版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
PUBLICSPENDINGANDINCLUSIVEGROWTH
ANEMPIRICALANALYSISACROSSECONOMIES
GaziSalahUddin,AnhH.Le,Md.BokhtiarHasan,JohnBeirne,andDonghyunPark
NO.815
ADBECONOMICS
October2025
WORKINGPAPERSERIES
ASIANDEVELOPMENTBANK
ASIANDEVELOPMENTBANK
ADBEconomicsWorkingPaperSeries
PublicSpendingandInclusiveGrowth:AnEmpiricalAnalysisAcrossEconomies
GaziSalahUddin,AnhH.Le,Md.BokhtiarHasan,JohnBeirne,andDonghyunPark
No.815|October2025
TheADBEconomicsWorkingPaperSeries
presentsresearchinprogresstoelicitcommentsandencouragedebateondevelopmentissuesinAsiaandthePacific.Theviewsexpressed
arethoseoftheauthorsanddonotnecessarilyreflecttheviewsandpoliciesofADBor
itsBoardofGovernorsorthegovernmentstheyrepresent.
GaziSalahUddin(gazi.salah.uddin@liu.se)isa
professoroffinancialeconomicsatLinköping
University,SwedenandNorwegianUniversityof
LifeSciences.AnhH.Le(le@imfs-frankfurt.de)
isaresearchaffiliateattheInstituteforMonetaryandFinancialStability,GoetheUniversityFrankfurt.
Md.BokhtiarHasan(bokhtiar_bank@)isanassociateprofessorattheIslamicUniversity,Bangladesh.JohnBeirne(jbeirne@)
isaprincipaleconomistandDonghyunPark(dpark@)isaneconomicadvisorattheEconomicResearchandDevelopmentImpactDepartment,AsianDevelopmentBank.
CreativeCommonsAttribution3.0IGOlicense(CCBY3.0IGO)
©2025AsianDevelopmentBank
6ADBAvenue,MandaluyongCity,1550MetroManila,PhilippinesTel+63286324444;Fax+63286362444
Somerightsreserved.Publishedin2025.
ISSN2313-6537(print),2313-6545(PDF)PublicationStockNo.WPS250423-2
DOI:
/10.22617/WPS250423-2
TheviewsexpressedinthispublicationarethoseoftheauthorsanddonotnecessarilyreflecttheviewsandpoliciesoftheAsianDevelopmentBank(ADB)oritsBoardofGovernorsorthegovernmentstheyrepresent.
ADBdoesnotguaranteetheaccuracyofthedataincludedinthispublicationandacceptsnoresponsibilityforanyconsequenceoftheiruse.ThementionofspecificcompaniesorproductsofmanufacturersdoesnotimplythattheyareendorsedorrecommendedbyADBinpreferencetoothersofasimilarnaturethatarenotmentioned.
Bymakinganydesignationoforreferencetoaparticularterritoryorgeographicareainthisdocument,ADBdoesnotintendtomakeanyjudgmentsastothelegalorotherstatusofanyterritoryorarea.
ThispublicationisavailableundertheCreativeCommonsAttribution3.0IGOlicense(CCBY3.0IGO)
/licenses/by/3.0/igo/.Byusingthecontentofthispublication
,youagreetobeboundbythetermsofthislicense.Forattribution,translations,adaptations,andpermissions,pleasereadtheprovisionsandtermsofuseat
/terms-use#openaccess
.
ThisCClicensedoesnotapplytonon-ADBcopyrightmaterialsinthispublication.Ifthematerialisattributedtoanothersource,pleasecontactthecopyrightownerorpublisherofthatsourceforpermissiontoreproduceit.
ADBcannotbeheldliableforanyclaimsthatariseasaresultofyouruseofthematerial.
Pleasecontactpubsmarketing@ifyouhavequestionsorcommentswithrespecttocontent,orifyouwishtoobtaincopyrightpermissionforyourintendedusethatdoesnotfallwithintheseterms,orforpermissiontousetheADBlogo.
CorrigendatoADBpublicationsmaybefoundat
/publications/corrigenda
.
Note:
ADBrecognizes“China”asthePeople’sRepublicofChina.
ABSTRACT
Weinvestigatetheeffectsofdifferentcomponentsofgovernmentspendingoninclusivegrowth.Morespecifically,weconsidertheinclusiveimpactofpublicspendingonenvironmentalprotection,health,education,housing,andsocialprotection,allofwhichcanconceivablypromoteinclusivegrowth.Forourempiricalanalysis,weapplypanelregressionsandlocalprojectionstoacomprehensivedatabaseof191economiesbetween1980and2023.Ourevidenceindicatesthatequity-promotinggovernmentspendingreducesincomeinequality,asmeasuredbytheGiniindex,andimproveshumandevelopmentindicators.Moreover,ouranalysisrevealsthatpoorerhouseholdsbenefitdisproportionately,suggestingthattargetedfiscalexpenditurescanpromoteequity.Notably,theinclusiveeffectsaremostpronouncedinadvancedeconomies,whererobustfiscalframeworkssupportandamplifysucheffects.Incontrast,emerginganddevelopingeconomiesexperiencemoremodestgains.Overall,thefindingshighlighttheimportanceofwell-designedpublicspendingprogramsforequitablegrowth.Finally,weconductstate-dependentlocalprojectionsandregionalsubsampleanalysis.
Keywords:governmentspending,inclusivegrowth,incomeinequality,developedanddevelopingeconomies
JELcodes:D63,E62,O23,O47
1INTRODUCTION
Givenrisingincomeinequalityaroundtheworld,inclusivegrowththatbenefitsthebroaderpopulationhasbecomeatoppriorityforacademicsandpolicymakers.Inparticular,theincomegapbetweentherichandthepoorwithineconomiesshowsnosignsofnarrowing[UnitedNations(UN)
1
].Inrecentdecades,incomedisparitieshavepersistedorevendeteriorateddespitesustainedeconomicgrowthinmanyeconomies(OECD,2015).Supportingthisobservation,Figure1illustratesasignificantreductioninincomeinequalitybetweeneconomiesfrom1980to2020,indicatingaconvergenceinaverageincomes.Conversely,incomeinequalitywithineconomieshasincreasedconsistentlyduringthesameperiod,demonstratingagrowingdisparitybetweenthetopandlowerearnergroups.Apotentiallypowerfultoolforgovernmentstopromotealessunequalincomedistributionispublicspending.Forexample,publicspendingoneducationhelpstoleveltheplayingfieldforthepoor.Fiscalpolicycanaffectresourceallocationandincomedistribution,therebycontributingtoachievingmoreinclusivegrowthandreducinginequality(Clementsetal.,2025).However,theeffectivenessoffiscalspendinginachievingthesegoalsremainsunclear.Moreover,earlierstudiesoftenfindthattheimpactvariesacrosseconomycontexts,especiallyindevelopedversusdevelopingeconomies(MallaandPathranarakul,2022).Ourstudycontributestotheimportantliteratureonthelinkbetweenfiscalpolicyandinclusivegrowthbytakinganin-depthlookathowdifferenttypesofpublicspendingaffectinclusivegrowth.
Figure1:GlobalIncomeInequality:Between-EconomyVersusWithin-EconomyInequality
(1820–2020)
Note:T10/B50istheratiooftheaverageincomesofthetop10%andthebottom50%.
Sources:WorldInequalityLab.wir2022.wid.world/methodologyandChancelandPiketty(2021).
1
/en/un75/inequality-bridging-divide
2
Theassociationbetweenfiscalspendingandinequalityismultifacetedandheavilyaffectedbyaneconomy’sinstitutional,economic,andsocialstructures.Totalpublicexpenditureshavetraditionallybeenviewedasaredistributivemechanismthatcouldreduceinequality(DoumbiaandKinda,2019).However,recentstudiesindicatethattheinfluenceofpublicspendingoninequalitynotonlydependsonitssize,butalsoonefficiencyandcomposition(Chuetal.,2000;Adarovetal.,2024).Morespecifically,governmentspendingoneducation,healthcare,andsocialprotectionhasasignificantpotentialtofosterinclusivegrowthbyalleviatingpoverty,ensuringequalopportunities,andaugmentingthecapabilitiesofdisadvantagedgroups(Clementsetal.,2022).However,inreality,theinclusiveimpactofsuchexpendituresvarieswidelyacrosseconomies.
Thestylizedfactsofthefiscalspending–inequality–inclusivegrowthnexusarepresentedinFigures2and3andTableA1intheAppendix.
2
Mosteconomieswiththelowestinequalitytendtohaverelativelyhighpublicexpenditure(%ofgrossdomesticproduct(GDP))alongwithhighinequality-adjustedHumanDevelopmentIndex(HDI)scores.Thispatternmayreflecttheimpactofequity-promotingfiscalpoliciesoninclusivegrowthandmoreequalincomedistributions.Atthesametime,mosteconomieswiththehighestincomeinequalityshowlowerpublicspendingandmarkedlylowerHDIscores.Furthermore,thespendingtypestatistics(Figure3)indicatethatexpendituresoneducation,health,andsocialprotectionaremorepronouncedinlowincomeinequalitynations.Thissupportsthehypothesisthattargetedspendingiscriticalindrivinginclusivegrowth(Clementsetal.,2022).However,therelationshipbetweenpublicspendingandinequalityisuneven.Forexample,somenationswithhightotalpublicspending,suchasBrazilandNamibia,stillhavehighinequalityandlowHDIscores.Incontrast,theUnitedArabEmirateshasrelativelylowpublicexpenditureyetenjoyslowinequalityandahighHDI.Thisindicatesthathighpublicspendingalonedoesnotguaranteeequitableincomedistribution.Thisraisessomevitalresearchquestions.Doesspendingcompositionmattermorethansize?Whatroledoinstitutionalqualityandeconomicstructureplay?Andhowcanfiscalpolicybedesignedtooptimizeitsinclusiveimpact?
2TheAppendixisavailableat
/10.22617/WPS250423-2
.
3
Figure2:TotalPublicSpending,InclusiveGrowth,andIncomeInequality
Top10CountrieswiththeLowestInequalityin2022
TotalPSandGiniindex
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1.000.900.800.700.600.500.400.300.200.10
0.00
Totalpublicspending(%ofGDP)——Giniindex(%)——HDI(Inequalityadjusted)
Top10CountrieswiththeHighestInequalityin2022
TotalPSandGiniindex
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.700.600.500.400.300.200.10
0.00
Totalpublicspending(%ofGDP)——Giniindex(%)——HDI(Inequalityadjusted)
GDP=grossdomesticproduct,HDI=HumanDevelopmentIndex,PS=publicspending,UAE=UnitedArabEmirates.
Notes:Thefigureshowsthenexusbetweentotalpublicspending(PS)(%ofGDP),inclusivegrowth(measuredbyinequality-adjustedHDI),andincomeinequality(measuredbytheGiniindex(%)).
Source:Authors’calculations.
4
Figure3:SectoralPublicSpendingandIncomeInequality
Top10CountrieswiththeLowestInequalityin2022
Giniindex
23.5
23.0
22.5
27.0
26.5
26.0
25.5
25.0
24.0
24.5
25
20
15
10
5
0
Sectoralspending
GiniCoefficient(%)
HealthSpending(%ofGDP)
EducationSpending(%ofGDP)Socialspending(%ofGDP)
Top10CountrieswiththeHighestInequalityin2022
Giniindex
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Sectoralspending
EducationSpending(%ofGDP)Socialspending(%ofGDP)
GiniIndex(%)
HealthSpending(%ofGDP)
GDP=grossdomesticproduct,UAE=UnitedArabEmirates.
Notes:Thefigureshowsthenexusbetweensectoralpublicspending(%ofGDP):Education,health,andsocial,andincomeinequality(measuredbytheGiniindex(%)).
Source:Authors’calculations.
Despiteextensiveresearchonfiscalspendingandinclusivegrowth,thesequestionsstillremainunsolved,underscoringasignificantgapintheexistingliterature.PleaserefertoSection2foramoredetaileddiscussionoftheliterature.Althoughmanyearlierstudies(e.g.,Cliftonetal.,2020;Clementsetal.,2022)examinedpublicspendingcategoriessuchaseducation,health,andsocialwelfare,analysisofothercategoriessuchasenvironmentalprotection,housingandcommunitydevelopment,andrecreationandcultureislimited.Yettheseothertypesoffiscalspendingcansubstantiallyaffectequity.Forexample,environmentaldeteriorationdisproportionatelyaffectsthepoor(ESCAP,2018).Likewise,poorhousingandcommunityservicesrestrictsocialandeconomicinclusion(WanjiruandPahari,2024).
5
Furthermore,mostexistingresearchfailstocapturethepotentialnonlinearityoftheimpactofdifferenttypesoffiscalexpendituresondifferentincomegroups.Thisrestrictsourunderstandingofhowvariousformsofpublicexpenditureinfluencedemographicgroups.Forexample,morespendingonhighereducationmaybenefithigh-incomehouseholdsmorethanlow-incomehouseholds(AriasandKheyfets,2023).Therefore,amorecomprehensivestudyisrequiredtoassessthedistributionaleffectsofdifferenttypesofpublicspendinganddesignpoliciesthateffectivelytargetandhelpunderprivilegedpeople.Anothermajorgapintheexistingliteratureistherelativelyscarceempiricalanalysisofthelinkbetweendisaggregatedfiscalspendingandinclusivegrowthacrossdifferenteconomygroups,mostnotablyindevelopedversusdevelopingeconomies.Fiscalpolicycandiffersignificantlybetweendevelopedanddevelopingnations,whichfacedifferentchallengesandopportunitiesforinclusivefiscalpolicy.Forexample,insufficientfiscalspace,poorinstitutions,andstructuralinequitiescanlimitequity-promotingpublicexpenditureinemerginganddevelopingeconomies(Danieletal.,2006).
Ourpapermakesanumberofnovelcontributionstotheliteratureonfiscalspendingandinclusivegrowth.First,weperformacomprehensiveglobalanalysisofdisaggregatedgovernmentspendingoneducation,health,socialprotection,environment,housingandcommunity,andrecreationandcultureinclusivegrowth.Ouranalysisthusprovidesamoregranularanddeeperunderstandingoftheinclusiveimpactoffiscalpolicy.Second,weusearichpaneldatasetof191economiesfrom1980to2023andemployJordà's(2005)localprojectionimpulseresponsefunctions(LP-IRFs),alongwithstate-dependentlocalprojectionapproaches,tobettercapturethedynamicandheterogeneouseffectsofinclusivefiscalspending.ThisLP-IRFstechniqueischoseninouranalysisparticularlybecauseofitsflexibilityinaddressingcomplex,nonlinearrelationshipsanditscapabilitytoestimateimpulseresponsesdirectlywithoutimposingthestrictrestrictionsofafullsystemspecification.Itiscomparativelyrobusttomoderatemisspecification(Jordà,2023).Thetraditionalvectorautoregression(VAR),bycontrast,canbemoreefficientwhenspecifiedcorrectly,yetitissusceptibletovariouschallenges:dimensionality,identificationchoices,andmodelmisspecification,whichareespeciallycriticalinmulti-economypanelswithseveralfiscalinstruments(Jordà,2023),asinourcases.Givenourdatafeatures(e.g.,multi-economysetting,heterogeneousfiscalinstruments),ourLPframeworkallowsustoexplorehowtheimpactoffiscalspendingevolvesacrosshorizons,variesacrossincomegroups,andshiftsbasedonthemacroeconomicandinstitutionalcontextofaneconomy,therebyprovidingamorenuancedandpolicy-relevantperspectiveonfiscaldynamicsthattightlyparameterizedVARsmayfailtodo.
Third,wecomparetheeffectsoffiscalspendinginadvancedeconomies(AEs)versusemergingmarketsanddevelopingeconomies(EMDEs).Wehighlightthecriticalroleofinstitutional
6
capacityandgovernancequalityinmagnifyingorconstrainingthedistributionalimpactofsuchexpenditures,whichwereoftenoverlookedinpreviouscross-economystudies.Finally,ourfindingshavesignificantimplicationsforpolicymakerscraftingfiscalpoliciestoreduceincomeinequalityand,moregenerally,fostermoreinclusivegrowth.Ouranalysishelpsidentifythetypesofpublicexpenditurewiththebiggestinclusiveeffects,therebyinformingandguidingtheallocationofscarcefiscalresources.
Ourempiricalevidenceclearlyshowsthatpublicspendingthatcanconceivablypromoteequity,suchaseducation,health,andsocialprotection,isstatisticallyandeconomicallysignificantlyassociatedwithimprovementsinincomeinequalityandhumandevelopmentindicators.Theequitygainsfromgovernmentspendingaremostsubstantialinadvancedeconomies,whichtypicallyhavestrongerfiscalframeworksandinstitutions,asevidentinfasterandmoredurabledeclinesintheGiniindex.InEMDEs,whichtypicallyhaveweakerinstitutionsandstructuralbarriers,fiscalpolicyalsoreducesincomeinequality,buttheimpactisnotasstrong.Furthermore,ourstate-dependentandregionalanalysesrevealthattheinfluenceofinclusivespendingiscontextdependent.Morespecifically,highcorruption,weakgovernance,andelevatedclimateriskallweakentheefficacyofinclusivespending.Takentogether,ourresultsunderlinetheimportanceoftargetedfiscalinterventionsthatdirectlyaddressthemostpressingsocialneeds,particularlyinhealth,education,andsocialprotection,withinthebroadercontextofstrengtheninginstitutionssothatpublicresourceseffectivelyreachvulnerablepopulations.
Therestofthepaperisdesignedasfollows.Section2discussestherelevantliterature,includingtheoreticalstudiesandempiricalanalysisofthelinkbetweenfiscalspendingandincomeinequality.Section3laysoutourempiricalmethodology.Section4describesthedataandvariablesusedinourempiricalanalysis.Section5reportsanddiscussesourmainempiricalresults,andfinally,Section6concludesourpaper.
2LITERATUREREVIEW
Therelationshipbetweengovernmentspendingandinclusivegrowthisthesubjectofalong-standingdebateineconomicresearch.Manyresearchershaveinvestigatedtheimpactofgovernmentspendingonreducingincomeinequalityandpromotinginclusiveeconomicgrowth.Thisresearchstreamhasgainedrenewedmomentuminthewakeofrecentglobalrecessionssuchastheglobalfinancialcrisisandthecoronavirusdisease(COVID-19)pandemic,whichdisproportionatelyhitthepoorandthusexacerbateinequalities.Fiscalpolicy,whichplaysabigroleinresourceallocationandincomedistribution,isavitalpolicytoolforpromotingequity.Inthissection,wecriticallyreviewtheexistingbodyofresearchonthecomplexinterplaybetween
7
fiscalspendingandinclusivegrowth.Weadoptastructuredapproachtotheliteraturereview,whichisbasedonkeythemes,schoolsofthought,andresearchgaps.Finally,weexplainthecontributionofourstudytothelargeandgrowingliteratureonthefiscalpolicy–inclusivegrowthnexus.
2.1TheoreticalPerspectivesonFiscalSpendingandInclusiveGrowth
Economictheoryoffersdivergentperspectivesontheroleofgovernmentspendinginaddressingincomeinequality.Forinstance,Keynesianeconomicsgenerallypositsthatfiscalinterventionscanstimulatedemand.RecentsupportiveevidenceincludesClementsetal.(2022),whofindthatfiscalinterventionsinsocialsectorssuchaseducation,health,andsocialbenefitscanboostaggregatedemand,indirectlyreducingdisparitiesandthuspromotinginclusivegrowth.Thispointofviewsuggeststhatactivegovernmentparticipationcanaddressmarketfailuresandguidetheeconomytowardmoreequitableoutcomes.
Incontrast,neoclassicaleconomistsprioritizeeconomicefficiency.Aboveall,theycautionagainstexcessivegovernmentspending,arguingthatitcandistortmarketmechanismsandhinderoptimalresourceallocation(Barro,1990).Hence,neoclassicaltheorypostulatesthatgovernmentinterferencecanleadtoinefficiencies,crowdoutprivateinvestment,andharmoveralleconomicperformance.Thesecontrastingperspectivesontheroleofthegovernmenthighlightthedilemmabetweeninterventionandefficiencythatpolicymakersface.
Endogenousgrowththeoriesofferyetanotheralternativeview.Thesetheoriesunderscoretheimportanceofhumancapitalinvestments,especiallyineducationandhealthcare,forlong-termgrowthandequity.Inlinewiththeinclusivegrowthconcept,thistheoreticalframeworkpointsoutthatsuchinvestmentscanenhanceproductivity,broadeneconomicopportunities,andsupportamoreequitableincomedistribution(Lucas,1988).Morerecentperspectives,suchasthesocialinvestmentparadigm,builduponthisemphasisonhumancapital.Theyhighlightthesignificanceofproactiveandfocusedsocialspendingtolowerstructuralinequalitywhilepromotingsocialinclusion(Semmler,2007).
Weobservethepracticalramificationsofthesetheoriesintaxpolicy,akeycomponentofanyfiscalstrategy.Effectivetaxdesignisindispensableforachievingbothefficiencyandequality,therebyfacilitatinginclusivegrowth.Soundtaxpolicyrequiresacarefulevaluationofdetailedtaxpolicychoicesrelatedtopersonalincometaxonlaborandcapitalincome,wealthtax,corporateincometax,andconsumptiontax(Abdel-KaderandDeMooij,2020).Moreover,politicalsupportiscrucialforsuccessfullyimplementingtaxreformstopromoteinclusivegrowth(Abdel-KaderandDeMooij,2020).
8
2.2EmpiricalEvidenceonFiscalSpendingandInclusiveGrowth
Empiricalstudiesthatexplorethelinkbetweenfiscalspendingandinclusivegrowthyieldmixedevidenceabouttheimpactoffiscalspendingonincomeinequality.
2.2.1FiscalPolicy,IncomeInequality,andInclusiveGrowth
Asubstantialbodyofresearchcentersontheroleoffiscalredistributioninadvancinginclusiveeconomicgrowth,especiallywithinAsia(e.g.,AoyagiandGanelli,2015;Clementsetal.,2025;Clementsetal.,2022).AoyagiandGanelli(2015)suggestthatfiscalredistributions,combinedwithmonetarypolicyandstructuralreforms,arekeydriversofinclusiveeconomicgrowth.Clementsetal.(2025)furtheremphasizethatfiscalredistribution,primarilythroughtargetedhealthandeducationspending,significantlyliftsthelikelihoodofachievinginclusivegrowthandreducingincomeinequality.However,thesestudiesalsocautionthatraisingsufficientgovernmentrevenuestofundtargetedprogramsandprovidesocialbenefitsadequatelymayencountersignificantchallenges(Clementsetal.,2022).
Severalearlierstudiesemphasizethecompositionofpublicexpenditureasamajorinfluenceoneconomicgrowthandinclusivedevelopment(Semmler,2007;Zouharetal.,2021).Semmler(2007)exploredtheeffectsofvariouspublicexpenditurecomponentssuchaseducation,health,infrastructure,andsocialbenefitsoninequalityandpoverty.Thisstudyarguesthatgrowth-promotingfiscalspendingcanexpandfuturefiscalrevenueandhencefuturefiscalspace.Althoughthereisabroadconsensusonthepotentialoffiscalpolicytoreduceincomedisparity,theparticularexpenditurecomponentsandtheirdynamicinfluencesonequityvarysignificantlyacrossnationsandincomelevels(Isiakaetal.,2025).
Inthisconnection,Zouharetal.(2021)showthatspecifictypesofspendingareimportantintermsoftheirdynamiceffectoninequality,incomedistributionacrossvarioussegmentsofsociety,andtheassociatedtimeprofile.Cliftonetal.(2020)showthatgovernmentexpenditureonspecificcomponents,suchaseducation,personalincometaxes,andsocialsecurity,substantiallyreducesincomeinequalityinurbanareas.However,theseeffectsareinconsistent,andtheychangeovertime.Similarly,Hur(2015)andClementsetal.(2022)findthatincreasedpublicspendingonspecificexpenditurecomponents—suchaseducation,health,andsocialprotection—correlateswithlowerincomeinequality,asmeasuredbytheGiniindex.
MallaandPathranarakul(2022)presentcontrastingevidencefordevelopingversusdevelopedeconomies.Theyfindthatprogressiveincometaxtendstoreduceincomeinequalityonlyindevelopingeconomies.Theyalsoshowthathighergovernmentspending,particularlyoneducationandhealth,isassociatedwithlowerincomeinequalityindevelopedeconomies.
9
However,thisrelationshipisnotconsistentlyobservedindevelopingeconomies.Thisunderscorestheimportanceofconsideringthespecificcontextofdevelopedversusdevelopingeconomieswhenanalyzingtheinclusiveimpactoffiscalpolicy.Furthermore,studiessuggestthatinemerginganddevelopingnations,fiscalpoliciesoftendonotsubstantiallyreduceinequality,possiblyduetocorruption,leakages,andweakinstitutionalframeworks(Chuetal.,2000;Guptaetal.,2002;MallaandPathranarakul,2022).Martinez-Vazquezetal.(2012)alsofindmixedevidence.Theysuggestthatprogressivepersonalandcorporateincometaxesareassociatedwithlowerincomeinequality,whileothertaxes,suchasgeneraltaxes,excisetaxes,andcustomsduties,tendtoexacerbateinequality.Theirfindingsalsosuggestthatincreasedpublicexpendituresoneducation,health,andsocialwelfaretendtoreduceinequality.However,arecentstudybyLiuandDong(2025)offersdivergentevidence.Theyshowthatpublicspendingonsocialwelfaremayincreaseincomedisparitybetweenurbanversusruralareasin31Chineseprovinces.However,theimpactisinconsistentacrossprovinces.AlesinaandArdagna(2010)examinetheeffectsofsignificantchangesinfiscalpolicy,suchasfiscalstimulusandadjustment,oneconomicgrowthinOrganisationofEconomicCo-operationandDevelopment(OECD)economies.Theirfindingsindicatethatafiscalstimulusthroughtaxcutsismoreeffectiveforraisinggrowththanincreasingpublicspending.Theyalsosuggestthatfiscaladjustmentsthroughspendingcutstendtoreducebudgetdeficitsandpublicdebt-to-GDPratiosmorethanraisingtaxes.
2.2.2BroaderFiscalPolicyMeasuresandIncomeInequality
Researchersalsoinvestigatetheimpactofbroaderfiscalpolicymeasuresbeyondspecificexpenditurecategoriesonincomeinequality.Forinstance,AgnelloandSousa(2014)analyzetheimpactoffiscalconsolidationonincomeinequality.Theirfindingssuggestthatfiscalconsolidationtendstoincreaseincomeinequality,mainlyduetospendingcuts.Thesizeoffiscalconsolidationprogramsandtheirinteractionwitheconomicconditions,suchasbankingcrises,inflation,andeconomicgrowth,influenceincomedistribution(AgnelloandSousa,2014).Konstantinou(2024)alsofindsthatfiscalconsolidationintheformofpublicspendingexacerbatesinequality.However,theeffectoffiscaladjustmentsoninequalitymaydependonthesizeofthefis
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 神经递质与突触可塑性
- 纳米抗体针对病毒治疗
- 2025-2030装修行业市场深度分析及竞争格局与投资价值研究报告
- 2025-2030智慧办公环境改造评估员工舒适度分析空间规划规划发展研究
- 2025-2030智慧农业遥感监测行业市场现状供需探讨技术方案
- 2025-2030智慧农业装备制造业技术进步及产品应用与市场研究
- 2025-2030智慧农业系统行业市场竞争现状供需分析技术投资评估报告
- 2025-2030智慧农业物联网技术农业生产自动化系统开发研究报告
- 2025-2030智慧农业无人机播种施肥技术研发市场分析报告
- 2025-2030智慧农业农产品溯源区块链技术自然灾害预警病虫害防控实时监控生产全程可视化方案评估报告
- 高空作业车安全操作规程
- 2024云南省委党校研究生招生考试真题(附答案)
- 诺如病毒考试题及答案
- DB45∕T 2479-2022 一般固体废物填埋场水文地质工程地质勘察规范
- 岗位安全责任清单意义
- 2025年焊工(技师)考试练习题库(附答案)
- 学术自由与责任共担:导师制度与研究生培养制的深度探讨
- 法拍司辅内部管理制度
- 道路损坏修缮协议书模板
- 2025年上海市各区高三二模语文试题汇编《现代文一》含答案
- 公司履约保函管理制度
评论
0/150
提交评论