.DecarbonizationofSteelmaking4

3.TheLow-CarbonSteelProduction(LCSP)Model5

3.1.SystemConfiguration5

3.2.TheLCSPModelDescription6

4.ModelInputDataforDefaultScenario7

5.ScenarioDescriptionsandResults8

5.1.DefaultScenarioResults(S0)9

5.2.ScenarioS1:S0+IncentivestouseHighQualityScrap9

5.3.ScenarioS2:S1+Minimizing(CCSCosts)+CheaperHPrice($2.5/kgH)1122

6.Conclusions12

References14

AppendixA.TheLow-CarbonSteelProduction(LCSP)Model16

A.1.Formulation20

A.1.1.Hydrogenfeedstock20

A.1.2.H-basedDRIproduction202

A.1.3.CCSassociatedwithHproduction212

A.1.4.CostrelatedtoHproductionCO2222

A.1.5.Naturalgasfeedstock23

A.1.6.NG-basedDRIproduction24

A.1.7.CCSassociatedwithNGproduction25

A.1.8.CostrelatedtoNGproductionCO252

A.1.9.Ironorefeedstock26

ResourcesfortheFuturev

A.1.10.Steelscrapfeedstock27

A.1.11.Steelproduction/outputanddemand27

A.1.12.Impuritylimitforindividualsteelproductp28

A.1.13.Objectivefunction28

AppendixB.ModelDefaultInputData31

CleanSteelmaking:TransitioningtoaLow-CarbonFuture1

1.Introduction

Thesteelindustryisasignificantcontributortoglobalgreenhousegasemissions,

accountingforapproximately7percentoftotalglobalCO2emissions,dueprimarilytoitsrelianceoncarbon-intensiveproductionprocesses.IntheUnitedStates,thesteelsectorplaysavitalroleintheindustrialeconomy,producingaround80millionmetrictonsofcrudesteelannually,makingitoneofthelargeststeelproducersglobally.AdefiningfeatureoftheUSsteelindustryisitsdominantuseofelectricarcfurnace

(EAF)technology,whichcontributesapproximately70–75percentofnationalsteeloutput—farexceedingtheglobalaverageofabout30percent.

EAFsteelmaking,whichreliesonelectricitytomeltscrapordirectreducediron

(DRI),presentsamoreflexibleandlower-emissionsalternativetotheconventional

blastfurnace–basicoxygenfurnace(BF-BOF)route,whichdependsoncoal-derivedcokeforironorereduction.IntheUnitedStates,thepredominanceofEAFsoffersa

structuraladvantageintermsofcarbonintensity.WhileBF-BOFproductiontypicallyemitsbetween1.8and2.2metrictonsofCO2pertonofsteel,EAFprocessesemitonly0.4to0.6metrictonsofCO2pertonofsteel,contingentonfactorssuchaselectricitysourceandinputmaterialcomposition.EAFsaretypicallychargedwithsteelscrapbutcanalsoincludeotheriron-bearingmaterialssuchasdirectreducediron(DRI),hot

briquettediron(HBI),orpigiron.

AkeychallengeforEAFsisthevariabilityinscrapquality.WhileEAFscanremove

someimpuritiesduringrefining,theyarelesseffectivethantraditionalBF-BOF

methodsateliminatingcertainresidualelements,suchascopper,zinc,andtin1Theseelementstendtoaccumulateinrecycledscrapandtheresultingsteel,whichlimitstheuseofhigh-residualscrapintheproductionofflatproductsorhigh-specificationsteels(e.g.,thoseusedinthedefenseindustry).BecausetheseimpuritiescannotberemovedintheEAFprocess,dilutingscrapwithlower-residualmaterialslikeDRIorpigiron,

termedchargeblending,iscommonlyusedtomanagetheirlevels.by.

Amidgrowingdecarbonizationimperatives,theUSsteelsectorisincreasingly

consideringinvestinginemergingtechnologies,includinghydrogen-basedDRI,carboncaptureandstorage(CCS),andenhancedscrapprocessing.Althoughdecarbonizingprimaryironproductionandsecuringreliablelow-carbonelectricityremainkey

challenges,theUSindustries’EAF-centricsystemprovidesarelativelyfavorablefoundationfortransitioningtowardlow-emissionssteel.

Globally,ironandsteelindustryemissionsgenerallystemfromcoal-intensiveprimarysteelmaking.Asthephysicalandregulatoryimpactsofclimatechangeintensify,thesectorfacesmountingpressuretoalignwithnet-zerotargets.Thisconvergenceof

1ScrapqualityisamajorissueforEAFs.UnlikeBF-BOFroutes,whichprimarilyuseiron

oreandcancontrolimpuritiesmoresystematically,EAFsrelyonrecycledscrapsteel.

Thecompositionofscrapcanvarywidelyandmaycontainunwantedresidualelementslikecopper,tin,andzinc,whicharedifficulttoremoveintheEAFprocess.Thisvariabilityaffectsthequalityofthesteelproduced,makingscrapqualityacriticalfactorinEAF

operations.

ResourcesfortheFuture2

policy,investor,andconsumerexpectationsunderscorestheurgencyofemissions

reductions—notonlyasanenvironmentalimperativebutalsoasastrategiceconomicnecessity.

SeveraltechnologiesareemergingasalternativestoBF-BOFandEAFthatcan

contributetothedecarbonizationofsteelproduction,withnaturalgas–baseddirect

reducediron(NG-DRI)servingasakeytransitionalsolution.NG-DRIofferssubstantialCO2emissionsreductionsrelativetocoal-basedblastfurnacesandprovidesabridgetowardtheeventualdeploymentofcleanhydrogen-basedDRI(H2-DRI).H2-DRI,whichsubstituteshydrogen(eitherblueorgreen)forfossilfuels,holdsthepotentialfornear-zerodirectemissions;however,widespreadadoptionofH2-DRIremainsconstrainedbyhighproductioncostsandlimitedsupportinginfrastructure.

Carboncapture,utilization,andstorage(CCUS)alsorepresentsapromisingpathwayformitigatingemissionsfromexistingproductionroutesduringthetransitiontomoresustainabletechnologies(Jordan,etal.,2025).

MoststeelmodelsusedinenergyandclimatepolicyanalysisaccountforenergyuseandCO2emissionsbutdonotaddressthequalityofthesteelproduced.2GiventheimportantroleofscrapinfuturesteelproductionusingEAFtechnology,modelsareneededthatincorporatebothimpuritylevelsandCO2emissionsintensityinthefinalsteelproduct.

Thisstudypresentsacost-minimizingblendingmodelforlowCO2emissions

productionviaEAFtechnology,accountingformultipleinputmaterialsandproduct

outputs,eachwithspecificimpurityandCO2emissionsintensityconstraints.The

modeloptimallyallocateshydrogen-basedandnaturalgas–basedDRIalongside

variousscrapgradestosatisfyproduct-levelqualityrequirementswhilemeeting

assumedsystem-wideemissionstargets.Inparallelwithtechnologicalinnovation,

policyinstrumentsarecriticalforacceleratingemissionsreductionsinthesteelsector.Market-basedmechanisms—suchastradableemissionscreditsystems,industrial

tradableperformancestandards,andcarbonpricing—encouragecleanerproduction

byenablingfirmsthatoutperformemissionstargetstogainfinancialbenefits,either

throughcredittradingorbypayinglowercarboncosts.TheCarbonBorderAdjustmentMechanismlevelstheplayingfieldbyapplyingacarbonpricetoimportsfrom

countrieswithoutstrongclimatepolicies,protectingdomesticindustriesfromcarbonleakagewhileencouragingglobalemissionsreductions(Park,etal.,forthcoming).

Together,thesetechnologicalandpolicyapproachescancatalyzethesteelindustry’stransitiontowardamorecarbon-efficientandcompetitivefuture.

Thispaperproceedsasfollows:Section2reviewstheliteratureonmodelanalysesanddecarbonizationofsteelmaking.Section3introducesthesystemconfigurationand

2EPPAisamultiregion,multisectorCGEmodeloftheglobaleconomydevelopedbytheMITJointProgramontheScienceandPolicyofGlobalChange.Thismodeliswidely

usedtoassesstheeconomicimpactsofclimatepolicies,energypolicies,andtechnologychanges.Itcapturesinteractionsbetweensectors,regions,andhouseholds,accountingforproduction,consumption,trade,andemissions.

CleanSteelmaking:TransitioningtoaLow-CarbonFuture3

thelow-carbonsteelproduction(LCSP)model.Section4providesdetailsonthedatainputs.Section5analyzesthescenariosandpresentstheresults.Finally,Section6

concludeswithkeyinsightsandpotentialavenuesforfutureresearch.

2.LiteratureReview

2.1.ModelAnalyses

Manyeconomicandenergymodelshavebeenusedtoanalyzesteelsectorsaround

theworld.TheLCSPmodelpresentedherewasinspiredbythosemodelsbuthasthestrategicadvantageofaspecializedframeworktoaccountforonlycertainaspectsoftheindustry.Manymodelsusedforresearchingaspectsoftheironandsteelindustriesarebroaderinscope.Forinstance,MIT’sEconomicProjectionandPolicyAnalysis

(EPPA)modelincludesmultiplesectorsoftheglobaleconomy.Inarecentanalysis

byGurgeletal.(2025),EPPAwasemployedinanalyzingadvancedsteelmaking

techniques,whichcanreduceemissionsintheindustrialsectorintothefuture.Resultsfromabasescenarioshowedthatfrom2020to2050,steelmadefromBF-BOFplantswillbealmostentirelyovertakenbysteelmadethroughscrap,andemissionsfromsteelproductionwilldecreasebyover50percent.ItwasalsousedinBenavidesetal.(2024)tounderstandcostdifferencesbetweenBF-BOFsteelplantsandmoresustainable

DRI-EAFproductionroutes.Includingmultipleeconomicsectorsinamodelcan

furthercapturerelationshipsamongindustries,especiallyinthecontextofemissionsmitigation.Manygovernmentsandindustryleadersarelookingtoreducetheir

industrialemissionsoverthenextquartercentury;ourmodelcanprovideadeeperunderstandingofthecostsandlogisticsofconvertingthemeansofsteelproduction.

Becauseofitswidescopeandtemporalresolution,MIT’sEPPAmodelhasbeenusedinmultiplecasestoexaminechangesintheironandsteelindustry.EPPA’sfunctionalityiscenteredontheGlobalTradeAnalysisProject(GTAP)DataBase,managedby

PurdueUniversity.ThedatasetcontainsbilateraltradeinformationandallowsEPPAtostudytheinput-outputrelationshipsacrossmultipleeconomiesandsectors.Themodelendogenouslysetspricesandincludesfeaturessuchaspopulationandlanduse.Contrastingly,theLCSPmodeliscountryandsectorspecific.Withitshigher

spatialresolution,inputdataismorespecific,andthismodelcanbeusedtoanswermoreprecisequestionsregardingadvancementsinsteelmaking.AstheLCSPmodelisexpandedinthefuture,itmayincorporatecertainfeaturesoftheEPPAmodel,

especiallysincebothmodelsarewrittenandsolvedinGAMS.

Similarly,manyanalysesofinternationalsteelmarketshavebeenconducted.Wangetal.(2022)usetheC3IAM/NET-ISoptimizationmodeltosimulatethedynamicsofthesteelindustryinChina.Theiranalysisfindsthatthemosteffectivewaytodecarbonizethesectorwouldbebytransitioningtowardtheusageofenergy-savingsteelmakingtechnologylikeEAF,whichwouldcontributeabout22percentofpotentialemissionsreductionsbetween2020and2060.AstudyofIndia’shigh-emissions-producing

industries,withafocusonsteel,utilizedtheEPPAmodeltoshowtheimportance

ResourcesfortheFuture4

ofgovernmentsupportintheindustry’stransition.Theresearchillustratedthe

importanceofcarbonpricingforthesector.Ifitismadeeconomicallycompetitive,CCSdeploymentreducesemissionsby80percentin2050relativetoascenariowithno

governmentintervention(Paltsev,etal.,2022).

2.2.DecarbonizationofSteelmaking

Carboncapturetechnologyisbeingsupportedworldwide,withover600projectsin

thepipelineglobally(GlobalCCSInstitute2024).TheUnitedStateshouses15ofthe50operationalCCSplantsintheworldandhasallocatedover$8billioninappropriationsforCCSprogramsuntil2026(CBO2023).CoupledwithitsexistingfleetofEAF

plants,theUShasacomparativeadvantageintheabilitytoproducelow-carbonsteelproducts.WithitsfocusonEAFsteelproductionintheUS,theLCSPmodelspecializesinmodelingtheseinfrastructuraladvancements.

SteelmakersintheUSandaroundtheworldhavesetapathtodecarbonizingtheindustryoverthenextquartercentury.Theusageofscrapinsteelproductionwillplayacriticalroleinthisprocess,asitrequiresonlyone-eighthoftheenergyof

thatproducedbyusingironore(Çiftçi2018).In2017,steelmakersrecycledabout84

percentofglobalscrapsupplies,makingitoneofthemostrecycledmaterialsinthe

world.Itisprojectedthatin2030,therewillbearoundonebilliontonsofscrapsteel,

whichcouldbeusedtoregeneratenewsteelthroughEAFprocesses.TheInternationalEnergyAgency’sSustainableDevelopmentScenariorequiresthattheaverageCO2

emissionsintensityofsteelproductiondecreaseby60percentby2050;inthisscenario,scrapwouldmakeup45percentoftotalmetallicinputs(IEA2020).

Despitethewidespreadapplicationofscrapsteel,theimportanceofitsutilization

infuturesteelproductionisdebatedbyresearchersaroundtheworld.The

AustralianorganizationResponsibleSteelhasbeenamajorproponentofthesliding

scaleapproach,whichsetsdifferentstandardsforsteelproducedfromhigh-and

low-emittingsources(ResponsibleSteel2022).Theapplicationofthisstandard

acknowledgestheimportanceofbothscrapandironoreinthefutureofsteelmaking.TheGlobalSteelClimateCouncil(GSCC)hasbeencriticalofthisframework,noting

thatseparatestandardscouldallowforsteelplantswithhigheremissionslevelsto

markettheirproductas“sustainable”inthesamewayalow-emittingplantmight

(Alkaff2023).Italsoarguesthatdifferentstandardsincentivizehigh-emittingplants

topostponeimprovingthesustainabilityoftheirproductionprocesses.Instead,the

GSCChasestablisheditsownSteelClimateStandard,withasinglesetoftechnology-agnosticstandards,whichwouldrewardproducersalreadyusingmethodsinvolving

scrap(GSCC2024).Regardlessoftheapproach,thesteelindustryseemssetonapathtoincreaseitsrecycledscrapapplicationintothefuture.

EAFplantsaretypicallyoperatedusingscrapsteelbutcanalsouseDRIasaninput,madeusingeithernaturalgasorhydrogen.Hydrogen-basedDRIisstillanemergingtechnology,butsignificantinvestmentshavebeenmadearoundtheworld.Midrex,aNorthCarolina–basedcompanythatspecializesindirectreductiontechnology,haspartneredwithotherorganizationstosupplyH2-basedDRIplantsinSwedenand

CleanSteelmaking:TransitioningtoaLow-CarbonFuture5

Finland(MidrexTechnologies2025).Stegra’sgreenhydrogen,iron,andsteelplantsinSweden,oncetheyareoperationalin2026,areexpectedtocutsteelsectoremissionsbymorethan7milliontonsannually(Stegra2025).TheHydrogenBreakthrough

IronmakingTechnology(HYBRIT)project,apartnershipbetweenLKAB,SSAB,

andVattenfall,hasademonstrationsiteinSwedentotestgreensteelproduction

methods.Theplantwillmakecarbon-freesteelproductsavailableonthemarketin

2026(HybritDevelopment2025).InAustralia,ProgressiveGreenSolutionsstarteditsMid-WestGreenIronProject,whichwillseethebuildoutof1.4GWofgreenhydrogenelectrolyzerstoproducesevenmilliontonsofgreenironpelletsannually.Around

halfofthesepelletswillbefurtherprocessedtoproduceovertwomilliontonsofHBIannually,aformofironmoresuitableforlong-distancetransportandlesspronetoreoxidation(Martin2025).

Although90percentofChina’ssteelismadeusingBOFtechnology,small-scale

projectsareappearingthroughoutthecountry.Theseprojectsareproducingonly

smallamountsofgreensteel,around10,000metrictonseach,butmanycompaniesarepartneringwithinternationalbuyers,whichcancreatestrongincentivestoincrease

investments(Kaufman2025a,b).Indiaisanothermajorproducerinthesteelindustry.In2024,theConfederationofIndianIndustryandtheWorldWildlifeFundpartneredtocreatetheIndianGreenSteelCoalition,whichaimstodecreasethecarbonintensityofsteelproductionby30percentby2030,relativeto2023(WWF-India2025).The

operablestatusofgreensteeltechnologyvariesaroundtheworld,butnumerouscountrieshaveestablishedtheirroleinseekingtodecarbonizethesteelsector.

3.TheLow-CarbonSteelProduction(LCSP)Model

3.1.SystemConfiguration

Figure1illustratesanintegratedsystemdiagramforEAFsteelmaking.Itcapturesthequantityflowsoffeedstocks(ironore,DRI,andscrap),energyinputs(naturalgas,

hydrogen,andelectricity),CO2emissions(fromenergyproduction,transportation,CCS,andsteelmaking),andimpurity(copper),aswellastransactionsofCO2offsetsandrenewableenergycredits(RECs).

Inthenaturalgas(NG)boxcomponent,weestimatetheproductionandtransportationcosts,alongwiththeassociatedemissionsofnaturalgas,basedonthespecific

quantitiesneededtoprocesseachtypeofironore.Theironoreboxcomponent

providescorrespondingestimatesfortwodifferentgradesofironore:onewithhighandtheotherwithlowironcontent).Inthehydrogenboxcomponent,weassess

theproductionandtransportationcosts,alongwithemissions,forthreesourcesofhydrogen:g

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论