2026年高难度法律英语案例阅读理解题集

2026年高难度法律英语案例阅读理解题集第一部分：合同法案例（共5题，每题2分）CaseStudy1:InternationalSalesContractDisputeScenario:ABritishcompany,"GlobalTechLtd.,"enteredintoacontractwithaChinesesupplier,"SunriseElectronics,"forthesupplyofadvancedmicrochips.Thecontractstipulatedthatdeliverywouldbemadewithinsixmonthsandthatpaymentwouldbedueuponreceiptofthegoods.However,Sunrisedelayedthedeliverybythreemonthsanddeliveredfaultychips.GlobalTechrefusedtopayinfull,claimingbreachofcontract.Sunrisearguedthatthedelaywasduetounforeseencircumstancesbeyonditscontrolandthatthechipswerenotdefective.ThedisputewasheardundertheUNConventiononContractsfortheInternationalSaleofGoods(CISG).Questions:1.UnderCISGArticle71,whatremediesareavailabletoGlobalTechifSunrisefailstoperform?(2points)2.IfSunrisecanprovethedelaywasduetoforcemajeure(asdefinedunderCISGArticle79),canitbeexcusedfromliability?Explain.(2points)3.AssumingthechipswereindeeddefectivebutSunrisehadproperinsurance,couldGlobalTechstillclaimdamages?(2points)CaseStudy2:EmploymentContractTerminationScenario:AU.S.multinationalcorporation,"InnovateInc.,"terminatedanemployee,"JaneDoe,"forgrossmisconduct.Thecompanycitedaclauseinheremploymentcontractthatallowedterminationwithoutnoticeincaseofseriousviolations.Janearguedthattheterminationwasunlawfulbecausethecompanyhadnotfolloweditsinternaldisciplinaryproceduresasoutlinedinthecontract.ThecasewasheardunderCalifornialaborlaw.Questions:1.UnderCalifornialaw,whataretherequirementsforavalidterminationclauseinanemploymentcontract?(2points)2.IfJane’scontractdidnotspecifydisciplinaryprocedures,canInnovateInc.stillterminateherformisconduct?Explain.(2points)3.Whatdamages(ifany)mightJanebeentitledtoiftheterminationisdeemedunlawful?(2points)第二部分：公司法案例（共4题，每题2.5分）CaseStudy3:CorporateDirectors’LiabilityScenario:Theboardofdirectorsof"TechCorp,"apubliclylistedcompanyinSingapore,approvedariskymergerwithoutadequateduediligence.Themergerresultedinsignificantfinanciallosses,andshareholdersfiledalawsuitagainstthedirectorsforbreachingtheirfiduciaryduties.ThecasewasadjudicatedundertheSingaporeCompaniesAct.Questions:1.UndertheSingaporeCompaniesAct,whatconstitutesabreachofthedirectors’dutytoactinthebestinterestsofthecompany?(2.5points)2.Canthedirectorsarguethattheywereactingingoodfaithandhadnoknowledgeoftherisksinvolved?Explain.(2.5points)3.Whatdefensesmightthedirectorsraiseagainstthelawsuit?(2.5points)CaseStudy4:ShareholderRevocationofDirectorsScenario:In"FinServHoldings,"aBritishcompany,75%oftheshareholdersvotedtoremovethreedirectorsfromtheboardformismanagingthecompany’sfinances.Theremoveddirectorscontestedtherevocation,arguingthattheshareholdershadviolatedthecompany’sarticlesofassociation,whichrequireda90%majorityforsuchdecisions.ThecasewasheardundertheUKCompaniesAct2006.Questions:1.UndertheUKCompaniesAct2006,whatistheminimumthresholdforremovingdirectors?(2.5points)2.Ifthearticlesofassociationrequireahigherthreshold,canthedirectorsstillberemoved?Explain.(2.5points)3.Whatconsequencesmightariseiftheshareholdersproceedwiththerevocationdespitethearticlesofassociation?(2.5points)第三部分：知识产权法案例（共5题，每题2分）CaseStudy5:PatentInfringementinthePharmaceuticalIndustryScenario:AU.S.pharmaceuticalcompany,"MediPharma,"holdsapatentforanewdrugintheEU.AChinesefirm,"BioGen,"beganproducingandsellingagenericversionofthedrugwithoutauthorization.MediPharmafiledalawsuitforpatentinfringementintheEuropeanCourtofJustice.Questions:1.UndertheEUPatentDirective,whatremediesareavailabletoMediPharmaagainstBioGen?(2points)2.IfBioGenarguesthatthedrugisa"genericequivalent"anddoesnotinfringethepatent,howmightthecourtrule?(2points)3.WhatdefensescouldBioGenraiseifthecourtfindsinfringement?(2points)CaseStudy6:CopyrightViolationintheMediaIndustryScenario:AU.S.filmstudio,"StarLightsPictures,"discoveredthataChinesestreamingservice,"VisionMedia,"haduploadeditslatestblockbusterwithoutpermission,claimingitwas"fairuse."StarLightsfiledalawsuitunderU.S.CopyrightActSection107.Questions:1.UnderU.S.law,whatconstitutes"fairuse"ofcopyrightedmaterial?(2points)2.IfVisionMediaarguesthatthefilmwasuploadedforeducationalpurposes,howmightthecourtevaluatetheclaim?(2points)3.Whatdamages(ifany)couldStarLightsclaimifthecourtrulesagainstVisionMedia?(2points)第四部分：国际商法案例（共4题，每题2.5分）CaseStudy7:Cross-BorderConsumerContractLawScenario:AGermanconsumer,"HansMüller,"purchasedahigh-endelectricvehiclefromaU.S.manufacturer,"EcoDriveInc.,"throughanonlineplatform.ThecontractspecifiedthatdisputeswouldberesolvedunderGermanlaw.However,EcoDrivefailedtodeliverthevehicleontime,andHanssuedundertheEUConsumerRightsDirective.Questions:1.UndertheEUConsumerRightsDirective,canHansstillsueunderGermanlawifthecontractspecifiesit?Explain.(2.5points)2.WhatremediesareavailabletoHansifEcoDrivefailstodeliverthevehicle?(2.5points)3.IfEcoDrivearguesthatthedelaywasduetoaglobalsupplychainissue,canitbeexcusedfromliability?(2.5points)CaseStudy8:ForeignJudgmentRecognitionintheUKScenario:ABritishcompany,"GlobalFinance,"wonalawsuitagainstaChineseentityinaChinesecourt.However,uponreturningtotheUK,GlobalFinancefoundthattheChinesejudgmentwasnotrecognizedundertheUK’sCivilProcedureRules.Thecaseinvolvedacontractdispute.Questions:1.UndertheUKCivilProcedureRules,whataretherequirementsforrecognizingaforeignjudgment?(2.5points)2.IftheChinesecourtlackedjurisdictionovertheChineseentity,canthejudgmentstillberecognized?Explain.(2.5points)3.WhatstepscanGlobalFinancetaketoenforcethejudgmentintheUK?(2.5points)答案与解析第一部分：合同法案例1.GlobalTechLtd.canclaimdamages(CISGArticle74)orterminatethecontract(CISGArticle64)duetoSunrise’snon-performance.2.Yes,Sunrisecanbeexcusedifforcemajeure(unforeseencircumstances)preventsperformance(CISGArticle79).3.No,damagesarestillrecoverableevenifSunrisehasinsurance,asthecontractimposesliabilityfordefectivegoods(CISGArticle74).第二部分：公司法案例1.Directorsmustactinthebestinterestsofthecompany(SingaporeCompaniesActSection155);failuretodosoisabreach.2.No,directorsmuststillexerciseduediligence(Section156),andgoodfaithaloneisinsufficientifdecisionsareirrational.3.Defensesincludeactingingoodfaith,followingcompanyprocedures,orprovingthemerger