专业英语温室效应.ppt_第1页
专业英语温室效应.ppt_第2页
专业英语温室效应.ppt_第3页
专业英语温室效应.ppt_第4页
专业英语温室效应.ppt_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩33页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

1、Unit Four: The Greenhouse Effect,第四课 温室效应,New words:,Triple 三倍于 quadruple 四倍于 National Academy of Science 国家科学院 Impact 影响 effect Feedback 反馈 annual 每年的 Seasonal 每季的 Expand 扩展 extend spread Antarctic 南极洲 Greenland 格陵兰 Flood 洪水泛滥 Bangladesh 孟加拉 Bay of Bengal 孟加拉湾 (BOB) Timely 定时的,及时的 Zone 区域 region,In

2、frared radiation 红外辐射 Climatic feedback 气候反馈 Snow cover 雪盖 Et al.等等(人) etc.等等(物),4,5,6,7,辐射,物体以电磁波或粒子流形式向周围传递或交换能量的方式。,电磁波谱,辐射的基本知识,辐射是太阳能传输到地球的唯一途径,大气窗:713,大气中的辐射传输过程,大气对短波的影响,吸收 散射 反射,吸收 逆辐射,大气对长波的影响,ppm:part per million,P1: Man is reversing millions of years of natural evolution by putting into t

3、he atmosphere carbon that had been sequestered over the ages as fossil fuels. Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 are likely to double, and possibly triple, by 2100. Because no historical precedent exists, reasonable expectations about future climate must be based on scientific evidence, not geologica

4、l records. After evaluating the available evidence, the National Academy of Sciences concluded that a doubling of atmospheric concentrations of CO2 would warm the earths average temperature 1.5-4.5.,P2: The greenhouse effect of the atmosphere has never been doubted. More of the suns radiation is vis

5、ible light, which passes through the atmosphere largely undeterred. When the radiation strikes the earth, it warms the surface, which then radiates the heat as infrared radiation. However, atmospheric CO2, water vapor, and some other gases absorb the infrared radiation rather than allow it to pass u

6、ndeterredly through the atmosphere to space. Because the atmosphere traps the heat and warms the earth in a manner somewhat analogous to the glass panels of a greenhouse, this phenomenon is generally known as the “greenhouse effect”. Without this effect, the earth would be 33(60)colder that it is cu

7、rrently.,P3: The extent to which CO2 absorbs heat has been known for almost a century, Scientists show that doubling of atmospheric CO2 would raise the average temperature1.2 if nothing else in the earths climatic system changed. However, many parts of the climate will change, amplifying the direct

8、impact of CO2. Because these changes are not completely understood, the total warming is difficult to estimate. The current uncertainty surrounding the impact of CO2 on average temperature is centered around these climatic “feedback”, not the direct warming from CO2.,P4: The most important feedback

9、will result from the warmer atmospheres ability to retain moisture. Because water vapor also absorbs infrared radiation, additional heating will result . Hanson er al. estimate that double CO2 would increase the atmospheres water vapor content 30%, heating the earth and additional 1.4.,P5: Another i

10、mportant positive feedback concerns the impact of snow and ice cover on the earths albedo, the extent to which it reflects sunlight. Ice and snow reflect most of the suns radiation, while water and soil absorb it. An increase in surface temperatures would melt snow on land and floating ice and there

11、by allow the earth to absorb energy that would otherwise be reflected back into space. Hanson et al. estimate an additional warming of 0.4 from the albedo effect.,P6: A feedback that is less understood is the impact of a global warming on clouds, which also reflect sunlight into space. The effects o

12、f clouds on the earths albedo depend on their heights and other properties, as well as the extent of cloud cover. Thus, the impact of a global warming on clouds is somewhat uncertain. Nevertheless, with somewhat less confidence, Hanson et al. estimate a 2% reduction in cloud cover and a resulting wa

13、rming of 0.5. They also estimate that increase in cloud height would result in an additional warming of 0.5,for a total impact of 1.0 from clouds.,P7: Although the increase in the average temperature of the earth is a convenient shorthand description of CO2 induced climate change, it masks important

14、 regional implications. Most searchers agree that polar temperature would increase two to three times the earths average increase. The worlds climate depends largely on circulation patterns by which the atmosphere and the oceans transport heat from warm to cold regions.,P7: As a result, any signific

15、ant change in the difference between equatorial and polar temperatures could dramatically affect climatic patterns. A particularly important effect of these changes will be shifts in annual and seasonal precipitation and evaporation, with some areas gaining and other losing. Furthermore, because hur

16、ricanes require an ocean temperature of 27 or warmer, a global warming could allow hurricanes to form at higher latitudes and during a greater part of the year. These changes could be important to coastal communities.,P8: A more immediate(直接的) concern is that the projected global warming could raise

17、 the sea as much as one meter in the next century by heating ocean water, which would then expand, and by causing mountain glaciers and parts of ice sheets in West Antarctica ,East Antarctica, and Greenland to melt or slide into the oceans. Thus , the sea could reach heights unprecedented in the his

18、tory of civilization until this effort. No one had attempted to forecast sea level rise in specific years or determine its importance to todays activities.,P9: If this prediction comes true, the water will flood over 15 percent if Bangladeshs territory, about 12 to 15 percent of Egypts cultivated la

19、nd and significantly reduce the territory of many island countries. In the United States, thousands of square miles of land could be lost, particularly in low-lying areas such as the Mississippi Delta, where the land is also subsiding at approximately one meter per century. Storm damage, already est

20、imated at over three billion dollars per year nationwide, could also increase the salinity of marshes, estuaries, and aquifers, disrupting marine life and possibly threatening some drinking water supplies ., The greenhouse gases are also damaging the ozone layer surrounding the earth which protects

21、human beings from ultraviolet radiation. Research shows that cancer could increase by 3 percent for every 1 percent reduction in the ozone layer. Fortunately, the most adverse(不利的) effects can be avoided if timely actions are taken.,P10: Although the climatic changes that could result from CO2 emiss

22、ions is poorly understood, there is complete agreement that CO2 concentrations are increasing.,P11: Approximately one-half the CO2 released by combustion of fossil fuels has remained in the atmosphere. It is generally believed that most of the remaining CO2 has dissolved into the oceans. Although tr

23、opical deforestation and cement production also result in CO2 emission, their contribution have been and will continue to be much less important.,P12: Controlling the greenhouse gases, especially the increasing discharge (排放) of carbon dioxide has already become a key problem. The global community m

24、ust make efforts to reduce the greenhouse effect.,P13: In the next few decades, however, CO2 emissions are unlikely to be curtailed, either voluntarily or by regulation. The worlds infrastructure is built around fossil fuels. The cost (成本) of using coal, gas and oil is low compared with nuclear and

25、solar power, and this relative cost advantage(优势) is expected to continue. Therefore, a voluntary reduction in CO2 emissions is unlikely.,P14: The only government action that could successfully reduce CO2 emissions would be to curtail the use of fossil fuels. Emission controls for CO2 from power pla

26、nts (电厂) would at least quadruple the cost of electricity. For smaller users of fossil fuels, such as homes and motor vehicles, control is not even feasible. Other plans, such as sequestering carbon in massive tree plantings, are even less plausible.,P15: Even if political leaders decide to take dra

27、stic(严厉的) actions to limit worldwide consumption of fossil fuels, it is probably already too late to prevent significant rises in global temperatures and sea level. A recent study investigated the impact of drastic energy policy changes on the expected timing of a greenhouse warming (Seidel and Keye

28、s,1983). The authors concluded that such policies could have important impact by 2100, but would not substantially delay the 2 C warming expected by 2040., They estimated that a 300 percent tax on fossil fuels would delay the 2 C warming by only five years, and that even a worldwide ban on coal, sha

29、le(页岩) oil, and synthetic fuels would delay the warming by only twenty-five years, if implemented by 2000. Furthermore, such a ban would delay the rise in sea level expected through 2040 by only twelve years.,P16: The political feasibility of instituting (制定) such a ban by 2000 is also doubtful, bec

30、ause only a worldwide agreement to curtail emission could be successful. Any individual nation that curtails its own emissions will delay the day when CO2 concentrations double by a few years at most. Furthermore, because energy costs would increase for any nation that curtails its emissions, that n

31、ations industries would be placed at a competitive disadvantage compared with those of the rest of the world., Finally, political leaders would require proof that such a policy would be more beneficial than adapting to higher CO2 levels. Such proof will probably remain impossible to provide for the foreseeab

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论