英语演讲与辩论教学设计详案.doc_第1页
英语演讲与辩论教学设计详案.doc_第2页
英语演讲与辩论教学设计详案.doc_第3页
英语演讲与辩论教学设计详案.doc_第4页
全文预览已结束

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

【关键词】 新课程标准/ 演讲/ 辩论 / 教学设计英语演讲与辩论是英语语言综合能力的体现。随着英语风行全球及国际间往来的频繁,人们用英语发表演说或进行辩论的机会越来越多:正式的学术报告,外国友人的宴会,各级各类的演讲与辩论比赛,等等。英语演讲与辩论是学生必须掌握的基本技能,理应在学校教育中受到重视。普通高中英语课程标准(实验)在语言技能目标(八级)中有这样的表述:“能经过准备就一般话题作3钟演讲。”九级的目标描述是:“能经过准备就一些专题作5-10分钟演讲,并回答有关提问。”而且,讲演与辩论作为语言应用类,也已被列为高中任意选修课之一。英语演讲与辩论不仅是一个选修课模块,也可作为常规课堂教学的一种方法,用以训练学生的口语表达能力。把英语演讲与辩论作为一种教学方法应用于课堂教学,教学设计如下:辩论主题:Is it right or wrong to use animals in experiments?教学目标:1、引导学生就“动物实验”话题做发挥性语言表述,强化语言知识。2、指导学生明确英语辩论的特点、技巧,提高他们的思维应变能力。教学难点:以“辩论”的操练形式强化学生的英语思维能力,在公众场合的听说能力及临场应变能力。Teaching procedures design:Step 1 Warming upI. Provide the debate topic. II. Divide the students into two groups: the positive and the negative according to their own choices.III. Help students collect materials in groups.IV. Make the first draft of their debate, the design of their debate, the strategies, and standards for assessment, and so on.A、The first affirmative speaker must: define the topic; present the affirmatives team line; begins arguments against the negative side.B、The first negative must: accept or reject the definition; present the negative team line; rebut some of the main points of the first affirmative speaker; presents strong negative arguments.C、The second affirmative must: reaffirm the affirmatives team line; rebut all the remaining points of the negatives case; present a summary of the affirmatives case; round off the debate for the affirmative.D、The second negative must: reaffirm the negatives team line; rebut all the remaining points of the affirmatives case; present a summary of the negatives case.Step 2 Carry out the debatingSome of the arguments:I. Positive: It is right to use animals in experiments.Arguments: 1、 Animal testing has helped to develop medicines against many diseases. Doctors can become more skilled from working on animals.2、Human life is more important than animal life. Millions of animals are killed for food every year .Using animals for medical science is much more important.3、Few animals feel any pain. They get painkillers and if the experiment does not work, they are killed before they feel pain.II. Negative: It is wrong to use animals in experiments.Arguments:1、Millions of animals die in experiments that are not successful. Doctors can learn the same things from watching other doctors or videos.2、Animals have the same rights as human beings. Animals are still used to test cleaning products, skin creams and shampoos. There are already many such products; we dont need more of them.3、Can we know they dont feel pain? We have no right to kill them.Step 3 commentingOffering comments about the debate according to the standards we discussed.Step 4 SummarizingWhat have you learned in this lesson?Step 5 HomeworkWrite a short passage about the debate topic, presenting your own opinion and your arguments or reasons. 设计反思:演讲与辩论不同于一般的口语交际,有其特殊性,教师必须更加灵活地控制课堂,以便最大限度地发挥学生现有的语言交际能力,同时也为他们创造更多的学习机会,克服各种障碍,积极参与。教师也应努力营造一种宽容,友善的课堂气氛,使学生的演讲与辩论活动不受到正确或错误的评

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论