ImprovingSupplyChainManagementRelationships英文版).ppt_第1页
ImprovingSupplyChainManagementRelationships英文版).ppt_第2页
ImprovingSupplyChainManagementRelationships英文版).ppt_第3页
ImprovingSupplyChainManagementRelationships英文版).ppt_第4页
ImprovingSupplyChainManagementRelationships英文版).ppt_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩15页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

1、Improving Supply Chain Management Relationships,Mary Simmerman Vice President, Materiel,April 23, 2003,Acquisition & Logistics Excellence Conference,2,Copyright 2003 Northrop Grumman Corporation,Agenda,Introductions Supplier Management What Does It Mean? The Defense Business Whats Driving the Transf

2、ormation? Northrops Model “Strategic Relationships, Strategic Alliances” Key Success Factors Future Vision Where Do We Go from Here? Questions and Answers,3,Copyright 2003 Northrop Grumman Corporation,Mary Simmerman, VP, Materiel,Oversee Domestic and International Procurement and Subcontract Managem

3、ent VP, Supplier Management and Procurement at Boeing Space and Communications Co-Lead Supplier Mgmt. Process Council at Boeing Past Life at Northrop in Advanced Systems Division and Grumman Aerospace SME for Material Operations of Boeing Airlift and Tanker 1998 Malcolm Baldridge Award MBA, Keller G

4、raduate School, BA in Business Mgmt., University of Phoenix,4,Copyright 2003 Northrop Grumman Corporation,Cost-Based Adversarial “Vendor” “Tug of War” Non-Evaluative Short-Term Event-Based,Collaboration Joint investment Sophisticated Evaluation Tools Long-Term Focus Continuous improvement True Partn

5、erships,Quality Issues,Poor Communic.,TQM,6 Sigma,Metrics,Integrated Systems,New Tech.,SCM Focus,Past,Present,Supplier Management What Does it Mean?,5,Copyright 2003 Northrop Grumman Corporation,What Do We Mean Today?,A Formal Process by Which Suppliers Are Evaluated and Categorized by Their Ability

6、 to Add Value to Our Business Via Investment, Collaborative Planning & Design, Risk-Sharing and Product Enhancement,Supplier Management Is Enabling Relationships with Providers of Goods and Services to: Attain Business Objectives Expand Business Opportunities Reduce / Transfer Business Risks,6,Copyr

7、ight 2003 Northrop Grumman Corporation,Market Share,Significantly Enhanced revenue,Benefits from Supplier Management,New Products/ Items,Broader Name Recognition,Reduced Costs,New Distribution Channels,New Customers,Why Manage Suppliers?,60-70% of What We Build Is Procured!,Customer Satisfaction,7,C

8、opyright 2003 Northrop Grumman Corporation,Industry Consolidation War Tactics Cultural Issues Enhanced Communications Weapons Technology,The Genesis,The Defense Business Whats Driving the Transformation?,“Integrated Network” True Partnerships “Systems, Services, Support” Precision Weapons & “Real-Ti

9、me” Communications,Goals,Collaboration,8,Copyright 2003 Northrop Grumman Corporation,The Northrop Model Supplier Engagement,Possess Technology That Would Be Beneficial to Our Future Business Aspirations Align with Our Future Strategies (e.g. NHA, JIT) Have R&D Expenditures That Are Relevant to Techn

10、ologies We Believe Are Gaps in Our Portfolio Select Potential Strategic Partners (Industry / Geography) with Characteristics That Would Be Critical Differentiators for Us in Future Competitions (e.g. Skills, Political Strengths, Technologies),9,Copyright 2003 Northrop Grumman Corporation,The Northro

11、p Model Hawkeye Case Study,Issues: Radar Approach & Team Solidified Within the Navy (NAVAIR, OPNAV, CNO, ASN) Navy Funding Profiles to Support RMP SD&D and Post Multiyear Production RMP SD&D Proposal Submission in June and Contract Award by December FY 2004 NTE Production Proposal Submission in Nove

12、mber and AAC Award by December (3 Hawkeye 2000 Aircraft),Strategies: Preserve FY 2003 Budget for SD&D and Production and Preservation in POM-04 Continue Hawkeye 2000 and Advanced Hawkeye/RMP Advocacy Campaigns Work with the Customer for Post MYP Production Via Affordability Options FY 2004-2005 (Haw

13、keye 2000) FY 2006-TBD (RMP LS / TAMD),Hawkeye Industry Team,Tactics: Leverage the Strength of a “Team” in USN, OSD, Congress and the Media Propagate “Value of RMP” as Highest Priority of Advocacy Campaign Stress “Value of Hawkeye 2000/CEC” to Nearterm Fleet Operations Develop Affordability Posture

14、on RMP SD&D and Post Multiyear Production Target Key OPNAV Flags Promote Team Accomplishments,Strategic Intent: Joint Marketing of the E-2C Hawkeye and USN AEW&C Roadmap,10,Copyright 2003 Northrop Grumman Corporation,The Northrop Model F-35 Case Study,Strategic Intent: Collaborative Design and Engin

15、eering while pursuing “Best Value”,Issues: Cost containment is key for the program Investment structure requires sourcing strategy for participating countries RFB/RFQ are “model” based Design and production specs are evolving as the bid process progresses,Strategies: Exploit technologies which suppo

16、rt collaborative design and engineering to address weight and configuration challenges Employ “ePMO” for document and data sharing for global team Deploy common engineering standards (CATIA),F-35 Global Team,Tactics: Developed JSL “Virtual PMO” for global project management support Balance “best val

17、ue” and collaborative engineering capabilities to meet cost and design challenges Develop specific incentives for team to address center fuselage and weight challenges.,11,Copyright 2003 Northrop Grumman Corporation,Continuous Review Process Based on Performance Measures Reflecting Total Cost of Own

18、ership Must Be in Place to Provide Ongoing Monitoring of the Suppliers Effectiveness “Platinum Source” Case Study,Key Success Factors Supplier Relationship Management,12,Copyright 2003 Northrop Grumman Corporation,Key Success Factors Supplier Relationship Management, Platinum Source,13,Copyright 200

19、3 Northrop Grumman Corporation,Key Success Factors Supplier Benefits,14,Copyright 2003 Northrop Grumman Corporation,Key Success Factors Supplier Relationship Management,Suppliers / Contractors Are Selected Strategically, with a Long-Term Focus, Rather Than Historic Short-Term, Transaction-Based. Org

20、anization Must Commit the Resources to Develop Mutually Beneficial Relationship. Demands on Suppliers Requiring Capital Investments Necessitates the Sharing of Plans and Schedules Utilize Suppliers As a Knowledge Source and Share Benefits of Expanding Into New Markets, Assessing Value-Based Opportun

21、ities, Discovering New Cost Savings, and Extending Current Functionalities,15,Copyright 2003 Northrop Grumman Corporation,Key Success Factors Supplier Relationship Management (Cont),Involve Key Suppliers in Long-Term Strategic Alliances, Where Specific Capabilities May Need to Be Developed. MWBEs Ma

22、y Be a Good Source for This. Align Suppliers, IR&D to Technology Maps,16,Copyright 2003 Northrop Grumman Corporation,Business Partners,World,Enterprise Group,SAP R/3,Business Warehouse,Order Entry, ILS, CS,Financials,HR,Fulfillment,.,E-Procurement,Strategic Enterprise Management,Portal,.,Extending S

23、cope (New Dimensions & Add-Ons),COLLABORATION,Internet,Extranet,Intranet,ENTERPRISE,Knowledge Warehouse,Supplier Relationship Mgt,Collaborative PLM,APO,CRM,Customer Relationship Mgmt,MFG, QA,Procurement,Billing,Complete,IES III/IV,FoF,Key Success Factors Technology Blueprint,17,Copyright 2003 Northrop Grumman Corporation,Direct,Indirect,Supplier Collaboration, Management, Improvement,Specification Development,Supplier / Part / Category Master Data Detailed Cost Element D

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

最新文档

评论

0/150

提交评论