【持续性肾脏替代治疗crrt英文精品课件】access brophy_第1页
【持续性肾脏替代治疗crrt英文精品课件】access brophy_第2页
【持续性肾脏替代治疗crrt英文精品课件】access brophy_第3页
【持续性肾脏替代治疗crrt英文精品课件】access brophy_第4页
【持续性肾脏替代治疗crrt英文精品课件】access brophy_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩16页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

Access in Pediatric CRRT,Patrick D Brophy MD Pediatric Nephrology, Dialysis & Transplantation CS Mott Childrens Hospital University of Michigan,From Gina,The System is Down due to poor Access!,My first choice is.,Access,If you dont have it you might as well go home. This is the most important aspect of CVVH therapy. Adequacy. Filter life. Increased blood loss. Staff satisfaction.,Vascular Access,Ideal Catheter Characteristics Easy Insertion Permits Adequate Blood Flow without Vessel Damage Minimal Technical Flaws High Recirculation Rate Kinking Shorter and Larger Catheters SIZE DOES MATTER Lower Resistance Improved Bloodflow,Pediatric CRRT Vascular Access: Performance = Blood Flow,Minimum 30 to 50 ml/min to minimize access and filter clotting Maximum rate of 400 ml/min/1.73m2 or 10-12 ml/kg/min in neonates and infants 4-6 ml/kg/min in children 2-4 ml/kg/min in adolescents,Venous Access for CRRT,Match catheter size to patient size and anatomical site One dual- or triple-lumen or two single lumen uncuffed catheters Sites femoral internal jugular avoid sub-clavian vein if possible,Catheter Position,No Right or Wrong Choice of Placement FACTORS Clinical expertise Body Habitus Other catheters (Citrate anticoag-triple preferred) Coagulopathy Intra-abdominal distension,Catheter Position,Internal Jugular-Right- aim for RA to secure adequate BFR Subclavian-Patient mobility? Most frequent site of inadequate performance -catheter curves and abutts against SVC-Vein collapses against catheter due to positional/volume change Femoral- optimal position in tip of IVC,Vascular Access for Pediatric CRRT: Pros and Cons of Femoral Site,Relatively larger vessel may allow for larger catheter higher flows Ease of placement No risk of pneumothorax Preserve potential future vessels for chronic HD,Shorter femoral catheters with increased % recirculation Poor performance in patients with ascites/increased abdominal pressure Trauma to venous anastamosis site for future transplant,PROS,CONS,Vascular Access for Pediatric CRRT: Pros and Cons of IJ/SCV Site,Tip placement in right atrium decreases recirculation Not affected by ascites Preserve potential vein needed for transplant,SCV stenosis (SCV) Superior vena cava syndrome Risk of pneumothorax in patients with high PEEP Trauma to veins needed potentially for future HD access,PROS,CONS,Femoral versus IJ catheter performance,26 femoral 19 20 cm 7 20cm 13 IJ Qb 250 ml/min (ultrasound dilution) Recirculation measurement by ultrasound dilution method,Little et al: AJKD 36:1135-9, 2000,Femoral versus IJ catheter performance,Little et al: AJKD 36:1135-9, 2000,* p0.001 * p0.007,Troubleshooting Access,How can you tell if you have a problem before starting? Check placement first, then use syringe to test resistance and blood return.,What if you have problems during treatment? Check line for kink, then assess patients position or need for sedation.,Access,Clotting or sluggish catheter. tPA (tissue plasminogen activator). (Spry et al., Dialysis&Transplantation. Jan. 2001). Normal saline flush. Reason to replace catheter. Clotted catheter with no response to tPA. Exit site blood leakage with no response to pressure dressing. Severe kinked catheter. Bad re-circulation issues.,Pressures,Arterial or outflow pressures High negative pressure = access problem. High positive pressure = filter problem. Moderate to high positive pressure + high return (venous) pressure = access problem. Venous or return pressures Moderate to high positive pressure + high arterial pressure = filter problem. High return pressure + moderate arterial pressure = access,Vascular Access for Pediatric CRRT: Some Final Thoughts,Catheters with poor function will function poorly over and over and over and over Balance between surgical/ICU expertise (preference?) and the necessary evils dictated by the patient high PEEP femoral catheter? massive ascites IJ catheter? available sites are there any? Which vessel are you willing to traumatize?,Conclusions,Poor Access- May as well stop Choice- patient size and optimal flows Site- IJ/Femoral -recommended Care- Lo

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论