版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
Acloserlookattheworld’slargestsmartEVmarket
McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights2025
September2025
Aboutthereport
ThisreportisbasedonarecentcomprehensivesurveyofChineseautomotiveconsumers.
—Wesurveyed2,498consumersusingonlinesampling.Thesurveyranfromfourthquarter2024tofirstquarter2025.
—Thesamplecovers19majorcitiesacrossChinarepresentingarange
ofdemographicattributes,includingtier-one,-two,-three,and-fourcities,aswellasNorthChina,NortheastChina,EastChina,CentralandSouthChina,SouthwestChina,andNorthwestChina.
—Thereportisdividedintogroupsbyage,incomestatus,car
purchasingexperience,existingcarbrandsandtypes,andmore.
Basedonthecarpurchasingdecision-makingprocess,thereportanalyzesconsumers’attitudes,brandpreferences,purchasing
habits,andcarexperienceindepth.
Authors
MingyuGuan
DanielBirke
ThomasFang
TonyZhou
IIMcKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights2025
Introduction
TheChineseautomarkethasmadesignificantprogressonthetransitiontoelectric
vehicles(EVs)sincethetrendstartedinChinaabouttenyearsago.Electrificationand
smartificationhavegainedmomentum,especiallyinthepastfiveyears,andlessonsfromtheChinesemarketcanbeextractedfortheglobalautomotivetransformation.Indeed,thetechnologicalchangesunderwayarenotonlyinfluencingthepreferencesandbehaviors
ofChineseconsumersbutalsoshapingtheevolutionoftheglobalautomotiveindustry.Forthefirsttime,Chineseconsumersaredefiningthedirectionofaglobalindustry.
McKinseyhasfollowedthechangingpreferencesandbehaviorsofChineseauto
consumersandstudiedtheunderlyingdriversofthisevolutionforadecade.Thisreport
drawsontheMcKinseyChinaAutoConsumerSurvey2025torevealfourprimaryinsights(seesidebar,“Aboutthereport”):
I.Competitionisshiftingfrompricetoinnovation.China’sautomotivemarketis
caughtinanescalatingpricewar,butsteepdiscountshaveyieldedonlymarginalsalesgrowth.Incontrast,consumersareactivelyembracingnewmodelsandcutting-edge
technologies.Thisdivergencesuggestsautomakersmayfindmoresuccesscompetingthroughinnovationthanthroughrelentlesspricecuts.
II.Incumbentsarestartingtofallbehindasthelandscapereshuffles.ChineseOEMs
haveearnedconsumerrecognitionintheEVsectorthroughtechnologyinnovation.
Whilemanyincumbentmultinationalbrandsarestillperceivedaspremium,some
arestrugglingtoconverttheirlegacyappealintopricingpowerforEVs.Theseglobal
playersarefacedwiththechallengeofbuildingonthereputationtheyestablished
duringtheinternalcombustionengine(ICE)-onlyeratomeettheneedsoftoday’ssmartandelectrifiedautomotivemarket.
III.Plug-inhybridandextended-rangetechnologieshavebecomemainstreamintheelectrificationtrend.Agrowingnumberofbatteryelectricvehicle(BEV)ownersshowregretabouttheirBEVownershipexperience,becausetheyaredissatisfiedwiththe
chargingexperience.Butplug-inhybridEVs(PHEVs)andextended-rangeEVs(EREVs)aresteadilygainingpopularitybecausetheyofferaneasyrefuelingexperienceanda
practicalsolutiontorangeanxiety.
IV.Technologicaldemocratizationisleadingtoscenario-baseddifferentiation.
Comparedwiththepastfewyears,thisyear’srespondentsshowhigherawarenessofautonomousdriving.Theyknowaboutthetechnology’sadvancedfeatures,express
satisfactionwithitsperformance,andexpecttoseehigher-levelautomation.Assmarttechnologiesbecomemorewidespread,thetrendof“technologicaldemocratization”—whichismakingvehicleswithadvancedtechnicalfeaturesmoreaffordable—is
pushingOEMstoprioritizefeaturesandexperiencesthatfitactualuserscenariosasakeydifferentiator.However,broaderadoptioninChinawillrequireOEMstoeducateconsumerstoensurethatthesefeaturesareusedsafelyandeffectivelygivencurrenttechnologicallimitations.
McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights20251
2McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights2025
McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights20253
Priceofcarcurrentlyowned,RMBthousand
Competition
shiftsfrompricetoinnovation
Keyinsights:
—Aconsiderableproportionofconsumersexpressedadesiretotradeupwhenbuyinganewcartoreplacetheirexistingcars.
—Theeffectofautomakers’pricewarsonboostingsalesisquitelimited,farfrommatchingthemassiveinvestmentrequiredtowagesuchpricecompetition.
—Incomparison,consumersareembracingthe“technologywar,”indicatingthatinnovation-drivenconsumptionisgraduallybecomingmainstream.
ThechangingbudgetdecisionsofChineseconsumerswhenbuyingnewcarshavealwaysbeenanimportanttopicfortheindustry.Oursurveyshowsthatmostconsumers,whenpurchasing
theirnextcars,tendtostayinthesamepricerangeoftheircurrentcars.Still,some20to30percentofconsumerssaytheywanttotradeupfortheirnextcarpurchase(Exhibit1).
Exhibit1
Fortheirnextcarpurchase,mostChineseconsumersstaywithinthesamepricerangeorupgradetoahigherpriceclass.
Stayinthesamerange
Prefertotradeup
Prefertopayless
Highest%group
Budgetfornextcarvspriceofcarcurrentlyowned
%ofrespondents
Budgetfornextcar,RMBthousand
<100
100-149
150-199
200-299
300-400
>400
150-
199
6%
52%
54%
2%
0%
0%
150-
199
3%
25%
50%
17%
0%
0%
200-
299
0%
3%
28%
63%
22%
0%
100-
149
67%
46%
1%
0%
0%
0%
200-
299
1%
2%
45%
81%
3%
1%
100-
149
23%
68%
16%
0%
0%
0%
300-
400
0%
0%
6%
18%
50%
6%
300-
<100
27%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
<100
74%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
>400
0%
0%
0%
3%
28%
94%
>400
0%
0%
0%
0%
29%
92%
400
1%
0%
0%
17%
68%
7%
20232024
Source:McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerSurveyacrosstheyears
4McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights2025
Wealsofindthatownersofcarsincertainpricerangesaremorelikelytomovetoalowerbudgetrange(thanthecurrentcar)fortheirnextcarpurchasecomparedwith2023(Exhibit2).
Exhibit2
Thepercentageofconsumerswhoplantodowngradeincreasedamongownersofmidpricedcars.
Consumerswhoplantodowngrade,bypriceofcarcurrentlyowned
%ofrespondents,RMBthousand
2022
22
2023
21
20
2024
17
1616
12
10
8
6
4
3
2
1
0
100–149150–199200–299300–400>400
Source:McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerSurveyacrosstheyears
McKinsey&Company
—Fewcarownerswhopaidbetween100,000and150,000RMBfortheircurrentcarswanttodowngradefortheirnextcarpurchase,indicatingastrongwillingnesstoupgradetobettervehiclesamongentry-levelconsumers.
—Ownersofcarsworthmorethan400,000RMBshowedlessinclinationtodowngradethanlastyear,reflectingtheirpurchasingpowerandinterestinnewmodelsandtechnologies.
—However,intheremainingsegments,theproportionofcarownerswhowanttodowngradehassignificantlyincreasedandisclosetothe2022level.Avarietyoffactorscouldbecausingthis.Forexample,aspricecompetitioninChina’spassenger-carmarketintensifies,consumerscannowbuyanewcarwithbetterperformanceandfunctionsatalowercost.Thiswilldoubtless
affectconsumers’budgetplanningfortheirnextcar.
McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights20255
Exhibit3
Althoughthepricingcompetitionescalatedin2024,itresultedinverylimitedadditionalnetdemand.
Question:Doesthepricecompetitionhaveapositiveornegativeimpactonyournew-carpurchasedecision?
Consumerattitudestowardpricecompetition
%ofrespondents
100%
61.3%
Neutral:Hasno
64.1%
impactonpurchasedecision
17.5%
21.1%
Negative:Makesmemorehesitanttomakepurchasedecision
16.4%
19.4%
Positive:Triggersoracceleratespurchasedecision
20232024
Netimpactcaused
bypricecompetition,
positiveviewsminusnegativeviews,%
+3.0%+3.6%
(+0.6p.p.vs
2023)
Source:McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerSurveyacrosstheyears
McKinsey&Company
ThepricingcompetitioninChina’sautomarketisintensifying.InapreviousChinaAutomotive
ConsumerSurvey,wefoundthatconsumerswerelargelyunimpressedbythepricecompetition—thenetstimuluseffectwasonly3percent(calculatedasthepercentageofconsumerswitha
“positive”viewofthepricewar—thosewhofeltitstimulatedoracceleratedtheirpurchasing
decision—minusthosewitha“negative”view,whobelieveditdelayedordiscouragedtheir
decision).Inthisyear’ssurvey,thenetstimuluseffecthasincreasedslightlyto3.6percent(Exhibit3).However,consideringthehugecostsinvolved—discountratesintheICEcarmarketroseby
nearlyeightpercentagepointsin2024comparedwith2023,andthoseintheEVmarketrosebynearlyfivepercentagepoints1—theadditional0.6percentagepointgaininnetstimulusisclearlynotworththeexpense.
1McKinseyanalysisof“Researchonthevolumeandpriceperformanceofthepassengercarmarketin2024,”AutohomeDataPlatform,February20,2025.
6McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights2025
Atthesametime,R&DefficiencyimprovementsarecontinuingtoshortenthereleasecycleofnewmodelsandnewtechnologiesintheChinesemarket.Oursurveyaskedconsumersabouttheir
attitudestowardthistechnologycompetitiontounderstandwhetherithasstimulatedconsumers’interestinnewmodelsandnewtechnologiesorencouragedthemtodelaytheirpurchasebecausetheyexpecttoseebettertechnologiesinthefuture.Theresultsshowthatsignificantlymore
consumersapplaudtheshorterreleasecycleofnewmodelsandtechnologiesthantheydopricecompetition:Thenetstimulusoftheformeris10.8percent,farhigherthanthatofthelatter(3.6percent).Moreover,ashouseholdincomegoesup,thestimulatingeffectofacceleratedR&Dalsobecomesstronger(Exhibit4).Thisindicatesthatconsumersaremoremotivatedbyinnovative
technologiesthanbypricecompetition.
ThetakeawayforOEMsisthatcompetingthroughinnovationismoreeffectivethanengagingin
purepricecompetition.OEMscanshifttoastrategyofprovidingbettertechnologicalfeatures
forthesameprice,whichnotonlybettermeetsconsumers’expectationsbutalsoprotectsOEMs’productsandbrandpositioning.
Exhibit4
Theacceleratedproductdevelopmentcyclehashadasignificantpositiveimpact,especiallyamonghigher-incomeconsumers.
Question:Doestheshortenedcarlaunchingcyclehaveapositiveornegativeimpactonyournew-carpurchasedecision?
Consumerattitudestowardaccelerateddevelopmentcycle
%ofrespondents,householdincomeinRMB
100%
63.9%
64.1%
64.9%
64.3%
6.1%
29.0%
10.3%
25.8%
12.5%
23.3%
16.0%
19.7%
Neutral:Hasno
impactonpurchasedecision
Negative:Makesmemorehesitanttomakepurchasedecision
Positive:Triggersoracceleratespurchasedecision
Netimpact,positive
viewsminusnegative
views,percentagepoints
2024<24,00024,000-48,000>48,000
+10.8%+3.6%+15.5%+22.9%
Source:McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerSurvey2025McKinsey&Company
McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights20257
8McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights2025
Incumbentsstarttolagbehind
Keyinsights:
—Thenumberofbrandsinconsumers’initialconsiderationsets(ICSs)hasincreasedbutisstillfarlessthanthenumberofnewbrands.
—Whileleadingmultinationalbrandsmaintainanadvantageinpremiumandluxury
recognition,theyhavefailedtotranslatethisadvantageintosalespremiums.
—DisruptorbrandshavegainedextremelyhighconsumerawarenessintheEVmarket,outperformingtheirincumbentcounterparts.
—ChineseOEMshaveearnedrelativelystrongconsumerrecognitionontechnology-relateddimensions.
Newbrandsareincreasinglypartofconsumers’initialconsiderationset
AsthecompetitioninChina’sautomarketintensifies,severalleadingattackershavegained
considerabletraction,whilesomeincumbentbrandsarestrugglingtocompete.Since2021,20newbrandshaveemerged(eachofwhichhasmonthlysalesexceeding1,000units),whilenineincumbentbrandshaveexitedthemarket(Exhibit5).
Whenconsumerswanttopurchaseacar,theycreateanICS,collectmoreinformationabouteachbrandinthatset,andmaketheirfinalpurchasedecisions.Howwillconsumers’ICSs
changeasmorenewbrandsemerge?
Thesurveyfindsthattheaveragenumberofbrandsinconsumers’ICSsisstilllowdespitethe
additionofasignificantnumberofnewpassenger-carbrandsintheChinesemarket.From2021to2024,thenumberofbrandsincludedinanaverageICSincreasedfrom2.5to3.4(Exhibit6).
Exhibit5
Inthepastthreeyears,20newbrandshavebecomeavailabletoconsumers.
Passenger-vehiclebrandsinChina
Numberofbrands1
81
Numberofunits,
thousands
>1,200
600-1,200
240-600
3
70
3
9
7
8
20
9
10
14
17
120-240
13
15
60-120
33
19
12-60
2021ExitedNew2024
1.Includingallbrandswithsalesofmorethan12,000unitsinChinain2021and2024;brandnumbersplitbyannualsalesvolume.Source:ChinaNewCarInsuranceRegistrationDatabase
McKinsey&Company
McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights20259
Exhibit6
Theaveragenumberofbrandsinconsumers’initialconsiderationsetsremainslowdespitetheadditionof20newbrandstotheChinesemarket.
Brandsininitialconsiderationset(ICS)FinaltransactionswithinICS
Numberofbrands
2.8
2.5
3.42.9
All
respondents
3.0
2.7
3.53.0
<1-yeargroup1
3.3
2.7
2.62.1
>3-yeargroup2
202122232024
%
2023
2024
2022
98%
87%
90%85%
77%
79%
ICE3ownersEV4owners
1.Surveyparticipantswhoboughttheircarinthe12monthspriortothesurvey.
2.Surveyparticipantswhoboughttheircaratleast3yearsbeforethesurveyandplantobuyanewoneinthenext12months.
3.Internalcombustionengine.
4.Electricvehicle.
Source:McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerSurveyacrosstheyears
McKinsey&Company
Thesurveyindicatesthat98percentofICEbuyersandcloseto90percentofEVbuyersenduppurchasingbrandsfromwithintheirICSs.Inotherwords,nomatterhowhardabrandworkson
productdefinition,R&D,procurement,andproduction,thoseeffortsarenotlikelytobereflectedinsalesunlessconsumersarealreadyinterestedinthatbrand.
TheshareofEV-onlybrandsinanICSincreasedforrespondentswhopurchasedtheircurrentcarsatleastthreeyearsagoandplantobuyanewoneinthenextyear(Exhibit7),whethertheycurrentlyownEVorICEcars.
10McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights2025
Exhibit7
Brandsthatproduceonlyelectricvehiclesareincreasinglypopularamongtheinitialconsiderationsetsofexperiencedcarbuyers.
Brandsinbuyers’ICSs1
Numberofbrands
2.62.1
3.32.7
All
ICE
owners
2.6
3.42.8
2.2
ICE2
owners
2.6
3.32.6
1.9
EV3
buyers
232024
22
2021
RespondentswithEV-onlybrands4inICS,%
50
41
41
11
90
76
57
EV
owners
29
202122232024
1.“Buyers”includessurveyparticipantswhoboughttheircaratleast3yearsbeforethesurveyandplantobuyanewoneinthenext
12months.ICSisinitialconsiderationset.
2.Internalcombustionengine.
3.Electricvehicle.
4.BrandsthatmanufactureonlyEVcars.
Source:McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerSurveyacrosstheyears
McKinsey&Company
—TheproportionofEVownerswithEV-onlybrandsintheirICSgrewfromlessthan30percentin
2021to90percentin2024.
—TheproportionofICEownerswithEV-onlybrandsintheirICSincreasedfromabout10percentin2021to50percentin2024.Thatis,halfofrespondentswhopurchasedtheircurrentICE
carsatleastthreeyearsagoandplantobuyanewcarinthenextyearincludedEV-onlybrandsintheirICS.
McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights202511
ShiftingICSsreflecttheevolvinglandscapeofChina’spremium-carmarket.Weanalyzedthe
percentageofpremiumGermanbrands(Benz,BMW,andAudi)andemergingpremiumEVbrands(includinganAmericanbrandandsomeleadingChinesebrands)inconsumers’ICSs(x-axis:
percentinconsideration),aswellasthepercentageofbuyerswhoinitiallyincludedthemintheirICSandultimatelypurchasedone(y-axis:percentofwinning).
—BecausecompetitivedynamicsvarybetweentheoverallmarketandtheEVmarket,brandperformancebetweenthetwomarketsalsovaries.
—PremiumGermanvehicleshavemuchbetterICSperformanceintheoverallmarketthanintheEVmarket(Exhibit8).
Exhibit8
MajorpremiumGermanbrandsperformpoorlyoninitialconsiderationsetswithintheelectricvehiclespace.
PercentageofICS-enteringvseventualwinninginsales;forafewbrandsonly1;forrecentcarbuyers(<1year),2024
%inwinning2
60
40ICSperformanceof3
majorpremiumGermanbrandsinEVmarket
Aggregated(inclICEandEV3owners)OnlyEVowners
ICSperformanceofthe3major
premiumGermanbrandsin
aggregatedmarket(ICEandEV)
20
0
1020304050
%inconsideration4
Note:ICSisinitialconsiderationset.
1.WeightedaverageperactualpremiumEVsalesmixin2024of3majorpremiumGermanbrands,1premiumUSEVbrand,and3premiumChineseEVbrands.
2.PercentageofbuyerswhoultimatelypurchasedabrandintheirICS.
3.ICEisinternalcombustionengine.EViselectricvehicle.
4.Percentageofbrandsincludedinconsumers’ICSs.
Source:McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerSurvey2025
McKinsey&Company
12McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights2025
—ThisdifferenceshowsthatalthoughleadingpremiummultinationalbrandshadastrongreputationintheICE-onlyera,theystruggletoleveragethisreputationtosellEVs.
WealsofindthatbuyersofpremiumGermanandpremiumChineseEVsaremorelikelytoincludeeachother’sbrandgroupsintheirICSs:In2024,21percentofpremiumChineseEVbuyers
includedpremiumGermanbrandsintheirICS,upfrom12percentin2023.Only7percentof
premiumGermanbrandbuyersincludedpremiumChineseEVbrandsintheirICSin2023,butthisnumbersoaredto40percentin2024(Exhibit9).
Exhibit9
BuyersoftraditionalpremiummultinationalvehiclesareincreasinglylikelytoconsiderpremiumChineseelectricvehicles.
2024
2023
Initialconsiderationsetofownerswhoboughttheirvehiclelessthan1
yearago,%ofrespondents3majorpremiumGermanbrands,%PremiumChineseEVbrands,%
3majorpremiumGermanbrands
PremiumChineseEVbrands
3majorpremiumGermanbrands
PremiumChineseEVbrands
Brandpurchased
100%
40%
(+33p.p.1vs2023)
21%
(+9p.p.1vs2023)
93%
7%
95%
91%
12%
1.Percentagepoints.
Source:McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerSurveyacrosstheyears
McKinsey&Company
Asimilartrendappearsinthemasssegment(Exhibit10).Fifty-sixpercentofmass-Chinese-
brandbuyersincludedmassmultinationalcarbrandsintheirICSs,slightlyhigherthanin2023(43percent).Andwhileonly49percentofmass-multinational-brandbuyersincludedmassChinesebrandsintheirICSsin2023,thissoaredto70percentin2024.Inotherwords,sevenoften
buyersofmassmultinationalbrandsconsideredbuyingamassChinesebrand.ThisposesahugechallengetothemarketinganddealersystemsofmultinationalOEMs.
McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights202513
14McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights2025
Exhibit10
Chinesebrandsarerapidlygainingtractioninthemasssegment.
2024
2023
Initialconsiderationsetofownerswhoboughttheirvehiclelessthan1yearago,%ofrespondents
Massmultinationalbrands,%MassChinesebrands,%
Mass
multinationalbrands
MassChinesebrands
Brandpurchased
99%
70%
(+21p.p.1vs2023)
56%
(+13p.p.1vs2023)
97%
49%
Mass
multinationalbrands
MassChinesebrands
98%
95%
43%
1.Percentagepoints.
Source:McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerSurveyacrosstheyears
McKinsey&Company
Perceptionofpremiumandluxurybrands
Oursurveyincorporatedquantitativeresearchonbrandperception.Specifically,wecategorizedautomotivebrandsintofivetiers:entrylevel(onepoint),volumesegment(twopoints),near-
premium(threepoints),premium(fourpoints),andluxury(fivepoints).Respondentswereaskedtoclassifybrandsbasedontheirperceptions(Exhibit11),whichledtosomekeyfindings:
Exhibit11-a
Multinationalbrandskeeptheiradvantageinpremiumandluxuryrecognition,butChinesebrandsarestartingtogaintraction.
Question:Whichpositionmatchesthegivenbrands?
MultinationalChinese
Consumerperceptionofdifferentbrands’position(regardlessofpowertraintype)1
4.8
4.84.6
4.8
Luxurygroup
4.5
4.5
3.93.83.83.7
3.9
3.7
3.6
3.5
3.5
3.4
3.2
Premiumgroup
3.2
3.1
3.1
3.0 2.92.92.9
2.82.82.7
2.72.7
2.7
1.Weightedaveragescoreofeachbrand(luxury,premium,near-premium,volumesegment,entrylevel,ratedfromhightolowas5,4,
3,2,1pointsrespectively).
McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights202515
Exhibit11-b
Multinationalbrandskeeptheiradvantageinpremiumandluxuryrecognition,butChinesebrandsarestartingtogaintraction.
Question:Whichpositionmatchesthegivenbrands?
Massgroup
2.22.2
2.12.0
1.91.91.91.91.91.91.9
1.81.81.7
1.61.6
1.5
1.51.41.41.4
1.4
1.3
1.31.2
Multinational
Chinese
1.Weightedaveragescoreofeachbrand(luxury,premium,near-premium,volumesegment,entrylevel,ratedfromhightolowas5,4,
3,2,1pointsrespectively).
Source:McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerSurvey2025
McKinsey&Company
—Chineseconsumersdifferentiateautomotivebrandsintothreedistinctclusters:luxury,premium,andmass.
—Incumbentbrandsdominateallluxurypositions.
—Incumbentbrandsmaintainsignificantadvantagesinthepremiumcluster,indicating
sustainedconsumerrecognitionoftheirdecades-longbrandequitydespitechallengesfromelectrificationandsmartification.
—Severaldisruptorbrandshaveenteredthepremiumcluster,butmostofthemlagbehind
incumbents.Notably,onedisruptorleadstheentirepremiumcluster,highlightingitssuccessinbrandingandcompetitiveness.
—Disruptorbrandsdominatethemasscluster,outperformingincumbentcompetitors.
16McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights2025
McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights202517
Weaskedrespondentswhatdefinesapremiumcarbrandinanefforttoidentify“musthave”
and“nicetohave”factorsamongattributessuchasbrandheritage,safety,andmaneuverability(Exhibit12).
Exhibit12
Brandheritageisseenasthemostimportantfactorindefiningapremiumcarbrand,butitsleadingadvantageismarginal.
Question:Whatdefinesapremiumcarbrand?,%ofrespondents
Must-have
Nicetohave
Importanceoffactorindefiningapremiumcarbrand,%ofrespondents
Brandheritage
Safety
Maneuverability
Comfort
Powertrain
Vehiclequality
Servicequality
Smartcabin
Autonomousdriving
Good-looking
Customization
Racingperformance
Sustainabilityandsocialresponsibility
OriginatedfromdevelopednationssuchasEU,US,orJapan
52
44
31
79
35
46
77
32
77
55
22
50
76
76
75
27
46
30
53
49
48
23
74
73
25
25
51
71
19
52
70
18
68
47
22
49
66
17
53
41
12
83
Source:McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerSurvey2025McKinsey&Company
—“Strongbrandheritage”rankedasthemostimportantfactorinapremiumautomotivebrand.
However,whencomparedwithsubjectivefactorssuchassafety,maneuverability,comfort,andpower,theleadingadvantageofbrandheritage,apurelyemotionalfactor,isnotsignificant(forexample,theratingofbrandheritageisonlyfourpercentagepointshigherthanthenumber-
twofactor,safety).
—ThisexplainswhyoneChinesebrand,despitebeingnewlyestablished,couldtaketheleadin
thepremiumsegment.Althoughthisyoungbranddoesn’thavemuchbrandheritage,itcanrideonthetechnologicalstrengthsofitsparentcompany.Thisbrandhasachievedrevolutionary
breakthroughsinsafety(forexample,sailinginthewater),maneuverability(suchastank-
liketurning),comfort(suchassignificantperformanceenhancementenabledbysuspensionbreakthroughs),andpower(morethan1,000horsepower),therebygaininghigherrecognitionfromconsumers.
—Intermsofmust-haves,brandheritagerankslowerthanmoresubjectivefactorssuchassafetyandmaneuverability.Thisagainillustratesthattheleadingadvantageofbrandheritageover
rationalfactorsisnotstable.
—Amongallfactors,“originatedfromdevelopednationssuchastheEuropeanUnion,UnitedStates,orJapan”isregardedastheleastimportant.
Atthesametime,wealsofoundthattheimportanceofbrandheritagevariesamongrespondentsfromdifferentbackgrounds.Relativelyspeaking,respondentsfromlower-tiercitiesandowners
oflow-pricedmodelsaremorelikelytoassignimportancetobrandheritage(Exhibit13).This
indicatesthathigh-incomeconsumersandresidentsofhigh-tiercitiesarelessinfluencedbythepurelyemotionalfactorofbrandheritageandcaremoreaboutotherfactors.Thisshiftmayspreadtootherconsumers,giventhatconsumptiontrendsinChina’sleadingtier-onecitiesareseenasaleadingindicatorforthewholecountry.
Asmentionedearlier,incumbentautomotivebrandsgenerallyenjoyhigherrecognitionaspremiumorluxurybrandsthantheirdisruptorcounterparts.However,thishasnottranslatedintohigher
priceadvantagesinthemarket.Traditionally,Chineseconsumershavebeenwillingtopaya
higherpremiumforforeignbrands,butthistendencyhasdiminishedinrecentyears:50percent
ofrespondentssaidtheywerenotwillingtopayahigherpremiumformultinationalpremiumEVs
thanforChineseones—onparwith2023buthigherthan2022(47percent).Amongthosewillingtopayapremium,mostarewillingtopayonlyaverylimitedamount,withonly3percentindicatinga
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 拱桥模架施工方案(3篇)
- 风蚀护肩施工方案(3篇)
- 年底小区活动策划方案(3篇)
- 开封订餐活动方案策划(3篇)
- 服装生产加工工艺规范(标准版)
- 景观设计方案汇报
- 樱花节活动方案
- 生物医学金属材料全面解析
- 2025年高职(化妆品技术)化妆品生产工艺试题及答案
- 2025年大学本科四年级(土地资源管理)土地规划利用测试题及答案
- 2026年广西贵港市华盛集团新桥农工商有限责任公司招聘备考题库及参考答案详解
- 2026年市场集团有限公司所属企业(温岭浙江工量刃具交易中心股份有限公司)公开招聘工作人员备考题库及1套完整答案详解
- 2026青海西宁市湟源县水务发展(集团)有限责任公司招聘8人参考考试试题及答案解析
- 保安服务礼仪培训课件
- 2026年软件开发公司系统架构师面试问题集
- 天津轨道交通集团秋招试题及答案
- 眼镜定配工技师(渐进镜方向)考试试卷及答案
- 2025山东春宇人力资源有限公司招聘医疗事业单位派遣制工作人员笔试模拟试题及答案解析
- 2025年关于中国社会科学杂志社总编室(研究室)公开招聘5人的备考题库及答案详解1套
- 焊接技术岗新员工入职培训手册
- 2025年CCAA国家注册审核员考试(IATF16949内审员基础)综合能力测试题及答案
评论
0/150
提交评论