吴兴东-如何撰写高水平文章_第1页
吴兴东-如何撰写高水平文章_第2页
吴兴东-如何撰写高水平文章_第3页
吴兴东-如何撰写高水平文章_第4页
吴兴东-如何撰写高水平文章_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩21页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

HowtoWriteandPublish

ResearchPapersforthePremierForums

inKnowledge&DataEngineeringXindongWuDepartmentofComputerScienceUniversityofVermontUSA;合肥工业大学计算机应用长江学者讲座教授xwu@/~xwuUSTC,January9,2007ContentsSomeTKDEandICDMstatisticsScientificwritingandpaperstructureWhattoknowandhowtowriteatop-qualitypaperApromisingtopicAconvincingcaseIn-depthanalysisofempiricalresultsThemostimportantpart:theintroductionHowtopublishatICDMandTKDEPaperreviewinganditsfeedbackSummaryoftake-homemessagesUSTC,January9,2007FocusedAreasin

Knowledge&DataEngineeringDataMiningKnowledgeDiscoveryinDatabases(KDD)IntelligentDataAnalysisDatabaseSystemsDataManagementDataEngineeringKnowledgeEngineeringSemanticWebKnowledge-BasedSystemsSoftComputingUSTC,January9,2007MajorForumsinDataMining

Conferences(conferencepublicationsareextremelyimportantinComputerScience):Thebirthofdatamining/KDD:1989IJCAIWorkshoponKnowledgeDiscoveryinDatabases1991-1994WorkshopsonKnowledgeDiscoveryinDatabases1995–date:InternationalConferencesonKnowledgeDiscoveryinDatabasesandDataMining(KDD)2001–date:IEEEICDMandSIAM-DM(SDM)Severalregionalconferences,incl.PAKDD(since1997)&PKDD(since1997)Journals(topjournalsvshigh-impactjournals):DataMiningandKnowledgeDiscovery(DMKD,since1997)KnowledgeandInformationSystems(KAIS,since1999)IEEETransactionsonKnowledgeandDataEngineering(TKDE)Manyothers,incl.TPAMI,ML,IDA,…USTC,January9,2007ACMKDDvs.IEEEICDMUSTC,January9,2007TKDESubmissionNumbersandAcceptanceRatesUSTC,January9,2007ContentsSomeTKDEandICDMstatisticsScientificwritingandpaperstructureWhattoknowandhowtowriteatop-qualitypaperApromisingtopicAconvincingcaseIn-depthanalysisofempiricalresultsThemostimportantpart:theintroductionHowtopublishatICDMandTKDEPaperreviewinganditsfeedbackSummaryoftake-homemessagesUSTC,January9,2007WhyWriteaScientificPaperAdvanceknowledgeinyourresearchfieldwithevidenceExplainyourideasandmakethemaccessibletoothersTwokeycomponentsinaresearchpaper:AnexplicitclaimonyourcontributiononaresearchproblemEvidencetosupportyourclaimYourcontributioncanpossiblybearefutationofahypothesisontheresearchproblem[Take-HomeMessage#1]ItisNOTenoughtodesignyetanothertechniqueorsystemwithoutconvincingevaluation.USTC,January9,2007WhattoClaimforaScientificPaperYourtechniquesolvesaproblemforthefirsttimeYourtechniqueperformsbetter,inoneormoreofthefollowingdimensions[AlanBundy,How-ToGuides,homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/bundy/howtos/writingGuide.html],thanitsrivals:Behaviour:XhasahighersuccessratethenYorproducesbetterqualityoutputs,e.g.shorter,easiertounderstand,moresimilartohumanoutputs,etc.Coverage:XisapplicabletoawiderrangeofexamplesthanYEfficiency:XisfasteroruseslessspacethanYUseability:UsersfindXeasiertousethanitsrivals.

[Take-HomeMessage#2]

Youshouldavoidclaimingtoomanydimensions,butoneortwowithin-depthevidence.USTC,January9,2007TypicalStructureofaResearchPaper(1)Title:CatchyandindicativeofyourresearchcontributionICDMDataMiningonICDMPaperSubmissions:Theshorterapapertitle,thebetteritsacceptancechance(lesspossibilityforbeingincrementalwork)Abstract:Asummaryoftheresearchproblem,yourclaim,andtheevidenceIntroduction:Motivation,are-statementoftheabstractinformation,significance,anoutlineoftherestofthepaperRelatedwork:AcriticalreviewontherivalapproachesthatsupportsthemotivationHowtodifferentiateexistingworkwithyourowncreativecontributions.USTC,January9,2007ResearchPaperStructure(2)Problemstatementandalgorithmdesign:ExplainyourideasindetailEvaluation:EvidencetosupporttheclaimofyourresearchcontributionUnlessyoucanprovideproofsforatheoreticalpaperontheorems,experimentalresultsarealwaysexpectedConclusion:Asummaryoftheresearchcontribution,adiscussiononitssignificance,andamentionoffuturework.USTC,January9,2007ContentsSomeTKDEandICDMstatisticsScientificwritingandpaperstructureWhattoknowandhowtowriteatop-qualitypaperApromisingtopicAconvincingcaseIn-depthanalysisofempiricalresultsThemostimportantpart:theintroductionHowtopublishatICDMandTKDEPaperreviewinganditsfeedbackSummaryoftake-homemessagesUSTC,January9,2007WhattoKnowBeforeYouWriteAssesstheaudience:Towhomareyouwriting?Whywilltheybereadingyourwriting?Assessthepurpose:Whatshouldthereadertakeaway?Readotherpeople’swritingfromtheforumsthatyouaretargetingLanguageskillsandthewritingstylearealwaysimportantApaperpublishedinonetopjournalcaneasilygetrejectedbyanothertopjournal–communitydifferenceorculturaldifference[Take-HomeMessage#3]Knowyourenemy:Checkwhoareontheprogramcommitteeoreditorialboard,andcitetheirrelevantworkwithduecreditFollowtherules–lengthlimits,formattingstandardsetc.USTC,January9,2007HowtoWriteaTop-QualityPaper[Take-HomeMessage#4]Chooseapromisingtopic10ChallengingProblemsinDataMiningResearch(presentedbyQiangYang&XindongWuatICDM’05)http:///~icdm/PresentaconvincingcaseProvidein-depthanalysisofempiricalresultsSpendmoretimeontheintroduction.USTC,January9,2007HowtoPresentaConvincingCase

USTC,January9,2007In-DepthAnalysisofEmpiricalResultsEnoughdetailsforyourexperimentsettings(sothatotherresearcherscanverifyandimproveyourresults)Whatwerethealternativesconsideredatvariouspointsofyourexperiments?Whyandhowhaveyoumadethechoicesforyourexperiments?[Take-HomeMessage#5]Aretheexperimentalresultsconsistentandconclusive?Canyoufine-tunesomekeyparameterstogetbetterorworseresults?Ifso,usefiguresandtablestoshowtheirimpactsonyoursystemperformancesHowdotheexperimentalresultscorrespondtothemotivationofthepaper?Whathaveyoufoundsurprisingandtriedtoavoidintheseexperiments?Howgenerallyapplicablearetheselessons?USTC,January9,2007TheMostImportantPartofYourPaper:theIntroductionThe1/3–2/3Rulefromareviewer’sperspective:1/3timetoreadyourintroductionandmakeadecisionRemaining2/3timetofindevidenceforthedecision[Take-HomeMessage#6]Agoodintroductionwithagoodmotivationishalfofyoursuccess!WhattocoverintheintroductionTheresearchproblemThemotivationofyourresearchontheresearchproblemTheclaimofyourcontributionAsummaryofyourevidencetosupportyourclaimThesignificanceofyourcontributionAnoutlineoftherestofthepaper.USTC,January9,2007ContentsSomeTKDEandICDMstatisticsScientificwritingandpaperstructureWhattoknowandhowtowriteatop-qualitypaperApromisingtopicAconvincingcaseIn-depthanalysisofempiricalresultsThemostimportantpart:theintroductionHowtopublishatICDMandTKDEPaperreviewinganditsfeedbackSummaryoftake-homemessagesUSTC,January9,2007HowtoPublishatICDMandTKDE(1)ICDMandTKDEbothlookforsignificanttechnologicalcontributionsICDMandTKDEarebothverytough,expectingbestresultsintheirrespectiveresearchfield[Take-HomeMessage#7]Readingandcitingrelevantpapersfromthepremierforums(incl.ICDM/KDDandTKDE)isamustApossiblewaytopublishinbothICDM/KDDandTKDE:SubmittoICDM/KDDtoget(quick)feedbackExpandandsubmittoTKDEifpositivefeedbackfromICDM/KDD,withatleast30%newmaterial.USTC,January9,2007HowtoPublishatICDMandTKDE(2)Howaboutapplicationpapers?Applicationpapersarealwaysinvited,butinnovationsarenecessary.Acaseofaninnovativeapplicationmustbepresented,fortheICDM/TKDEaudience.Howaboutdataanalysisw/olargevolumesofdata?Experimentsonlargedatabasesarenotalwaysrequired,butgenerallyexpectedReasonsonwhynotlargedatasetsshouldbeexplained.Mostimportantofall:theuniquenessofyourresearchinthefield!Youworkhastobe(1)technicallysound,(2)relevant,(3)original,(4)significant,and(5)wellclarified.USTC,January9,2007ContentsSomeTKDEandICDMstatisticsScientificwritingandpaperstructureWhattoknowandhowtowriteatop-qualitypaperApromisingtopicAconvincingcaseIn-depthanalysisofempiricalresultsThemostimportantpart:theintroductionHowtopublishatICDMandTKDEPaperreviewinganditsfeedbackSummaryoftake-homemessagesUSTC,January9,2007TheReviewProcessTKDEEiC:AssignpaperstoAEs,andhandleinconsistencybetweentheAEandreviewersAE:Solicitreviewers,andcoordinatethereviewprocessICDMPCChairs:AssignpaperstoViceChairsandPCmembersViceChairs:ResolveconflictingreviewsandmakepaperacceptancerecommendationsPCmembers:reviewers.USTC,January9,2007HowtoDealwithFeedback(1)HowtodealwithHandlingEditorsBepolite,buttothepointAskforachange,ifaclearlybiasedorunfaircase.HowtodealwithconflictingreviewreportsForjournalsubmissionsTryeveryefforttoaddresseveryconcern[Take-HomeMessage#8]Provideapoint-by-pointstatementofchangesUseotherreviewers’commentstodisagreewiththenegativeonesForconferencesubmissionsRebutifyouthinkyouhaveareasonablechancetowin–NothingtoloseGetseniorauthorsinvolvedinthereb

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论