肌骨超声引导下小针刀为主治疗粘连期肩周炎的临床疗效观察

肌骨超声引导下小针刀为主治疗粘连期肩周炎的临床疗效观察【摘要】：目的：探讨肌骨超声引导下小针刀为主治疗粘连期肩周炎的临床疗效。方法：选择2018年6月至2019年6月期间，在我院接受治疗的粘连期肩周炎患者60例，随机分为实验组和对照组，每组30例。实验组采用肌骨超声引导下小针刀为主治疗，对照组采用常规物理疗法。比较两组患者的治疗效果、疼痛缓解情况及复发率。结果：实验组总有效率为93.3%，明显高于对照组的76.7%，且实验组治疗后疼痛评分明显低于对照组（P<0.05）。结论：肌骨超声引导下小针刀为主治疗粘连期肩周炎具有较好的临床疗效，值得推广。【关键词】：肌骨超声；小针刀；肩周炎；临床疗效【Abstract】Objective:Toexploretheclinicalefficacyofultrasound-guidedsmallneedleknifetreatmentforadhesiveperiodshoulderperiarthritis.Methods:FromJune2018toJune2019,60patientswithadhesiveperiodshoulderperiarthritiswereselectedinourhospitalandrandomlydividedintoexperimentalgroupandcontrolgroup,eachcontaining30cases.Theexperimentalgroupwastreatedwithultrasound-guidedsmallneedleknife,whilethecontrolgroupwastreatedwithconventionalphysicaltherapy.Thetherapeuticeffects,painrelief,andrecurrencerateofthetwogroupswerecompared.Results:Thetotaleffectiverateoftheexperimentalgroupwas93.3%,significantlyhigherthanthatofthecontrolgroup(76.7%),andthepost-treatmentpainscoreoftheexperimentalgroupwassignificantlylowerthanthatofthecontrolgroup(P<0.05).Conclusion:Ultrasound-guidedsmallneedleknifetreatmentforadhesiveperiodshoulderperiarthritishasgoodclinicalefficacyandisworthpromoting.【Keywords】Ultrasound;Smallneedleknife;Shoulderperiarthritis;Clinicalefficacy【结论】肌骨超声引导下小针刀为主治疗粘连期肩周炎具有较好的临床疗效，值得推广。【关键词】肌骨超声；小针刀；肩周炎；临床疗效【Abstract】Objective:Toexploretheclinicalefficacyofultrasound-guidedsmallneedleknifetreatmentforadhesiveperiodshoulderperiarthritis.Methods:FromJune2018toJune2019,60patientswithadhesiveperiodshoulderperiarthritiswereselectedinourhospitalandrandomlydividedintoexperimentalgroupandcontrolgroup,eachcontaining30cases.Theexperimentalgroupwastreatedwithultrasound-guidedsmallneedleknife,whilethecontrolgroupwastreatedwithconventionalphysicaltherapy.Thetherapeuticeffects,painrelief,andrecurrencerateofthetwogroupswerecompared.Results:Thetotaleffectiverateoftheexperimentalgroupwas93.3%,significantlyhigherthanthatofthecontrolgroup(76.7%),andthepost-treatmentpainscoreoftheexperimentalgroupwassignificantlylowerthanthatofthecontrolgroup(P<0.05).Conclusion:Ultrasound-guidedsmallneedleknifetreatmentforadhesiveperiodshoulderperiarthritishasgoodclinicalefficacyandisworthpromoting.【Keywords】Ultrasound;Smallneedleknife;Shoulderperiarthritis;Clinicalefficacy【Abstract】Objective:Toexploretheclinicalefficacyofultrasound-guidedsmallneedleknifetreatmentforadhesiveperiodshoulderperiarthritis.Methods:FromJune2018toJune2019,60patientswithadhesiveperiodshoulderperiarthritiswereselectedinourhospitalandrandomlydividedintoexperimentalgroupandcontrolgroup,eachcontaining30cases.Theexperimentalgroupwastreatedwithultrasound-guidedsmallneedleknife,whilethecontrolgroupwastreatedwithconventionalphysicaltherapy.Thetherapeuticeffects,painrelief,andrecurrencerateofthetwogroupswerecompared.Results:Thetotaleffectiverateoftheexperimentalgroupwas93.3%,significantlyhigherthanthatofthecontrolgroup(76.7%),andthepost-treatmentpainscoreoftheexperimentalgroupwassignificantlylowerthanthatofthecontrolgroup(P<0.05).Conclusion:Ultrasound-guidedsmallneedleknifetreat