淡江大学九十五学年度第二学期课程教学计画表(格式二).doc

淡江大學九十五學年度第二學期課程教學計畫表(格式二)壹、科目名稱：科技文獻研究貳、授課老師：宋雪芳參、開課系所班級：資圖所肆、必選修：選修伍、學分數：2陸、先修科目：柒、教學內容及進度：一、 科技文獻研究概述二、 科學傳播理論1、 科學傳播理論Claude Shannon & Warren Weaver 、Garvey、Mikhailov、Grunig、Seiler & Surprenant、Clifford Lynch、G. J. Brown 、S. D. Neil 、Claudine A. Jenda 2、 科學傳播調查研究的歷史沿革3、 大科學（Big Science）4、 無形學院（Invisible college）三、 科技機構組織(國際組織、國家機構、研究、教學單位、工商企業)四、 科技資訊需求五、 科技文獻資料類型1、 科技期刊、2、 科技會議文獻、3、 碩博士論文、4、 專利、標準5、 技術報告、6、 統計、工商企業雜誌與目錄六、 科技資訊檢索七、 網路上的科技文獻八、 科技圖書館1、 科技圖書館歷史沿革2、 美國科技圖書館事業現況與發展3、 台灣科技圖書館事業現況與發展4、 未來的科技文獻與科技圖書館參考書：1. C. D. Hurt, Information Sources in Science and Technology. Libraries Unlimited, Inc., Englewood, Colorado 19982. Crawford, Susan Y. From Print to Electronic: the transformation of scientific communication. NJ: Information Today Inc., 1996 3. Diaz, Karen R. ed., Reference Sources on the Internet, New York: The Haworth Press, Inc. c1997. (ZA4226.R44)4. H. Robert Malinowsky, Reference Sources in Science, Engineering, Medicine, and Agriculture. Oryx Press, 1994 5. Julie Hallmark and Ruth K. Seidman. Sci-Tech Librarianship: Education and Training. The Haworth Press, Inc., 1998.6. Subramanyam, Krishna, Scientific and Technical Information Resources, New York: Marcel Dekker,19817. 宋雪芳，網路時代科技文獻之研究，文華，2000/038. 李德竹，重要科技文獻指南，文華，1995/129. 傅雅秀，科學傳播的理論與實證研究， 中國圖書館學報，57期（民國85年12月），頁55 - 68。References 1.Adams M. Rethinking interlibrary loan for the scientist. Science and Technology Libraries. 2004; 24(3/4):401-409.2.Alberani V, Poltronieri E. Documentazione e scienza dellinformazione: Interazioni con la biblioteconomia. documentation and information science: Interactions with librarianship. Bollettino AIB. 2003; 43(2):189-211.3.Alpi K. Bioinformatics training by librarians and for librarians: Developing the skills needed to support molecular biology and clinical genetics information instruction. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. 2003; (37) 4.Angier B, Piergrossi A, Spahn K. Wells reserve research library: A use and user analysis. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, no.47, pp.np. 2006; (47):np-np.5.Axford M, Bedner R, Carpenter C, et al. Creating a BUZZ: Attracting Sci/Tech students to the library! Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, no.45. 2006; (45) 6.Bakar ABA. Library and information science journal as a tool for continuing professional development in malaysia: A bibliometric study. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science. 2005; 10(1):19-28.7.Bar-Ilan J, Fink N. Preference for electronic format of scientific journals. A case study of the science library users at the hebrew university. Library and Information Science Research. 2005; 27(3):363-376.8.Barr D. Zoo and aquarium libraries: An overview and update. Science & Technology Libraries. 2005; 25(3):71-87.9.Beales DI. Cyber libraries: Building the perfect beast. Med Ref Serv Q. 2002; 21(4):49-56.10.Bedard MA, Crawley-Low J, Fagen D, Jette J, Murphy SA. Standards for the academic veterinary medical library. Journal of the Medical Library Association ( JMLA ). 2005; 93(1):130-132.11.Bell L, Burnette P, Dorsch J, Peters TA. PDAs and health sciences libraries. Library Hi Tech. 2003; 21(4):400-411.12.Brown C, Krumholz LR. Integrating information literacy into the science curriculum. College and Research Libraries. 2002; 63(2):111-123.13.Brown CM, Ortega U. Information-seeking behavior of physical science librarians: Does research inform practice? College & Research Libraries. 2005; 66(3):231-247.14.Carlock D. Science and technology sources on the internet: Plant conservation resources on the internet. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, no.45. 2006; (45) 15.Chae K, Park J, Choi H. E-journals in korea: The electronic site licence initiative. Electronic Library, vol.24, no.3, pp.322-334. 2006; 24(3):322-334.16.Christianson M. The 2003 STS continuing education survey: Selected analyses of science librarians interests. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. 2004; (41) 17.Chudamani KS, Nagarathna HC. Cost effectiveness of infrastructure in digitisation of traditional format library materials: A case study of indian institute of science. SRELS Journal of Information Management. 2005; 42(4):515-522.18.Clayden J. Out in the wide world with a new piece of paper: A survey of graduates of edith cowan universitys bachelor of science (library technology). Australian Library Journal. 2002; 51(2):143-155.19.Clifton M. Ask a science librarian. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. 2005; (43):n.20.Cooksey EB. Too important to be left to chance: Serendipity and the digital library. Science & Technology Libraries. 2004; 25(1/2):23-32.21.Cooksey EB. Out to sea but with a rudder: Acquisitions advice for the solo science librarian. Acquisitions Librarian. 2003; (29):23-30.22.Dee CR. Digital reference service: Trends in academic health science libraries. Med Ref Serv Q. 2005; 24(1):19-27.23.Dee CR, Newhouse JD. Digital chat reference in health science libraries: Challenges in initiating a new service. Med Ref Serv Q. 2005; 24(3):17-27.24.Dee C, Allen M. A survey of the usability of digital reference services on academic health science library web sites. Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol.32, no.1, pp.69-78. 2006; 32(1):69-78.25.Duke JD, Hartman S, Locknar A. Reaching the engineering and science communities: New technologies and approaches at MIT. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, no.45. 2006; (45) 26.Dupuis J, Ryan P. Bridging the two cultures: A collaborative approach to managing electronic resources. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. 2002; (34) 27.Earl MF, Mack T, Southern J. Mentoring at a distance: Successful matching of experienced librarians with school of information sciences students via electronic and traditional means. Technical Services Quarterly. 2003; 21(3):53-65.28.Feeney M, Martin J. The business of science: Cross-disciplinary information literacy in the applied sciences and business. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. 2003; (37) 29.Firestein K, Jerant LL. Not virtual, but a real, live, online, interactive reference service. Med Ref Serv Q. 2003; 22(2):57-68.30.Flaxbart D. Death of an encyclopedia salesman? the fate of science reference resources in the digital age. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. 2004; (39) 31.Fletcher S, Maynard S. Public library materials fund and budget survey 2000-2002. Australian Library Journal. 2003; 52(2):194.32.Forsman RB. Administration and management in health science libraries. Australian Library Journal. 2002; 51(1):74.33.Geer RC. Broad issues to consider for library involvement in bioinformatics. Journal of the Medical Library Association ( JMLA ), vol.94, no.3, pp.np. 2006; 34.Ghosh S, Talukder T. Total quality management and its implication on library laws. SRELS Journal of Information Management. 2004; 41(3):255-266.35.Goodall G, Julien H, Lajoie-Paquette D, McKechnie L. How human information behaviour researchers use each others work: A basic citation analysis study. Information Research. 2005; 10(2) 36.Goswami PR. The application of leadership and management principles and strategies to a library and information service. Science and Technology Libraries. 2002; 23(2/3):35-42.37.Guard R. Musings on collaboration and vested interest. Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2005; 31(2):89-91.38.Hall L, Zhou J. Taming the two cultures: Integrating the science divisional library into the main library. Science and Technology Libraries. 2004; 24(3/4):219-238.39.Haynes D. CILIP consultancy services. Information Research Watch International. 2002; Dec:2-3.40.Hernon P, Schwartz C. The case of the submitted paper. Library and Information Science Research. 2005; 27(3):277-280.41.Herrero-Solana V, Rios-Gomez C. Produccion latinoamericana en biblioteconomia y documentacion en el social science citation index (SSCI) 1966-2003. latin american publications in librarianship and documentation in social science citation index (SSCI) 1966-2003. Information Research. 2006; 11(2):n.42.Hitchcock M, Sager R, Schneider J. And then there was one: Moving and merging three health science library collections. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. 2005; (44):n.43.Holley RP, Tucker NA. Digital infrastructure development within a nonprofit polymer science library: An analysis of the transition to digital serials at the michigan molecular institute. Serials Review. 2004; 30(2):101-109.44.Jeevan VKJ. Expanding information access through resource sharing and consortia in science and technology libraries. SRELS Journal of Information Management. 2003; 40(4):365-389.45.Jose BS, Pacios AR. The impact of consortia purchasing of periodical publications on the document supply service. Interlending and Document Supply. 2006; 33(4):189-195.46.Kaag CS, Streatfeild R. Its a wrap (part 1): Coping with a binding budget cut by using shrinkwrap as a storage alternative for serials. Serials Librarian. 2003; 43(3):59-70.47.Kaag CS, Streatfeild R. Its a wrap (part 2): Implementing shrinkwrap preservation of selected serials. Serials Librarian. 2003; 43(4):51-61.48.Kaag CS, Streatfeild R. Its a wrap (part 3): The full (w)rap on shrinkwrap preservation of journals. Serials Librarian. 2004; 45(4):55-70.49.Kearns K, Hybl TT. A collaboration between faculty and librarians to develop and assess a science literacy laboratory module. Science & Technology Libraries. 2005; 25(4):39-56.50.Kittelson P, Jones S. Touring by design: Using information architecture to create a virtual library tour. Australian Academic and Research Libraries. 2002; 33(1):39-48.51.Korolev S. Gifts to a science academic librarian. Acquisitions Librarian. 2002; (27):87-94.52.Kusky T. Encyclopedia of earth science. Libr J. 2005; 130(8):116.53.Lawal I. Science resources: Does the internet make them cheaper, better? Bottom Line. 2002; 15(3):116-124.54.Maynard S, Davies JE. The cost of copyright compliance in further education and higher education institutions. Library Review. 2002; 51(5and6):310-311.55.Maynard S, Fletcher S. Public library materials fund and budget survey 2000-2002. Library Review. 2002; 51(5and6):311-312.56.McGrath WE. Current theory in library and information science. library trends, winter, 2002, 50 (3) 309-574. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2003; 54(4):358-359.57.McGrath WE. Current theory in library and information science. New Library World. 2003; 104(1/2):67-68.58.Meho LI, Spurgin KM. Ranking the research productivity of library and information science faculty and schools: An evaluation of data sources and research methods. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2005; 56(12):1314-1331.59.Muller J. La bibliotheque de sciences po: Rahabilitation totale du batiment principal. the po sciences library: Total refurbishment of the main building. Bulletin des Bibliotheques de France. 2004; 49(4):102-108.60.Nisonger TE, Davis CH. The perception of library and information science journals by LIS education deans and ARL library directors: A replication of the kohl-davis study. College & Research Libraries. 2005; 66(4):341-376.61.OConnor S. Retrospective on library management, 1997-2003: The editorship of professor patricia layzell ward. Library Management. 2003; 24(8/9):446-449.62.Ortega L, Brown CM. The face of 21st century physical science librarianship. Science & Technology Libraries. 2005; 26(2):71-90.63.Paster A, Fescemyer K, Henry N, Hughes J, Smith H. Assessing reference: Using the wisconsin-ohio reference evaluation program in an academic science library. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, no.46, pp.np. 2006; (46):np-np.64.Pfander JL, Williams BA. The beat of a different drum: Using the arts in outreach to science/engineering students and faculty. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, no.45. 2006; (45) 65.Qayyum MA. Internet reference services and the reference desk: Does the nature of a users query really change. Internet Ref Serv Q. 2002; 7(3):15-22.66.Ramaswamy M, Haddock M. The dynamics of agriculture subject guide access at kansas state university libraries. J Agric Food Inf. 2004; 6(4):17-24.67.Rochard M. Science students and the university library: Some evaluations. Bulletin des Bibliotheques de France, vol.51, no.2, pp.48-49. 2006; 51(2):48-49.68.Roy PC. Authorship pattern of indian library science journals for the period of 1991-2000. SRELS Journal of Information Management. 2004; 41(4):393-404.69.Searing SE. All in the family: Library services for LIS online education. J Libr Admin. 2004; 41(3/4):391-405.70.Shedlock J, Walton L. An academic medical library using LibQUAL+: The experience of the gaiter health sciences library, northwestern university. J Libr Admin. 2004; 40(3/4):99-110.71.Shen Y. Chinese academic librarianship in transition: A