高考英语二轮复习题型组合练(四)课件

题型组合练(四)

50分阅读提分练Ⅰ.阅读理解A(2025·浙江新阵地教育联盟第一次联考)AstheexcitementoftheSummerOlympicsattractsaudiencesworldwide，itpresentsagoldenopportunitytoinspireouryoungergenerationnotjustinsportsbutinthefieldsofScience，Technology，Engineering，andMathematics(STEM).Thesedisciplines，oftenperceivedascomplex，canbemadeaccessibleandenjoyablethroughthelensoftheOlympics.Here，weexploreaseriesofinnovativeSTEMchallengesdesignedforbothlowerelementaryandupperelementarystudents，aimedatsparkingtheircuriosityandfosteringaloveforlearning.SurfingSTEMChallengeTheSurfingSTEMChallengeinvitesstudentstoexplorethefascinatingworldofmagneticforces(磁力)bykeepingasurfersuspendedinmid-air.Usingamagneticstick，studentsguidethesurfer'strack，mirroringthefluidmovementsofsurfingwaves.BasketballSTEMChallengeTheBasketballSTEMChallengeattractsstudentsbytaskingthemwithinventingabasketballgametailoredforone-handedplay，makinguseofmaterialsathand.Theactivityhighlightstheimportanceofcreativity，engineeringcapability，andacollaborativeeffort，allwithinthevibrantatmosphereoftheSummerOlympics.SkateboardingSTEMActivityTheSkateboardingSTEMActivitychallengesstudentstocraftasmallskateboard，alongwithconstructingaskateparktodemonstratetheirfingerboarding

skills.It'sanengagingwaytoconnectwiththedynamicworldofskateboardingintheSummerOlympics，encouragingteamwork，innovation，andhands-onlearning.GolfSTEMChallengeTheGolfSTEMChallengetasksstudentswiththeexcitingprojectofdesigningandbuildingaminigolfcourse，alongwithcreatingtheirowngolfclub.ThisinnovativeapproachtolearningnotonlybringsthespiritoftheSummerOlympicsintotheclassroombutalsofostersteamwork，problem-solving，andadeeperunderstandingofthescientificconceptsbehindthegameofgolf.Clickheretofindoutmoreinformation.[语篇解读]

本文是一篇应用文。文章主要介绍了专门为小学生设计的四个创新STEM挑战，旨在激起学生的好奇心以及对学习的热爱。1.WhatisthemaingoaloftheSTEMchallengesdescribedinthetext?A.TotrainstudentsforfuturecareersinSTEM.B.Toencouragestudents'curiosityandloveforlearning.C.Tohelpstudentsunderstandcomplexscientifictheories.D.Topromotetheimportanceofsportsandphysicalactivity.解析

B细节理解题。根据第一段最后一句“Here，weexploreaseriesofinnovativeSTEMchallenges...aimedatsparkingtheircuriosityandfosteringaloveforlearning.”可知，这一系列的创新STEM挑战是专为小学生设计的，旨在激发他们的好奇心，并培养他们对学习的热爱，故选B。2.WhichtwoSTEMchallengesencouragestudentstobuildsomethingphysical?A.SurfingSTEMChallengeandGolfSTEMChallenge.B.SurfingSTEMChallengeandBasketballSTEMChallenge.C.SkateboardingSTEMActivityandGolfSTEMChallenge.D.BasketballSTEMChallengeandSkateboardingSTEMActivity.解析

C细节理解题。根据SkateboardingSTEMActivity中的“craftasmallskateboard，alongwithconstructingaskateparktodemonstratetheirfingerboardingskills”和GolfSTEMChallenge中的“designingandbuildingaminigolfcourse”可知，这两个课程都鼓励学生制作实体物品，故选C。3.Whereisthistextmostlikelytobefound?A.Aneducationalwebsite.B.Atravelblog.C.Ascientificreport.D.Asportsmagazine.解析

A文章出处题。根据第一段最后一句总结句可知，本文的推荐内容与创新教育有关，再由最后一段中的“Clickhere”可知，文章来自一个网站，所以最可能选自于一个教育网站，故选A。

B(2025·南京、盐城调研测试)Morethan20yearsago，Yung-ChiCheng，aYaleprofessorindrugdevelopmentforcancer，hadapioneeringidea：WhatifhecouldunlockthepotentialofancientChinesemedicinesfortreatingcancer?Whatifhecoulddesignbotanicaldrugsthatwouldmaketraditionalcancertreatmentsworkbetter?Noonehaddoneitbefore.Fellowresearchersandexpertsadvisedhimtochangecourse，becausedevelopingbotanicaldrugswastoocomplicatedandtoorisky.ButChengdidn'tlettheideago.Now，inalandmarkmomentforcancerresearch，Chengandresearchpartnersarelaunchingthefirstinternationalclinicaltrialforabotanicaldrug，YIV-906.Shwu-HueyLiu，apostdoctoralresearcherinCheng'sYalelab，spenthoursleafingthroughancientChinesetextsatYale'slibrary，seekingthepropertiesofChineseherbs.ShereturnedwithHuangQinTang，a1，800-year-oldtreatmentforstomachillnesses，basedonwhichtheteamdevelopedadrugandtesteditononethousandmice.Whatfollowedwereyearsofadditionaltestingofthedrug'seffectivenessforarangeofcancersinmultiplehumanstudiesinvolvingover200patients.Thepositiveeffectsdisplayedagainandagain.YIV-906notonlyreducedthesideeffectsofradiationtreatment，butalsoledtofasterrecoveryandlongersurvivalrates.Alltheyneednowarelargerdatasets.Whentheresultsoftheinternationaltrialareavailableaboutthreeyearsfromnow，YIV-906mayfinditselfnextinalonglineofbreakthroughdrugsdevelopedfromnaturalproducts，whichincludesamalaria(疟疾)treatmentdevelopedfromtheChineseherbqinghao，thediscoveryofwhichledtoaNobelPrizeforchemistTu

Youyou.Ithasbeenalongjourney，butifChengandhisteamaresuccessful，itcouldcreateanewapproachfortreatingcancer，Theycalledthenewapproach“WE”medicine，acombinationofWesternmedicineandEasternmedicine.“It'satotallynewmodel.I'vemetwithalotofdoubt，butIthinktheresultswillspeakforthemselves，”Chengsaid.[语篇解读]

本文是一篇记叙文。文章主要介绍了耶鲁大学教授Yung-ChiCheng及其团队在开发植物抗癌药物方面所做出的贡献。4.WhatdidfellowresearchersinitiallythinkofCheng'sresearch?A.Creative.

B.Comprehensive.C.Conventional. D.Challenging.解析

D观点态度题。根据第一段中的“Fellowresearchersandexpertsadvisedhimtochangecourse，becausedevelopingbotanicaldrugswastoocomplicatedandtoorisky.”可知，同行的研究人员和专家建议他改变方向，因为开发植物药物太复杂，风险太大。由此可知，同行的研究人员最初认为Cheng的研究具有挑战性。故选D。5.WhydidLiurefertoancientChinesetexts?A.Shewantedtoquestionancienttreatmentmethods.B.Shedesiredtofindinspirationfortreatingdiseases.C.ShetriedtodocumentthehistoryofChineseherbs.D.Shedeterminedtofindacureforstomachillnesses.解析

B细节理解题。根据第二段中的“Shwu-HueyLiu，apostdoctoralresearcherinCheng'sYalelab，spenthoursleafingthroughancientChinesetextsatYale'slibrary，seekingthepropertiesofChineseherbs.”可知，Yung-ChiCheng所在的耶鲁大学实验室的博士后研究员Shwu-HueyLiu花了很长时间在耶鲁大学图书馆翻阅中国古代文献，寻找中草药的特性。由此可推测，她翻阅中国古代文献是为了寻找治疗疾病的灵感。故选B。6.Whatdoesparagraph3mainlytalkabout?A.Thestepsofthedrugtesting.B.TheapplicationofYIV-906.C.Theeffectsoftheclinicaltrial.D.TheeffectivenessofYIV-906.解析

D段落大意题。根据第三段中的“testingofthedrug'seffectiveness”和“YIV-906notonlyreducedthesideeffectsofradiationtreatment，butalsoledtofasterrecoveryandlongersurvivalrates.”可知，该段主要说明了药物试验的结果，证明了YIV-906的效果。故选D。7.WhydoestheauthormentionChineseherbqinghao?A.Toillustratethevalueofbotanicaldrugs.B.Toadvocatetheadoptionof“WE”medicine.C.TopraiseTu'scontributionstodrugdevelopment.D.Tohighlightitssuccessinmedicinedevelopment.解析

A写作意图题。

根据倒数第二段中的“YIV-906mayfinditselfnextinalonglineofbreakthroughdrugsdevelopedfromnaturalproducts”可知，作者提到中草药青蒿是为了说明植物药物的价值。故选A。C(2025·沈阳第一次质检)Inastudy，152collegestudentsexposedtomisinformationreadoneoftwoarticlesintendedtogivecorrectandscientificallybackedinformation.Thosewhoreadanarticlethathad“justthefacts”preservedmoremisconceptionsthanthosewhoreadanarticlewitharefutation—meaningitspecificallypointedoutthefalseclaimsbeforepresentingthefacts.Forthisstudy，researchersfirsttestedwhatthestudentparticipantsknewaboutputtingfluoride(氟化物)inwater.Thestudentsthenreadtwoarticles：onewithfalseinformationsayingthatfluoridationisharmfulandtheotherpresentingthescientificideasthatfluoridationissafeandpreventsdentaldisease.Theparticipantsallreadthesamemisinformation，butdifferentgroupsreadanarticlewiththecorrectinformationeitherinatraditional“justthefacts”styleoronethatfirstrefutedthemisinformation.Thestudyalsotestedtheeffectsofhavingtheparticipantsreadthecorrectarticlebefore，orafter，themisinformation.Apost-testrevealedthatthestudentsstilllearnedunderallfourconditions—butthegroupthatperformedtheworsthadseenthemisinformationfollowedbya“justthefacts”typetext.Thosewhohadreadtherefutationarticleeitherbefore，orafter，themisinformationhadfewermisconceptions.Theyalsohadmorepositiveemotionstowardthesubject.Withlargeamountsofinformationeasilyavailableonline，itcanbehardformanypeopletosortfactfromfalsehood.Thiscancauseaproblemcalled“conceptualpollution”—whenlearningincorrectinformationgivesrisetointerventionandconfusioninlearningthecorrectinformation.“Yourminddoesn'tdiscriminatecontents.Whetherit'sacorrectconceptionoramisconception，itjustabsorbsit，”Danielson，apsychologyresearcher，says.Researcherslikehimarelookingforwaystoteachsciencethatbreakthroughthenoiseofmisinformation.Thisstudyandothersprovethatarefutationapproachisprospective.Researchersalsoperceivetherefutationalapproachworkswellfortopicsfromphysicsandchemistrytohighlypoliticalones.[语篇解读]

本文是一篇说明文。文章通过研究案例来说明不同信息的呈现方式对纠正错误认知的效果。8.Whatdoweknowaboutthestudentparticipantsinthestudy?A.Theyweredividedintotwogroups. B.Theygotmisinformationfirst.C.Theywereshowntherightinformation. D.Theyreadthesametwoarticles.解析

C细节理解题。第一段介绍了研究结果，第二段解释研究过程。根据第二段中的“Thestudentsthenreadtwoarticles：onewithfalseinformationsayingthatfluoridationisharmfulandtheotherpresentingthescientificideasthatfluoridationissafeandpreventsdentaldisease.”可知，参与的学生阅读了两篇文章：一篇包含虚假信息，另一篇则提出了科学观点。第二段最后一句提到，研究还测试了让参与者在阅读错误信息之前或之后阅读正确文章的效果。由此可知，实验过程中，虽顺序不同，但学生参与者都阅读了正确的信息。故选C。9.Inwhatorderdidthepoorest-performinggroupreadthearticles?A.Misinformationfirst，thenrefutation.B.“Justthefacts”first，thenmisinformation.C.Refutationfirst，thenmisinformation.D.Misinformationfirst，then“justthefacts”.解析

D细节理解题。根据第三段中的“butthegroupthatperformedtheworsthadseenthemisinformationfollowedbya‘justthefacts'typetext”可知，表现最差的小组是先看到了错误信息，然后阅读了“仅事实”类型的文本。故选D。10.Whatdoestheunderlinedword“noise”probablymeaninparagraph4?A.Correction. B.Disturbance.C.Occurrence. D.Comprehension.解析

B词义猜测题。根据最后一段中的“Yourminddoesn'tdiscriminatecontents.Whetherit'sacorrectconceptionoramisconception，itjustabsorbsit”可知，你的大脑不会对内容进行区分，无论是正确的概念还是误解，它都会吸收。所以研究人员正在寻找能够突破错误信息的“noise”的方式来教授科学，noise与disturbance“干扰”意义相近。11.Howdoesthetextdevelop?A.Fact—Contrast—Explanation—ExpectationB.Introduction—Process—Result—ConclusionC.Background—Problem—Analysis—SolutionD.Topic—Classification—Discussion—Outcome解析

B文章结构题。文章共有四段，首段研究结论引入话题；第二段介绍实验过程；第三段介绍实验结果；第四段分析原因，得出结论(最后两句)。故选B。D(2025·济南摸底考试)ImagineachildaskingachatbotorvoiceassistantifSantaClausisreal.HowshouldtheAIrespond，giventhatsomefamilieswouldpreferalieoverthetruth?Thisisadilemmainthelittle-studiedareaofrobotsdeception(欺骗).TwoGeorgiaTechresearchers，KantwonRogersandReidenWebber，designedadrivingsimulation(模拟)experimenttoinvestigatehowintentionalrobotdeceptionaffectstrustbetweenhumansandAI，andwhetherdifferenttypesofapologiescanhelprepairthattrust.Inthesimulation，participantswereinstructedtodrivea“robot-assistedcar”tothehospitaltosaveafriend'slife，whiletheAIassistantfalselywarnedofpoliceahead，advisingparticipantstostayunderthespeedlimit.Uponreachingthehospital，participantswereinformedthattherewerenopolice，andtheyreceivedoneoffivedifferenttext-basedresponsesfromtherobot—threeadmittingthelie，twoofferingasimpleapologywithoutadmission.Thestudyaimedtodeterminewhichtypeofapologywasmosteffectiveinrepairingtrustafterarobot'slie.Theresultsoftheexperimentweresurprising.45%oftheparticipantsdidnotspeed，becausetheybelievedtherobotknewmoreaboutthesituationthantheydid，revealinganoverlytrustingattitudetowardAI.Theresultsalsoindicatedthatwhilenoneoftheapologytypesfullyrecoveredtrust，theapologywithnoadmissionoflyingwasstatisticallymoreeffectiveinrepairingtrustthanotherresponses.Theresearchers'finalgoalistocreatearobotsystemthatcanlearnwhenandhowtolieorapologizeduringhuman-AIinteractions.Buttheyacknowledgethatthisisacomplexissue.“WestillknowverylittleaboutAIdeception，butwedoknowthatlyingisnotalwaysbad，andtellingthetruthisn'talwaysgood，”Rogerssaid.“Sohowcanwemakelawsthatsupportnewideaswithoutharmingthem，whilealsokeepingpeoplesafe？”[语篇解读]

本文是一篇说明文。人工智能该如何对一些问题作出回应，是讲真话还是撒谎？人工智能的欺骗是怎样对信任产生影响的？两位研究人员针对这些问题设计了一个模拟实验。12.Whatistheaimoftheexperiment?A.ToassessAI'sintentionalresponses.B.ToexamineAI'slearningcapabilities.C.ToevaluateAI'sassistancewithdriving.D.TostudyAIdeception'simpactontrust.解析

D细节理解题。根据第二段内容可知，这个实验的目的主要是调查人工智能欺骗是如何影响人与人工智能之间的信任的，和不同类型的道歉是否能帮助修复那种信任。故选D。13.WhichresponsefromAIisthemosteffectiveinrepairingtrustintheexperiment?A.“Iamsorry.”B.“Iliedtoyou.”C.“You'reatyourdestination.”D.“Forgivemeformyfault.”解析

A推理判断题。根据第四段的“theapologywithnoadmissionoflying...thanotherresponses”可知，从结果来看，不承认说谎的道歉在修复信任时比其他回应更有效。结合四个选项可知，选A。14.WhatmightRogersadviseAIlawmakerstodo?A.Balanceinnovationandusers'safety.B.Prioritizeprotectionofusers'privacy.C.PromotemoralbehaviorinAIsystems.D.Enforceclearerandstricterregulations.解析

A推理判断题。

根据最后一段的“Westillknowverylittleabout...sohowcanwemakelaws...whilealsokeepingpeoplesafe？”可知，Rogers说我们对于人工智能欺骗了解还很少，但是我们确实知道撒谎不总是坏的，讲真话也不总是好的。因此，我们如何能让立法者在不伤害人们的情况下既能够支持这些新观点，与此同时也确保人们是安全的？由此可以推测，Rogers建议立法者平衡科技创新和使用者的安全。故选A。15.Whatcanbeasuitabletitleforthetext?A.TheHuman-AIConfidenceCrisisB.ADilemmainHumanHonestyC.IsaRobotSystemPromising?D.AIDeception：BadOrNot?解析

D标题归纳题。文章围绕人工智能欺骗这一话题展开描述，记叙了两个科技研究人员设计的一个模拟实验的目的、过程和结果，研究人员之一Rogers建议立法者要在保护人们隐私的同时还要在不伤害他们的情况下支持这些新观点。故选D。

Ⅱ.阅读七选五(每小题2.5分，共12.5分)(2025·重庆一诊)Towerrunningisasportwhereathletescompetebyclimbingskyscraperstairs.

1Whywouldsomeonechoosetoraceupabuildingwithnoviews，nocrowds，andfewrefreshmentstations?Manyaremotivatedbycharity，raisingfundstocombatdiseaseslikecancerortosupporteducationforthelessfortunate.Somearejustfortheirinnerinterest，formingfundraisingandtrainingteams.

2Itenhancesheartandlungfunction，strengthensthelowerbody，andboostsenduranceandmentalresilience.However，towerrunningisnotforthefaint-hearted.Anyonewhohasclimbedupalongflightofstainsknowsclimbingstairscanbepainful.Andthepainincreasesgreatlyduringrunning.Towerrunnersmustbeabletodealwiththestressesontheirfeetandlegswhilerunning.Theriskoffallingisreal，whichcanleadtosevereinjuries.Soyou'dbetteravoidstartingyourtrainingbyhittingthestairshard，especiallyifyouareabeginner.Startslowlyandincreasegradually.

3Theymi