【亚开行】公共支出与包容性增长:跨经济体的实证分析-2025.10_第1页
【亚开行】公共支出与包容性增长:跨经济体的实证分析-2025.10_第2页
【亚开行】公共支出与包容性增长:跨经济体的实证分析-2025.10_第3页
【亚开行】公共支出与包容性增长:跨经济体的实证分析-2025.10_第4页
【亚开行】公共支出与包容性增长:跨经济体的实证分析-2025.10_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩102页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

PUBLICSPENDINGANDINCLUSIVEGROWTH

ANEMPIRICALANALYSISACROSSECONOMIES

GaziSalahUddin,AnhH.Le,Md.BokhtiarHasan,JohnBeirne,andDonghyunPark

NO.815

ADBECONOMICS

October2025

WORKINGPAPERSERIES

ASIANDEVELOPMENTBANK

ASIANDEVELOPMENTBANK

ADBEconomicsWorkingPaperSeries

PublicSpendingandInclusiveGrowth:AnEmpiricalAnalysisAcrossEconomies

GaziSalahUddin,AnhH.Le,Md.BokhtiarHasan,JohnBeirne,andDonghyunPark

No.815|October2025

TheADBEconomicsWorkingPaperSeries

presentsresearchinprogresstoelicitcommentsandencouragedebateondevelopmentissuesinAsiaandthePacific.Theviewsexpressed

arethoseoftheauthorsanddonotnecessarilyreflecttheviewsandpoliciesofADBor

itsBoardofGovernorsorthegovernmentstheyrepresent.

GaziSalahUddin(gazi.salah.uddin@liu.se)isa

professoroffinancialeconomicsatLinköping

University,SwedenandNorwegianUniversityof

LifeSciences.AnhH.Le(le@imfs-frankfurt.de)

isaresearchaffiliateattheInstituteforMonetaryandFinancialStability,GoetheUniversityFrankfurt.

Md.BokhtiarHasan(bokhtiar_bank@)isanassociateprofessorattheIslamicUniversity,Bangladesh.JohnBeirne(jbeirne@)

isaprincipaleconomistandDonghyunPark(dpark@)isaneconomicadvisorattheEconomicResearchandDevelopmentImpactDepartment,AsianDevelopmentBank.

CreativeCommonsAttribution3.0IGOlicense(CCBY3.0IGO)

©2025AsianDevelopmentBank

6ADBAvenue,MandaluyongCity,1550MetroManila,PhilippinesTel+63286324444;Fax+63286362444

Somerightsreserved.Publishedin2025.

ISSN2313-6537(print),2313-6545(PDF)PublicationStockNo.WPS250423-2

DOI:

/10.22617/WPS250423-2

TheviewsexpressedinthispublicationarethoseoftheauthorsanddonotnecessarilyreflecttheviewsandpoliciesoftheAsianDevelopmentBank(ADB)oritsBoardofGovernorsorthegovernmentstheyrepresent.

ADBdoesnotguaranteetheaccuracyofthedataincludedinthispublicationandacceptsnoresponsibilityforanyconsequenceoftheiruse.ThementionofspecificcompaniesorproductsofmanufacturersdoesnotimplythattheyareendorsedorrecommendedbyADBinpreferencetoothersofasimilarnaturethatarenotmentioned.

Bymakinganydesignationoforreferencetoaparticularterritoryorgeographicareainthisdocument,ADBdoesnotintendtomakeanyjudgmentsastothelegalorotherstatusofanyterritoryorarea.

ThispublicationisavailableundertheCreativeCommonsAttribution3.0IGOlicense(CCBY3.0IGO)

/licenses/by/3.0/igo/.Byusingthecontentofthispublication

,youagreetobeboundbythetermsofthislicense.Forattribution,translations,adaptations,andpermissions,pleasereadtheprovisionsandtermsofuseat

/terms-use#openaccess

.

ThisCClicensedoesnotapplytonon-ADBcopyrightmaterialsinthispublication.Ifthematerialisattributedtoanothersource,pleasecontactthecopyrightownerorpublisherofthatsourceforpermissiontoreproduceit.

ADBcannotbeheldliableforanyclaimsthatariseasaresultofyouruseofthematerial.

Pleasecontactpubsmarketing@ifyouhavequestionsorcommentswithrespecttocontent,orifyouwishtoobtaincopyrightpermissionforyourintendedusethatdoesnotfallwithintheseterms,orforpermissiontousetheADBlogo.

CorrigendatoADBpublicationsmaybefoundat

/publications/corrigenda

.

Note:

ADBrecognizes“China”asthePeople’sRepublicofChina.

ABSTRACT

Weinvestigatetheeffectsofdifferentcomponentsofgovernmentspendingoninclusivegrowth.Morespecifically,weconsidertheinclusiveimpactofpublicspendingonenvironmentalprotection,health,education,housing,andsocialprotection,allofwhichcanconceivablypromoteinclusivegrowth.Forourempiricalanalysis,weapplypanelregressionsandlocalprojectionstoacomprehensivedatabaseof191economiesbetween1980and2023.Ourevidenceindicatesthatequity-promotinggovernmentspendingreducesincomeinequality,asmeasuredbytheGiniindex,andimproveshumandevelopmentindicators.Moreover,ouranalysisrevealsthatpoorerhouseholdsbenefitdisproportionately,suggestingthattargetedfiscalexpenditurescanpromoteequity.Notably,theinclusiveeffectsaremostpronouncedinadvancedeconomies,whererobustfiscalframeworkssupportandamplifysucheffects.Incontrast,emerginganddevelopingeconomiesexperiencemoremodestgains.Overall,thefindingshighlighttheimportanceofwell-designedpublicspendingprogramsforequitablegrowth.Finally,weconductstate-dependentlocalprojectionsandregionalsubsampleanalysis.

Keywords:governmentspending,inclusivegrowth,incomeinequality,developedanddevelopingeconomies

JELcodes:D63,E62,O23,O47

1INTRODUCTION

Givenrisingincomeinequalityaroundtheworld,inclusivegrowththatbenefitsthebroaderpopulationhasbecomeatoppriorityforacademicsandpolicymakers.Inparticular,theincomegapbetweentherichandthepoorwithineconomiesshowsnosignsofnarrowing[UnitedNations(UN)

1

].Inrecentdecades,incomedisparitieshavepersistedorevendeteriorateddespitesustainedeconomicgrowthinmanyeconomies(OECD,2015).Supportingthisobservation,Figure1illustratesasignificantreductioninincomeinequalitybetweeneconomiesfrom1980to2020,indicatingaconvergenceinaverageincomes.Conversely,incomeinequalitywithineconomieshasincreasedconsistentlyduringthesameperiod,demonstratingagrowingdisparitybetweenthetopandlowerearnergroups.Apotentiallypowerfultoolforgovernmentstopromotealessunequalincomedistributionispublicspending.Forexample,publicspendingoneducationhelpstoleveltheplayingfieldforthepoor.Fiscalpolicycanaffectresourceallocationandincomedistribution,therebycontributingtoachievingmoreinclusivegrowthandreducinginequality(Clementsetal.,2025).However,theeffectivenessoffiscalspendinginachievingthesegoalsremainsunclear.Moreover,earlierstudiesoftenfindthattheimpactvariesacrosseconomycontexts,especiallyindevelopedversusdevelopingeconomies(MallaandPathranarakul,2022).Ourstudycontributestotheimportantliteratureonthelinkbetweenfiscalpolicyandinclusivegrowthbytakinganin-depthlookathowdifferenttypesofpublicspendingaffectinclusivegrowth.

Figure1:GlobalIncomeInequality:Between-EconomyVersusWithin-EconomyInequality

(1820–2020)

Note:T10/B50istheratiooftheaverageincomesofthetop10%andthebottom50%.

Sources:WorldInequalityLab.wir2022.wid.world/methodologyandChancelandPiketty(2021).

1

/en/un75/inequality-bridging-divide

2

Theassociationbetweenfiscalspendingandinequalityismultifacetedandheavilyaffectedbyaneconomy’sinstitutional,economic,andsocialstructures.Totalpublicexpenditureshavetraditionallybeenviewedasaredistributivemechanismthatcouldreduceinequality(DoumbiaandKinda,2019).However,recentstudiesindicatethattheinfluenceofpublicspendingoninequalitynotonlydependsonitssize,butalsoonefficiencyandcomposition(Chuetal.,2000;Adarovetal.,2024).Morespecifically,governmentspendingoneducation,healthcare,andsocialprotectionhasasignificantpotentialtofosterinclusivegrowthbyalleviatingpoverty,ensuringequalopportunities,andaugmentingthecapabilitiesofdisadvantagedgroups(Clementsetal.,2022).However,inreality,theinclusiveimpactofsuchexpendituresvarieswidelyacrosseconomies.

Thestylizedfactsofthefiscalspending–inequality–inclusivegrowthnexusarepresentedinFigures2and3andTableA1intheAppendix.

2

Mosteconomieswiththelowestinequalitytendtohaverelativelyhighpublicexpenditure(%ofgrossdomesticproduct(GDP))alongwithhighinequality-adjustedHumanDevelopmentIndex(HDI)scores.Thispatternmayreflecttheimpactofequity-promotingfiscalpoliciesoninclusivegrowthandmoreequalincomedistributions.Atthesametime,mosteconomieswiththehighestincomeinequalityshowlowerpublicspendingandmarkedlylowerHDIscores.Furthermore,thespendingtypestatistics(Figure3)indicatethatexpendituresoneducation,health,andsocialprotectionaremorepronouncedinlowincomeinequalitynations.Thissupportsthehypothesisthattargetedspendingiscriticalindrivinginclusivegrowth(Clementsetal.,2022).However,therelationshipbetweenpublicspendingandinequalityisuneven.Forexample,somenationswithhightotalpublicspending,suchasBrazilandNamibia,stillhavehighinequalityandlowHDIscores.Incontrast,theUnitedArabEmirateshasrelativelylowpublicexpenditureyetenjoyslowinequalityandahighHDI.Thisindicatesthathighpublicspendingalonedoesnotguaranteeequitableincomedistribution.Thisraisessomevitalresearchquestions.Doesspendingcompositionmattermorethansize?Whatroledoinstitutionalqualityandeconomicstructureplay?Andhowcanfiscalpolicybedesignedtooptimizeitsinclusiveimpact?

2TheAppendixisavailableat

/10.22617/WPS250423-2

.

3

Figure2:TotalPublicSpending,InclusiveGrowth,andIncomeInequality

Top10CountrieswiththeLowestInequalityin2022

TotalPSandGiniindex

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

1.000.900.800.700.600.500.400.300.200.10

0.00

Totalpublicspending(%ofGDP)——Giniindex(%)——HDI(Inequalityadjusted)

Top10CountrieswiththeHighestInequalityin2022

TotalPSandGiniindex

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

0.700.600.500.400.300.200.10

0.00

Totalpublicspending(%ofGDP)——Giniindex(%)——HDI(Inequalityadjusted)

GDP=grossdomesticproduct,HDI=HumanDevelopmentIndex,PS=publicspending,UAE=UnitedArabEmirates.

Notes:Thefigureshowsthenexusbetweentotalpublicspending(PS)(%ofGDP),inclusivegrowth(measuredbyinequality-adjustedHDI),andincomeinequality(measuredbytheGiniindex(%)).

Source:Authors’calculations.

4

Figure3:SectoralPublicSpendingandIncomeInequality

Top10CountrieswiththeLowestInequalityin2022

Giniindex

23.5

23.0

22.5

27.0

26.5

26.0

25.5

25.0

24.0

24.5

25

20

15

10

5

0

Sectoralspending

GiniCoefficient(%)

HealthSpending(%ofGDP)

EducationSpending(%ofGDP)Socialspending(%ofGDP)

Top10CountrieswiththeHighestInequalityin2022

Giniindex

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

16

14

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

Sectoralspending

EducationSpending(%ofGDP)Socialspending(%ofGDP)

GiniIndex(%)

HealthSpending(%ofGDP)

GDP=grossdomesticproduct,UAE=UnitedArabEmirates.

Notes:Thefigureshowsthenexusbetweensectoralpublicspending(%ofGDP):Education,health,andsocial,andincomeinequality(measuredbytheGiniindex(%)).

Source:Authors’calculations.

Despiteextensiveresearchonfiscalspendingandinclusivegrowth,thesequestionsstillremainunsolved,underscoringasignificantgapintheexistingliterature.PleaserefertoSection2foramoredetaileddiscussionoftheliterature.Althoughmanyearlierstudies(e.g.,Cliftonetal.,2020;Clementsetal.,2022)examinedpublicspendingcategoriessuchaseducation,health,andsocialwelfare,analysisofothercategoriessuchasenvironmentalprotection,housingandcommunitydevelopment,andrecreationandcultureislimited.Yettheseothertypesoffiscalspendingcansubstantiallyaffectequity.Forexample,environmentaldeteriorationdisproportionatelyaffectsthepoor(ESCAP,2018).Likewise,poorhousingandcommunityservicesrestrictsocialandeconomicinclusion(WanjiruandPahari,2024).

5

Furthermore,mostexistingresearchfailstocapturethepotentialnonlinearityoftheimpactofdifferenttypesoffiscalexpendituresondifferentincomegroups.Thisrestrictsourunderstandingofhowvariousformsofpublicexpenditureinfluencedemographicgroups.Forexample,morespendingonhighereducationmaybenefithigh-incomehouseholdsmorethanlow-incomehouseholds(AriasandKheyfets,2023).Therefore,amorecomprehensivestudyisrequiredtoassessthedistributionaleffectsofdifferenttypesofpublicspendinganddesignpoliciesthateffectivelytargetandhelpunderprivilegedpeople.Anothermajorgapintheexistingliteratureistherelativelyscarceempiricalanalysisofthelinkbetweendisaggregatedfiscalspendingandinclusivegrowthacrossdifferenteconomygroups,mostnotablyindevelopedversusdevelopingeconomies.Fiscalpolicycandiffersignificantlybetweendevelopedanddevelopingnations,whichfacedifferentchallengesandopportunitiesforinclusivefiscalpolicy.Forexample,insufficientfiscalspace,poorinstitutions,andstructuralinequitiescanlimitequity-promotingpublicexpenditureinemerginganddevelopingeconomies(Danieletal.,2006).

Ourpapermakesanumberofnovelcontributionstotheliteratureonfiscalspendingandinclusivegrowth.First,weperformacomprehensiveglobalanalysisofdisaggregatedgovernmentspendingoneducation,health,socialprotection,environment,housingandcommunity,andrecreationandcultureinclusivegrowth.Ouranalysisthusprovidesamoregranularanddeeperunderstandingoftheinclusiveimpactoffiscalpolicy.Second,weusearichpaneldatasetof191economiesfrom1980to2023andemployJordà's(2005)localprojectionimpulseresponsefunctions(LP-IRFs),alongwithstate-dependentlocalprojectionapproaches,tobettercapturethedynamicandheterogeneouseffectsofinclusivefiscalspending.ThisLP-IRFstechniqueischoseninouranalysisparticularlybecauseofitsflexibilityinaddressingcomplex,nonlinearrelationshipsanditscapabilitytoestimateimpulseresponsesdirectlywithoutimposingthestrictrestrictionsofafullsystemspecification.Itiscomparativelyrobusttomoderatemisspecification(Jordà,2023).Thetraditionalvectorautoregression(VAR),bycontrast,canbemoreefficientwhenspecifiedcorrectly,yetitissusceptibletovariouschallenges:dimensionality,identificationchoices,andmodelmisspecification,whichareespeciallycriticalinmulti-economypanelswithseveralfiscalinstruments(Jordà,2023),asinourcases.Givenourdatafeatures(e.g.,multi-economysetting,heterogeneousfiscalinstruments),ourLPframeworkallowsustoexplorehowtheimpactoffiscalspendingevolvesacrosshorizons,variesacrossincomegroups,andshiftsbasedonthemacroeconomicandinstitutionalcontextofaneconomy,therebyprovidingamorenuancedandpolicy-relevantperspectiveonfiscaldynamicsthattightlyparameterizedVARsmayfailtodo.

Third,wecomparetheeffectsoffiscalspendinginadvancedeconomies(AEs)versusemergingmarketsanddevelopingeconomies(EMDEs).Wehighlightthecriticalroleofinstitutional

6

capacityandgovernancequalityinmagnifyingorconstrainingthedistributionalimpactofsuchexpenditures,whichwereoftenoverlookedinpreviouscross-economystudies.Finally,ourfindingshavesignificantimplicationsforpolicymakerscraftingfiscalpoliciestoreduceincomeinequalityand,moregenerally,fostermoreinclusivegrowth.Ouranalysishelpsidentifythetypesofpublicexpenditurewiththebiggestinclusiveeffects,therebyinformingandguidingtheallocationofscarcefiscalresources.

Ourempiricalevidenceclearlyshowsthatpublicspendingthatcanconceivablypromoteequity,suchaseducation,health,andsocialprotection,isstatisticallyandeconomicallysignificantlyassociatedwithimprovementsinincomeinequalityandhumandevelopmentindicators.Theequitygainsfromgovernmentspendingaremostsubstantialinadvancedeconomies,whichtypicallyhavestrongerfiscalframeworksandinstitutions,asevidentinfasterandmoredurabledeclinesintheGiniindex.InEMDEs,whichtypicallyhaveweakerinstitutionsandstructuralbarriers,fiscalpolicyalsoreducesincomeinequality,buttheimpactisnotasstrong.Furthermore,ourstate-dependentandregionalanalysesrevealthattheinfluenceofinclusivespendingiscontextdependent.Morespecifically,highcorruption,weakgovernance,andelevatedclimateriskallweakentheefficacyofinclusivespending.Takentogether,ourresultsunderlinetheimportanceoftargetedfiscalinterventionsthatdirectlyaddressthemostpressingsocialneeds,particularlyinhealth,education,andsocialprotection,withinthebroadercontextofstrengtheninginstitutionssothatpublicresourceseffectivelyreachvulnerablepopulations.

Therestofthepaperisdesignedasfollows.Section2discussestherelevantliterature,includingtheoreticalstudiesandempiricalanalysisofthelinkbetweenfiscalspendingandincomeinequality.Section3laysoutourempiricalmethodology.Section4describesthedataandvariablesusedinourempiricalanalysis.Section5reportsanddiscussesourmainempiricalresults,andfinally,Section6concludesourpaper.

2LITERATUREREVIEW

Therelationshipbetweengovernmentspendingandinclusivegrowthisthesubjectofalong-standingdebateineconomicresearch.Manyresearchershaveinvestigatedtheimpactofgovernmentspendingonreducingincomeinequalityandpromotinginclusiveeconomicgrowth.Thisresearchstreamhasgainedrenewedmomentuminthewakeofrecentglobalrecessionssuchastheglobalfinancialcrisisandthecoronavirusdisease(COVID-19)pandemic,whichdisproportionatelyhitthepoorandthusexacerbateinequalities.Fiscalpolicy,whichplaysabigroleinresourceallocationandincomedistribution,isavitalpolicytoolforpromotingequity.Inthissection,wecriticallyreviewtheexistingbodyofresearchonthecomplexinterplaybetween

7

fiscalspendingandinclusivegrowth.Weadoptastructuredapproachtotheliteraturereview,whichisbasedonkeythemes,schoolsofthought,andresearchgaps.Finally,weexplainthecontributionofourstudytothelargeandgrowingliteratureonthefiscalpolicy–inclusivegrowthnexus.

2.1TheoreticalPerspectivesonFiscalSpendingandInclusiveGrowth

Economictheoryoffersdivergentperspectivesontheroleofgovernmentspendinginaddressingincomeinequality.Forinstance,Keynesianeconomicsgenerallypositsthatfiscalinterventionscanstimulatedemand.RecentsupportiveevidenceincludesClementsetal.(2022),whofindthatfiscalinterventionsinsocialsectorssuchaseducation,health,andsocialbenefitscanboostaggregatedemand,indirectlyreducingdisparitiesandthuspromotinginclusivegrowth.Thispointofviewsuggeststhatactivegovernmentparticipationcanaddressmarketfailuresandguidetheeconomytowardmoreequitableoutcomes.

Incontrast,neoclassicaleconomistsprioritizeeconomicefficiency.Aboveall,theycautionagainstexcessivegovernmentspending,arguingthatitcandistortmarketmechanismsandhinderoptimalresourceallocation(Barro,1990).Hence,neoclassicaltheorypostulatesthatgovernmentinterferencecanleadtoinefficiencies,crowdoutprivateinvestment,andharmoveralleconomicperformance.Thesecontrastingperspectivesontheroleofthegovernmenthighlightthedilemmabetweeninterventionandefficiencythatpolicymakersface.

Endogenousgrowththeoriesofferyetanotheralternativeview.Thesetheoriesunderscoretheimportanceofhumancapitalinvestments,especiallyineducationandhealthcare,forlong-termgrowthandequity.Inlinewiththeinclusivegrowthconcept,thistheoreticalframeworkpointsoutthatsuchinvestmentscanenhanceproductivity,broadeneconomicopportunities,andsupportamoreequitableincomedistribution(Lucas,1988).Morerecentperspectives,suchasthesocialinvestmentparadigm,builduponthisemphasisonhumancapital.Theyhighlightthesignificanceofproactiveandfocusedsocialspendingtolowerstructuralinequalitywhilepromotingsocialinclusion(Semmler,2007).

Weobservethepracticalramificationsofthesetheoriesintaxpolicy,akeycomponentofanyfiscalstrategy.Effectivetaxdesignisindispensableforachievingbothefficiencyandequality,therebyfacilitatinginclusivegrowth.Soundtaxpolicyrequiresacarefulevaluationofdetailedtaxpolicychoicesrelatedtopersonalincometaxonlaborandcapitalincome,wealthtax,corporateincometax,andconsumptiontax(Abdel-KaderandDeMooij,2020).Moreover,politicalsupportiscrucialforsuccessfullyimplementingtaxreformstopromoteinclusivegrowth(Abdel-KaderandDeMooij,2020).

8

2.2EmpiricalEvidenceonFiscalSpendingandInclusiveGrowth

Empiricalstudiesthatexplorethelinkbetweenfiscalspendingandinclusivegrowthyieldmixedevidenceabouttheimpactoffiscalspendingonincomeinequality.

2.2.1FiscalPolicy,IncomeInequality,andInclusiveGrowth

Asubstantialbodyofresearchcentersontheroleoffiscalredistributioninadvancinginclusiveeconomicgrowth,especiallywithinAsia(e.g.,AoyagiandGanelli,2015;Clementsetal.,2025;Clementsetal.,2022).AoyagiandGanelli(2015)suggestthatfiscalredistributions,combinedwithmonetarypolicyandstructuralreforms,arekeydriversofinclusiveeconomicgrowth.Clementsetal.(2025)furtheremphasizethatfiscalredistribution,primarilythroughtargetedhealthandeducationspending,significantlyliftsthelikelihoodofachievinginclusivegrowthandreducingincomeinequality.However,thesestudiesalsocautionthatraisingsufficientgovernmentrevenuestofundtargetedprogramsandprovidesocialbenefitsadequatelymayencountersignificantchallenges(Clementsetal.,2022).

Severalearlierstudiesemphasizethecompositionofpublicexpenditureasamajorinfluenceoneconomicgrowthandinclusivedevelopment(Semmler,2007;Zouharetal.,2021).Semmler(2007)exploredtheeffectsofvariouspublicexpenditurecomponentssuchaseducation,health,infrastructure,andsocialbenefitsoninequalityandpoverty.Thisstudyarguesthatgrowth-promotingfiscalspendingcanexpandfuturefiscalrevenueandhencefuturefiscalspace.Althoughthereisabroadconsensusonthepotentialoffiscalpolicytoreduceincomedisparity,theparticularexpenditurecomponentsandtheirdynamicinfluencesonequityvarysignificantlyacrossnationsandincomelevels(Isiakaetal.,2025).

Inthisconnection,Zouharetal.(2021)showthatspecifictypesofspendingareimportantintermsoftheirdynamiceffectoninequality,incomedistributionacrossvarioussegmentsofsociety,andtheassociatedtimeprofile.Cliftonetal.(2020)showthatgovernmentexpenditureonspecificcomponents,suchaseducation,personalincometaxes,andsocialsecurity,substantiallyreducesincomeinequalityinurbanareas.However,theseeffectsareinconsistent,andtheychangeovertime.Similarly,Hur(2015)andClementsetal.(2022)findthatincreasedpublicspendingonspecificexpenditurecomponents—suchaseducation,health,andsocialprotection—correlateswithlowerincomeinequality,asmeasuredbytheGiniindex.

MallaandPathranarakul(2022)presentcontrastingevidencefordevelopingversusdevelopedeconomies.Theyfindthatprogressiveincometaxtendstoreduceincomeinequalityonlyindevelopingeconomies.Theyalsoshowthathighergovernmentspending,particularlyoneducationandhealth,isassociatedwithlowerincomeinequalityindevelopedeconomies.

9

However,thisrelationshipisnotconsistentlyobservedindevelopingeconomies.Thisunderscorestheimportanceofconsideringthespecificcontextofdevelopedversusdevelopingeconomieswhenanalyzingtheinclusiveimpactoffiscalpolicy.Furthermore,studiessuggestthatinemerginganddevelopingnations,fiscalpoliciesoftendonotsubstantiallyreduceinequality,possiblyduetocorruption,leakages,andweakinstitutionalframeworks(Chuetal.,2000;Guptaetal.,2002;MallaandPathranarakul,2022).Martinez-Vazquezetal.(2012)alsofindmixedevidence.Theysuggestthatprogressivepersonalandcorporateincometaxesareassociatedwithlowerincomeinequality,whileothertaxes,suchasgeneraltaxes,excisetaxes,andcustomsduties,tendtoexacerbateinequality.Theirfindingsalsosuggestthatincreasedpublicexpendituresoneducation,health,andsocialwelfaretendtoreduceinequality.However,arecentstudybyLiuandDong(2025)offersdivergentevidence.Theyshowthatpublicspendingonsocialwelfaremayincreaseincomedisparitybetweenurbanversusruralareasin31Chineseprovinces.However,theimpactisinconsistentacrossprovinces.AlesinaandArdagna(2010)examinetheeffectsofsignificantchangesinfiscalpolicy,suchasfiscalstimulusandadjustment,oneconomicgrowthinOrganisationofEconomicCo-operationandDevelopment(OECD)economies.Theirfindingsindicatethatafiscalstimulusthroughtaxcutsismoreeffectiveforraisinggrowththanincreasingpublicspending.Theyalsosuggestthatfiscaladjustmentsthroughspendingcutstendtoreducebudgetdeficitsandpublicdebt-to-GDPratiosmorethanraisingtaxes.

2.2.2BroaderFiscalPolicyMeasuresandIncomeInequality

Researchersalsoinvestigatetheimpactofbroaderfiscalpolicymeasuresbeyondspecificexpenditurecategoriesonincomeinequality.Forinstance,AgnelloandSousa(2014)analyzetheimpactoffiscalconsolidationonincomeinequality.Theirfindingssuggestthatfiscalconsolidationtendstoincreaseincomeinequality,mainlyduetospendingcuts.Thesizeoffiscalconsolidationprogramsandtheirinteractionwitheconomicconditions,suchasbankingcrises,inflation,andeconomicgrowth,influenceincomedistribution(AgnelloandSousa,2014).Konstantinou(2024)alsofindsthatfiscalconsolidationintheformofpublicspendingexacerbatesinequality.However,theeffectoffiscaladjustmentsoninequalitymaydependonthesizeofthefis

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论